Meanwhile, Senator Fettermanchin (tm) is throwing a wobbly because the mean old teacher won't hold school outside today --
Fetterman: I just want to go home. I've missed our entire trip to the beach… I’m going to vote no. There’s no drama… I don't think it's really helpful to put people here till some ungodly hour. pic.twitter.com/ZJTAYBI74u
You cannot really understand what goes on at the top of a municipal gummint like Chicago if you don't get that it doesn't matter if it's 1971, 1991 or 2011. Doesn't matter if Da Mare's name is Daley or Emmanuel. It is life under the rule of a Pharaoh, which is why local artist Tony Fitzpatrick's poem "The Dead Still Walk" (from "Bum Town") ends:
...
Who built the pyramids?
Mayor Daley built the pyramids.
(Everybody knows dat.)
BY FRAN SPIELMAN City Hall Reporter/fspielman@suntimes.com October 31, 2011 3:00PM
The head of the city’s Department of Family and Support Services had a Marie Antoinette moment on Monday — when she suggested that homeless Chicagoans who need overnight transport this winter “take a cab” to emergency shelters.
After testifying at City Council budget hearings, Commissioner Evelyn Diaz was discussing the $2.4 million, mid-year cut in state funding that forced Mayor Rahm Emanuel to lay off 24 city employees who worked the overnight shift picking up homeless residents and transporting them to shelters.
Diaz was asked what would happen this winter without the overnight shift. How were homeless Chicagoans — many of them suffering from alcohol, substance abuse and mental health problems — supposed to get to emergency shelters overnight? Were they supposed to just hang tough until 8 a.m?
“If they can’t find another alternative,” she said.
Asked to identify an alternative, Diaz said, “Public transportation, cabs.”
When a reporter reminded the commissioner that homeless people can’t afford cab fare, an apparently embarrassed Diaz ignored the question.
Hours later, department spokeswoman Anne Sheahan attempted to explain away the commissioner’s statement. Sheahan said Diaz was referring to an expanded contract with the American Red Cross that, in the absence of overnight homeless services, provides families who lose their homes in a fire with a cab voucher to transport them to shelters.
When reporters were questioning Diaz, there was never any mention of fire victims.
The cab remark sounded a bit like Marie Antoinette’s notorious, “Let ‘em eat cake.”
But, Julie Dworkin, director of policy for the Chicago Coalition of the Homeless, said, “I’m not offended by it. I don’t know that she believes it’s realistic for homeless people to take a cab. She was probably just trying to show how difficult the situation is — that we’re left with choices that really don’t make sense.”
...
Some stuff you should know.
First, the Department of Family and Support Services is a mess: a polyglot empire stitched together out of bleeding chunks of other departments because Mare Daley wanted it that way. There might have been some talk of saving a few bucks by sharing HR and accounting department and suchlike, but mostly for Hizzoner's convenience. First he wanted everything to do with "kids" under one roof. Then "families". Then, apparently all carbon-based like forms that could not be attended to by the Park District and Animal Control.
And so you end up with everything from Head Start to homeless services to ex-offender programs to incumbent worker dog groomer retraining bolted together into a behemoth that rivaled the size and Byzantinity of Streets and Sanitation, and then handed it off to the principal of one of the schools one of the Daley children just happened to attend:
The Chicago Sun-Times reported this summer that Daley was pushing Mary Ellen Caron, founder and former principal of his daughter's Catholic elementary school, for chief education officer, but Huberman resisted, saying the job needed to go to a minority. The post was never filled. Caron remains the $147,060-a-year commissioner of the city's new mega-Department of Family and Support Services.
Huberman has been under fire from newly elected Chicago Teachers Union President Karen Lewis for making cost-cutting decisions that impact the classroom from a business perspective, without any input from educators.
And such a behemoth can lurch along for a good long time on inertia and Mayoral pixie dust.
Until the money runs out.
At which point all the clever dogs cash in their clout cards and make their way to their reserved seats on the very few, very well-appointed lifeboats --
Chicago Public Schools CEO Ron Huberman to step down
SUN-TIMES EXCLUSIVE | Huberman to leave in middle of school year
Chicago Public Schools CEO Ron Huberman has told Mayor Daley he has no intention of serving another mayor and intends to leave his $230,000-a-year job long before the mayor leaves office in mid-May.
