
Act like a man of thought.
Think like a man of action.-- Thomas Mann


Glenn Beck
By Sarah Palin Thursday, Apr. 29, 2010
...
Glenn's like the high school government teacher so many wish they'd had, charting and connecting ideas with chalk-dusted fingers — kicking it old school — instead of becoming just another talking-heads show host. Self-taught, he's become America's professor of common sense...
His love of the Founding Fathers inspires others to learn and respect our nation's history. Best of all, Glenn delights in driving the self-proclaimed powers-that-be crazy. (The whole country awaits the red phone ringing!) Even his critics...have to admire his amazing ability to galvanize everyday Americans to better themselves...
Why MPW Turned Down the Washington Post
Five weeks ago, I received an unsolicited offer from the Washington Post. They asked if they could post my picture and biography on their website and link to every new blog post appearing here if I agreed to produce regular original content for them at their request. I turned them down. Why?
Because they wanted me to work for them for nothing.
The Post is organizing a “local blogging network” linking to selected blogs from their website and asking bloggers to submit original content, which would be edited by them. The Post’s rights to that content would be enforceable under a written agreement. That agreement was written as follows...

"The road to energy innovation is sure to be messy, but the U.S. is going to have to develop energy sources that are plentiful and clean."
"In 1860, Samuel Curtis, a Republican congressman of Iowa, sponsored a bill to create a transcontinental railroad. The debate over that public-private partnership was long and messy. Democrats said the proposal was unconstitutional. Others rightly argued that it meant huge giveaways to the rich.Of course, to make his long, long stretch worth the effort, modern energy policy would have to actually have something more in common with the building of the transcontinental railroad that Bobo's blunt assertions:
But the railroad effort, backed by Abraham Lincoln, swept forward.
..."
"Energy innovation is the railroad legislation of today. This country is studded with venture capitalists, scientists, corporate executives and environmental activists atremble over the great opportunities they see ahead."Which is, of course, nonsense; there simple are no more vast government holdings of public assets to give away to plutocrats, which at its core was what made the Age of Rail possible.
I believe that this nation should commit itself to achieving the goal, before this decade is out, of landing a man on the Moon and returning him safely to the Earth. No single space project in this period will be more impressive to mankind, or more important in the long-range exploration of space; and none will be so difficult or expensive to accomplish.Such a project would need to be capable of moving theory into practice with the priority and zeal of national security crash project.—John F. Kennedy, May 25, 1961
...The Manhattan Project began as a small research program in 1939, which eventually employed more than 130,000 people and cost nearly US$2 billion ($22 billion in present day value). It resulted in the creation of several research and production sites whose construction and operations were secret.
Project research took place at more than 30 sites, including universities, across the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom. The three primary research and production sites of the project were the plutonium-production facility at what is now the Hanford Site in eastern Washington State; the uranium-enrichment facilities at Oak Ridge, Tennessee; and the weapons research and design laboratory now known as Los Alamos National Laboratory. The MED maintained control over U.S. weapons production until the formation of the Atomic Energy Commission in January 1947.
The Roosevelt Administration believed that if private enterprise could not supply electric power to the people, then it was the duty of the government to do so. Most of the court cases involving TVA during the 1930s concerned the government's involvement in the public utilities industry.
...
The earliest ideas for a computer network intended to allow general communications among computer users were formulated by the computer scientist J. C. R. Licklider, of the Bolt, Beranek and Newman (BBN) company, in August 1962, in memoranda discussing his concept for an “Intergalactic Computer Network”. Those ideas contained almost everything that composes the contemporary Internet. In October 1963, at the United States Department of Defense, Licklider was appointed head of the Behavioral Sciences and Command and Control programs, at the Advanced Research Projects Agency — ARPA (the initial ARPANET acronym). He then convinced Ivan Sutherland and Bob Taylor that this computer network concept was very important, meriting development, although he left ARPANET before anyone worked on his concept.
ARPA and Bob Taylor continued their interest in creating such a computer communications network, in part, to allow ARPA-sponsored researchers at various corporate and academic locales to put to use the computers ARPA was providing them, and, in part, to make new software and other computer science results quickly and widely available.


