Monday, February 28, 2011

All Hail Dan Sinker




Also known to the world as

@MayorEmanuel

"The Atlantic" picks up the wonderful story here:

Revealing the Man Behind @MayorEmanuel

Feb 28 2011,

...
For weeks, journalists and insiders have urged the person behind @MayorEmanuel to reveal himself, but he (or she) demurred. Until now. After a protracted email negotiation, the author has outed himself to The Atlantic. He's receiving no compensation.

The genius behind @MayorEmanuel is Dan Sinker, who has a heart made out of Chicago and balls of punk rock.
...

Shia Kapos at Crain's has a little more:
The writer who kept Chicago Twitter followers on the edges of their seats during the Chicago mayoral campaign has revealed himself to the Atlantic. He's Dan Sinker, a Columbia College assistant journalism professor and founder of Punk Planet, a zine that ran from 1994 to 2007.

Columbia College. Hehehe. I might have known. If they're not careful they're going to get a reputation as the whelping box for anonymous Chicago online writers :-)

What Mr. Sinker accomplished 140-characters at a time was as beautifully executed a piece of hilariously subversive public performance art as I have seen in a long, long time.

Outstanding, Red Team, outstanding!
Get you a case of beer for that one.

Do We Still Need


This bullshit, astroturf, keep-"compromising"-ever-Rightward farce?

Oh Hell no.

From Newsweek, Marky Mark McKinnon speaks out on the real villains who have forced -- forced! -- Hero Centrists like him to buy time-shares in Glenn Beck's ass-crack.
Do We Still Need Unions? No

Let’s End a Privileged Class.

...it is the abuse by public unions and their bosses that pushes centrists like me to the GOP.
Fortunately these clowns will have to scuttle away and find another gravy train ten seconds after they burn through Uncle Scrooge McBloomberg's start-up Centrist Welfare dough.

Or, at the risk of repeating myself:
...
I mean, ever since the Republican Base ducked out on paying the tab for a generation of being loudly and catastrophically wrong about everything by putting on funny hats, screaming about liberty and calling themselves "The Tea Party", their sleazy Centrist enablers have been seething with jealously. Quite suddenly the monster they built didn't need them anymore and the skeevy hustlers who had helped create the Racist/Corporatist/Dominionist Confederacy on the bones of the New Deal and the grave of the American Dream found themselves cast out and looking for their next meal ticket.

Preferably a meal ticket under a banner that -- like "Tea Party -- wouldn't keep bringing up their horribly inconvenient past as the sleazy, enabling hustlers.

Hey, kids! I have an idea! Lets peel those the icky, damning labels off of everything and -- presto! -- there is magically no longer any difference between rat poison and apple sauce!

Can I haz my million dollars now?
...

And after they have folded the tents on their 1,000th sucker-the-rubes-into-cutting-their-own-economic-throats and moved seamlessly on the the 1,001st, one group will still be around.

Because it has survived worse than this.

Because The Dude abides.

Sunday, February 27, 2011

Andrew Sullivan Trades Up

Vanity_Fair
In case you were wondering whether or not you were living in the End Times of Media Grand Unification:

The Dish is moving! In April, we'll be joining The Daily Beast.

For me, it's a strange mixture of excitement and sadness. Sadness because the Atlantic has been a very special home for me and all the interns and staffers who have worked at the Dish. The more than four years that I've worked here have been the most rewarding, exhilarating and challenging of my career. I cherish my colleagues, their support and debate, and will miss them deeply
...

But there are some opportunities you just can't let pass by. The chance to be part of a whole new experiment in online and print journalism, in the Daily Beast and Newsweek adventure, is just too fascinating and exciting a challenge to pass up. And to work with media legends, Barry Diller and Tina Brown, and with the extraordinary businessmen Sidney Harman and Stephen Colvin, is the opportunity of a lifetime.
...
I never begrudge another writer making a living, so congratulations to Mr. Sullivan on movin' on up to the East Side. Also too I have no beef with about 80% of what he writes, and am in accord with quite a bit of it.

However...

...so long as Mr. Sullivan continues to traffic in the kind of perniciously self-absolving, self-serving revisionist and false-equivalency claptrap that he and so many of his fellow Conservative Expatriates so shamelessly flog in order to hang onto their gigs as Serious Public Persons, I will continue to whang away at the mendacity-based pieces of their infrastructure with a tiny, rubber hammer.

Meanwhile, if The Atlantic is looking to fill the newly-created hole in its batting order, perhaps instead of the Usual Suspects, they might consider one of Mr. Sullivan's fellow Weblog Award winners.

Hehehe :-)

Sometimes I just crack myself right up.

Lifetime Achievement.


I have never understood


Celebrity culture

And the fame economy.

Sunday Morning Comin' Down


Gregger's really earned his pay today: reducing the complex and dangerous story of labor, democracy, taxes and the social contract now playing itself out in Wisconsin into a cartoonish, corporate-friendly farce.

If Greggers had been 1/2 as hard on Governor Walker -- and bothered to get at any of the difficult, embarrassing issues at the heart of the matter -- his tone-shift from bored/accommodating (hey, Walker, what about them Liberal bloggers and that kookie prank call) to dogged/aggressive (hey, Trumka, some random goof yelled Hitler. Doesn't that discredit the entire labor movement!) would have been much less noticeable.

(I suppose given the fact that the Mouse Circus performers had to be beaten on the head with sticks just to get one them to include even one representative of Labor in a discussion of the biggest Labor story in memory...the fact that Trumka was permitted in front of a camera at all is something of a miracle)

Instead, trivia and questions about process and "the politics of it all" was used to dissipate valuable airtime into a thin mist of pointlessness, while Gregger's pointedly avoided making any mention of the Koch Brothers' role in all of this, or the tax cuts which Walker used to blow a hole in the Wisconsin and get this while party started.

Last week, the big question was how in the world Walker could possibly survive after;
A) Being exposed as a liar,
B) Being exposed as a complete tool of the Koch Brothers political machine and,
C) Being stupid enough to allow himself to be so massively and publicly exposed as such.
Or, as Mamet put it in "House of Games":
You see, in my trade, this is called - what you did - you cracked out of turn. Huh? You see? You crumbed the play.
This was never a question for me: I have rarely gone wrong betting on the bottomless inattentiveness, ignorance and reprogrammability of the Pig People (me from a few days ago:)
...given the billions the Right has spent on cultivating that Base and constantly upgrading its propaganda machine, I have no doubt whatsoever that were Scott Walker to rub shit in his hair, set it on fire and run through the state capitol -- naked and accompanied by bazouki music -- yelling "David Koch cock tastes like Norweigan Jarlsburg!", within 2-3 months (and probably much sooner) the Golem Right would have completely forgotten it ever happened, and would retain only a vague, Fox-flavored aftertaste that Scott Walker is one tough, anti-Socialism sumbitch, and the protesters were all lazy moochers, welfare cheats and outside agitators.
So why is this worth mentioning?

Because the scam doesn't work without loyal drones like Greggers carrying its water. And because between the original broadcast of "Meet the Press", the two times it is re-run on MSNBC on Sunday, and the other times it is re-re-run on Liberal Talk Radio Central, Gregory's capacity to pollute the terms of the debate by smothering the media world in his establishmentarian, Beltway drivel is not to be underestimated.