Huberman's departure could mean Daley would have to turn over the nation's third-largest school system in the middle of the school year to a caretaker schools chief who would be replaced by yet another schools chief after a new mayor is seated.
All this threatens to occur over a critical set of months when CPS traditionally devises its budget, prepares for state tests and decides which schools to close. It must tackle these tasks with an administrative staff decimated by budget cuts, teachers left disgruntled by cost-saving layoffs, and the specter of even worse budget woes next school year.
Mayor-elect Emanuel Announces Department of Family and Support Services Leadership Team
Previously posted on April 28, 2011
Today, Mayor-elect Rahm Emanuel announced the next leaders of the Department of Family and Support Services (DFSS). Evelyn Diaz will serve as Commissioner of DFSS and John Pfeiffer will support her as First Deputy Commissioner.
"Evelyn and John understand that at the end of the day, this is not about programs, but about people. It's not about the number of dollars we spend, but about the number of lives we affect," said Mayor-elect Emanuel. ...
to try to make the shuddering, clanking mess that municipal gummint has become operate without the only lubricant that is capable of keeping all of its groaning inefficiencies and wildly mismatched parts from seizing up and bursting into flames.
But is any of that qualify as an Eternal Truth?
Nah.
The Eternal Truth is found in what the Commissioner did not say.
She did not tell the simple truth that her boss' decision to cut $2.4M from homeless services means that -- however hard front-line staff works to take up the slack -- services to the most vulnerable and least politically important group of citizens in Chicago are going to take a huge hit. Which, in turn, means that more homeless Chicagoans are almost certainly going to start showing up in the ER and in the morgue.
Because the brutal reality is that, at the federal, state and local levels, deep budget cuts usually translates into more disaster dropped onto the heads of the already poor and powerless. Onto the back of people who are already just barely hanging on by their nails.
Because while Moses has words, Pharaoh has spears, and you do not stay a general in Pharaoh's Army saying shit like that out of school.
NASA Robot arrives at ‘New’ Landing Site holding Clues to Ancient Water Flow on Mars
by Ken Kremer on September 3, 2011
Opportunity has begun a whole new mission at Endeavour Crater promising a boatload of new science discoveries.
Scientists directing NASA’s Mars Opportunity rover gushed with excitement as they announced that the aging robot has discovered a rock with a composition unlike anything previously explored on the Red Planet’s surface – since she landed on the exotic Martian plains 7.5 years ago – and which offers indications that liquid water might have percolated or flowed at this spot billions of years ago.
Barely three weeks ago Opportunity arrived at the rim of the gigantic 14 mile ( 22 km) wide crater named Endeavour after an epic multi-year trek, and for the team its literally been like a 2nd landing on Mars – and the equivalent of the birth of a whole new mission of exploration at an entirely ‘new’ landing site.
“This is like having a brand new landing site for our veteran rover,” said Dave Lavery, program executive for NASA’s Mars Exploration Rovers at NASA Headquarters in Washington. “It is a remarkable bonus that comes from being able to rove on Mars with well-built hardware that lasts.”
...
This is what Hope actually looks like: a small helpmate to mankind made by our species with love and exquisite precision, slowing ambling across the surface of an ancient world, enduring so far beyond anyone's wildest dreams as to border on miraculous, and sending back dispatches from the Final Frontier in silent streams of 1s and 0s.
Remind me again how tax cuts and Creationism were responsible for landing this tireless emissary of the human race on Mars?
Well, everyone has an imaginary scenario, so here's mine.
The Obama Administration announces next week that since the GOP refuses to participate in good faith in the actual work of governing the United States, in order to avoid defaulting on our national debt and sending the world into a global financial meltdown, the Administration would accede to Republican demands that all deficit reduction be accomplished solely by making radical cuts to existing government programs with no increase in taxes.
However, in the spirit of the Time Honored Conservative Principle of Federalism, the President adds that the cuts would not be allocated programmatically, but geographically by state.
Using a CBO-updated version of the map originally provided by "The Fourth Branch" in 2010, cuts will be allocated based on the status of each state's overall contribution to the federal budget.
