Monday, June 23, 2014

Fundraiser Day Four: Sunday Morning Comin' Down


"Dick Cheney tends his media garden" Edition



So why are monsters like Dick Cheney on teevee? At all?

Yeah, yeah, I know...but I don't mean that question in the usual, impotent Liberal-fist-shaking way, imploring Heaven or spirits or MSNBC to move our Ouija Board planchette around and spell out for us why the fuck this war criminal is appearing at anything but a sentencing hearing.

Because the answer to that question is obviously not for public consumption.

Of course, considerable light could probably be shed on this subject by some of the thousands of people who share Lunchables and juice boxes in the food court at the Twin Towers complex in Rosslyn, VA  where the ABC teevee corporation shares "trophy" office space, parking, (comm equipment?  urinal cakes?) etcetera with one of the largest defense contractors on Earth --
...
Defense contractor Raytheon Co. renewed its lease for 115,000 square feet at 1100 Wilson Blvd. in Rosslyn. The deal is for 10 years and keeps Raytheon in Monday Properties’ 1.08 million-square-foot Twin Towers, which are currently the two tallest buildings in the region at 31 stories.

Raytheon’s renewal is one of the largest office lease transactions signed this year in the Washington, DC, market. The firm has been in Rosslyn since the late 1980s and said its desire to stay in the area was one of the main reasons behind the decision to renew. Raytheon underwent a major search process, which lasted nearly two years to find the best deal for the best office space.

Unlike many other major defense contractors, such as Northrop Grumman and Boeing who have decreased their foot print in Rosslyn, Raytheon decided to buck the trend and continue to keep a large presence in the area, according to a Monday spokesperson. While other defense firms close and consolidate their offices, Raytheon is doing the opposite by continuing to lease large blocks of office space in the region and have no future plans of consolidating space.

This deal comes just a few months after Monday announced the Department of Labor’s renewal of 91,428 square feet in the same building, which followed Booz [and] Co.’s signing for 14,387 square feet in the neighboring tower at 1000 Wilson Blvd.
...
-- but obviously those people ain't talking, which leaves it to silly bloggers like me to speculate irresponsibly about all the deadly serious matters about which our media refuses to talk.

So for rest of us rubes out here in flyover nation who don't have secret decoder rings,  all we see is what is in front of us. The same, surreal this Cheney kabuki -- where everyone already knows exactly what is going to happen -- over and over again.  Cheney is asked a question -- maybe friendly, maybe aggressive -- and then he will lie.

And lie.

And lie.

He will deflect, invert and smirk and then he will lie some more.

From Brother Charles Pierce:
...
There is absolutely no reason to book Dick Cheney to discuss anything having to do with Iraq. He will lie, because that's what he does. You know he will lie. He knows he will lie. How does this add anything to what we need to know about what the country needs to do next? And if Fox News wants to give him a platform, well, it's past time for the rest of the national media to stop treating that particular puppet show seriously. In fact, I am of the mind that, as regards to the media universe and Fox News, the Amish have the best idea of all. We can leach the poison out of our politics fairly easily because everybody knows where it comes from. We had a dry run for the puke funnel in the Clinton years, and now we've had five years plus of the puke funnel at full flood. There are people to take seriously and people not to take seriously. Dick Cheney on Iraq is an easy one, or it ought to be..
And since we all know in advance that no one is going to go after him with the knives-out ferocity that a monster like Cheney rates (and since he would just shrug it off and keep on lying anyway) he will be thanked, and will move on to the next teevee camera where the process will be repeated.

So instead of asking the unanswerable -- "Why is this thug on my teevee again?" -- it is perhaps more fruitful to ask what Dick Cheney get out of this?  After all, seeing his shambling undead corpse croaking out ludicrous bullshit is not going to change any minds.  He is not going to budge policy or advance his cause one inch, so what purpose is served?

And I think the answer may actually be very simple, one you jettison the notion that Cheney is there to talk to you or me about war and peace.

He's not.

Cheney is there from downtown.  He's there from Mitch and Murray, to do what he has always done -- enforce discipline among the underlings.



He is there because Iraq is back in the news, falling to bits just as the Dirty Hippies warned, which means there is always the danger that someone with a camera other than Rachael Maddow might dare to commit the only truly unpardonable Beltway sin: remembering.


Cheney is there to not-so-subtly remind our Elite Media, the Brain Caste of the Republican Party and the Bush regime dead-enders of the terms of contract they signed with him 12 years ago; the one where they sold their immortal souls in exchange for power and wealth and status.  The one where they get to have everything their filthy little hearts desire in exchange for never, ever taking a serious look back at how the Cheney Administration lied us into Iraq and then looted it -- along this the United State Treasury -- while getting 4,500 American soldiers killed.

That was the fucking deal, and Cheney is to make damn sure every signatory remembers the fine print:



Or as I wrote almost a decade ago (yes, I've been at this that long):
The Real President reminds potential Rats...


...before I go down, you'll all sleep with the fishes.

Why this is So Fucking Bad – Part II

The underlying motives of the Modern GOP.

You and I, we live in a house built by giants.

Flawed giants to be sure – we’re all sinners here – but the men and women who made this place for us stood a full head taller than their times and looked to make us as fine a future as their magnificent, damaged vision could perceive.

The planks of the floor tongue-and-grooved together by Jefferson’s prose. The bricks laid straight and true by Washington. The kitchen kept tight and warm by Franklin. The Southern Wing fumigated by Sherman and made beautiful by Ms. Rosa Parks.

Everywhere the joins and seams are sealed against the elements by the blood of patriots who died at Omaha Beach, and Gettysburg, and Philidelphia, Mississippi to keep our house safe, or to force the landlords to keep their promise and make our house a home for all who live here.

It’s not a perfect house – it has always been a fixer-upper – but it’s our house, yours and mine, black and white, man and woman, conservative and liberal, rich and poor, new arrival or DAR.

