Monday, September 07, 2026

These God Damn Hippies Need to Get a Haircut, Get a Job, and Quit Whining

 


You know, back in my day...

Via Comic Sans:


I'm beginning to think I might enjoy becoming the crusty old fucker who yells at the MAGA youth for being  stupid.  

In fact, it might be the role for which I have been preparing my entire life.  


Get Off My Lawn


"Inadvertently"? You Keep Using That Word.


I do not think it means what you think it means.

This is so fucking adorable I could plotz.

We had the makings of just such an "independent media" decades ago.  

It was the Liberal blogosphere.

We saw through the legacy media's toxic addiction to the "Both Sides" lie.  We warned -- very clearly, every day -- exactly where the poisonous combination of escalating conservative-media lies and racism, coupled with obstinate legacy-media Both Siderist denialism, was going to lead.

And all of those warnings were routinely slandered and dismissed by the likes of Longwell, Kristol and all the rest of them until it was far, far too late.  After all, we were just Dirty Fucking Hippies.

Funny thing about the term Dirty Fucking Hippies, which was coined, I believe by Atrios/Duncan Black sometime during the early aughts.  This would have been during roughly the same period that Sarah Longwell was working for the Conservative Intercollegiate Studies Institute, and Bloody Bill Kristol was pimping the shit out of Bush's Iraq Debacle, promising it would all be over in a matter of weeks, and calling anyone who opposed it a clueless libtard traitor. 

Y'know, the Good Old Days.

The point of “Dirty Fucking Hippies” wasn't the profanity: it was the sarcasm. It was how Beltway pundits and journalists portrayed the online left precisely because bloggers could say things establishment media figures refused to say.

In fact, it could get you fired.  From Sarah Boxer, in The New York Review, February 2008:

Bloggers give new, Web-inflected meanings to old words. A “troll” on the Web is someone who posts provocative things just to cause an outcry. “Astroturfing” is creating a fake grassroots movement. Bloggers also sprinkle their blogs with expressions like WTF (translation: “What the fuck?”), lol (laugh out loud), and meh (a verbal shrug). They willfully misspell—like “teh” for “the.” They call the Internet “the internets,” cutely following George W. Bush’s slip. If people wrote like this for publication, they’d be fired. 

And, indeed, there is a term for getting canned because of your blog: “dooced,” named for the blogger Dooce, now a stay-at-home-mother (SAHM) or, as she puts it, a “Shit Ass Ho Motherfucker,” who got fired for blogging about her employer.

Bloggers challenged mainstream-media gatekeeping and the way the media had become an insulated, self-satisfied cult of performative "objectivity".  It's Jay Rosen's "view from nowhere".  And starting during the Bush years, Liberal bloggers treated profanity as evidence that they were not performing objectivity for elite approval.

Which sure sounds a fuck of a lot like the makings of an "independent media" to me.  

And of course, during all that time, Longwell, Kristol and all the rest of them never objected to the corrosive Both Siderism of the legacy media, because that corrosive Both Siderism always tilted the playing field heavily in favor of the Right.  It still does. And so only now, when the same Both Siderism is no longer reliably serving their side, do Longwell, Kristol and all the rest of them seem to have discovered that there's something wrong.  

But it's the word "inadvertently" that makes it art.  

As you might know, The Bulwark runs live-read ads for The New York Times, and were running live-read ads for The Washington Post right up until pundits like Jennifer Rubin began fleeing the place.  Their rapid growth has depended almost entirely on MSNBC (now MS NOW) promoting their business and their employees practically every single day since it was founded in 2019, plus regular appearances on NPR and that bastion of Both Siderism, the  Sunday Shows.  And, of course, by maintaining at least a cordial relationship with the legacy media.  A small sample:

 The Washington Post (May 2024):  

"The Bulwark finds a sweet spot in the center-right"

Vanity Fair (2025)

"How The Bulwark Is Thriving in a New Trump Era"

Semafor (2025)

"Washington Post economics columnist moves to The Bulwark"


Which is no surprise given that the Trump origin myth that Never Trumpers have been peddling since day one:  that Trump came outta nowhere and somehow hypnotized 77 million voters and virtually every elected Republican into becoming fascists.  Isn't that weird?

That story is ever so much more congenial to the Both Siderist bubble the lords and ladies of the legacy media live in than the actual history of the modern GOP that Liberals are always yapping about.  

So why go out of your way to piss off institutions who you wish to speak kindly of your business and your brand new book?

Hence the word "inadvertently".

But we Dirty Fucking Hippies know better.

Oh yes, we fucking well do.  



I Am The Liberal Media


Friday, September 04, 2026

Republican Candidates' Unresolvable Dilemma


How to bend the knee and kiss the poison ring without actually touching the poison ring.


No Half Measures



Tuesday, September 01, 2026

Professional Left Podcast Episode 1019: Where's the Beef?


“A__ Po_itics is _oca_."  -- The legacy media needs to buy a vowel.



















For The Record, Toby Was Right About Hamburger


And CJ was 100%, pollyannaish wrong about "the public".


Because there is no such thing as "the public".  There is the plurality who does their best to listen to facts an experts.   And then there's that huge chunk of the public which is either drunk on Fox News lies or desperately wants to blame "both sides".  

And taken together, the Fox News zombies and the Both Siderists are enough to capsize the country.


I Am The Liberal Media!



Saturday, August 29, 2026

It's Not Science Fiction, It Just Seems Like It


It's not from an adjacent dimension or an alternate timeline.  

There was a time within living memory, kids, when intelligent people sat around tables having civilized conversations about interesting subjects.  And you could watch it on the teevee!

From 1982, this is Isaac Asimov, Harlan Ellison, and Gene Wolfe discuss science-fiction writing with Studs Terkel and Calvin Trillin on the Alpha Repertory Television Service (ARTS), the predecessor of today's A&E (Arts and Entertainment Network). 

The program was called "Nightcap: Conversations on the Arts and Letters."

Enjoy.