Fourth Branch explains:
The red states in the map [above] are states which received more than $1.00 in federal money for every $1.00 in taxes paid by residents of that state. Blue states are states which received less than $1.00 in federal money for every $1.00 paid by residents of that state in taxes (information from a 2005 study by the Tax Foundation). ...
There is a very strong correlation, then, between a state voting for Republicans and receiving more in federal spending than its residents pay to the federal government in taxes (the rust belt and Texas being notable exceptions). In essence, those in blue states are subsidizing those in red states. Both red and blue states appear to be acting politically in opposition to their economic interests. Blue states are voting for candidates who are likely to continue the policies of red state subsidization while red states are voting for candidates who profess a desire to reduce federal spending (and presumably red state subsidization).
Under the Obama Administration's proposed "Rewarding Wealth Producers and Penalizing Moochers Patriotic American Values Re-alignment" Act, "wealth producing" states such as New York, California, Illinois who have traditionally received less than a dollar back for every dollar they pay in taxes would be exempt from any budgetary cuts, and would qualify for across-the-board tax cuts since wealth-producing states should always be accommodated and encouraged in every way possible, regardless of circumstances.
On the other hand, the "welfare mooching, deficit-teat-sucking" states such as Kansas, Arizona, Kentucky and Alaska who have for years gotten away with parasitically looting their wealth-producing neighbors by receiving more than a dollar back for every dollar they pay in taxes will now assume 100% of the responsibility for eliminating the federal budget deficit. Each of these welfare mooching, deficit-teat-sucking states will be given a block rescission amount representing the percentage of the federal deficit for which they will be now be help legally responsible.
(And to those from the welfare mooching, deficit-teat-sucking states may try to argue that this is somehow unfair, let me point out that everyone knows that adding even one thin dime to the tax burdens of the wealth-producing states would instantly and forever destroy them as job creation engines, so that must be off the table.)
Each welfare mooching, deficit-teat-sucking state will be given 30-days to develop a budget plan which will guarantee compliance: welfare mooching, deficit-teat-sucking states who fail to comply with this directive will be taken over by a federal budget receiver and the national guard who will make the necessary cuts unilaterally.
Acting together in this way, I am sure we can get through this current budget crisis and something something our great nation towards, oh, let's say a brighter future.
To start with, Our Mr. Brooks has written two -- Two! -- columns in row that didn't involve Copy/Paste Bazooka-Joe-bubble-gum-wrapper-grade examinations of other people's work, but instead use all 1,600 words to lovingly tongue-bathe Ryan's body...of work. Sure, Bobo missed a few spots -- like the part about the math not remotely adding up, the projections being ridiculous, the poor, the middle class and the elderly getting stomped, the rich getting even more tax cuts and, well, just about everything of importance -- but like the fiddling Liberal trivia Bobo ignored in the run-up to the Iraq War (like the part about the math not adding up, the projections being ridiculous, the potential for catastrophic downsides and, well, just about everything of importance) it is clear that none of this really matters because of the sheer, light-bending atomic weigh of Paul Ryan's Flint Ironstag/Bolt Vanderhuge/Thick McRunfast/Blast Hardcheese Seriousness.
And we all remember from Operation Endless Clusterfuck that nothing puts the roses in Bobo's cheeks like the chance to stand on top of a Big, Horrible Idea and rain vitriol down on all those smarmy, unserious Liberals who are clearly being driven by nothing less than an all-consuming hatred of Freedom and America (all emphasis added by me).
Meanwhile, among the smart set, Hamlet-like indecision has become the intellectual fashion. The liberal columnist E. J. Dionne wrote in the Washington Post that he is uncomfortable with the pro and antiwar camps. He praised the doubters and raised his colors on behalf of "heroic ambivalence." The New York Times, venturing deep into the territory of self-parody, ran a full-page editorial calling for "still more discussion" on whether or not to go to war. ...
In certain circles, it is not only important what opinion you hold, but how you hold it. It is important to be seen dancing with complexity, sliding among shades of gray. Any poor rube can come to a simple conclusion--that President Saddam Hussein is a menace who must be disarmed--but the refined ratiocinators want to be seen luxuriating amid the difficulties, donning the jewels of nuance, even to the point of self-paralysis.