And we work on the place, year after year. Some of us, sadly, have little or no interest in the basic duties of citizenship, and believe that the Democracy Fairy comes and snakes the pipes, weather-strips the doors and re-caulks the tub. Some of us involve ourselves in the running of the country with varying degrees of passion and duration because that's what we can afford. And some of our fellow citizens spend their lives at it because we understand that keeping up the Old Home Place is the slow work of lifetimes. A task that is incremental, blooms only rarely and usually lacks heroics.

It is rarely the lifers that militate for Revolution Now! because they well understand what is at stake and how hard it is to build and govern once the revolutionaries are done knocking it all down and dancing around the fires. No, it is usually the uninvolved -- the sleepy ones who have little or no understanding of how the political process works, how a bill becomes a law (Schoolhouse Rock, People!) or how a minority party has to fight with finesse and under the radar -- who come tumbling down from the attic full of drive-by advice on the futility of hard work and how the fact that everything isn't perfect yet proves that we need to burn it all down and start over.

Fine. As the boys and girls of Fireside Theater once said, "I Think We're all Bozos on This Bus." This experiment has been running for two-and-a-quarter centuries, and it has been every bit as much a Freak Carnival and Tijuana Donkey Show as it has been High Mass.

So what?

We all work in the dark and we all do what we can. That’s the social compact. That’s the deal, and from generation to generation our house gets little additions. New furnishings from Imperial to Populist to Early "Whip Inflation Now."

Sometimes we paint the place Red, and sometimes Blue, and sometimes what those colors mean changes completely, but the compact requires -- absolutely requires -- that we respect the house itself.

And it is in this signal betrayal that the Modern Republican Party is singularly infamous.

They are not remotely interested in changing the artwork or the crown molding; they're going after the walls, the floor and the brickwork. They're setting fire to the foundation stones themselves, and the indictment of Scooter Libby is only the latest link in the chain.

Consider just these few core samples taken from the anthracite soul of the Party of Darkness:

On Making War.

There is a proper way a modern Great Nation goes to war. When describing how a Great Nation undertook the gravest decision any country can make, the watchword damned well better have been "Deliberate". And Cautious. Reluctant. Even Sad. As a last, possible resort. The gravity a Great Nation must feel down to it's bones before going to war might best be summed up by Lincoln in his Second Inaugural:
"All dreaded it, all sought to avert it. While the inaugural address was being delivered from this place, devoted altogether to saving the Union without war, urgent agents were in the city seeking to destroy it without war—seeking to dissolve the Union and divide effects by negotiation. Both parties deprecated war, but one of them would make war rather than let the nation survive, and the other would accept war rather than let it perish.

And the war came."
For sober-minded adults, the days of undertaking mass slaughter for martial glory and piqued pride disappeared in the trenches of World War I, and were permanently entombed under the rubble of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

But instead, this Chickenhawk Administration came to the table iron-hard, leg-humpin', Priapistic for war. For the profit it would bring as well as the suppressing fire it would provide for its political agenda. War as Distraction. War as Photo-Op.

And to accomplish this end, they ate away at the decision-making apparatus itself. When, like this Administration, you see war as just another means to a profitable end -- and you have no ethics-bound limits on what you are prepared to do to advance your partisan agenda -- you end up lying lavishly because you no longer recognize Truth or Falsehood as points on a moral compass.

Bush did not seek to prove the case for war; instead he strove to destroy the very mechanism by which such decisions are made.

He did what he has done his whole life. He cheated, and his Party cheered, and in doing so he took a sledgehammer to the floorboards of democracy,

On Appointing Judges.

No big mystery here. When Harriet Miers got into choppy water over her utter lack of qualifications for the job to which Bush had nominated her, he casually played the Evangelical Card.

He didn't even encrypt it -- he just up and said that Harriet should be trusted because of her specific and rancid views on Christ. Period.

From Terri Schiavo, to Justice Sundays, to anointing John Ashcroft as Inquisitor General, to the whole "Torture? So what!" stance of the GOP, to veiled death threats against "activist judges", to Pat Robertson's psychotic and unrepudiated assertions that "liberal judges" are the greatest threat to American civilization in history, to James Dobson's flaunting his ownership of Bill Frist's testicles and reassurance that Dear Harriet would've voted the right way...the GOP has made it explicitly clear that they have no use for an independent judiciary. They have set an overt Christopath Evangelical Test for holding the gavel; a perversion that our Constitution was explicitly set up to guard against.

As is true in the Prosecution of War, in the Prosecution of Justice the GOP have no use for the mechanisms the Founders put in place. They don't make war on a given judge: They make war on the very idea of Justice.

On the Idea of the Commonweal.

Begin with two, filthy words: Grover Norquist.

Then comes Katrina, Barbara Bush, "Brownie" and showing our racism to the world.

"AARP's Gay!" attacks on Social Security, backed up by the likes of Brit Hume lying as loud and often as necessary to blowtorch the last line of defense between senior citizens and penury.

The Modern GOP rides to electoral victory on the stooped backs and sloped brows of ten million loyal bigots, segregationists, and American Swastika flyin' wannabe Klansmen. It's not that they object to this program or that; they loathe the very idea that the government should be in the business of helping its citizens at all, especially "those people."

Understanding racists is really not that difficult: For these degenerates, the Government Is the Problem because it takes their tax money and gives it to Mud People, fags and Furriners. Period. And on that basis, they are completely cool with the idea of gutting government itself. And as they have made crystal clear, if they can't milk what they want from their conservative manques and stalking horses, these types are perfectly willing to go back to blowing up Federal Buildings and Family Planning Clinics.

On the Primacy of Reason.


First and foremost, we Americans are the Children of the Enlightenment.