Elsewhere, President McCain and Vice President Lieberman want to give weapons to the Libyan opposition and use American fighter pilots to shoot down planes over Benghazi. Because while America's track record of improving things by sticking our huge military johnson into the middle of other people's troubles in the Middle East is has been singularly awful, no matter how often or spectacularly things blow up in our faces, it always works out well for President McCain and his Likud Party dik-dik bird.

Leaving me with naught to do but once again pick Mamet's pocket:
You say I acted atrociously.
Yes. I did.
I do it for a living.







Friday, February 25, 2011

Weekly Professional Left Podcast #62

ProfessionalLeft
"Labor is prior to, and independent of, capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration."

-- Abraham Lincoln




Button, Button, who's got the Button...

You do, if you take advantage to the chance to pick up this mint-condition memento of the final days of the Mainstream Media, available at Blue Gal's Cafepress Store (and keep listening later in the year for an opportunity to win one). Also too, the Podcast Donate Button Button below allows listeners to throw a contribution specifically towards the podcast. Thanks for your listenership and support!




Thanks again to Frank Chow for the graphic at the ProLeft website and Heather at Crooks and Liars Video Cafe for their help. And don't forget, our archives are available for free with no downloads at Professional Left.

Unregulated Capitalism Gone Wild


Destroyed the work economy and eviscerated public service union pensions.

Period. Full-stop.

The Republican Capitalism-Gone-Wild Solution?

Double-down and keep kicking working people in the gut until they spit up blood, agree to throw away their children's future and beg to work for sub-minimum wage.

And how long has this Kult of the Kochsuckers been lighting votive candles at the altar of Unregulated Capitalism-Gone-Wild?

A long...
"Regulation -- which is based on force and fear -- undermines the moral base of business."
-- Alan Greenspan, "The Objectivist Newsletter", 1963
...Long...
"In Soviet Russia, the scapegoat was the bourgeoisie; in Nazi Germany, it was the Jewish people; in America, it is the businessmen."
-- Ayn Rand, 1961 Ford Hall Forum lecture
...Long...
"One of the most widespread delusions of our age is the belief that the American worker owes his high standard of living to unions and to "humanitarian" labor legislation."
-- Nathanial Branden, "Common Fallacies About Capitalism", 1962*
* ("..former student and one-time romantic partner of novelist Ayn Rand, Branden had a prominent role in promoting Rand's philosophy, Objectivism.)
...Long...
"If you want to gauge collectivist's theory's distance from reality, ask yourself: by what inconceivable standard can it be claimed that the broadcast airwaves are the property of some illiterate sharecropper who will never be able to grasp the concept of electronics, or some hillbilly whose engineering capacity is not quite sufficient to cope with a corn liquor still -- and that broadcasting, the product of an incalculable amount of scientific genius, is to be ruled by such owners?
...

"There is only one solution to this problem and it has to start at its base: nothing less will do. The airways should be turned over to private ownership. The only way to do it now is to sell radio and television frequencies over to the highest bidders...-- and thus put an end to the gruesome fiction of 'public property'."
Ayn Rand, "The Objectivist Newsletter", April 1964

...Long...
"In a mixed economy, every government action is a direct threat to some men and an indirect threat to all. Every government interference in the economy consists of giving unearned benefits, extorted by force, to some men at the expense of others. By what criterion of justice is a consensus-government guided? By the size of its gang."
-- Ayn Rand, 1961 Ford Hall Forum lecture

...Time.
"Should citizens have their wealth expropriated to support an educational system which they may or may not sanction, and to pay for the education of children who are not their own? To anyone who understands and is consistently committed to the principles of individual rights, the answer is clearly: No."
-- Nathanial Branden, 1963

For anyone who cares to look, moldering away in the yellowing pages of Ayn Rand's lesser works the entire ideological infrastructure of the Modern Right is laid bare.

Of course, unlike Heaven's Gate or Jim Jones and the Peoples Temple (which disappeared once the madness of their founders was fully unfurled), by appealing to rich sociopaths and rich-sociopath-wannabees, the Randite Cult is specifically engineered to be a for-profit enterprise and so it goes on and on (Believe me, if the Branch Davidians had had the foresight to make their insanity capitalist-friendly, today, instead of being vaguely remembered as "that nut who set himself and his followers on fire", David Koresh would have his own show on Fox.)

And so, as with other corporate-friendly cults such as Scientology and Mormonism, the well-heeled heirs of the franchise have worked very hard to quietly paper over the many dingbat ravings of its founder that got wired into their Holy Scripture, but it's all there: the totalizing ideology where "More unregulated capitalism" is the absolute answer to any and every question; the constant, whiny chant of aggrieved victimhood; the short, furious, declarative, Manichean paragraphs -- one after another after another -- stating quite bluntly that any tax for any reason is slavery, anyone not on your side is morally equivalent to a Nazi or a Soviet Communist, and that any compromise on anything is treason.

Business is inherently moral because all business is conducted on the basis of honesty and integrity.

Any government not exclusively devoted to protecting your property is illegitimate and based on extortion.

Monopolies never happen.

Trusts were uniformly good.

Government causes all economic depressions.

The American continent was empty and unowned by anyone until American industrialists arrived.

Industrial child labor was noble.

Before private property rights, there was no Civilization.
...

This is the base metal from which all Modern Conservative alloys are manufactured. Add misogyny, xenophobia, "...and the Negroes" and you have Limbaughism. Blend in a massive dose of recycled Bircher crackpot conspiracy mongering and you have Glenn Beck. Squirt it into a Baby Jebus-shaped injection mold and you have the anti-science, anti-evolution, anti-choice Christian Conservatives.

Then dumb the whole mess down about 70% and stick it into a pair of fuck-me pumps and you have Sarah Palin.

Of course, as is the case with virtually every other issue, Randites get the on-the-ground realities of the moderns industrial economic exactly backwards. Go into any thriving modern manufacturing company and you're not going to find John Galt in the back room tinkering together (out of nothing but spare parts and fictional Objectivist genius) a magical engine that pulls electricity out of the air (after which it is immediately expropriated by The Evil Gummint to power its sinister Contraptions That Make Your Kids Into Gay Socialists.)

Rather, you will find a small business -- say 50 to 100 people -- in its second or third generation, using very expensive, computer-controlled machines they bought from the American distributor of a profitable company headquartered in Switzerland or German or Some Other Loathsome Socialist Hellhole. In the back, you will probably find people with engineering degrees, sweating over some problem, or working on 3-D models of some part or another that they are specing out or improving upon.

Many of these engineers are graduated of some of America's finest public colleges, and were put through school in part thanks to your tax dollars. Most got to work that day thanks to roads your taxes paid for, or public transit systems your tax dollars subsidizes. A couple are out sick, but thanks to the worker's rights some union fought and died for 60 years ago, they can take those days off and avoid infecting the rest of their colleagues without fear of losing their job.

It is also a fair bet that their illness wasn't caused by waste water or toxic byproducts from the production process at their factory: thanks to government regulation and regular testing, the water they buy from the local provider (usually are very generous rates) is nearly as clean leaving the plant as it was when it was piped in. In fact, the plant is mostly clean, well-lighted and overall about as pleasant a place to earn a blue collar living as one could ask for.