For example, on September 19, a group of peaceniks took out a full-page ad in the New York Times opposing the campaign in Afghanistan and a possible campaign in Iraq. Signatories included all the usual suspects: Jane Fonda, Edward Said, Barbara Ehrenreich, Tom Hayden, Gore Vidal, Ed Asner, and on and on. In the text of the ad, which runs to 15 paragraphs, Saddam Hussein is not mentioned. Weapons of mass destruction are not mentioned. The risks posed by terrorists and terror organizations are not mentioned. Instead there are vague sentiments, ethereally removed from the tensions before us today: "Nations have the right to determine their own destiny, free from military coercion by great powers. . . . In our name, the government has brought down a pall of repression over society. . . . We refuse to be party to these wars and we repudiate any inference that they are being waged in our name." The entire exercise is a picture perfect example of moral exhibitionism, by a group of people decadently refusing even to acknowledge the difficulties and tradeoffs that confront those who actually have to make decisions about policy.
...there is the dream palace of the American Bush haters. In this dream palace, there is so much contempt for Bush that none is left over for Saddam or for tyranny. Whatever the question, the answer is that Bush and his cronies are evil. What to do about Iraq? Bush is evil. What to do about the economy? Bush is venal. What to do about North Korea? Bush is a hypocrite.
And so, after years slithering around in a tapioca wilderness of crappy, forgettable "both sides do it " columns desperately trying to equivocate and mediocritize his way away from his own disastrous, written record, Bobo has once again found the Righteous Conservative Footing for which he has been groping since his Dear Leader's Excellent Iraqi Adventure went tits-up: another Conservative Manichean safe-house from which he can pour "You're-either-with-us-or-with-the-terrorists"-brand boiling oil on those fucking Unserious Liberals and their fucking "nuance".
And Andrew Sullivan? Well, Andrew has at last found another Stern, Flog-Wielding, This-is-gonna-hurt-a-LOT (...of poor people) Reagan Daddy to worship: another Woobie to play with that's even more fun than the endless game of "Husker Du" he has been playing with Trig Palin and various uteri.
Like Brooks, Sullivan is willing to grant that there are a few "flaws" in the Ryan plan that spoil a truly perfect view from atop Mount Randite (in the same sense that the freezing water pouring in through the gaping "flaw" ripped open by an iceberg below Titanic's waterline might spoil ones enjoyment of the ten course meal in the first class dining saloon) but that this should in no way stop the White House and Congressional Democrats from pretending that the slavering orcs that now make up the GOP are, in fact, reasonable men and women of good will. And should, in no way, stop the White House and Congressional Democrats from sticking their hands into the same Birther/Death Panel/Extend-the-Bush-Tax-Cuts-forever band saw that chopped them to bits every single time they made the mistake of thinking that the GOP was anything other than an enemy to be destroyed.
This is what is so hilariously fraudulent and, ultimately, dangerous about America's Greatest Conservative Public Intellectuals: the casually schizophrenic way they lie about their own tribe. On Monday, Wednesday and Friday they bitch about how awful it is that their nice, clean, orderly Church of the Imaginary Reagan has been overrun by a pack dirty, poo-flinging, often-racist yahoos who have turned the GOP into a complete cracker factory bent on destroying Obama by any means necessary...
Because however drastically and repeatedly their Conservative Ideology fails them over and over again, it it beyond their capacity to admit the simple truth that Liberals Are Right, not because it isn't true, but because it is bad career move (me, from 2009):
... But then again, if Mr. Sullivan simply outed himself as a Liberal, he would instantly lose his place in the food-chain, wouldn’t he? Because like that microscopic number of self-loathing black Conservatives who make their daily bread by serving the interests of the Southern Bigot Party, more than any other single factor, it was always the sheer gawking, oddballness of the brazen self-delusion inherent in being the gay champion of the Christopath Homophobe Party that put Mr. Sullivan in the spotlight.
That was what gave him his unique and lucrative cache.
After all, Liberal gay political writers are a dime a dozen, and so in a strange way we find Andrew Sullivan locked in the same kind of mortal combat over labels -- and for exactly the same reasons -- as Roy Cohn's character in "Angels In America" as he adamantly insisted -- even as he was dying of AIDS -- that he was not a "ho-mo-sex-shall". ...