We were born during the rise of the Rational against the the dark tide of Superstition and Fear. It was because of our willingness to swear fealty to Reason even though it might doom some of our sacred cows to the slaughter line that we truly were a light unto the world; and it is this primary, prenatal fact of our origins that is most despised and conspicuously ignored by the current crop of Fundy "Originalists" who only want to ram the Ten Commandments down our throats and send all those scarily emancipated women back to purdah.

So again we see the perversity of the GOP on a cellular level.

Because it affronts the sensibilities of its loyal swine, the Republican party is actually willing to wage war on Evolution; a science whose fundamentals have been settled beyond any serious debate across an entire, global community of literate, learned humans for over a century.

Except here.

Except with the panderers that run the Republican Party who, for sordid electoral wages, are more than happy to run three centuries of Enlightenment through the wood chipper. Who cheerfully retard our children -- that face a future of fierce, technological competition -- by forcing the schools to teach that the ignorant superstitions of snake handlers are every bit as 'scientifically" valid as the results of a century and a half of careful observation, exploration and experimentation.

And because it might impinge on the bottom lines of their corporate overlords, these same illiterate, innumerate whores are quite willing to rewrite the laws of physics and meteorology in Crayola, and pretend that Global Warming is just the kooky notion of a handful of addled intellectuals, even as one "storm of the century" after another beats the coastal United States to splinters, and sheets of polar ice the size of states continue to "melt, thaw, and resolve themselves into a dew."

Again, it is not a particular decision or theory against which the GOP has set themselves, but the entire idea of Man using Reason to make decisions against which they have set themselves.

They make war on the idea of Enlightenment itself.

How much more of an enemy of Democracy could they possibly be?

And now...Scooter Libby.

What is the Scoot Man charged with?
Blow away the smoke and just listen to the sturdy poetry of the indictment itself to understand what is at stake here.

When all is said and done, what Libby tried to do was no less than attempt to destroy the instrumentality by which the truth itself could be found.

On a matter of National Security.

During a time of war.

He did it as cooly and deliberately as a suicide bomber going after a troop carrier, which is treason to the bone, and only a traitor would defend it or spin it as anything less.

And the best either the Real President and the Potemkin President could choke out were a few words of non-specific regret, padded out with praise for all the Goodness Scooter had ladled over the Constitution.

Conclusion:

In the end, there is always room in our raucous, national chorus for voices of discontent, dissent and disputation. That's how our house was built; that's exactly what its checks and balances and tightly toleranced acoustics are designed to modulate.

What cannot be tolerated are those whose goal is the razing of Liberty's Temple.

Those who carefully nurture ignorance, deliberately foster bigotry and fear, and take up arms against the muscle and sinew of Enlightenment itself.

The vermin that dare to call themselves "Republicans" while working day and night to cripple and kill the Republic.

The termites in the joists and tenons of Democracy's home.



Sunday, June 22, 2014

Fundraiser Day Three: While You Were Out, Ctd.



In case you were worried that Dinesh DeSouza's fairy tales of Barack Obama's father's ghost appearing like Hamlet's dad and leading him into a Sekrit Marxist Muslim Plot to turn Murrica into a Leninist Sharia Workers Caliphate might be disappearing into the back of the wingnut closet where they* keep their Haig '88


campaign buttons and autographed copies of "GEORGE WALLACE FOR THE BIG JOB" segregationist comic book, don't be.

D'iscredited Defrauder is still on the job, asking such important questions like...
Is Barack Obama the Intellectual Heir of Bill Ayers ?
And the answer is...no.

Surprise!  (I had to swap out this screen shot for the actual video, b/c the damn thing would not stop auto-starting):


See, as D'iminish Desuckers carefully explains to the sock puppet who is "interviewing" him, Barry O is actually more radical than his Communist Cell Leader, Bill Ayers.
"Bill Ayers does not want the federal government to have a dossier on you so that if they decide you're a critic, they can send guys with guns to your door.  Bill Ayers does not want that.  But Obama does."
Hell, he's even more dangerous than...

...Jimmy Carter!

Because Jimmy Carter was just a fuck-up who handed Iran over to Khomeini because he was stupid. Whereas  Obama was "thrilled" to his pals in the  and the Muslim Brotherhood come to power in Egypt.
"So you get the idea here that Obama is acting consistently to undermine our allies and, in a sense, allow our enemies to consolidate power.”
To people who are not Fox News zombies, this sounds like random, paranoid gibberish echoing though the air conditioning ducts of a mental institution.

To people who are Fox News zombies, this random, paranoid gibberish not only makes perfect sense, it is the well-thumbed hymnal from which they sing their little hearts out every day.  To them, there is no scintilla of doubt that Barack Obama is the personification of pure Liberal evil and in personal command of sinister terrorist forces around the world.  This is because, after expending decades of effort and billion of dollars, Conservatives have bred for themselves a 100% fact-resistant chump army.

The hard work of building their Uruk-hai is over.  At this point all Conservatives have to do is maintenance, which means:
  • Making sure every single thing President Obama does is immediately retrofitted into pre-existing narrative of secret Commie cells and vast, globe-spanning, multi-generational plots destroy Murrica, which have all culminated with the presidency of Barack Obama.  And don't worry one little bit about what to do with yesterday's steaming pile of Roger Ailes-brand treason that directly contradicts today's batch of lies! The Pig People long ago completely internalized Conservatism's real secret weapon -- Strategic Forgettery -- so that will not be a problem:
  • Fox News questions 'convenient' timing of Benghazi suspect's capture

    A Fox News panel on Tuesday mused about the alleged "political motivations" behind the Obama administration's "convenient" capture last weekend of a key suspect in the Benghazi embassy attack.