Elsewhere you will find highly paid line workers programming the machines, tending and tweaking them according to a formalized process (borrowed from Toyota or Nissan or a company from Some Other Loathsome Socialist Hellhole) that maximizes the efficient use of the Very Expensive machines, and noting where things can be improved. Some of these workers are members of unions and some are not. Most of them are 50 or older and looking forward to retirement. Often they work in teams in areas called "cells" where they will work on several machines making several different parts at once.

Much of what this thriving modern manufacturing company does has been forced on them by overseas competition, especially from China: competition which steals their ideas, their patents and sometimes whole factories, and then puts them back into production halfway around the world using cheap (and sometimes slave) labor; which manipulates currency unfairly; which imposes massive tariffs and grossly distorts the market.

None of this is fair, of course, because the real capitalists -- the transnational corporations that write the rules -- don't want "fair trade". They want "free trade" which, in the end, simply means a winner-take-all world where he who has the most money wins.

At the other end of the spectrum -- at the consumer end -- our thriving modern manufacturing company is also feeling the pinch because a long time ago a group of people called "Conservatives" started preaching the "Fuck Everyone But Me" gospel of the absolute goodness of greed and the absolute virtue of being utterly self-centered. Which all seemed like a pretty fine idea to many of the owners of the manufacturing companies back in the day, because it meant that they now had an ideological justification for busting unions, slashing payroll and stopping expensive investments in training and new equipment.

Unfortunately, their consumers were in the back pews of the very same "Fuck Everyone But Me" cathedral, and their takeaway was:
"Fuck loyalty and screw this 'Buy American' crap."

But what about your neighbors?

"Caring about others is the root of all evil."

But what about the good of your country?

"Sounds like collectivist Socialist thinking to me. Look, if I can get my TV, food. clothes, coat hooks, dry wall, children's toys and whatever else for 11 cents cheaper from some industrial 3rd World forced labor plantation, why shouldn't I?"

Are you sure you're gonna like where this road leads?

"Of course! As a Noble Wealth Producer, I know that my great job at Maytag will never, ever go away! And if fucking over the American worker to save a few bucks is good enough for the Noble Wealth Producers at GE, it's good enough for me!"
Oopsie.

See, the proles were never supposed to catch on to this dodge, but once they did, things started to spiral downward very quickly and the proverbial rope that Lenin once warned that Capitalism would one day sell to its own executioners was suddenly around the neck of the American Dream.

And so we come to the present day, and the on-the-ground realities of a typical thriving modern American manufacturing company -- with its aging workforce, modern, complex equipment and team-based structure -- fighting to stay alive against some forces created by its own folly, and some which are too big and powerful for it to control.

And what do we find they need more than anything else?

A few hundred copies of "Atlas Shrugged" perhaps?

Um, no.

See, since the skills involved in keeping the company profitable are no longer static, more than anything else they need a steady supply of well-trained workers to take the place of those who are coming up on retirement, and a means by which to retrain their existing workers every few years. And since there is no way in Hell these companies can afford to maintain their own standing training facility, staff and equipment (all of which must be constantly upgraded to keep up with rest of the industry) what they need more than anything else are excellent public schools. Grade schools, high schools, trade schools and community colleges. Schools that not only teach the technical material you will need to run one of these company's million-dollar machines without destroying it, but the ability to read, to do math and to work with others on a team.

Schools that must compensate their teachers well enough with Evil Taxes Extorted From Noble Wealth Producers to be able to attract and keep people who can accomplish this difficult feat day after day after day.

I could cite similar examples from other public institutions and other vital sectors of the economy all fucking day long, but this is just a free blog and not my Great American Novel, so lets just say that, absent strong and mutually respectful and mutual beneficial public/private/labor/management arrangements, the economic pillars that prop up the American Middle Class will be gone within my lifetime and the nation you and I once knew will cease to exist and be replaced by a Two Class feudalism of transnational corporations and their retinue of wingnut welfare think tanks, teevee networks and paid political employees...and peons.

Which, based on the evidence found in the original gospels of Branden, Greenspan and Rand, has clearly been the Conservative plan all along.





Thursday, February 24, 2011

Correcting Andrew Sullivan

Vanity_Fair

Andrew Sullivan writes:
The raw partisanship and threats confirm to me that [The Pwning Of Scott Walker] is a classic piece of partisan warfare under the guise of fiscal conservatism. It also confirms every left-wing conspiracy theorist on the power of the Koch brothers. "Bring a baseball bat?"

OK, but "confirms"...to whom?

Watching the Wisconsin Uprising unfold, no one on the Left who has observed the Right over the last 30 years building (often with your enthusiastic assistance) its vast, reprogrammable, killbot Base has needed any confirmation about anything.

And given the billions the Right has spent on cultivating that Base and constantly upgrading its propaganda machine, I have no doubt whatsoever that were Scott Walker to rub shit in his hair, set it on fire and run through the state capitol -- naked and accompanied by bazouki music -- yelling "David Koch cock tastes like Norweigan Jarlsburg!", within 2-3 months (and probably much sooner) the Golem Right would have completely forgotten it ever happened, and would retain only a vague, Fox-flavored aftertaste that Scott Walker is one tough, anti-Socialism sumbitch, and the protesters were all lazy moochers, welfare cheats and outside agitators.

So "confirms"...to whom?

The Right has long stopped being anything but a triumph of marketing fascist and fundamentalist heroin to stone Conservative addicts: sometimes the baggie gets stamped with a crude line-drawing of Reagan's face, sometimes Jesus, and sometimes a flag. For eight years the Kochs and their fellow oligarchs and Christopaths sold their poison with George Bush's smirking grin on the bag. Then, after too many people started puking up blood from their product, they switched packaging and began selling the same filth to the same junkies in red-white-and-blue tea bags.

In one, important way, what is happening in Wisconsin is culturally and politically notable for the same reason that a college student asking Newt Gingrich about his long history of lies and adultery -- a blindingly obvious question that establishmentarian testicle cozies like David Gregory have consistently refused to ask during any of their dozens of opportunity to do so -- has caused a momentary stir. It's not that it exposes some wild new facet of the depravity of the Right that everyone on the Left doesn't already know about. Rather, it exposes yet again the utter cowardice and complicity of the Koch and Gingrich-sized omissions in the mainstream press. Like Sherlock Holmes' dog that didn't bark in the night, it shows us all once again how deeply committed the Big Money Media is to collectively embargoing any serious reporting on the grotesque reality of what the Right has devolved into.

Not, of course, that we didn't all know that already :-)

Letters, I Get Letters

DGLETTER2
Rather than responding to the many comments from this post, I brought a bunch of them topside. Some to reply to; some just because they needed a bigger spotlight.

Hey, I'm an aggregator!

John Puma
and the Bush Doctrine,
Indeed. It's Cheney's 1% thinking: If there is a 1% chance unions may pose a political threat in the future, they must be destroyed now. Say it loud enough & the Koch's will buy you a governorship.
_____________________________________


Paul Kroenke,
Ah, how well I remember what it was like to be 16, halfway though my first six pack of Micky's and jerking off to "Atlas Shrugged" while blasting "Ride of the Valkyries".

