Because Mona Charen has been an influential, just-below-the-radar, hard-core Conservative for decades, and because despite being a Never Trumper, she hasn't upgraded her basic Conservative operating system one iota, this bit should come as no surprise to anyone.
Charen: ...and that... that is what the Republican Party is saying is fine. That they are okay with that... that... that... from now on our elections will be decided, uh, by who has a bigger gang, uh, of thugs who can come and intimidate the Congress while it's counting the votes. And this time most of them were not armed, but next time who's to say.
Charen: ...isn't this, I mean the... the, so, the parlous state of the Republican party -- and Linda [Chavez]'s you know, I totally second what Linda said about it being much bigger than the Republican party. It's a danger to the country. Um, but in light of that doesn't this sort of cry out for the Democratic party to, um, reign in its own extremists so that they can be appealing to people in the middle and not, y'know, and not have those people fleeing into the arms of a completely irresponsible party, namely the Republicans.
Aristocrats who had been run out of their out of their country by the serfs they had exploited.Aristocrats who suddenly found themselves financially dependent on the largess of people they detested.Aristocrats who, with that special, asshole-arrogance that comes with an inbred sense of entitlement, become indignant when their hosts don't snap to and do as they're told.Aristocrats who still believe in their God-given right to command a national spotlight and who go right on airily insisting they know what the serfs really want.
Damon Linker: Uh well sure. I mean there are certain parallels between the two parties. They each have, uh, a restive base, uh, that is demanding certain things that aren't really, I think, in the interest of the country.driftglass: Really Mr. Linker? Really? What exactly is the "restive" Democratic base asking for that is not in the interest of the country? Student loan debt forgiveness? Affordable healthcare? Help with child care? Serious action on the dire climate crisis? Criminal justice reform? Sensible gun control? And beyond Owning!The!Libs!, overturning the 2020 election, memory holing the 01/06/2021 armed GOP insurrection and enacting Jim Crow 2.0 voter suppression legislation across the country, what exactly does the GOP base want?
Linker: ...although the difference is that 70 percent, as we keep saying, of the Republican Party believes a complete, delusional fantasy about reality whereas on the Democratic side it's something like maybe 20 percent to 30 at the most of the party is sort of involved in a sort of quasi-religious activist mindset.driftglass: It's 91% of the GOP that are irredeemably nuts, and 7% of registered Democrats who believe Biden has Secret Green Lantern powers that he is refusing to use to pass legislation, but OK...Linker: Uh and then, of course, Biden is doing all kinds of things in economic policy that some people in the centrist... in the center... aren't entirely comfortable with...driftglass: Which people? What "center"?
Linker: ...but I don't think that part of it is really comparable. Um, and so the Republicans, I think, are definitely the more dangerous of the two. And I mean, you ask... you ask the Biden administration your question and they would say, "We're already doing that. "We're governing responsibly. We you know we have this economic agenda, it seems to be pretty popular in the polls. And so, y'know, those sensible Republicans who have decided rightly that their party has gone off the deep end, they can come right over to us right now! We're happy to have them!" Um, so I'm not sure what the incentive structure is for Democrats to do much more than they already have and blow up their own electoral coalition as a result.
Charen: You know you might have thought that after Trump is out of office, having been denied his platforms on social media, um, that this was an opportunity for the elites in the party and for the party in general to, um, begin to distance themselves from Trump and, um, and so that it seems to me if... if there had been other people who, uh, who followed [Liz Cheney's] lead it might have made a difference. Look, y'know, the... the sure there's a big problem with the base. But... but the base takes its cues from elites, let's face it. The elites they happen to follow the most slavishly are people like Tucker Carlson, um, but... but the elites matter...
What you will never hear GOP aristocrats like Mona Charen admit is that, by her own definition of "elites" -- people from whom the base of the party takes its cues -- for the last 30 years the Republican party's most important "elites" by far have been men like Rush Limbaugh, Newt Gingrich, Jerry Falwell and the many, many political and media imitators they spawned. These are the people who codified the language of rage, racism, paranoia and reflexive, unhinged contempt for Democrats as the GOP's mother tongue. Who taught an entire generation of of Conservative voters and politicians that compromise was betrayal, that the press was the enemy and that they should never, ever trust anyone who told them anything they didn't want to hear.