    "I think this thing needs to be tied in a bow for certain individuals to have a clean break," panelist Pete Hegseth said, adding that it was "all too neat, and it's too cute."...
  • And then pointing their flying monkeys in the right direction (h/t Heather at Crooks and Liars):
South Dakota Republican Party Passes Resolution Calling For Obama's Impeachment
*Thanks for the catch





Saturday, June 21, 2014

Fundraiser Day Two: From Beyond This Vale of Tears


The late Steve Gilliard sends his regards.

From The News Blog in 2006 we find Mr. Gilliard citing his own writing from early 2003:
To say we told you so would be crass. Too many lives are at stake. But we predicted a civil war would be the ultimate outcome of this back in April 2003, about three months before we formed this blog. The time table might have been off, maybe some of the specifics, but at the end of the day, the road ends in the same place.
Thursday | April 10, 2003

How Iraq could devolve into Civil War

Iraq is clearly suffering a period of disorder, the question is will it shift into civil war?

I am not predicitng a civil war. What I am saying is that there will be signs of a country slipping into civil war which should be clear. I don't know what will happen. Maybe the exiles and the US can build peace. I certainly hope so, because the alternative could be a catastrophy for both Americans and Iraqis.

* A lack of respect for civil institutions

The looting of hospitals is a bad sign. Taking things from a hospital, which is designed to help people, is not only mere greed. It is the suggestion that there is no respect for civil authority. Most people will loot a store or a government office, but a hospital? That's more than just greed. It means the people doing the robbing are either criminals looking to add to their loot, crazed teenagers, or people looking to create dependency on another source of power. Which is scary beyond belief.

The US military's easy going attitude towards the looting was amazing and amazingly self-destructive. It sends a message that they will not oppose groups of Iraqis breaking the law. This will not be seen as tolerance, but weakness.

* Rape and home robberies

There are reports of both according to the BBC in Basra and I can expect the same in Baghdad. That's the trigger to building home arsenals and then developing local militias. People will protect their families from harm. And this is where charsimatic leadership starts. The former Iran-Iraq War vet who beats a looter with his bare hands then becomes the local hero, starts gathering men around, and acquires a base of power.

Sound familiar? That's how the Taliban started in Afghanistan. The local warlords were pulling out teenagers and raping them and robbing the truck drivers. The locals, not into seeing their boys raped, formed a band of guerrillas. The rest, as they say, is history.

* The US Authority is slow to get off the ground

Iraq had a state-run economy. Most Iraqis depended on the state for food and work. Without a viable state, they will be able to get neither. That means illness and starvation. Starving, ill people will look to leadership from any quarter. The only way to prevent this is the timely delivery of security and food, water and healthcare.

*Factionalism starts to grow

We already have the indications of factionalism. The murder of an exile Shia cleric is a hint that the locals are not eager for their brethern to return home and start running things. Many of these exiles have been gone for decades. But the thing which could be worrysome is when the exiles start to gather local gunmen.

What could be a real problem is when the INC meets and Ahmed Chalebi starts to take a major role. The SCIRI, the largest and best armed of the exile groups, is clearly not interested in any role in an American-led occupation government. Its leader, Ayatollah Hakim Al-Bakir, has told anyone who asks that he would resist a US occupation. The murder of two Shia clerics, while not tied to him, could be a hint of what is to come.

The Kurds have two parties, the KDP and PUK. each who occasionally fight with each other. Both now occupy Kirkuk. Only one has agreed to leave. The US is promising to get them both to leave. There is no guarantee the US can make that happen. If the PUK leaves and the KDP doesn't, that's going to make one group look like a sucker.

Meanwhile, the Turks are watching and will invade if they have to. This is the key national security issue for Turkey. They will not tolerate a Kurdish state and if Iraq is slipping, they may feel obliged to move.

* Anti-Americanism coaleses into a coherent movement

It's one thing to have individuals come up to Marines saying go home. It's another to have a crowd marching saying that. Once you start to have groups come together over a central theme-opposing American power-you will be creating the circumstances for various groups to start funding these efforts. The Arab world is desperately unhappy about the US invasion. It would take very little for money to flow from one bank account to another.

The first signs of real trouble and things could get ugly quickly from here is if Shia clerics, remember Shias are 60 percent of the country, declare that their people must oppose the US. Once that moral and religious grounding is established, opposition will explode because it will be justified to the majority of people.

Money means power. It means you can get and keep an army functioning. The disappearence of the Iraqi Army means there are hundreds of thousands of trained, led men who could appear to bolster an anti-American movement clandestinely. The US intelligence would be slow to pick this up and could only realize it exists after a massive street march, where the kids march first and the hard men come behind, with AK's and RPG's in their hands. A naked challenge to US power could result in a bloody embarassement. The lack of social order and a police force would place crowd control in US hands. And with the widespread distribution of gasmasks and chemical suits, tear gas would simply be pointless.

Remember, both Syria and Iran need the US to fail. They could be ready sources of revenue for anti-Americans ready to act. Keep in mind, the Iraqi Army is in hiding. Even if they went home, they didn't just disappear. Their commanders can find them if they need to.

* The factionalism turns to violence

It will start small. Assassinations, maybe a shoot out or two in a distant province away from direct US control. Maybe a US official or an exile. Then the killings move to mob-style violence, car bombs, gunfights, kidnappings, murders. As the pace of the killings grow, you start to see organized formations. Maybe 1000 men, maybe 1500. They start to use heavier weapons, rockets, mortars, machine guns in their internecine battles. Neighborhoods, then towns, start to fall into disorder. Local militas now control the area. These areas start to spread. Instead of the looting and raping you see now, you see nothing but order. You don't steal a loaf of bread in these areas. People who do, get killed, publicly.

This means that there are now local groups who can provide a coherent oppsition to the US.