"One of the most elemental human rights [is] the right to belong to a free trade union." -- Ronald Reagan.
_____________________________________


double nickel,
Almost everyone I have ever known in the public sector (including the many teachers and principals in my own family, and my ex's) have been hard-working middle class people who chose modest salaries doing jobs they loved and were good at, job security and respect...over the larger salaries in the private sector. Now that it is abundantly clear that siding with the Conservatives to gut unions in the private sector was a suicidally stupid decision that has pauperized the middle class, dimwitted "Libertarians" have moved on to trying to pit the victims of 30 years of Reaganomics against each other.

And you gotta love the Libertarians these days who are nothing but "Dine and dash" Bush Conservatives: clowns who having been wrong about everything they said and fucked up everything they touched for years and think that putting on a funny hat fools anyone but their idiot fellow travelers. They bear the same relationship to "Conservatives" that the porn actor who will do everything but farm animals has to the one who will do everything including farm animals.

Except of course I've never heard of an "everything but" porn actor who was actually so lacking in self-awareness that they would lecture everyone else on the superiority of his awesome principles as he stands there in ass-less chaps covered in poo and sprinkles.
_____________________________________


Habitat Vic,
Here you go -- Now available on Flikr
MAX_GOV_lg
_____________________________________


Glen Tomkins and "Walker is done."

I hope you're right, but I no longer bet against the GOP base's apparently unlimited capacity to be brainwashed and reprogrammed over and over and over again by the same liars and lunatics.
_____________________________________


double nickel,
/shrugs/ They are always wrong, never in doubt and the never change their minds except to slide further down the wingnut rabbit hole.
_____________________________________


Paul Kroenke,
You should expect less from me. I'm the worst of the lot.
_____________________________________


zombie rotten mcdonald,
Reprinting some of your comments verbatim.

It used to be that white collar professionals were protected by demand for their services; good working conditions and wages were necessary to attract decent employees. But In our new, exciting Republican Wage-slave economy, employers are perfectly happy to hold people hostage to employment and most especially, health care.

Unions created the middle class. And that aggravates the Koch brothers no end.
...

It's funny how ["amazing benefits that nobody in the private sector gets anything close to"] is seen as a slam on unions, rather than a failing of non-unionized employment.
_____________________________________


jim,

Reprinting some of your comments verbatim.

...
Breitbart's minions & their many copycats have been giving a free public workshop in how to ruin your opponents for more than a year now, with some real scalps to show for it. Seems like every time someone does the same to some GOP satrap, it's in the form of a harmless & forgettable prank like this one. If the right can do it with heavily-edited bullshit, surely Reality-PAC can do it with the cold hard ugly truth ... it's way past time for the American left to put down the pearls, back away from the hugbox & re-learn how to fight to win.
_____________________________________


CC,
Reprinting some of your comments verbatim.

Paul K said "...it's teachers working 9 months a year in pleasant conditions..."

Yep. Pleasant conditions. 25-30 kids an hour each day in a room with no windows with intermittent heat/air, especially at the change in season; outdated equipment; kids that come to school sick; high stakes tests; being shit on (I mean advised) by asshats (I mean concerned citizens) like you; chalk dust; white board markers; poor lighting. Yep conditions are perfect.

I'd agree that I only work for 9 months of the year. Can I remind you that I plan and grade on my own time (also on the weekends) bringing my weekly hourly work time to somewhere in the area of 70-80 hours a week. So if I spread that over the entire 52 week year (with no time off ever) I would put in about 48 to 55 hours a week. Sounds like a great job for $70K a year...oh wait, it will take me 25 years to reach that pay.

Couple that with the fact I'll take a month in the summer to take a required class (on my own dime) as well as run classes for other dedicated teachers--correction--brothers and sisters.

Teachers unions, while we fight for better pay for teachers, also fight for better conditions for students, better teaching materials, better administrators and school board officials. All of this in addition to trying to provide a quality education for students.

The job is so difficult and stressful that more than 50% of teachers don't make it past the first 5 years. But you're right, screw it, get rid of unions so that you can pay teachers $8 an hour to balance the budget.

I love the work that I do and I do my job well. But try to tie me to my job by my love of it and I'll walk and many of my counterparts will do the same thing. Guess what? We are good at other things. Private sector beware. Teachers will take your jobs.


Thank you.
Could not have said it better.
_____________________________________

The World is Going "Boom"


And we seem to be

All out of


Superspies.

Wednesday, February 23, 2011

Wisconsin's Maximum Governor Speaks UPDATE


Wisconsin's Maximum Governor had a little fireside monologue.

If he had actually answered questions, here's how it might have gone.

Nonexistent Questioner: Governor, why do you need to use destroy the public service unions?

Maximum Governor: Be fair -- I'm only destroying the unions that didn't vote for me.

Nonexistent Questioner: OK, Governor, why do you need to destroy the public service unions that didn't vote for you?

Maximum Governor: Because we have a deficit.

Nonexistent Questioner: But don't we have a deficit largely because the first thing you did when you took office was to push through massive tax cuts?

Maximum Governor:
And your point?

Nonexistent Questioner: So if deficits are the problem...and tax cuts caused them...why not just put taxes back to where they were.

Maximum Governor: Clearly you do not understand arithmetic. Once rich people's taxes are cut, they can never, ever, ever,ever be raised again under any circumstances. This is called "shared sacrifice".

Nonexistent Questioner: Says who?

Maximum Governor: Says the Koch Brothers.

Nonexistent Questioner: Who are they?

Maximum Governor:
Billionaire crackpot industrialists. From the family that bankrolled the John Birch Society and a hundred other fascist front groups. Think Ralph Bellamy and Don Ameche from "Trading Places"

but richer and more soul-dead.

Nonexistent Questioner: And why does their opinion matter?

Maximum Governor: They gave me lots and lots of money.

Nonexistent Questioner: What do your supporters think of that?

Maximum Governor: My supporters think whatever Rush Limbaugh tells them to think.

Nonexistent Questioner: Oh. So why will destroying the public service unions who didn't vote for you solve your deficit problem?

Maximum Governor: Because unions that didn't vote for me are run by monsters who will never, ever, ever give me what I asked for.

Nonexistent Questioner: But that's just a lie. They just gave you everything you asked for.

Maximum Governor: It is not a lie, because...because while it may be true that unions did just give me everything I asked for now and it may be true that their imaginary uncooperativeness was the sole rationale I gave for destroying them, at some point in the future they might not give me what I want, which is why they must be destroyed right now.

Nonexistent Questioner: I see.

Maximum Governor: It's like "The Terminator". If I don't kill Sarah Conor now, she will one day give birth to Cesar Chavez III who will oppose me.

Nonexistent Questioner: Uh huh.

Maximum Governor: Then I would lose and the Koch Brothers would stop giving me money and maybe seal me in an oil drum and drop me in the ocean.

Nonexistent Questioner: Uh huh.

Maximum Governor: So you can see that, while what I have said so far might be considered by some in the Gotcha Media to be great, big, filthy lies, it is possible that someday what I said might happen, in which case I would have been telling the truth retroactively.

Nonexistent Questioner: So what you are saying is that we need to invade now, because we cannot wait for the final proof -- the the smoking gun that could come in the form of a better dental plan for Wisconsin teachers at some point in the future?

Maximum Governor: Exactly.

Nonexistent Questioner: Thank you for your time, Governor.

Maximum Governor: You betcha!