...even though Mr. Sullivan now, belatedly comes to believe much of what Liberals believe and finally deigns to notice a horde of grotesque truths about his Conservative Movement about which Liberals have been sounding the alarm for 30 years, Andrew Sullivan nonetheless looks us all straight in that eye and argues that he could not possibly be some mere Liberal.
Because in Mr. Sullivan's world, "Liberal" does not refer to a political ideology, but to an impoverishing political ghetto from which no amount of "being right about everything" will permit you to achieve escape velocity. In Mr. Sullivan's world, "Liberal" is a terrible disease that afflicts losers who do not get invited to spout their views on teevee. ...
After a long, unhappy drought, in Paul Ryan's Operation Atlas Shrugged they have finally, finally found the next, Big, Horrible Idea behind which they can now snipe and whine. A Big, Horrible Idea which, like George Bush's Operation Endless Clusterfuck, comes factory-equipped with the following Seriously Awesome features:
Both represent commitments of a huge percentage of America's political and economic resources with a high probability that it will make a bad situation much, much worse.
Both are championed by adherents of radical and destructive ideologies.
Both show little regard for real people living in the real world.
Both show massive contempt for their critics.
Both show little capacity for doing basic math.
Both show massive contempt for actual experts.
Both are immediately christened as Big Serious Ideas by dilettante pundits.
Both give David Brooks and Andrew Sullivan woodies a yard long.
And, most importantly, both stand an excellent chance of fucking everything up and getting a whole lot of people killed...but not the sort of people that the likes of Brooks and Sullivan would have on their Christmas card lists anyway, so fuck it, lets roll!
And thus does Paul Ryan becomes the new Paul Wolfowitz -- the Right's new misunderstood genius who is being unfairly smeared by his enemies (From David Brooks, Weekly Standard, February 21, 2003 via Salon):
I mentioned that I barely know Paul Wolfowitz, which is true. But I do admire him enormously, not only because he is both a genuine scholar and an effective policy practitioner, not only because he has been right on most of the major issues during his career, but because he is now the focus of world anti-Semitism. He carries the burden of their hatred, which emanates not only from the Arab world and France, but from some people in our own country, which I had so long underestimated.
and back into another war we plunge.
Another war in which, once again, Sullivan and Brooks and the rest of their ilk giddily advocate risking other people's lives and other people's fortunes.
Another war which, once again, will cost Sullivan and Brooks and the rest of their ilk exactly nothing when it blows up in their faces. Hell, if the past is any guide, the bigger a Conservative fucks-up, the better the promotion (Glenn Greenwald in Salon, September, 2009):
... All of this would be a fascinating study for historians if the people responsible were figures of the past. But they're not. They're the opposite. The same people shaping our debates now are the same ones who did all of that, and they haven't changed at all.
They're doing the same things now that they did then.
When you go read what they said back then, that's what makes it so remarkable and noteworthy. David Brooks got promoted within our establishment commentariat to The New York Times after (one might say: because of) the ignorant bile and amoral idiocy he continuously spewed while at The Weekly Standard. According to National Journal's recently convened "panel of Congressional and Political Insiders," Brooks is now the commentator who "who most help[s] to shape their own opinion or worldview" -- second only to Tom "Suck On This" Friedman. Charles Krauthammer came in third.
Ponder that for a minute.
Because such are the perks of being America's Greatest Conservative Public Dilettantes.
"One day, my pretties, we will destroy them all!" *
File under: California Governor stymied by hilariously perfect metaphor for everything that's wrong with this country.
From Yahoo News:
Old technology foils Schwarzenegger's wage order
... For the second time in two years, Schwarzenegger has ordered most state workers' pay cut to the federal minimum wage because lawmakers missed their deadline to fix the state's $19 billion budget deficit. The Legislature's failure to act has left the state without a spending plan as the new fiscal year begins.
Chiang cited Friday's ruling by the 3rd District Court of Appeals, which said "unfeasibility" would excuse him from complying with Schwarzenegger's minimum wage order. He said a fix to the state's computerized payroll system won't be ready until October 2012.
