Tuesday, August 09, 2022

Hugh Hewitt, Andrew Yang and "One Legal Expert" Walk Into a Bar Exam


Dear Future Historians.

On this day in the Year of Our Lord 2022 the Washington Post's Cyborg Sent From the Future to Destroy America (tm)  ... 

... retweeted the latest in a long, long line of Third Party grifters  ... 

... citing a lone, anonymous "legal expert" quoted in Tiger Beat on the Potomac (h/t Brother Charles Pierce) that Murrica is in turrible, turrible danger --



-- because law enforcement executed a legal search warrant to retrieve stolen classified documents from the home of a notorious criminal and traitor.  

Yes, after weeks of vapid fan-dancing and buzz-wording, the Forward Party has finally staked out a position on something.  And that something is their approval of Donald Trump wiping his ass with the rule of law.  

It was very on-brand for everyone concerned.



No Half Measures

4 comments:

Kevin Holsinger said...

Good morning, Mr. Glass.

Photoshops for Trump concerning the raid:

1. Scarface and his little friend.
2. Gandalf realizes the orcs are moving in Moria.
3. Breaking Bad finale (never saw the show)?

Best to you and your loved ones.

Unknown said...

Andrew Yang: Objectively pro-crime. (which is what trump did taking those documents)

But it's useless to expect a libertarian to understand the niceties of living under the rule of law, instead of the rule of men.

joejimtree said...

Andrew Yang: I wonder if Orban would support my fun party. He's not Putin, and there should be room in our discourse for people like that, and I think we shouldn't hold grudges so much if it gets me six months of attention.

Robt said...

Foreword right wing soldiers

When moving to the independent gated community where no fig leaf's for right wingers who haven't quite fully transformed to the Zombie horde and still have a few working brain cells that haven;t died yet. That know how easily visible they are in the Independent party but still rather be a Russian than a Democrat.

If these Forward party candidates cannot appeal in any of the other parties. What makes them think creating their own will make them more appealing and trust worthy?