UPDATE: "Are you there, God? It's me, Scotty." The Buffalo Beast (pretending to be David Koch) alleges to have gotten through to the Maximum Governor and prompts him to proudly lay his massive ego and his ratfucking assholery bare. No kidding. If true (and boy-howdy does it sound that way) this will be the news everywhere tonight, so get it here before Chris Matthews can get his sweaty arms around it.





Tuesday, February 22, 2011

Rahmses Wins


From the Chicago Sun-Times:

Editorial: A new Chicago hands reins to Rahm


For the first time in 22 years, the words Mayor and Daley are no longer inextricably linked.

In a remarkable victory Tuesday, Rahm Emanuel trounced five opponents. Emanuel won 55 percent of the votes, besting even the most pie-in-the-sky projections.

Emanuel is now mayor-elect, poised to take over a dramatically different city from the one Daley first encountered as mayor in 1989.

Though a fast and furious five-month sprint, this campaign offered a real education. A few nuggets, then, about what we learned about Chicago, circa 2011:
...

The piggy bank is empty

If you didn’t know it before the campaign, most Chicagoans are now aware, at least vaguely, that Chicago city government is broke.

With a deficit approaching $700 million, austerity is the new reality in Chicago. Daley staved off dramatic cuts with one-time fixes, but that no longer cuts it. For Daley, being mayor was mostly about more — new buildings, new programs, new spending.

Those days are now officially over.

Hate to break it to the Sun-Times, but predicting Rahm would come in in the mid-50s was hardly "pie-in-the-sky". Among friends, I wagered that Rahm would end up with either 46% or 54%, and I was not exactly alone.

Everyone I know was of the same two minds: the former, high-but-not-enough-to-win-number comes in if Chicago decided it was enjoying its political carnival and wanted to keep the fun going a bit longer, and the latter, we-welcome-our-new-Insider-Overlords-number if Chicago is the kind of place where the combination of mountains of cash, gigadaleys of clout and the rumored deployment of Carol Moseley Braun as a patsy to frag any possibility of a genuine Progressive coalition would prove unstoppably successful.

And as anyone from the home of the Chicago Cubs should have learned long ago, when it comes to baseball and politics, betting with your heart is a mug's game.

From the Chicago News Cooperative:

Chico Aide: Rahm Campaign Like `Hurricane’
By DAN MIHALOPOULOS
February 23, 2011

“Running against Rahm felt like waking up every morning and running face-first into a gale-force hurricane,” said Ken Snyder, media strategist for Chico’s campaign. “He had $13 million. He had two beloved presidents. He had Hollywood stars. He had the tacit support of [retiring Mayor Richard M. Daley]. Not mention a hell of a resume.”

But Snyder told the Chicago News Cooperative that Emanuel also benefited from the weak showing of Carol Moseley Braun. Chico aides had hoped Braun would garner enough black support to force a run-off — but not enough votes to finish ahead of Chico and in second place.

“Carol’s campaign was a shipwreck of a candidacy,” Snyder said.
...



And so now the Age of Rahmses begins...

Chicago: I could never love you.

Rahmses: Does that matter? You will be mine. You will come to me whenever I call you,and I will enjoy that very much. Whether you enjoy it or not is your own affair. But I think you will...

Chicago: You will let DeValle live?

Rahmses: I will not make him a martyr for you to cherish. No phantom will come between you and me in the night. Yes, I will let him live. From where I send him there is no return.

Rahmses: [turning to DeValle] Here is your king's scepter, and here is your kingdom, with the scorpion, the cobra, the IVI-IPO and some obscure City College Working Group for, say, Tuition Reimbursement Reform for subjects. Free them if you will. Leave Chicago to me.

Rahmses: Now somebody bring me my official City of Chicago Neck Stabbin' Pencil and let's get it on, bitches!
So it was written.
So it will be done.

Meanwhile, for those in search of a cheap laugh on this cold night, delight yourself in the knowledge that somewhere Michelle "Sack 'o Wingnut Bile" Malkin is apparently busying herself picking a twitterfight

with the most famous fake Rahm Emanuel in the Universe.






Autodidactic Asphyxiation


Every now and then, wingnut protocol 'droid David Brooks forgets that his entire career hinges on his capacity to hide the lyrics of his native Republican contempt for working people beneath the somnolent monotone music of Reasonable Centrism (in case you are unsure of the difference, a "Republican" is someone who want to dismantle all protection for working people at once. A "Centrist" wants to dismantle half of all protection for working people today...half of the half that it left tomorrow...and half of the remainder the day after that.)

Today was one of those every-now-and-thens.

And when David Brooks has one of these lapses (such as when he famously slopped whitewash all over St. Ronald Reagan's use of the racist Southern Strategy with such flagrant disregard for the facts that had to be brought to book by his fellow New York Times op-ed columnists --

Bob Herbert Slams David Brooks' Revisionism of Reagan's Racist Legacy
This post, written by Amanda Marcotte, originally appeared on Pandagon
Bob Herbert joins in the spanking of David Brooks for trying to whitewash over Ronald Reagan's racist legacy, particularly his non-subtle signaling of support for the murders of 3 civil rights workers in Neshoba County, Mississippi in 1964. Reagan opened his campaign for President there in 1980 with a lot of loaded language about "states' rights", the rallying cry for the Confederacy to paper over the fact that they were separating in an attempt to escape an impending ban on slavery. "States' rights" then became the battle cry for those who didn't appreciate the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and were casting around for code language to oppose it without making directly racist statements. Sayeth Herbert:
The murders were among the most notorious in American history. They constituted Neshoba County's primary claim to fame when Reagan won the Republican Party's nomination for president in 1980. The case was still a festering sore at that time. Some of the conspirators were still being protected by the local community. And white supremacy was still the order of the day.
That was the atmosphere and that was the place that Reagan chose as the first stop in his general election campaign. The campaign debuted at the Neshoba County Fair in front of a white and, at times, raucous crowd of perhaps 10,000, chanting: "We want Reagan! We want Reagan!"
Reagan was the first presidential candidate ever to appear at the fair, and he knew exactly what he was doing when he told that crowd, "I believe in states' rights."
Emphasis mine. Brooks is playing off the fact that, from our vantage point, those murders happened a long time ago, and don't loom so large. In 1980, however, the murders had only happened 16 years before. The cases were still open. (No action was taken against the murderers until 2005, 41 years after the murders and 25 years after Reagan gave his nod of approval.) To put that into perspective, it would be like Rudy Giuliani kicking off his campaign in Jasper, TX with a speech about how he wants to "clean up" the nation like he cleaned up New York. No one would be under any illusions that barely concealed racist messages were being sent out.

-- an internal beat-down which the Gray Lady's starched-skirt rules of in-house decorum virtually never permits) the results come across like some sort of Randite thought-experiment:
What happens when you take America's Leading Conservative Intellectual, lock him in a dirty clothes hamper full of the Koch Brother's soiled underpants, remove all those pesky "facts" and "context" surrounding the Wisconsin Labor Uprising and insist that he write his column using only cliches from Dick Armey's Big Book of Anti-Labor Bumper Stickers...

...while still mortaring it all together with just enough meaningless, nonspecific drivel to meet the his contractual obligation to the New York Times to never take a position on anything clearly enough that he cannot weasel and equivocate his way out of later?

It's an art: one that for some reason pays phenomenally well.

Some choice bits from today's column, unfairly cut from their ooey-gooey Centrist marinade:

Make Everybody Hurt
By DAVID BROOKS

...
The public sector unions and their allies immediately flew into a rage, comparing Walker to Hitler, Mussolini and Mubarak.