* There are moves to consolidate power

The groups grow, they bump up against each other, they keep killing. And then they choose sides. A group of Shia decide to openly challenge the occupation government and declare their own rule, the Kurdish parties start in against each other, the INC collapses and the wild card, Saddam supporters decide to throw their lot in with the Shia and reveal where their weapons are. The Army splits along ethnic lines and you have the Sunni divisions and Republican Guard against the Shia units and the generals decide to join one group or the other.

Now, some of these signs may blend together, but briefly put, the signs of civil war are when disorganized opposition becomes organized around a central theme and players with money and weapons join the cause. A civil war is organized killing, not just looting. I don't think Iraq is close to it, yet. But things can go either way. The INC can be accepted. Or it can be rejected violently. It depends on how and if the US can organize and feed the people.

If they can't, then these other factors can come into play. There are too many guns and too many players and unless the US can pay them off and bring order, people will create order and not in a way we would prefer.

Steve Gilliard
Well, the resistance grew up before we reached the possiblity of civil war, and it took years to create the conditions for civil war, but we created them.

It is only a matter of time before the Iraqi Army collapses and takes sides.

I miss that guy.



Fundraiser Day Two: While You Were Out


While you were busy worrying about real things in the real world, here are a few of the various species of mendacious twaddle over which Breitbart's unloved spawn were freaking out...

Cop-killing Wingnut-Seditionists-Who-Got-Cranked-Up-To-11 is reported thus:
...
Firstly, we need to realize this is not a “gun” problem. This is a government problem.
...
In fact, these two nuts that killed the Vegas officers–and make no mistake, these two were nuts–were directly affected by Obama’s militarization of the US government. The pair was supposedly in attendance at the Bundy Ranch (though I haven’t seen direct proof of that) when Obama sent his jackbooted government thugs to destroy a single ranger’s livelihood.
Crazy "Leftist" Donna Brazille is always a great fallback hate-pinata when some innocuous comment from Michelle Obama is not immediately available to be inflated into Fascism On The March!
The woman who was never proud of her country until she and her husband were deposited in the White House spoke to a class in Topeka, Kansas last Friday where she told students to monitor their parents for racist speech because she and her hubby can only do so much without good little informants like them back home.
In nearly every big city in America gangs of black youths have been roaming through the city searching out white people to beat and sometimes kill.
The Redskins as yet another Terrifying Sign of the coming Obama Caliphate:
Barack Obama has become an expert at using his powers to regulate as a weapon to destroy Americans he doesn’t like. Just as he attempted to use the IRS to destroy conservatives, as he’s used the EPA to destroy our energy sector, as he used Obamacare to eliminate freedom of religion, Obama and his thuggish administration has now attempted to force a football team to stop using a name Obama doesn’t like.
And of course, remember kids!  Shouting n*gger on the air isn't the problem.  The PC Police trying to silence your attempt to have honest discussion is...well...you know where this is going...
WIND Kicks Joe Walsh Off The Air, Station Refused to Allow Honest Discussion of Racism

Former Congressman Joe Walsh joined WIND AM 560 not long after he left Congress and has been doing a great, fearless job on the air. The station was even beginning to look into syndicating him. But now, because he tried to have an honest discussion about racism, the station got cold feet and suspended him until further notice...



but as one Leftist Devil once said...
...once purity itself becomes all you care about -- once it becomes a distillery race to see who can get to 100% -- the chicken farmers are never far behind:
The main Islamist group in Algeria, the GIA, ended up being led by a Mr. Zouabri, a chicken farmer, who killed everyone who disagreed with him. He issued a final communiqué, declaring that the whole of Algerian society should be killed, with the exception of his tiny remaining band of Islamists. They were the only ones who understood the truth.



Friday, June 20, 2014

Professional Left Podcast #237

ProfessionalLeft
"Don’t be naive about these things. I will destroy your life.”

-- Roger Ailes quoted in "The Loudest Voice in the Room"


 Links:

Da' money goes here:




Fundraiser Day Two: Today In Ongoing "We Fucking Told You So" Team Coverage...



Longtime readers of know that while we here at the driftglass blog strive to maintain a levels of technical, graphic and authorial quality which meets or exceeds those of other sites with budgets 100,000 times larger than ours, sometimes we have to cut corners. For example, you might not know that in order to provide our readers with as close to cutting-edge Ramesh Ponnuru coverage as we can afford, we have had to outsource that beat to an itty-bitty, off-shore division staffed with drunks and layabouts so that we can bring you an irregular feature called "Ramesh Ponnuru's Wingnut Purity Creds to Expire".   Unfortunately, this has often amounted me having to yell at them to off their their lazy asses every now and then and check the meat thermometer on Mr. Ponnuru's stealthy, deliberate transition from "the smirky little weasel who wrote 'The Party of Death: The Democrats, the Media, the Courts, and the Disregard for Human Life'" to a Very Serious Conservative Thinker who Thinks Very Serious Conservative Thoughts.

For Money.

Of course carry out his bold plan to sidle on over to the David Brooks side of the S.S. Conservative Obtusitania, from time to time Young Ramesh has to...well..."steal" is a harsh word, so let's just say it has been rumored that from time to time he wire-drops into Liberal Central Command

in order to "liberate" some of our time-honored observations about Conservatism without leaving any finger-prints.

(Needless to say, Liberals realize when they have, once again, been jacked without so much as a 'Thank you' or by-your-leave, but who the fuck pays attention to those losers anyway? As one of their more disreputable members observed long ago,
...
Finally, at no point during this latest reshuffling of America's Conservative media courtiers will anyone be gauche enough to mention that the Filthy Liberals were, once again, absolutely right all along.

Still, over here in the cultural ghetto of Liberal Central Command, we will all laugh and drink our chardonnay and laugh some more.)
And speaking of Young Ramesh and our media's gentlemen's agreement to never notice when Liberals are once again shown to have been absolutely right all along...here's a lovely little bit of awesome from a few weeks ago which my surly, drunken, good-for-nothing staff did not call to my attention until now:

The Tea Party Never Existed
MAY 21, 2014 4:34 PM EDT
By Ramesh Ponnuru
Much of journalism consists, G.K. Chesterton wrote, of "saying Lord Jones is dead to people who never knew Lord Jones was alive." Much of political journalism this week consists of people who have not understood the Tea Party since its birth saying that it's now dead.