Fury over cop DUI case
'07 CRASH | Officer filmed drinking before fatal accident, but judge throws out evidence
April 28, 2010
BY KIM JANSSEN Staff Reporter kjanssen@suntimes.com
A Chicago cop filmed drinking at least five shots of liquor minutes before he crashed his SUV, killing two young men, could walk free after a Cook County judge ruled that key evidence against him was illegally seized.
In a ruling greeted with fury and anguish by the families of victims Miguel Flores, 22, and Erick Lagunas, 21, Judge Thomas Gainer Jr. found there was "no conspiracy" among Officer John Ardelean's fellow officers to protect him.
It prompted ugly scenes and arrests outside his courtroom as the families clashed with Cook County sheriff's deputies. And it may have fatally damaged the case against 35-year-old Ardelean, who's charged with four counts of aggravated DUI and two counts of reckless homicide in the Thanksgiving Day 2007 deaths.
Video footage from the Martini Ranch Bar showed the officer downing shots just minutes before the crash between Ardelean's SUV and a sedan carrying Flores and Lagunas at the intersection of Damen and Wellington in Roscoe Village.
But Ardelean's attorney, Tom Needham, challenged his arrest because two fellow officers and a sergeant from the Belmont district station where he works and a paramedic said he didn't appear intoxicated at the accident scene.
Prosecutors implied that the officers turned a blind eye.
Ardelean wasn't arrested or given a Breathalyzer test until seven hours after the crash, when the officers' supervisor, Lt. John Magruder, said he noticed Ardelean had bloodshot eyes, smelled of booze and "was walking kind of funny with a limp or something.''
Based on the 0.032 blood alcohol level Ardelean recorded, an expert prosecution witness was due to testify that the officer would have been nearly twice the legal limit of 0.08 at the time of the crash.
But Gainer ruled Magruder did not have probable cause to arrest Ardelean, meaning the Breathalyzer results and expert testimony can't be used.
...
"Some legal experts are questioning a judge's invocation of the 'fighting words' doctrine to acquit three police officers charged with beating businessmen in a bar," Abdon Pallasch wrote in the Sun-Times.
"'Their use of 'fighting words' does not allow police officers or anyone else to beat them up. Police officers confronted by fighting words have a duty to control themselves,' said Indiana University Law Professor Patrick Baude, who argued a 'fighting words' case before the U.S. Supreme Court.
"Criminal Court Judge Thomas Gainer noted in his opinion Tuesday that the police officers claimed one of the businessmen called one of the officers a 'p - - - -' and another of the bus