Walker’s critics are amusingly Orwellian.

...
It’s the left that has suddenly embraced extralegal obstructionism.

Still, let’s try to put aside the hyperventilation.
...

Even if you acknowledge the importance of unions in representing middle-class interests, there are strong arguments on Walker’s side. In Wisconsin and elsewhere, state-union relations are structurally out of whack.

...
Private sector union members know that their employers could go out of business, so they have an incentive to mitigate their demands; public sector union members work for state monopolies and have no such interest.
...

Private sector unions confront managers who have an incentive to push back against their demands. Public sector unions face managers who have an incentive to give into them for the sake of their own survival.
...

As a result of these imbalanced incentive structures, states with public sector unions tend to run into fiscal crises.

...
There is little relationship between excellence and reward, which leads to resentment among taxpayers who don’t have that luxury.

...
It’s really important that we establish an unwritten austerity constitution: a set of practices that will help us cut effectively now and in the future.

The foundation of this unwritten constitution has to be this principle: make everybody hurt.
...

So I’d invite Governor Walker and the debt fighters everywhere to think of themselves as founding fathers of austerity.
...

So, stripped of its fancy ribbons, Mr Brooks' advice on the matter of labor unions is -- surprise! -- exactly the same as his advice on every other issue since the beginning of time, regardless of fact or context: play it right down the middle...but only after stop long enough to blame Cadillac-driving welfare queens...illegal immigrants... mouthy women...Liberals...gays...working people for the illegal war...foreign policy debacle...constitutional crisis...economic catastrophe your ideology has visited upon us.

And kick 'em in the balls one more time for good luck.

Over in the Better Universe, a column this bad could be a career-ender, but of course here there will be no such consequence.

Here is does not matter how often Mr. Brooks' ideology proves itself a catastrophic failure, or how many falsehoods, half-truths and lies-by-omission he Brietbarts into his columns to prop up that failed ideology (from reading this column you would hardly know, for example, that the most prominent person making Wisconsin-to-Egypt comparisons was not some anonymous shouter in the cheerful and well-mannered sea of tens of thousands of "public sector unions and their allies", but was instead Mr. Brook's own Conservative American Idol and and a militant advocate of massive social-program gutting, Republican Representative Paul Ryan.)

Tomorrow, next month, next year Ellsworth Monkton Bobo will still be there collecting princely sums for filling the world with his soft, mealy, razor-concealing road-apples of common wisdom.

And just how is that possible?

Because Bobo is a very senior member of a very special, very selective union -- Pundits Local 183.

A union whose chief innovation was boldly and irrevocably severing all "relationship between excellence and reward" years and years ago.

"Peter, you’ve heard all this. You’ve seen me practising it for ten years. You see it being practised all over the world. Why are you disgusted ? You have no right to sit there and stare at me with the virtuous superiority of being shocked. You’re in on it. You’ve taken your share and you’ve got to go along. You’re afraid to see where it’s leading. I’m not. I’ll tell you.
...

Judgement, Peter ! Not judgement, but public polls. An average drawn upon zeroes – since no individuality will be permitted. A world with its motor cut off and a single heart, pumped by hand. My hand – and the hands of a few, a very few other men like me. Those who know what makes you tick – you great, wonderful average, you who have not risen in fury when we called you the average, the little, the common, you who’ve liked and accepted these names. You’ll sit enthroned and enshrined, you, the little people, the absolute ruler to make all past rulers squirm with envy, the absolute, the unlimited, God and Prophet and King combined. Vox populi. The average, the common, the general.

A union whose members haven't missed a meal since.






Monday, February 21, 2011

Moor's Law


The speed of Middle Eastern uprisings against despots -- and the violence of the reactions against them -- will double every 18 days.

(The original Moore's Law here.)

Saturday, February 19, 2011

The Beatings Will Continue


Until the coverage improves.

See if this sounds familiar?

A Newsweek reporter, press credentials pinned to his coat and not interfering with the police was coolly and systematically beaten. A Philadelphia newsman was told, “Hey, you dirty bastard, give me that goddamn notebook,” by a policeman who had been jabbing a girl… As he surrendered his notebook, the policeman clubbed him and left him bloody.

Seven newsmen were attacked by police that night. In only one case could there have been any mistake made about the person’s identity. It was clear the police were looking for reporters, that they were the prime target.


[The next night], scores of people were beaten badly enough to require hospital treatment, including twenty newsmen. After Sunday’s jolting experience, reporters had mistakenly taken to wearing even bigger press credentials, which only served to attract the police like hungry sharks. The confiscation of film continued, and several cameras were damaged.

So, Cairo?

Bahrain?

Libya?

Nah.

Chicago, 1968.

After Sunday night, some policeman warned their friends among Chicago reporters to be careful, that the word was out to get the press. "Daley, who shared the police’s distrust or reporters, supported the attacks by claiming that they were not serious and no fault of the police. This was his way of getting the message across..."


-- “Boss”, by Mike Royko.

The Democratic Convention was actually the second police riot in Chicago in 1968. The first happened in the Spring of that year when, having been jerked around by various city departments over insurance and permits, Peace March participants were attacked and beaten by the cops without provocation. From Wikipedia:

On April 27, 1968, a Peace March was held in Chicago in conjunction with marches around the country. After stalled permit negotiations, march organizers were issued a permit for a march. They were allowed to use half of the sidewalk, and have a brief rally at the downtown Civic Center Plaza. During the march, police held marchers for several series of stoplights and otherwise harassed marchers. After the marchers reached the Plaza, police allowed for a brief pause before beginning to disperse the crowd. They used their nightsticks upon demonstrator’s legs and backs to hurry their departure, arrested and beat people who stepped off the curb into the street, taunted demonstrators with foul language, and otherwise harassed them.
The reason you probably never heard of it?

Because local media didn't cover it.
There was a public outcry at the police brutality but, as none of the major newspapers had planned on covering the march, the City had time to spin the situation in their favor. No police officers were charged in connection with the April 27 violence.
And the beat goes on.

Rip and Read




If you're like me, you get more than your authorize ration of absurd emails puked up from the murkiest, dung-smellingest end of the wingnut pool.

One making yet another round this week is this perennial "Top Ten Reasons Why I Voted Democrat" list. (Example: 1. I voted Democrat because I believe oil companies' profits of 4% on a gallon of gas are obscene but the government taxing the same gallon of gas at 15% isn't.)

I think this is actually a good thing, having noticed that this sort of rage-soaked broadside of ridiculous invective -- ink still wet from the Ministry of Truth printing presses -- is usually the response of the Right when their world starts to collapse. When their elected representatives start uncontrollably outing themselves as lying corporate shills and/or monstrously hypocritical perverts; when their bullshit economic and foreign policy theories start blowing up in big, public ways; when another assassin is caught with Glenn Beck's books in his trunk and of Bill O'Reilly's words on his lips; when their spokescreatures start going mad on the air...and when there are no handy, ginned-up stories about Ground Zero mosques or death panels to keep the Pig People distracted...they roll out this, generic, "There is no global warming because Al Gore is fat" claptrap.

It is the sign of a dead movement, caught once again in a corner of its own making, trying to scream its way out.