The loosely organized movement arose as a reaction to the reigning liberalism of 2009 and 2010, just as previous liberal moments in the mid-1960s, late 1970s and early 1990s brought about conservative backlashes. It was also, in part, a retrospective reaction by conservatives to compromises they had made during George W. Bush's years in the White House. This, too, is a fairly normal feature of political life: Purification is always easier when your side is out of power.

And just as the intra-Democratic conflicts of the Bush years -- think of the 2006 Ned Lamont-Joe Lieberman Senate primary in Connecticut, for example, itself a retrospective reaction to the party's moderation during Bill Clinton's administration -- didn't lead to lasting schism, so the Republican factionalism of recent years seems to be fading away.

This was predictable and, for that matter, predicted. In early 2010, Kate O'Beirne and I looked at detailed polling of Tea Party attitudes for the National Review. We argued that unifying the Republican Party would be easier than it was when Christian conservatives or supporters of Ross Perot joined the coalition: Unlike those earlier groups, Tea Party advocates already believed the same things that regular Republicans did. They basically were regular Republicans, just, if you will, more so.

The differences between the Tea Party and "establishment Republicans" have largely concerned style and attitude rather than program and ideology, and these are easily finessed -- especially because moods change.
...

Mitch McConnell, the Senate Republican leader whom self-proclaimed spokesmen for the Tea Party have loudly denounced, almost certainly won most Kentucky Republicans who consider themselves Tea Partiers in his re-election primary this week. Some of the denouncers are warning that McConnell will lose in November unless he gets his challenger's Tea Party supporters to turn his way. Some of those supporters tell pollsters they're so disgusted with McConnell that they'll back his Democratic opponent. They won't.

That's not because the Tea Party movement is dead. It's because the movement the pundits imagined -- a bitter enemy of the existing, pretty conservative Republican Party -- was never truly alive.
If you are masochistic enough to take a trip down that most despised thoroughfare in American politics -- Memory Lane -- all the way to origins of the "Tea Party" myth, you will fine no one but Filthy Liberals, yelling impotently at the Mainstream Media Behemoth that this was obviously another Republican  lie:
...based on simple observation, guess who appears to be the largest group of late-blooming independents?

Those fucknozzles who, after giving Dubya the longest tongue bath in modern political history while calling everyone else a traitor, started gagging on the sheer tonnage of bullshit their creepy idolatry of George W. Bush was requiring them to swallow and obediently regurgitate every fucking day, that's who.

Most newly minted “independents” seem to be little more than Republicans who are fleeing the scene of their crime, but at the same time still desperately want believe in the inerrant wisdom of Rush Limbaugh. They are completely incapable of facing the horrifying reality that that they have gotten every single major political opinion and decision of their adult lives completely wrong, so instead they double-down on their hatred of women and/or gays and/or brown people and/or Liberals, and blame them for the miserable fuckpit their leaders and their policies have made of their live and futures.

Like German soldiers after the fall of Berlin, they have stopped running away from the catastrophe they created only long enough to burn their uniforms.

But they fool no one.

Except, apparently, David Fucking Brooks.
Nothing but a cheap a gimmick by and for Republicans frantically trying to escape accountability for the catastrophe piled atop catastrophe that they had just spent eight unleashing on the country.

...
And then out of the West came their own gin-soaked Moses
Who swore all their shame could be turned into roses.
His name was Sylvester "Dick Armey" McBean
Inventor of the Fabulous, Tea-Baggulous Bush-Off Machine.

For the price of their souls and a couple of bucks
The Bush-Bellies could now buy some nips and some tucks...

A bald-faced fraud that the Mainstream Media was obviously in on:
...
The thing is, I don't especially begrudge these Four Heist Men of the Teapocalypse their ludicrous little charade; Hell, if I'd spent the last decade happily sucking the dicks of the people who destroyed my country, I'd guess I'd be dressing up in pantyhose and jaunty little hats and pretending I'd been asleep since the Ford Administration too.

Phil Ponce, on the other hand, is a different story. Letting these clowns use the the public airwaves to put across their underhanded, one-sided scam is unforgivable, and letting himself be used as their sweat rag in the process is beyond embarrassing.

If Royko were alive, he'd be dangling Ponce by his ankle from a fifth story window right about now, making him conjugate the verb "muckrake".

In Latin.

Backwards.

Else how's that boy ever gonna learn!
Sadly these observations from 2009 and 2010 were all written by a Liberal.

And who the fuck ever listens to those whiners?



When Words Fail


Laughter abides.

From Andrew Sullivan, the gay, Catholic, immigrant True Conservative public intellectual who was something like 30 years late to the "Hey, has anyone noticed that American Conservatism is fucked in the head?" party, and so far as I can ascertain has never acknowledged The Liberals were ever right about anything despite spending the last few years learning to mimic the Liberal canon and pass it off as cutting-edge Conservative epiphany:
Breaking: Ted Olson Created The Conservative Case For Gay Marriage

JUN 19 2014 @ 12:36PM

That’s what the super-rich super-lawyer – who, unlike all the countless previous lawyers in the marriage equality movement, did not work pro bono – tells the world in his new book. Nathaniel Frank reviews it:
Olson and Boies seem to think they were the first to cast same-sex marriage as a conservative issue and to conduct bipartisan outreach, an idea that rightly made Andrew Sullivan apoplectic, given his pioneering 1989 New Republic cover story, “Here Comes the Groom: A (Conservative) Case for Gay Marriage.”...
...
The arguments we honed in the 1990s were designed to be used by others, to spread as memes. And there is nothing more rewarding in a civil rights movement than hearing others make arguments and even rhetoric that you helped pioneer. We were delighted to have Olson on our side. But when a straight man barges into the movement at the very last minute and actually claims he came up with these arguments all by himself and that there had been no conservative outreach before him, you can see why it smarts a little...
...
I'll bet is does smart, Andrew
I'll bet it stings like a bitch.