Meanwhile, more than 200,000 state workers remain in limbo about the size of their July paychecks while Chiang asks the court for guidance on how to proceed. If wages are indeed cut to $7.25 an hour, employees will be reimbursed once a budget is signed.
John Harrigan, who served as a division chief for the state's payroll services from 1980 to 2006, said upgrading the system would be complicated, time-consuming and expensive. He said it could be done, but not without violating the federal Fair Labor Standards Act and substantially altering the payroll process.
"It's not something that you can take lightly and do overnight," said Harrigan, who also served as chief deputy controller from 2000 to 2002. "You have all the collective bargaining for civil servants and (state universities) that have to be taken into consideration. ... It's very complicated. It would take considerable effort."
The state's payroll system was designed more than 60 years ago and was last revamped in 1970, Hallye Jordan, state controller's office spokeswoman, said in an e-mail.
A report by the nonpartisan legislative analyst's office said an overhaul of the state's computerized payroll system was proposed by the controller's office in 2004. A year later, the Legislature approved $130 million for the effort, called the 21st Century Project.
Work to complete the project has been postponed by the controller's office repeatedly over the past several years, said Lynelle Jolley, spokeswoman for the governor's Department of Personnel Administration.
"They had various setbacks that only they can explain," she said.
Harrigan said he was involved with the 21st Century Project when it was conceived in the late 1990s. He said the state fired the vendor executing the project in 2008 because the company went bankrupt.
As the project dragged on, the state has had fewer experts on hand who could thoroughly understand the programming languages used to design the system.
"There's been a knowledge loss with people retiring," Harrigan said. ...
If this story of the Guvinator barking out empty orders about "zee bayroll zizdem being vixed now! Now! Now! And zo fort" leaves you dizzy with deja vu
no, you are not suffering from Anterograde Treknesia.
These latest impotent dicta from chief executive officer of The Sunshine State is virtually identical to this story featuring the same government, the same Governor and the same State Controller...
Schwarzenegger orders mass layoffs, unpaid furloughs
Union leaders for state employees vow to challenge the legality of the mandatory time off, which amounts to about a 9% pay cut according to the governor's finance department.
By Patrick McGreevy and Jordan Rau December 20, 2008
Reporting from Sacramento -- Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger on Friday ordered mass layoffs and unpaid furloughs for state workers starting in February to address California's growing fiscal crisis.
Under his executive order, 238,000 employees will be forced to take off two unpaid days per month through June 30, 2010. Managers will receive either the furlough or an equivalent salary reduction during the same period.
H.D. Palmer, spokesman for Schwarzenegger's finance department, said the mandatory time off is the equivalent of about a 9% pay cut for affected workers. He said the furloughs would save the state more than $1.2 billion.
... Schwarzenegger attempted a few months ago to unilaterally reduce the pay of state employees, but his order never took effect. State Controller John Chiang said the state's payroll system was incapable of carrying it out. ...
...engaged in the same call-and-response over the same, balky payroll system from two years ago.
California governor Arnold Schwarzenegger’s plans to reduce all state employees pay to the minimum wage are being blocked because the payroll system is run on COBOL.
Schwarzenegger signed an executive order last week to cut the salary of the state’s 200,000 employees to the minimum wage until the state budget, currently 36 days behind schedule, is passed.
But State Controller John Chiang told the Senate Committee on Governmental Organization that this was impossible as the payroll system was written 30 years ago in COBOL and there weren’t enough programmers to do the job.
Chiang estimated that with current resources it would take six months to make the change, and then nine to ten months to reverse them.
"Pragmatically, we just can't get the system to work in a timely manner for us to implement payment of minimum wage," Chiang said, according to the Sacramento Bee.
...
Of course, no one with any grasp of the history of technology -- its dark secrets and strange mutations -- has any trouble believing that tech-muggles like Governor Schwarzenegger and 90% of the rest of the United States would think that fixing technical problems is as simple as yelling at them. After all, in the world most people see around them, Man has not only gone to the Moon, but has stopped because it was boring and expensive.
Worse than the Whites Sands Missile Range Water Park even!
