"New York Times op-eds are the opium of upper classes." Comrade David Brooks
Based on both the public and sub rosa notifications I've been getting on social media, and my overflowing email inbox, it seems like I am no longer needed to point out the inevitable Both Siderist razor in the apple to be found in every New York Times op-ed by Mr. David Brooks.
For example...
So good on y'all! Well done.
I understand that it's easy to get distracted by the fact that a column by the balding, bespectacled guardian of the privileges of the privileged which begins "What’s Happening Is Not Normal. America Needs an Uprising That Is Not Normal." and ends with "We have nothing to lose but our chains" but don't get too excited. Like the 1970s Taco Bell menu, all Brooks has really done here is remix the same few ingredients out of which he has been making columns with for years and called it a Bell Beefer.
So, let's proceed on the well-founded axiom that Mr. Brooks has merely written a slightly more click-baity variation of his bog standard drivel, and indulge your old Unca Driftglass as I repurpose the opening paragraph of one of Brooks' most notorious jobs of hackwork from way back during the before time.
It was called "The Collapse of the Dream Palaces" by David Brooks, April 28, 2003 and I have added emphasis to note my emendations.
GEORGE ORWELL was a genuinely modest man. But he knew he had a talent for facing unpleasant facts. That doesn’t seem at first glance like much of a gift. But when one looks around the world, one quickly sees how rare it is. Most people nurture the facts that confirm their worldview and ignore or marginalize the ones that don’t, unable to achieve enough emotional detachment from their own political passions to see the world as it really is.
The always hilariously clueless David Brooks never noticed that he is not playing the part of Orwell here; that he is the myopic partisan dope who has made a career out of steadfastly seeing the world as it really is.
Now that
the war in Iraq is over,Trump as been re-elected we’ll find out how many peoplearound the worldin the punditocracy are capable of facing unpleasant facts. For the events of recent months confirm that millions of human beings are living in dream palaces, to use Fouad Ajami’s phrase. They are living with versions of reality that simply do not comport with the way things are. They circulate and recirculate conspiracy theories, myths, and allegations with little regard for whether or not these fantasies are true. And the events of the past month have exposed them as the falsehoods they are.
A category mistake (or category error, categorical mistake, or mistake of category) is a semantic or ontological error in which things belonging to a particular category are presented as if they belong to a different category.
-- were it not for that pesky word "error". Because it's not. What Never Trumpers like Brooks are doing is lying. Plain and simple. Deliberate and widespread.
And the origins of this lie can be found in this excellent article written by my wife all the back in August of 2016:
Don't You Dare Call It 'Trump-ism'
The Media is attempting to separate the Republican Party from Donald Trump. Who voted for him again?
Have you noticed a number of media outlets calling the Republican campaign for President, "Trumpism"? It isn't Trumpism. It's the Republican Party. And it has been for far longer than Donald Trump has been running for President.
My wife then references a 2015 video in which Alisyn Camerota asks a focus group of Trump and leaning toward Trump voters why they like him. Those of you who have watched any of these "average Trump voter" interviews know their trademarks.
The reason the news media interviewed these particular people is, they are registered Republican Primary voters.
They didn't just register to vote this year or fall off a truck into the Republican Party. They voted for Bush, twice. They voted for McCain/Palin. They voted for Romney. And they're tired of losing and being embarrassed by their votes, so embarrassed that they fell for a "Tea Party" rebranding just so they would not have to associate themselves with Bush.
And then the establishment had the nerve to suggest they vote for Bush's brother.
Donald Trump lies about a lot of things, but he is not lying when he says he received more Republican Primary votes than any other candidate in US history. That statistic is skewed by how many Republicans voted "Not Trump," but the fact that the race boiled down to Trump versus not-Trump is not helpful to the "Trumpism" argument. Republican voters selected Trump as their candidate, in state after state after state.
The beltway news media is terrified that the Republican Party will be forever tarnished by this Trump candidacy. Why? Because Trump-as-Republican busts open their "both sides" myth, that "both sides" of the political spectrum are equally bad, equally wrong and right, equally to be blamed for the "mess" in Washington.
Both-siderism protects the Beltway's need for an election horserace, as well as a "view from nowhere" in which the media is outside the race altogether and just an "observer" of "the process." But both-siderism picks a side: the side that is willing to lie repeatedly to win elections and policy points...