Official out after alleged DUI in city car
Refused test after rear-ending vehicle at red light
April 22, 2010
BY FRAN SPIELMAN City Hall Reporter/fspielman@suntimes.com
A $119,184-a-year deputy commissioner charged with providing shelter and emergency services for Chicago's homeless has resigned after getting into an accident in a city car while allegedly driving drunk.
On April 15, James V. Lobianco was charged with driving under the influence and failure to reduce speed after rear-ending a car waiting for a red light to change at Broadway and Ainslie.
James V. Lobianco resigned as deputy commissioner in charge of providing shelter and emergency services for Chicago's homeless following an April 15 crash in which he was charged with driving drunk.
No one was injured in the chain-reaction accident. Lobianco was driving a Toyota Prius registered to the city when he hit the car in front of him, causing that vehicle to rear-end another car.
Chicago Police Department spokesman Roderick Drew said responding officers "detected alcohol," but Lobianco "refused the field sobriety test and the Breathalyzer test." He was taken into custody and released the next morning. He is scheduled to appear in court in June.
Lobianco could not be reached for comment.
Ardelean mows down and kills two people, and suddenly on all matters related to checking a suspect's sobriety, the cops come down with a vicious case of whatever is was that Guy Pearce had in "Memento"."Before the crash, Ardelean had spent hours in a River North bar, the Martini Ranch. According to the bartender at the preliminary hearing, Ardelean drank two beers, a rum and coke and a shot of tequila. There were several other shots, but the bartender said they were plain shots of water."
It must have been Plain Shots of Water Night. Dare to drink one, get a second for free...
Well, if you find yourself inside one such confederacy of mediocrity, you will often find that booze is the lubricant that makes the clout engine hum, because it always has been, and for some very practical reasons. People can end up end up doing or saying very stupid things when they're drunk, and that can end up being very useful to the young executive on the make, or the low-wattage boss who needs leverage.
- In your workplace, do eager, stupid flatterers get ahead, or do the competent and able?
- Are excellence and creativity welcomed, or driven out with pointed sticks like a rabid dog made of mercury fulminate?
- Are relationships and personal information are the coin of the realm?
Huge NASA Science Balloon Crashes in Australian Outback
This story was updated at 10:51 a.m. EDT.
A huge NASA balloon loaded with a telescope painstakingly built to scan the sky at wavelengths invisible to the human eye crashed in the Australian outback Thursday, destroying the astronomy experiment and just missing nearby onlookers, according to Australian media reports.
In dramatic video released by the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC), the giant 400-foot (121-meter) balloon is seen just beginning to lift its payload, then the telescope gondola appears to unexpectedly come loose from its carriage. The telescope crashes through a fence and overturn a nearby parked sport utility vehicle before finally stopping.
...
View Ask the Editor Questions
Ask the Editor provides answers, clarification and guidance on style issues that go beyond the pages of the AP Stylebook. Before posing a question to AP editor David Minthorn, search the accompanying style archives for your topic. With thousands of questions and answers on file, your topic has very likely been covered. For typical style questions and responses, visit Ask the Editor FAQ.
...
Q. In re the recent style update on Web, website, Web feed --- my colleagues and I do not understand the difference between terms like website, webcam and webmaster being downcase and 1 word, and terms like Web feed and Web page being uppercase and 2 words. Can you please explain the logic here? Seems to us that all common "web" terms should be the same, but ... Thanks in advance. – from Escondido,, CA on Wed, Apr 21, 2010
A. Compounds are lowercase: website, webcam, webmaster, webinar, etc. Certain other terms remain two words, cap-W for the proper noun, in AP usage: the Web and Web page.
...

‘Epistemic Closure’? Those Are Fighting Words
By PATRICIA COHEN
It is hard to believe that a phrase as dry as “epistemic closure” could get anyone excited, but the term has sparked a heated argument among conservatives in recent weeks about their movement’s intellectual health.
The phrase is being used as shorthand by some prominent conservatives for a kind of closed-mindedness in the movement, a development they see as debasing modern conservatism’s proud intellectual history. First used in this context by Julian Sanchez of the libertarian Cato Institute, the phrase “epistemic closure” has been richocheting among conservative publications and blogs as a high-toned abbreviation for ideological intolerance and misinformation.
Conservative media, Mr. Sanchez wrote at juliansanchez.com — referring to outlets like Fox News and National Review and to talk-show stars like Rush Limbaugh, Mark R. Levin and Glenn Beck — have “become worryingly untethered from reality as the impetus to satisfy the demand for red meat overtakes any motivation to report accurately.” (Mr. Sanchez said he probably fished “epistemic closure” out of his subconscious from an undergraduate course in philosophy, where it has a technical meaning in the realm of logic.)
As a result, he complained, many conservatives have developed a distorted sense of priorities and a tendency to engage in fantasy, like the belief that President Obama was not born in the United States or that the health care bill proposed establishing “death panels.”
...

1. It turns out that they have been wrong about almost everything for most of their adult lives.
2. Even worse, it turns out that the Evil Liberals on whom they declared total, no-defeat/no-surrender war decades ago have been right for most of their adult lives.
3. Realizing that three decades of playing drum major for the shoutycracker brigade has left them with no marketable skills, these staunch champions of rugged individualism and ruthless meritocracy really, really, really want to hang onto their cushy sinecures as Respected Conservative Public Intellectuals despite the fact that facts 1 and 2 prove them to be almost uniquely incompetent to hold those positions. Their situation takes on an extra patina of panicky urgency when you consider the utter shambles that the Conservative Great Recession has made of the job market.
Ironic, no?
4. They obviously lied on their Respected Conservative Public Intellectuals resume, answering "yes" to the question about whether they had seen and comprehended "Fantasia", when obviously they had not.