In three minutes the average 14-year-old can download 12 million songs into their iPhone that all sound like "Creed", while simultaneously playing "Gray Lensmen versus Gangsta Che Guevara" and tracking the GPS coordinates of every Zhu Zhu Pet in the Zhuniverse. And so, given all of that and a quarter century of ads like this
the world most people see and accept is one where Technology appears to be both Ubiquitous (true) and Magic (false). (But a strange and special, Populist brand of Magic, that is at once opaque and complex...but also believed to be so simple that any chimp could learn everything they need to know in a few hours if only they really wanted to.)
So since technology is Easy and Magic, it must necessarily follow that fixing technology's flaws and failures are a matter of motivation: If the right people are yelled at or flattered or threatened, the problem will be solved and, conversely, if the problem has not yet been solved then clearly someone, somewhere is Not Yelling Loud Enough.
Of course, technology -- especially old tech -- does not work that way at all.
Old tech doesn't work like an iPad or a Roomba; instead, it works exactly like infrastructure (pictured here are a few of the runes and a grimoire I used when I was a minor sorcerer during the Last Days of COBOL... ...and which I held onto for sentimental reasons.)
Of course, there really were never any Last Days of COBOL, which is why there are so many ancient systems still humming away in the bellies of so many banks, insurance companies and governments.
Because they still work.
For the most part.
You see, in the years between the Kennedy and Carter Administrations when many of those old systems were being built, the programmers who worked on them had no idea they would last so long.
Like the builders of roads or bridges or dams, the people who laid the digital floorboards of these old systems were creating the stable foundation on which future enterprises would depend, and from which future prosperity would flow. Like the builders of roads or bridges or dams, the work they did cost a fortune. And like the builders of roads or bridges or dams, they assumed that that however tight their technique or advanced their building materials, one day what they were creating would come to the end of its useful life and need to be replaced.
But in many cases, that last part never happened.
The organizations that came to depend on those ancient applications also came to take them for granted. I mean, why replace a perfectly good billing system just because some squirrely guys who work down in the lightless caverns of the IT department keep insisting that the world will end if we don't? Slap an HTML shell over it and a VPN around it and -- boom! -- something almost as awesome as a brand, new system at a fraction of the cost!
Guess who gets the raise and promotion in this equation? And in a culture where being careful is scoffed at and cutting corners is rewarded, guess how long it takes for people to figure out that there is no future in being prudent and thoughtful about the future?
Then came the outsourcing/downsizing craze of the 80s and 90s, and suddenly those dour, squirrely, expensive, IT guys were no longer a problem because they had been laid off; replaced by a skeleton maintenance crew based in India...and a lot of smiley people in expensive suits who used the word "synergy" a lot.
And so, like the roads and bridges and dams of the Eisenhower and Johnson and Roosevelt administrations that were supposed to be budgeted for, planned for and replaced as part of thoughtful, long-range planners but never were and are now rotting out from underneath us...
...many of the Big Iron software systems from an age gone by ended up in the hands of short-term, immediate-profit-driven consultant-types who saw no reason why they shouldn't patch and paint just enough life out of those systems to last until they skipped out for the next gig...
...leaving behind systems buried way down deep in the heart of the organization that no one knows how to fix anymore, and which continues to groan ever louder and shudder ever harder under the weight of what continues to be stacked on top of them.
Until this happens:
Of course, any and all of this could be fixed.
All it requires is money: the political will to collect it and the discipline to spend it on what matters.
Which will never happen.
Sure it would put millions of people back to work and rebuild the foundation on which our future success and prosperity depends, but spending billions on rebuilding infrastructure is now called Socialism, and spending money on Socialism makes All Real Americans mad.
As opposed to pissing trillions away into endless wars half a world a away, which makes All Real Americans happy.
And even though they are completely toxic to and antithetical in every way to the kind of prudent, long-range planning that is the only thing that can possibly save us, somehow eventually unfettered Free Markets will fix all of the many, catastrophic problems that are now bearing down on us!
Because Freedom isn't Free, you lazy fucking hippies!
Or something.
*(For the record, the inventor of COBOL -- navy Rear Admiral Grace Murray Hopper [December 9, 1906 – January 1, 1992] -- was, by all accounts, a perfectly nice, brilliant nerd, the likes of whom we could sure use more of these days)