(It has also been interesting to watch how these slabs of raw, bigot Id have mutated over the years. For example, now that that it has penetrated all but the dimmest, dankest wingnut sewers that getting out the Hell out of the Republican's Excellent Iraqi Adventure is actually a good idea... the most dependable Pig People talking point of the last 10 years -- "I voted Democrat because when we pull out of Iraq I trust that the bad guys will stop what they’re doing because they now think we’re good people." -- has hastily been nailed into a packing crate and dropped into the sea, with the hole it left behind hurriedly caulked over with imbecile bumper sticker talking points about illegal immigration or "Drill, baby, drill"-ism about hos Liberals won't do such-and-so "because it might upset some endangered beetle or gopher".)

Don't waste your time rebutting, replying or even bothering with the sensibilities of the senders of these email: arguing logic with a Conservative is like debating quantum physics with a flatworm.

Instead, save yourself some typing and feel free to copy/paste/send some or all of the following.

With my complements.

I voted Republican because I believe any psycho with a couple of hundred bucks should be able to buy enough street-sweeper guns and ammo to take down a small country no questions asked.

I voted Republican because I am afraid of the imaginary Liberal that Rush Limbaugh keeps telling me lives under my bed.

I voted Republican because I think the Confederacy had it just about right.

I voted Republican because I know that I can trust unregulated multi-billion foreign corporations far more than my own neighbors.

I voted Republican because I only listen to right wing radio and Fox news, which has reduced my IQ by about half.

I voted Republican because I refuse to read a book, read a newspaper or remember anything that happened before 2009.

I voted Republican because I people who are different than me scare me.

I voted Republican because, damn it, we don't need our food inspected, or our streets paved, or clean water, or fire departments.

I voted Republican because instead of the elitist, Libtard "truth", they tell me I'm smart, and good-lookin', and a Real American Patriot a bunch of other crap I want to hear.

I voted Republican because I can't stand when the government spends money on anyone but me.

I voted Republican because I believe that government should police and regulate women's vaginae. Unlike, say, mountaintop mining companies or the entire pharmaceutical industry.

I voted Republican because I believe me and Zeke and Joe Bob can do a better job building a highway or a bridge or US foreign policy than some fancy-pants, East coast elitist "expert".

I voted Republican because a random email with BIG FONT and eagles and American Flags told me that Barack Obama is a Kenyan Socialist!

I voted Republican because I only give a shit about deficits...or the constitution...or illegal wars...when there is someone in the White House with a (D) after their name.

I voted Republican because election results only count when my side wins.

I voted Republican because I believe the Earth is 9,000 years old. No. Really. And I think my opinion about that should be taken seriously and taught in school.

I voted Republican because freedom of speech only counts when you agree with me; when you disagree with me, you're trying to take away my rights!

I voted Republican because I believe blowjobs are impeachable offenses, but torture, secret prisons and illegal wars are just good, clean fun!

I voted Republican because I'm actually stupid enough to believe that Democrats are giving free health care, education, and Social Security benefits to illegal aliens.

I voted Republican because I think Republican-appointed fringe-nutjob activist judges should decide the outcome of Presidential elections, and give full citizenship rights to foreign corporations.

I voted Republican because its easier than thinking for myself.

Friday, February 18, 2011

Your Weekly Professional Left Podcast

ProfessionalLeft

"Which side are you on boys? Which side are you on?"





Button, Button, who's got the Button...

You do, if you take advantage to the chance to pick up this mint-condition memento of the final days of the Mainstream Media, available at Blue Gal's Cafepress Store (and keep listening later in the year for an opportunity to win one). Also too, the Podcast Donate Button Button below allows listeners to throw a contribution specifically towards the podcast. Thanks for your listenership and support!




Thanks again to Frank Chow for the graphic at the ProLeft website and Heather at Crooks and Liars Video Cafe for their help. And don't forget, our archives are available for free with no downloads at Professional Left.

Thursday, February 17, 2011

He Is Not Amused

QUEENBOBO_SM
America's Leading Conservative Public Intellectual is not happy about the budget thingie.

No, not at all.

From the New York Times:

Tomorrow Never Comes

...
The budget has some fine features. I’ll soon be writing a column about how many of its provisions are better than anything the Republican Party is proposing. But it is laughably inadequate compared with the fiscal problems before us.

In 2012, the only year this budget controls, the president would actually increase the deficit with more spending. Roughly two-thirds of the alleged savings would nominally kick in after 2016. The budget imagines that $328 billion in financing for transportation projects will magically appear. While ignoring tax reform, it lards up the tax code with another layer of special preferences. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget calculates that $780 billion of the proposed deficit cuts are politically dubious.

The budget gets a lot of little things right, but it squanders the opening created by the debt commission. It fails to touch the big programs or ask for any shared sacrifice from the American people.


To which I have to say only this: I am not interested in anything any Republican or Conservative has to say about debt or deficits or "shared" sacrifice.

Not now. Not tomorrow. Not ever again.

You are the Party that inherited surpluses from Bill Clinton and pissed them away.

You are the Party that ran two wars on a credit card.

You are the Party that ran two wars on a credit card...while cutting taxes.

You are the Party that only learned how to spell d-e-f-i-c-i-t ten seconds after the Black Democrat was inaugurated.

You are the Party that held medical care for 9/11 first responders hostage so that you could ram through one more round of giveaways to billionaires.

America's Leading Conservative Public Intellectual continues:

Two explanations are commonly offered to explain why the White House decided to kick the can down the road. Some analysts say the Democrats are trying for a repeat of 1995: Do nothing on the deficit; goad the Republicans into announcing entitlement cutbacks and then savage them on the campaign trail for cutting off granny. I don’t believe this is in the president’s head. It would be morally reprehensible to bankrupt the nation for the sake of a campaign theme. Obama is not that sort of person.

I agree that it would be "morally reprehensible to bankrupt the nation for the sake of a campaign theme". Of course, what America's Leading Conservative Public Intellectual conveniently fails to note here is that deliberately "bankrupt[ing] the nation" as a means to achieving its ideological goals of wiping out the middle class and rolling back the New Deal is exactly what America's Leading Conservative Public Intellectual's own political party has been doing for the last 3o years.

From Common Dreams:

Two Santa Clauses or How The Republican Party Has Conned America for Thirty Years

by Thom Hartmann

...
By 1974, Jude Wanniski had had enough. The Democrats got to play Santa Claus when they passed out Social Security and Unemployment checks – both programs of the New Deal – as well as when their "big government" projects like roads, bridges, and highways were built giving a healthy union paycheck to construction workers. They kept raising taxes on businesses and rich people to pay for things, which didn't seem to have much effect at all on working people (wages were steadily going up, in fact), and that made them seem like a party of Robin Hoods, taking from the rich to fund programs for the poor and the working class. Americans loved it. And every time Republicans railed against these programs, they lost elections.

...
Wanniski decided to turn the classical world of economics – which had operated on this simple demand-driven equation for seven thousand years – on its head. In 1974 he invented a new phrase – "supply side economics" – and suggested that the reason economies grew wasn't because people had money and wanted to buy things with it but, instead, because things were available for sale, thus tantalizing people to part with their money. The more things there were, the faster the economy would grow.

At the same time, Arthur Laffer was taking that equation a step further. Not only was supply-side a rational concept, Laffer suggested, but as taxes went down, revenue to the government would go up!