Republican Detachment Disorder Defined
-- and all the usual suspects were jumping onto this bandwagon as fast as possible: Jennifer Rubin, Michael Gerson, Ramesh Ponnuru, Michael Steele, Frank Luntz, Charlie Sykes, David Brooks, Rush Limbaugh, Ron Fournier, Kathleen Parker, George Will, Tucker Carlson, David Frum, Joe Scarborough, Peggy Noonan, Bill Kristol, and on and on and on.
It's a huge shit sandwich and everybody but me is gonna have to take a bite.
There were also a couple of my posts from 2016 on this topic with headlines that I particularly like.
And
The arrogant fucks of the legacy media and the tiny clutch of Conservative pundits who would soon designate themselves as Never Trumpers linked arms and presented a united front: whatever was happening to the GOP somehow had nothing to do with them, or the Republican party they had spent their professional lives building (Conservative pundits), or spent their professional lives excusing and ignoring (arrogant fucks of the legacy media.) Ergo, what was happening to the GOP must be due to some mysterious, exogenous force which suddenly appeared out of nowhere and which obviously no one could have predicted.
And so, in an act of collective self-protection, the arrogant fucks of the legacy media invented a new thing.
And they called it "Trumpism".
In 1917, Albert Einstein inserted a term called the cosmological constant into his theory of general relativity to force the equations to predict a stationary universe in keeping with physicists' thinking at the time. When it became clear that the universe wasn't actually static, but was expanding instead, Einstein abandoned the constant, calling it the '"biggest blunder" of his life.
THESE DREAM PALACES have taken a beating over the past month. As the scientists would say, they are conceptual models that failed to predict events. But as we try to understand the political and cultural importance ofthe war in IraqTrump's re-election, the question is this: Will they crumble under the weight of undeniable facts? Will the illusions fall, and the political landscape change?
In other words, there will be no magic “Aha!” moment that brings the dream palaces down...
...no day will come when the enemies of this endeavor turn around and say, “We were wrong.BushThe Left was right.”
1) Are all truly "independent" and not just garden variety first-world American crankies who are never satisfied with their choices of anything,
2) Are all "independent" for reasons similar enough to one another that they would naturally cohere as a third party.
3) Are vast enough to create and sustain a viable third party that is markedly different than both the
RepublicansTrumpers and the aforementioned dirty, Commie, America-hating, terrorist-loving, baby-murdering Democrats, and,4) Are credulous enough to quench the greed of an unlimited number of grifters promising them the world.
None of these conditions were true then or ever likely to be true in the foreseeable future, and yet it seemed like every day yet another new "bipartisan group" came out of the woodwork, each promising a Centrist/Independent third way which would stand up to Trump while, at the same time, continuing to rebuke those awful Democrats.
par·ti·san: noun -- a strong supporter of a party, cause, or person.
The Coalition That Isn’tThe administration is trying too hard to prove something that isn’t. By insisting that the “coalition of the willing” is larger, deeper, and wider than is in fact the case, the administration only emphasizes the extent of its own isolation. Only Britain is offering meaningful support.
Take the list coalition countries the White House is updating daily. Sure, there are some important allies aside from Britain—notably Japan, South Korea, Spain, and Italy as well as number of “new” Europeans. But only three countries of these allies are actually contributing combat troops and capabilities (2,000 Australian troops, a Danish submarine and naval escort, and 200 Polish troops and refueling ship)—all in all less than one percent of the total number of troops in the region. The rest of the list is a motley crew of supporters—including such powerhouses as Afghanistan, Albania, Macedonia, Micronesia, the Marshall Islands and Palau.
The Women's March was a worldwide protest on January 21, 2017, the day after the first inauguration of Donald Trump as the president of the United States. It was prompted by Trump's policy positions and rhetoric, which were and are seen as misogynistic and representative as a threat to the rights of women. It was at the time the largest single-day protest in U.S. history, being surpassed 3 years later by the George Floyd protests.
The women’s marches were a phenomenal success and an important cultural moment. Most everybody came back uplifted and empowered. Many said they felt hopeful for the first time since Election Day.
But these marches can never be an effective opposition to Donald Trump.
In the first place, this movement focuses on the wrong issues.
Of course, many marchers came with broad anti-Trump agendas, but they were marching under the conventional structure in which the central issues were clear. As The Washington Post reported, they were “reproductive rights, equal pay, affordable health care, action on climate change.”