Thursday, June 19, 2014

Cladogenesis and The Eternal Sunshine of the Conservative Mind


Dance Me To The End Of Strauss

To understand what a mindless rabid, overwhelming, pandimensional clusterfuck Conservatism has become, it is not enough to simply critique the make and model of the vehicle they happened to be driving when they drove this country off the cliff.  It is equally important to understand the road they were traveling, and all the warning signs they had to blow past to get to the cliff in the first place.

For example, at this point pretty much everyone knows that, once upon a time, True Conservative Andrew Sullivan was an even more fanatical Iraq War cheerleader than Don Rumsfeld.  Mr. Sullivan -- who evangelizes the prudence, caution and skepticism of his hero Micheal Oakeshott -- hurled himself headlong into full "How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Invading Iraq" mode and, like virtually every other Conservative talking head at that time, used his media platform to slash and slander Liberals like me.  Called us dupes.  Fifth columnists.  You name it.

And then brutal Reality interceded, incinerating all the gauzy nonsense and bile-soaked bombast Conservatves had used to fence their terrible ideas off from criticism and exposing all the armchair Shuck and Awe warriors for frauds and poltroons and lunatics and profiteers they had always been.

Which is the moment that Modern Conservatism reached a genuinely cladogenic moment where the fitful equilibrium of the already-delusional Right was violently punctuated, splitting most of the into roughly two, distinct but related species.  As I wrote back in 2008 ("The Dolt-Stoss ™ ") both halves of Conservatism still reflexively hate Dirty Hippies, both still lies easily and often about their past and both still believe their "clade" of Conservatism -- the only True Conservatism -- failed because of an act of monstrous betrayal.

True Conservative Alpha:  The Denialists.  The past never happened.  They were never wrong.  Fox News never lies.  These are the Wolfowitzes and Kristols.  This is your Crazy Uncle Liberty.  This is the electoral backbone of the GOP whose grand plans only failed because they were stabbed in the back by nefarious Liberals, their RINO stooges and the media they secretly control.  These are the ones who, as I wrote in 2008, "...turned to prayer, beseeching that the sin which had been committed might be wholly blotted out.”  (2 Maccabees. 12:42) These are the ones who threw themselves en masse into the Fabulous, Tea-Baggulous Bush-Off Machine the minute it rolled into town.

True Conservative Beta:  The Both Siders.  There may have been some misjudgment in their past, but  Teh Liberals were just as bad!  Why quibble about whether or not they were wrong because Both Sides!  Fox News may be bad, but so is MSNBC!  This is virtually everyone else on the Right, from David Brooks and Andrew Sullivan to Joe Scarborough and David Gregory.  (I would include links to my own writing here, but since I have done +2,000 posts on this subject in the last decade, I wouldn't know where to begin.)

Of course there is still a lot of ideological bed-hopping between these two emergent species.  They hate each other, borrow from each other, make temporary alliances of mutual convenience with each other.  One day, David Frum is writing like a Liberal blogger, the next he straps on his Neocon armor to go forth and do battle with The Dirty Hippie brigade.  One day David Brooks is extolling the virtues of humility, prudence and self-reflection, and the next he is shamelessly slathering a tanker-truck full of White-Out all over American Conservative history to make it turn out the way he wants it to turn out.

Which brings us back to Andrew Sullivan, who was an early adopter of Beta True Conservatism.  It has led him to walk back his earlier ebullience about the Iraq War and the Bush Administration (which has been a good thing) and wander around the cultural landscape, pointing at every shiny, pretty object that catches his attention and yelling "Claim!" in the name of his True Conservatism like a Hunter from The Walking Dead (which has been an embarrassing and hilarious thing):



Because while I'm always down for a good, Neocon ass-kicking, that act alone is merely a cursory crash site investigation, and not nearly sufficient to explain the warped, intellectual path down which True Conservatism has raced in order to reach the cliff from which it defenestration itself.  For a tiny example of what I am talking about, I refer you to the evolving utility of the works of Conservative philosopher Leo Strauss -- the modern architect of the "Noble Lie" on which so much of True Conservatism depends -- as seen in the writings of Andrew Sullivan.