Neither concept made any sense – and time has proven both to be colossal idiocies – but together they offered the Republican Party a way out of the wilderness.

Ronald Reagan was the first national Republican politician to suggest that he could cut taxes on rich people and businesses, that those tax cuts would cause them to take their surplus money and build factories or import large quantities of cheap stuff from low-labor countries, and that the more stuff there was supplying the economy the faster it would grow. George Herbert Walker Bush – like most Republicans of the time – was horrified. Ronald Reagan was suggesting "Voodoo Economics," said Bush in the primary campaign, and Wanniski's supply-side and Laffer's tax-cut theories would throw the nation into such deep debt that we'd ultimately crash into another Republican Great Depression.

But Wanniski had been doing his homework on how to sell supply-side economics. In 1976, he rolled out to the hard-right insiders in the Republican Party his "Two Santa Clauses" theory, which would enable the Republicans to take power in America for the next thirty years.

Democrats, he said, had been able to be "Santa Clauses" by giving people things from the largesse of the federal government. Republicans could do that, too – spending could actually increase. Plus, Republicans could be double Santa Clauses by cutting people's taxes! For working people it would only be a small token – a few hundred dollars a year on average – but would be heavily marketed. And for the rich it would amount to hundreds of billions of dollars in tax cuts. The rich, in turn, would use that money to import or build more stuff to market, thus increasing supply and stimulating the economy. And that growth in the economy would mean that the people still paying taxes would pay more because they were earning more.

There was no way, Wanniski said, that the Democrats could ever win again. They'd have to be anti-Santas by raising taxes, or anti-Santas by cutting spending. Either one would lose them elections.

When Reagan rolled out Supply Side Economics in the early 80s, dramatically cutting taxes while exploding (mostly military) spending, there was a moment when it seemed to Wanniski and Laffer that all was lost. The budget deficit exploded and the country fell into a deep recession – the worst since the Great Depression – and Republicans nationwide held their collective breath. But David Stockman came up with a great new theory about what was going on – they were "starving the beast" of government by running up such huge deficits that Democrats would never, ever in the future be able to talk again about national health care or improving Social Security – and this so pleased Alan Greenspan, the Fed Chairman, that he opened the spigots of the Fed, dropping interest rates and buying government bonds, producing a nice, healthy goose to the economy. Greenspan further counseled Reagan to dramatically increase taxes on people earning under $37,800 a year by increasing the Social Security (FICA/payroll) tax, and then let the government borrow those newfound hundreds of billions of dollars off-the-books to make the deficit look better than it was.

Reagan, Greenspan, Winniski, and Laffer took the federal budget deficit from under a trillion dollars in 1980 to almost three trillion by 1988, and back then a dollar could buy far more than it buys today. They and George HW Bush ran up more debt in eight years than every president in history, from George Washington to Jimmy Carter, combined. Surely this would both starve the beast and force the Democrats to make the politically suicidal move of becoming deficit hawks.

And that's just how it turned out. Bill Clinton, who had run on an FDR-like platform of a "new covenant" with the American people that would strengthen the institutions of the New Deal, strengthen labor, and institute a national health care system, found himself in a box. A few weeks before his inauguration, Alan Greenspan and Robert Rubin sat him down and told him the facts of life: he was going to have to raise taxes and cut the size of government. Clinton took their advice to heart, raised taxes, balanced the budget, and cut numerous programs, declaring an "end to welfare as we know it" and, in his second inaugural address, an "end to the era of big government." He was the anti-Santa Claus, and the result was an explosion of Republican wins across the country as Republican politicians campaigned on a platform of supply-side tax cuts and pork-rich spending increases.
...

To reiterate, I am not interested in anything any Republican or Conservative has to say about debt or deficits or "shared" sacrifice.

Not now.

Not tomorrow.

Not ever again.

And least of all the fatuous, deceit-encrusted cluckings of America's Leading Conservative Public Intellectual.






Wednesday, February 16, 2011

And One Day, Perhaps They Shall Write

Vanity_Fair
a Very Stern Letter.

Reluctant as I am to pound the same nail twice in a row, I am nonetheless powerless to resist the bounty of hilariously un-self-aware obliviousness that has been baked into the following from Andrew Sullivan:

The Poison Of Limbaugh, Ctd
15 Feb 2011 05:39 pm

More and more sane conservatives are beginning to see what Mitch Daniels, David Frum, Conor Friedersdorf and Heather Mac Donald are on about. But this time, it's a popular talk show host, Michael Medved in the WSJ. Money quote:
...

Though they're late in coming, the whispers of complaint against Limbaugh and his ilk are getting louder on the right. Movement writers remain unwilling to condemn him. But the days when his superiors in respectability at places like The Claremont Institute were willing to honor him are far behind.
...
Giving anything remotely resembling credit to this vanguard of Bold Conservative Thought Leaders for daring to say mildly unkind thing about Rush Fucking Limbaugh...in this Year of Our Lord Two Thousand and Fucking Eleven...is right up there with loudly touting your friend's financial acumen when he advises you to sink all your dough into Pets.com and Flooz...in 2011...because this whole internet thing is gonna be fucking huge!

One can only marvel at the complete moral and intellectual decomposition of a Movement whose only consistent through-line during my entire adult life has been that Liberals are Commie-symp, terrorist-loving enemies of all things good and virtuous who hate American and who ain't never been right about nuthin'...

...now signaling to itself that the new, fashionable height of Advanced Conservative Cutting-Edge Social Criticism is to grudgingly and through clenched fangs start to catch up to where Liberals were 20 years ago.

Without, of course, ever acknowledging that there is a large, loud, well-informed contingent of Americans called "Liberals" who did not spend the last few decades getting every fucking thing completely wrong.

Sullivan knows the terrible secret of his Movement perfectly well: that nuclear pile which has powered Modern Conservatism since its inception has always been that witchbag of racism, paranoia, xenophobia, jaw-dropping stupidity and Fundamentalism that is currently manifesting itself as Limbaughism, and Palinism, and Beckism (From "Reactionary" by me in 2006 here:)
...
Individually, these samples of Enlightenment’s backwash make a persuasive argument that the good of our common humanity would be better served if the hatecults that fester in the wounds of our Democracy were gathered together for an All Ratfuckers Tribal Council at the Trinity Site and spontaneously Raptured into the stratosphere in a single, thermonuclear flash.

Collectively, they are the Modern GOP, and by putting every last species of botched American citizenship and knuckledragging bigot in harness together under one whip, the Republican Party has clawed its way to power.
...

Conversely, without their vast, ignorant and carefully-cultivated Base hating who they are told to hate at the tops of their lungs, and voting their rage in the way the right-wing industrialists who bankroll the Movement want them to...the Right would dry up tomorrow and blow away.

And Mr. Sullivan knows it, and has known it for a long, long, long time.

There is nothing new in the story of a Monster built by a short-sighted fool which eventually rises up, snaps its chains, attacks its creator and runs amok across the land: it is as old as the Golem and King Kong and Mary Shelley's "New Prometheus".

What is still a little bit amazing is that these "sane conservatives" -- who are (only now that it is far, far, far too late) slooooowly beginning to take notice of what was obvious to the average Liberal a generation ago -- are still being allowed to handle sharp objects, operate motor vehicles and get paid for sharing their infantile opinions with the world.