“People who make it into the establishment work and play well with others. They are part of the same overlapping social networks, and inevitably begin to perceive the world in similar, conventional ways. They thrive in institutions where people are not rewarded for being cantankerous…”
“In this drama, in other words, the establishment was pleasant, respectable and stupid, while the contrarians were smart but hard to love, and sometimes sleazy.”For some reason, the David Brooks makes no mention of ideological provenance of the orgy of radical deregulation that caused our long-stable financial system to suddenly become as prone to being ripped to pieces by packs of jackals as a hobbled goat staked out at a watering hole.






The Mustache of Understanding:
I’ve been trying to understand the Tea Party Movement. Sounds like a lot of angry people who want to get the government out of their lives and cut both taxes and the deficit. Nothing wrong with that — although one does wonder where they were in the Bush years. Never mind. I’m sure like all such protest movements the Tea Partiers will get their 10 to 20 percent of the vote. But should the Tea Partiers actually aspire to break out of that range, attract lots of young people and become something more than just entertainment for Fox News, I have a suggestion:
Become the Green Tea Party.
I’d be happy to design the T-shirt logo and write the manifesto. The logo is easy. It would show young Americans throwing barrels of oil imported from Venezuela and Saudi Arabia into Boston Harbor.
The manifesto is easy, too: “We, the Green Tea Party, believe that the most effective way to advance America’s national security and economic vitality would be to impose a $10 “Patriot Fee” on every barrel of imported oil, with all proceeds going to pay down our national debt.”
They weren’t around protesting during the Bush years BECAUSE THE TEA PARTY IS REPUBLICANS. They don’t care about the deficit. They care that a Democrat (and a black “Muslim,” to boot), is in the White House. They don’t care about fiscal restraint, they care that a Democrat is in the White House.
...



1. Failure in or neglect of duty or obligation; dereliction; default: delinquency in payment of dues.
2. Wrongful, illegal, or antisocial behavior.
3. Something, as a debt, that is past due or otherwise delinquent.




Strategy without tactics
Is the slowest route to victory.
Tactics without strategy
Is the noise before defeat.-- Sun Tzu