These are all important matters, and they tend to be voting issues for many upper-middle-class voters in university towns and coastal cities. But this is 2017...
...globalization, capitalism, adherence to the Constitution, the American-led global order. If you’re not engaging these issues first, you’re not going to be in the main arena of national life.
Instead, the marches offered the pink hats, an anti-Trump movement built, oddly, around Planned Parenthood, and lots of signs with the word “pussy” in them...
The central threat is not the patriarchy.
The central challenge is to rebind a functioning polity and to modernize a binding American idea.
If the anti-Trump forces are to have a chance, they have to offer a better nationalism, with diversity cohering around a central mission, building a nation that balances the dynamism of capitalism with biblical morality.
In a bid to corral the anti-Trump resistance, Bernie Sanders, AOC visit red statesStephanie and Ryan Burnett were perplexed. The crowd was enormous. The line snaked endlessly between buildings. Were they in the right place?
As the mother and son approached an aging college basketball arena in Salt Lake City, the mass of people seemed way too big for the Bernie Sanders rally they were planning to attend in one of the most conservative states in the country.
“We’re not used to that in a place like Utah,” said Ryan, a 28-year-old server and retail manager from South Weber, about 20 miles north of the arena.
Sanders, alongside his fellow progressive champion Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, took his “Fighting Oligarchy” tour deep into Trump territory this week and drew the same types of large crowds they got in liberal and battleground states.
Outside Boise on Monday, the Ford Idaho Center arena was filled to capacity, with staff forced to close the doors after admitting 12,500 people. There are just 11,902 registered Democratic Party voters in Canyon County, where the arena is located, according to the Idaho Secretary of State’s office.
So far, the only real hint of something larger — a mass countermovement — has been the rallies led by Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.
So far, the only real hint of something larger — a mass countermovement — has been the rallies led by Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. But this too is an ineffective way to respond to Trump; those partisan rallies make this fight seem like a normal contest between Democrats and Republicans.
What is happening now is not normal politics. We’re seeing an assault on the fundamental institutions of our civic life, things we should all swear loyalty to — Democrat, independent or Republican.
You will not fail to notice how that one, little word -- "should" -- is doing so much heavy lifting here that it threatens to shatter its spine.
Of course Republicans "should" swear loyalty to the fundamental institutions of our civic life you asshole. But the whole fucking point of the last 40 years -- and especially the last decade -- is that Republicans do not feel loyalty to the fundamental institutions of our civic life. In fact, Republicans have boundless contempt for them and want them put to the torch.
Then Republicans want to dance around the bonfire in orgiastic delight that they can finally, publicly be their true, swinish fascist selves.
Republicans want to revel in the fact that, at last, they have a leader who will not court them for their votes, then turn around and scold them or ignore them or make them them feel ashamed of their bigotry and stupidity. At last they have a leader who will encourages them to burn more, smash more, and scream the "N" word as loud as they damn well please.
This is the ugly reality of the modern Republican party which Never Trumpers like Brooks categorically refuse to face.
Which is why the word "Republican" is only found twice in Brooks' article, in the two paragraphs which I have cited. Whereas "Trump" and "Trumpism" are dropped 26 times: as thick as bird shit on a Grant Park statue.
This is why Brooks' whole plan comes down to wish casting the rise of a
sustained mass movement involving every level of society which will somehow
drive the scourge of Republicanism Trumpism back into the
sewers, while at the same time not be "partisan" in any way.
And of course every night the monkey butlers will regale us with jungle stories.
However, if this imaginary movement does not meet David Brooks' specifications... should it start to, y'know, blame people... or remember stuff... or recognize that the root of all of our problems is that the Republican party is full of Republicans... or fail to, uh, build a nation that balances the dynamism of capitalism with biblical morality, then be forewarned that it is doomed to fail!
Doomed I tells ya!
And if that happens, you can count Mr. David Brooks of The New York Times o-u-t out of your mass uprising.
2 comments:
Thanks. That was worth the wait.
If it isn't obvious. I will say it.
Republican God has exempted republicans from his 10 commandments. They are only for others to obey.
To point to enemies and call them names such as Heathens, Godless, sinners, evil.
Problem is, their God only is for them and no one else is allowed in the GOP religious tree house club. You cannot let woke sinners in your religious club otherwise how do you make enemies out of them to hate on.
Post a Comment