In other words, party aristocrats knew about the monster that was growing in their basement. Of course they knew, because how could all these lords and ladies of the GOP who have been wired into Republican politics for decades possibly not know. Turn on AM radio anywhere in the country at any point in the past 30 years and you knew instantly what the base was thinking. Look who the party credited with its 1994 sweep to power -- whose approval party leaders were forced to grovel for whenever they stepped out of line -- and you knew instantly who the party "elites" really were.
And while Liberals warned that the GOP was setting something dark and terrible at the throat of our democracy -- something the GOP would never be able to control-- party aristocrats like Mona Charen dismissed such warnings as alarmist crackpottery and were perfectly content with this arrangement until it was far too late.
And while neither Limbaugh nor Falwell nor Gingrich are name-checked during the balance of this podcast, it's clear that, among themselves, the people gathered around these microphones have a pretty clear idea that the real problem with the Republican party is that it's full of Republicans.
David French [podcast guest]: ...But now I got to agree about the base. I mean the base, right now, I mean if you're gonna... I was talking to somebody who's very well plugged-into the, uh, Williamson County Republican -- I'm in Williamson County, Tennessee. Williamson County, Tennessee is kind of a piggy bank of the GOP. It's a very, very Red place. I did that little New York Times tool where you were trying to figure out what kind of bubble you're in and 85 [percent?] of my neighbors are Republicans. And I found out from talking to these folks who are very plugged-in that people are furious at Marsha Blackburn. Furious, why? Because she didn't do more. She didn't do more to save Trump in the election.
French: And so a lot of a lot of these guys will say to you, "What do you want me to do? Because if I stand against trump I'm done. I'm going to be replaced and do you think this is good for the country? I'll be replaced by Lauren Boebert. I'll be replaced by Matt... y'know Madison Cawthorne. I'll be replaced by Marjorie Taylor Green, and is that going to be great for America? No." So on the one hand you've got to have leadership, but on the other hand you also have a giant base problem.
Bill Galston: Very briefly Mona, uh, I guess I disagree with you about the extent to which elite opinion has governed the transition to Trump and is ensuring the non-transition away from Trump. Uh, on my reading, Donald Trump won the Republican primary in 2016 because he was saying what the base wanted to hear. Uh, and nobody was directing them to ratify Trump's message.
Galston: They did it on their own. They then proceeded for four years -- all four years of the Trump presidency -- to give him unswerving support even in the face of events that would have toppled anyone else. So no, I don't think this is a question of what the elites are thinking or doing. I think it's a question of what the rank and file has come to believe for reasons that I've spent years trying to understand...
10 comments:
And beyond Owning!The!Libs!, overturning the 2020 election, memory holing the 01/06/2021 armed GOP insurrection and enacting Jim Crow 2.0 voter suppression legislation across the country, what exactly does the GOP base want?
Whatever it is, it cannot be achieved legislatively.
Not to be too selectively pointed for her. As this statement.
"Um, but in light of that doesn't this sort of cry out for the Democratic party to, um, reign in its own extremists so that they can be appealing to people in the middle and not, y'know, and not have those people fleeing into the arms of a completely irresponsible party, namely the Republicans".
It stands out and apart from any point of reason.
She becomes a never Trumper. Her entire republican party worship the Chosen one and the party submits to a Party dictator. Ignores all the lawlessness of their Trump while committing lawlessness as a political majority in Congress.
But tax cuts, De regulation, Ending annoying kneeling football players.. Colluding with Russia, Extorting Ukraine and organizing an insurrection. and for Trump and the GOP. But it is not only D,C, GOP. Observing the big GOP government control at the state levels is not indictive of the party.
"her answer to remedy is, If Democrats do not become republicans. Democrats will be responsible for the GOP?
When Independent was a haven for GOP ashamed consciences for their projected immoralities and failures by their control of government. Only when they lose control, Mind you!
Never Trumper is still republican. But republicans are telling the world a republican like Cheney is not a republican. Never Trumper cannot be a republican. She cannot be independent minded enough to become a independent .
Independents do not represent (enough) white supremacy, elite wealth rule). Freedom is a failure because they aren't free enough to own other people. That "we the People" thing in the Preamble is anti republican and in your face.
I think it is time to clearly define Never Trumpism.
For these folks of the Never Trumpism are chameleons and shape shifters..
Linker: Uh and then, of course, Biden is doing all kinds of things in economic policy that some people in the centrist... in the center... aren't entirely comfortable with...
driftglass: Which people? What "center"?
The center between Never Trumpers and Trumpeteers.
The center between republican and conservative.