"In these columns I try to give voice to a philosophy you might call progressive conservatism. "
...
"This general philosophy puts me to the left of where the Republican Party is now, and to the right of the Democratic Party. It puts me in that silly spot on the political map, the center, or a step to the right of it."
...
"One of the odd features of the Democratic Party is its inability to learn what politics is about. It’s not about winning arguments. It’s about deciding which arguments you are going to have. In the first year of the Obama administration, the Democrats, either wittingly or unwittingly, decided to put the big government-versus-small government debate at the center of American life.
"Just as America was leaving the culture war and the war war, the Democrats thrust it back into the government war, only this time nastier and with higher stakes."
...
"This produced the Tea Party Movement — a characteristically raw but authentically American revolt led by members of the yeoman enterprising class."
...
"The Democrats have become the government party and the Republicans are the small government party. The stale, old debate is back with a fury."
I find myself in agreement with David Brooks' column this morning on how - unwittingly - the Obama administration was forced into the kind of big government action required to cope with several huge crises, after years of negligence and drift. I can see how easy it was for the FNC-RNC to wheel out their exhausted tropes of anti-government rhetoric and for Paul Krugman, say, to wheel out his own pro-government radicalism.And thus does all dialogue on the Right descend ever further into Farce.
...
Ross reax here to D-wayne's synthesis of the NRO's depiction of Junebug's analysis of the latest epistemic hairball coughed up by Ambers to my response to K-Lo's crybaby post on the Zak-meister's latest take-down of ...it is difficult to unwind the smothering insiderhood and suss out anything useful other than...
A) It is one, monumental, self-indulgent, self-absolving circle-jerk and,The inhabitants of Centrism Island rule nothing.
B) No matter how far Right the whole circus has traveled in the last 30 years, somehow, the Vile Liberals are still Big Gummint villains and are still always, miraculously responsible for more than half of any given problem.
...
These are the same people who have told us to our faces for three decades that Government Is The Problem. That everything from health to food to oil to torture to coal mines needs to be completely deregulated. That Social Security needs to be eliminated.
That government must be annihilated.
So, BoBo, why in the fuck would a party of looters be interested in oiling the hinges on the vault door?
But that isn’t what’s interesting here.
What’s interesting is, yet again, the Dog that Didn’t Bark in the Night.
What BoBo is NOT suggesting.
The farrago of moral decomposition and indefensibly wretched excess that is the woof and warp of the GOP has been allowed to metastasize to such a scope and scale and worm into the belly of the body politic to a deeper level than the likes of Jim Wright and Dan Rostenkowski ever fucking dreamed of for one reason.
Because your criminals hide behind Christ, Bobo.
It is no accident that shoulder-to-shoulder with a mob-wannabe thug like Abramoff stood pillars of the Christian Right like Tom DeLay and Ralph “Satan’s Babyfaced Fingerfood” Reed.
In the past, Democrats -- like anyone else -- can and have become corrupt, and can and have been punished for it.
Severely.
The thing that makes the Republican Party different is not the rot in their hearts – which is capacious – and their seething hatred of the Brown Poor – which they rationalize away into the mists of market theory.
No what makes them worse – lethally worse – is their Fundamentalist Ideology.
Period.
Because when you are lining your pockets with House postage stamps, you’re just a crook and we’re all sinners here. But when you believe that God Has Chosen Your Party…you can justify any excesses.
When you have grown besotted on the grotesque perversion of the teachings of Jesus that is Conservative Christian Fundamentalism – when you cast yourself as the righteous Christian Soldiers at war with the Evil Liberal Humanists – then all things are permitted.
When you wrap your dick in the Flag and the Bible, then you can fuck anyone and anything any way you like because you believe that God is on your side.
You can justify an illegal war.
You can justify torture.
You can justify murder.
You can justify shredding the Constitution.
You can justify demanding your fucktard superstition trump science.
You can justify impeaching my President for trivia and letting your President skate over treason.
You can justify blaming Columbine on condoms and teaching evolution.
You can justify bombing Family Planning Clinics.
You can justify lynching.
You can justify blaming 9/11 on gays and feminists and the ACLU.
You can justify blaming hurricanes on liberals.
You can justify assassination.
You can justify calling liberal judges a greater threat to America than Nazis and terrorists.
You can justify turning women back into the reproductive chattel of men.
And having swallowed all of those camels, you certainly won’t strain at a few gnats like graft, corruption, extortion, blackmail and all the rest…because all of these things are simply means to the ends of the Greater Glory of the Prince of Peace!
And your Party is the one that is so fucking Blessed and Highly Favored in His eyes, right?
Mr. Brooks, these people are the problem and these people run your party. And what the fuck kind of congenital cerebral malfunction do you have that you cannot see that?
...



"...was a little gob-smacked when Mitch McConnell simply said that the financial regulation bill was another bank bailout. But I found it fascinating as a glimpse into the RNC-FNC mojo. The idea is simply to lie about legislation and hope that FNC and the system designed for epistemic closure on the right would carry the day. Even if it is untrue - death panels, etc - it can become true for one half of the political system that has abandoned any relationship to the reality of hard choices, as opposed to the fantasy of some kind of 1950s nirvana."
A) Had already been using a vastly superior and vastly more elegantly integrated version of the same technology for years and years...
B) Had already wasted endless, fruitless hours of their lives at show-and-tell-and-shout trying to convince their dull-witted DOS-addicted fellow citizens of the supremacy of the graphical user interface.

