Most of you know the joke, and probably know it has a dozen variations. Some versions are about two young kids -- one an extreme pessimist, the other an extreme optimist -- others are just about the optimist.
For the sake of brevity, we'll go with the single, very optimistic kid version.
William Brangham [host]: Yes, but, David, this gets to a point that journalists — a very difficult issue for a lot of journalists, which is, how do you represent this slice of the country, the MAGA slice of America, that believe fervently in the things that they believe, but yet it's very difficult to have a conversation with people if you can't even agree on simple facts, like who was legitimately elected?David Brooks: Yes. This is a problem decades in the making. So when I started as a police reporter in Chicago, there were tons of working-class guys there, and I guess, in my case, they tended to be guys, but they had no college degree. It became over the course of the decades that if you wanted to work in journalism, you had to have a college degree.And suddenly we're just slicing off the majority of the country, basically. And so those people felt their voice wasn't heard. And then so there's this populist revolt, and then now you have got a lot of people who are supportive of Donald Trump, but who violate our standards. They don't want to live up to the standards of just basic modesty or just honesty. We're just going to respect the truth.
For the record, to my knowledge, over the course of his entire career, Mr. Brooks has never lived up to basic standards of honesty or respect for the truth for three days running. But do please continue, Mr. Brooks.
David Brooks: I do think there are a lot of people out there who would fit both bills, who are good journalists and support Donald Trump... I think they're out there. We just have to work harder, I think. I still think we have to work harder to find those people and give them — so their voices are heard.
David Brooks: There's a fine magazine called "Compact" magazine that's more populist. There's a place called the Claremont Institute in California that's more populist.
I know nothing about "Compact" magazine other than Glenn Greenwald has found safe harbor there. But the Claremont Institute?
The fucking Claremont Institute?
That's Brooks' idea of a Trump-supporting outfit that lives up to Brooks' ideals of "basic modesty... honesty...respect the truth."
In the interest of fairness and basic modesty, I'm going to sit my Liberal ass down and let a 30-year veteran of Conservative media who is no friend of this blog, tell you all about the fucking Claremont Institute.
Ready?
My latest:
— Charlie Sykes (@SykesCharlie) October 17, 2021
Once one of the most prestigious bastions of conservative thought, Claremont now spends its time putting lipstick on the Trumpian wildebeest. https://t.co/s6rwbiPDsv
---> Meet the Obscure Think Tank Powering Trump’s Biggest Lies (Claremont, of course)https://t.co/WO8JZFnI3K via @vicenews
— Charlie Sykes (@SykesCharlie) November 5, 2021
---> Meet the Obscure Think Tank Powering Trump’s Biggest Lies (Claremont, of course)https://t.co/WO8JZFnI3K via @vicenews
— Charlie Sykes (@SykesCharlie) November 5, 2021
This is the new Claremont: pic.twitter.com/qldla8WVhk
— Charlie Sykes (@SykesCharlie) March 27, 2021
Claremont Institute prez endorses fake J6 conspiracy theory... even after it's been debunked, ridiculed, and shredded.
— Charlie Sykes (@SykesCharlie) November 21, 2023
Staying "over the target"! https://t.co/pYZ5ctXpw7
On this @BulwarkOnline Podcast, @gabeschoenfeld and @monacharenEPPC discuss the derangement of the conservative mind.... including what just happened at the Claremont Institute...https://t.co/aPsH3W1kFQ pic.twitter.com/0W2g4KhPVp
— Charlie Sykes (@SykesCharlie) July 15, 2019
And just for fun, a few other conservatives who are no friends of this blog weight in:
oof, this final paragraph from the Washington Post story on the odious Claremont Institute:https://t.co/Zu7U317O2G pic.twitter.com/E78IH8FscM
— Tom Nichols (@RadioFreeTom) July 24, 2022
"Jack Posobiec ― a Trump supporter who pushed the debunked Pizzagate conspiracy theory . . ." They forgot to add Claremont fellow. https://t.co/WddObqrkSv
— Mona Charen (@monacharen) November 7, 2019
Alternate headline to this fine piece:
— Bill Kristol (@BillKristol) August 11, 2023
The Claremont Institute—even worse than you think. https://t.co/nTVqkgN19J
Conserative David Brooks remains pot-committed to the lie that there are are still honest, sensible people within MAGA Right institutions because that lie reassures the Both Siderist invertebrates who are his core audience.
Conservative Never Trumpers loathe MAGA Right institutions for driving them out and selling out to Trump.
And oh how I would love to see these two groups collide on a debate stage somewhere that sells popcorn by the barrel.
By the way, today is my 19th blogiversary, so if you are inclined to support Liberal media...
2 comments:
Maybe Brooks is stocking food in a dead-end Claremont bunker so he has a place to retreat to.
Brooks has been able to smear the Walkers blood and guts all over him to last a while more and mingle through the Zombie Horde.
At some point, the smeared on innards of the zombies wears off and makes him vulnerable.
I grantee you, there is NO MAGA that reads Brooks' imaginative creation of the softer more pleasant side of the NAZI take over.
How Brooks can romance the covens heating up at America GOP Auschwitz.
Ah, the smell of burning corpses in the morning.......
Post a Comment