When a republican names where the center is just know it is in the realm of the GOP Tri-Fecta between zombie hungry, cannibalisms and witch burning barrages.
Trump is a floating end of the GOP spectrum and because of this variable. A center claimed by republicans is mathematically impossible.
Very nice. The Russian aristocrats nails it.
It's hard to give up that sweet sweet taste
of entitlement, isn't it?
With all the yelling about "freedumb!" and the Second Amendment
these days, it's well to remember that the Russian Revolution
didn't really result in communism but in Stalin's dictatorship.
By the way what ever happened to those Menshevik guys?
Might be some Never Trumper lessons there.
Reading these missives from a government in exile, I get the feeling they honestly don't understand what happened. Sure they helped shovel the red meat to some degree, and sure they had to playact apologies to their media prima donnas from time to time, but it was all an act, and the machine would keep running, and the grown-up had their hands firmly on the levers. It's as if they woke up one morning and all the Grups were gone, leaving feral children jerking the levers and smashing the governors on the machine. They realize something has happened, but they don't know what it is.
My def'n.: the aristocrat is who exacts the border between morality and immorality, inside which border they always set themselves.
That brain is built of self-righteous neurons only.
But to my point...
Many (thousands) times I listened to Rash Lamebrain as I would defend massmedia from his tripe and kind.
I can name his sins, inequities and infamy.
Crimes too.
Now this is happening: His idiotic imitators are displaying him in a glass case, claiming the body is alive (as USSR did with Stalin's corpse until Duma said 'time to move on, bury him'), and doing daily mouth to mouth attempted resuscitation. Especially iHeart radio -- their golden-egg ghoul died.
No, srsly, the programming still goes. Krissy Hines's bassman walks in the open, bum-bum-bum'ing the top of each hour. Then some 'guest ghost' you never heard mops the mic in that AM-radio tin tenor, "We got Rash here for you, just offstage in a refrigerated booth and he'll speak to you on a live mic, a little later."
Then the ghost wags through a ten-minute segue setup slosh to get to punch up some 2 minutes of dated Lamebrain sfx -- 'he's alive!, on-air!, the oracle speaks!' -- like preachers leading preachees to open their scriptures and turn to Rash2005, 5:17, or something. Each quarter hour is scaffold under a 2-min clip of ol' Big Fat Idiot. (He never recovered from Franken's smashmouth.) Rash 'holding-back' Lamebrain is still dead.
But the show does go on. They sound like necrophilic idiots.
[ perhaps gives new meaning to bodcast 🙄 ]
I think Mona Charen's plan for a nice life worked out well. She has some minor celerity recognized a bit by millions of people and being married to a DC lawyer probably some wealth with a lot of very nice things and gets all the social deference that implies.
I am not sure how one can say the plans didn't work out.
For Charen I think the plan worked fine. She's a modestly famous denizen of the Imperial Capital married to lawyer, probably ensconced in a nice Georgetown or equestrian exurb home filled with nice things. I'm guessing an Audi and a Volvo in the garage.
"And party aristocrats like Mona Charen choking on ..."
A talent agent is sitting at his desk. An all-American family of Republicans comes into the office -- a father, a mother, a daughter & son with a little dog tagging along. He askes the family what type of act a Republicans family does...[I'll spare you since you already know what happens next] . . .
. . . a few minutes later, following their performance & after the stage is covered in blood & piss & shit [and, well you know what else]
. . .the agent looks at the Republicans family (with their clothes torn off, their orifices bleeding & dripping & the dog (well, you already know what happened to the dog),
. . . and the agent asks this filthy, perverted family of vicious sodomites "what do you call that?
The Republican's mother & father say "THE ARISTOCRATS!"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4PgAkBZRJSY
Cheez Whiz said "It's as if they woke up one morning and all the Grups were gone, leaving feral children jerking the levers and smashing the governors on the machine. They realize something has happened, but they don't know what it is."
There never has been an "end game" except for power and money, and looking for whatever way leads to either one or both the quickest. Think of their motto this way "be verwee verwee quiet, we're hunting wabitts (power and money)."
I think that they think Tump's grifto-hucksterism fucktobia is just fine. He just gets caught a lot that's all, and they are just honky-dory with that. Democracy is just an inconvenience to them getting to the money and power. They don't seem to realize that the Democracy/republic is the thing that brought them the power and money in the first place.
As Forrest Gump quoted his mom: "stupid is as stupid does" The repubs have stupid on speed dial. A dangerous form of stupid, never forget.
Post a Comment