The Dead Still Walk
...
The Irish dead still talk
A lot in this city.
The fog is like cigar smoke
At the foot of the lake,
And Richard J. Daley
Could always see through
The smoke.
Every wink, every nod,
Every smirk
Turned into highways,
Skyscrapers and bridges.
"I'm a kid from the stockyards--
I'll stand with you."
And he did.
Then the Irish
Licked the frosting,
Ate the cake
And sold the
Plate.
Who built the pyramids?
Mayor Daley built the pyramids.
(Everybody knows dat.)
FOP president: Mayor Daley lacks loyalty, respect for cops
April 19, 2010
BY FRAN SPIELMAN City Hall Reporter
Fraternal Order of Police President Mark Donahue accused Mayor Daley today of demonstrating a “lack of loyalty and respect” for Chicago Police officers with his “flippant and erratic” response to an arbitrator’s ruling on the new police contract.
“Those advising the mayor on what he should or should not do or say need to step up and tell the Emperor he is truly naked,” Donahue wrote in a Letter to the Editor of the Chicago Sun-Times.
“His statements demonstrate his lack of integrity in labor relations, his woeful misunderstanding of the negotiations for this contract, as well as his lack of loyalty and respect for Chicago Police officers. … This mayor has once again driven a wedge between himself and organized labor with his flippant and erratic remarks.”
Chicago taxpayers dodged a fiscal bullet last week when rank-and-file police officers were awarded a ten percent pay hike over five years, their smallest increase in nearly three decades.
The pay raise fell short of the 16.1 percent Daley once offered and even shorter of the 24 percent the FOP initially demanded.
Daley responded to the city’s victory by urging officers bitterly disappointed in their pay raise not to blame him for the 16.1 percent their union leaders left on the table.
“If I agreed to 16 percent, they had my word on 16 percent. But, union officials must have not trusted [it]. I’m their kicking boy. In order to make their members mad at me, they have to kick me around. I understand that. That’s how it works. They make me the bad guy. But, I’m not the bad guy in this situation,” the mayor said Friday.
On Monday, Donahue fired back with verbal guns blazing.
He argued that the mayor’s “incoherent words” demonstrated his “total ignorance” of what actually happened in the negotiations.
Donahue maintained that it was Daley who pulled the offer off the table in March, 2009 “before it had even been discussed,” arguing that taxpayers could no longer afford the increase at a time when the city was hemorrhaging revenue.
The decision so infuriated the rank-and-file, 4,000 officers marched around City Hall chanting, “Daley sucks.”
“To say that the union didn’t let their members know of the offer defies the fact that all city offers were posted on the union website,” Donahue wrote.
...


Suspended Daley aide lands new six-figure gig at police department
Posted by John Byrne at 5:22 p.m.
Ex-city Fleet Commissioner Michael Picardi, suspended by City Hall this year after an embarrassing contracting mistake, has landed a new $129,000-a-year job with the Chicago Police Department.
As a deputy director, Picardi will oversee the police department's general support division, which includes the city auto pound, equipment and supply, and document services and graphics, according to police department spokesman Roderick Drew.
The new gig comes after Mayor Richard Daley suspended Picardi without pay for three months in January for contracts involving Central Auto Body in the Logan Square neighborhood. The shop's owner, John Szybkowski, was convicted nearly 30 years ago of faking work orders on police department vehicles and giving kickbacks to city workers. Yet that didn't stop him from getting a new city contract.
…
This isn't the first time Picardi has switched city jobs amid criticism.
…

The End Of The BlackBerry Elite
Dan Woods
In many companies, smartphones are status symbols. Senior executives and key staff are armed with BlackBerrys or other premium smartphones to accelerate communication.
But when the "BlackBerry elite" started years ago, most companies did not allow executives to use their BlackBerrys for personal calls and e-mails as well, and this forced executives to carry two phones.
In recent years companies have extended mobile phone privileges to rank-and-file workers, but the two-phone scenario has been unappealing to most. The solution: Let workers use one phone for both company and personal business. And now that smartphones are relatively inexpensive and many workers own one, companies are encouraging employees to use their personal phones for work. One retail executive told me that most of his employees were eager to use their personal phones to stay in touch with work e-mail, and some workers could be reimbursed for their phone and texting charges.
Increasingly, companies are attempting to bring personally owned smartphones into the fold of corporate IT, which in practice usually means providing access to MS Exchange or Lotus Notes. This fits into the vision of Organic IT in which corporate IT is delivered through personal technology.
...