Back in 2003, as the rhetoric of the Neocon's blood-drunk conquistador orgy was reaching a crescendo across the land, Strauss was a Great Man.  Period. And his keen and subtle work was being slandered by the paranoid and ignorant "academic Left" from {THE TRUTH ABOUT LEO STRAUSS)
The attempt of some who haven’t even read Strauss (let alone read him as carefully as he deserves) to smear his legacy and denigrate those who learned from him is a pathetic display of paranoia and ignorance. No wonder it goes down so well among some on the academic left. Paranoia and ignorance are their strong suits.
By 2006, as the wheels were clearly coming off of the Conservative Clown Car and Neocon rantings became ever louder and more unmoored from Reality, Strauss was suddenly the object of gross abuse...by Both Sides!
I’m not the only one to be struck by the difference between what Leo Strauss actually wrote and what some have inferred from it – both on the paranoid left and the triumphalist right. 
 -- and Mr. Sullivan was not only deeply confused about how anyone could possibly have misinterpreted Strauss so terribly --
 I was taught by a "Straussian," have known many and read more, and I could never understand the idea how the great man could be reduced to some kind of secret guru to "neoconservatism".  There’s a section in my forthcoming book that makes this point about the inherent skepticism, mischief and seriousness of Strauss as a thinker – qualities that make him particularly ill-suited for being a secret mastermind to anything, let alone a total transformation of American conservatism into something like its opposite...
-- but also believed that Strauss wasn't just not one of the causes of Conservatism's problems, but was a big part of it's cure:
Last year, I sat down and read (or re-read) several of Strauss’s longer works and saw in him not a rival to my own inspiration, Michael Oakeshott, but a very different, yet somehow kindred, spirit. Between them, they represent a skeptical conservatism that certainly doesn’t amount to anything like a defense of what conservatism or neoconservatism has morphed into in the last decade or so. In fact, it’s my contention that Oakeshott and Strauss are the best guides to where current conservatism has gone deeply, horribly wrong.
By 2012, Mr. Sullivan was beginning to suspect that Strauss and Oakeshott may not have been (Spoiler!) boon metaphysical companions and brothers by another philosophical mother:
But the real trouble, I'd argue, is with Strauss's 1930s-driven lack of faith in modernity, his insistence that unimpeachable truths (not insights, eternal truths) about human nature could be gleaned by close reading of ancient texts by a few in the elite, and his followers' need to disguise their disdain for democracy and religion (making them insufferable cynics). It was hard to find a Straussian scholar who wasn't obsessed with domestic politics and who wasn't a neoconservative, itching for a new war for freedom somewhere (emphasis added):

America, alas, didn't have a Burke or an Oakeshott to craft its conservative philosophy. It ended up with the work of a German Jewish exile, whose political didacticism was as pronounced as his philosophical inscrutability. The failure of American conservatism to come up with more than fundamentalist religion and gloriously noble foreign interventionism as its core policies (along with making government insolvent by pretending that lowering taxes increases revenue) might be seen as a consequence of this strange admixture.
And by 2013, Mr. Sullivan was divvying up the same Conservative territory between Oakeshott and Strauss that he had been uniting under them just a few years earlier.,  Guess who got the verdant farmland and who got the buzzard-shit covered wasteland in that deal?  (emphasis added):
Reviewing Oakeshott on Rome and America by Gene Callahan, Kenneth B. McIntyre describes what keeps Oakeshott from accompanying fellow British philosophers into America’s intellectual canon:
[His] lack of influence among the movers and shakers of American political life should not be surprising,given Oakeshott’s insistence on the irrelevance of political philosophy to practical politics. As he once wrote, “reputable political behavior is not dependent upon sound or even coherent philosophy.” Such behavior is instead related to the concrete practical knowledge of an actual political tradition and what such a tradition intimates. Oakeshott was skeptical of philosophers who meddled in practical affairs, insisting that he was not concerned with establishing “a seminary for training political hedge-preachers in some dim orthodoxy.” Oakeshott was skeptical of philosophers who meddled in practical affairs, insisting that he was not concerned with establishing “a seminary for training political hedge-preachers in some dim orthodoxy.”
No, that was Leo Strauss’s metier. Bill Kristol and Paul Wolfowitz are where you end up.
Which brings us to 2014, where we find Mr. Sullivan finally facing the terrible abyss where Strauss's principle of the Noble Lie inevitably led his acolytes, and where the term "Straussian" has become fully integrated into the scathing and 100%-indistinguishable-from-a-Dirty-Hippie vocabulary he now uses to describing the paranoid, ignorant Right:
I tend not to hold the somewhat conspiratorial view that followers of Leo Strauss, the guru of the neocon intelligentsia, actively believe in deceiving the American people in the pursuit of statecraft. Strauss argued that many critical texts in Western civilization were written with an esoteric teaching for the intelligent few, while presenting a less radical and palatable public doctrine for the masses. Hence the Straussian penchant for a noble lie – one that is good for the people to believe but which the elite knows is bullshit. Perhaps the classic example of this is the Straussian support for public religion, while the bulk of them are atheists. For them, religious faith is entirely instrumental – a way to lie your way to social order and cohesion.

In the case of the Iraq war, several untruths were told. Among them: there is no sectarianism in Iraq; it will cost next to nothing; it will be over in months; there are WMDs everywhere; Saddam and al Qaeda are joined at the hip. It’s hard to tell which of these untruths were sincerely believed by men like Wolfowitz and Kristol, longtime Straussians both, and which were a function of them not knowing anything about the country that was to be their text-book case of “creating reality”. But when a disgraced architect of that war goes on television to argue that the public needs to be told now that ISIS is al Qaeda, even though he knows that they are separate organizations with separate ambitions, I tend to withdraw whatever benefit of the doubt I give these men with the blood of hundreds of thousands on their hands.
...

This is a rare moment in which a Straussian actually comes out and says: yes, we’re deliberately lying by conflating all sorts of different things in the Middle East – the Sunni-Shia divide; the hostility between ISIS and al Qaeda – in order to concoct a simple and terrifying message to the American people that will enable us to get into another war in order to advance our goals in the Middle East. Yes, we know this is a lie – just as our insinuation that Saddam and al Qaeda were in cahoots before 2003 was also a lie. But it’s a noble one, and that’s all that counts...
As I said, these two, main branches of post-Dubya Conservatism -- Denialists and Both Siders -- may contend mightily with each other, but they're really very much products of the same DNA and whelping box. 

Both lean heavily on Imaginary Dirty Hippies to justify what they say and do.  

Both have very sketchy relationships to those parts of American history that makes their academic theorizin' look stupid.

Both claim they were betraaaayed!

And -- most hilariously -- while neither Denialists nor Both Siders feel any compunction about telling as many "Nobles Lies" as necessary to get them though the night, both Denialists and Both Siders are also adamant that the other guy can't be a True Conservatives
'cause he doesn't smoke
The same brand of lie as me...



And finally, I suppose this is as good a place as any to belatedly ease into my June fundraiser, so if you are inclined to support work like this, here you go!

Thanks,

driftglass