Thursday, May 16, 2019

The Abolition of Slavery Has Never Been Popular In The State of Alabama



Sorry, that's a typo.  What I meant to say is that civil rights have never been popular in the state of Alabama.

Sorry, that's another typo.  What I meant to say is that voting rights have never been popular in the state of Alabama.

Jebus.  Sorry again  That's yet another typo.  What is wrong with me today?  What I meant to say is that interracial marriage has never been popular in the state of Alabama. From Wikipedia:
In 1967, 17 Southern states (all the former slave states plus Oklahoma) still enforced laws prohibiting marriage between whites and non-whites. Maryland repealed its law in response to the start of the proceedings at the Supreme Court. After the ruling of the Supreme Court, the remaining laws were no longer enforceable. Nonetheless, it took South Carolina until 1998 and Alabama until 2000 to amend their states' constitutions to remove language prohibiting miscegenation. In the respective referendums, 62% of voters in South Carolina and 59% of voters in Alabama voted to make the amendments. In Alabama nearly 526,000 people voted against the amendment, including a majority of voters in some rural counties.
I am so sorry.  That's actually two typos.  Let me pause and compose myself.  Deep breath.

What Tucker Carlson meant to say is that abortion has never been popular in the state of Alabama.


However, do you know what is popular in the state of Alabama?

Fox News.

Which is why maybe we as a nation need to make sure that a few atavistic, Fundamentalist dungheaps like Alabama and a few screwheads from the Confederate States' Ministry of Public Enlightenment and Propaganda like Tucker Carlson have no say in our public discourse about women's health and reproductive rights.

Because if they are allowed to seize control of national policy, this is what the future looks like.



Behold, a Tip Jar!


7 comments:

Robt said...

Alabama is going to have to monitor all females of their state when breed able.

The law calls for criminal prosecution for any woman leaving the state to have an abortion.

If you think like a GOPer on this,

It should become Pat Robertson clear. The need for a old escaped slave hunters, need to make a comeback.
So they can contract out these brave men to hunt down any woman who flees the state suspected of having an abortion. Because they are all suspects now.

The next step would be to save money, by banning any travel by any a woman. Living there, born there, moved there or visiting and site seeing there or just passing thru on the highway to get somewhere else.

The abortion risk Alabama roach motel.
They can enter the state but they can never leave. Because they will have an abortion.
Now, Any woman can own a gun. Use their 2nd Amendment right to abort at any stage of pregnancy or age.

A big part of the problem here is, these the people of these states bring this on themselves with their vote. But it doesn't stop their.

If I was on the SCOTUS would rule on this in this maner.

It seems the country is deeply divided on this issue. (in an Apartheid minority /majority divide)
It has been the intent of these lawsuits over time to nibble pieces of the established Stare Deciis on this issue.

With one side seeing a medical reasonable need and the other side saying there is no medical need (until it is their own medical need) and then, the very law they demand of others to be restricted. Should not bear on their personal freedoms to seek such medical resolve.

Therefore after way too much rehashing of vasectomies are exempt and not preventing life on the part of a male anatomy responsibility.

I rule that Registered republicans who are so believing on this. Are hereby restricted from any abortion for any reason, excuse or billionaires desire to abort a pregnant mistresses child to stop any inheritance lawsuit in the future.

Those not registered Republican, may choose to seek this medical attention if they chose. If anyone is found to vote for republicans, they will be placed on a list and banned from this freedom of choosing for themselves and any doctors advice. Only their TV evangelist can advise them.


As it remains the law that any peroson may own an assault weapon awith the explicit right to shoot anyone to defend themselves from anything a voice in their head speaks of fear and threat. Aborting a pregnant woman, any child out of the womb as defined as "late Term Abortion".

It is essential to apply judicial restraint and recognize both sides of science and medical profession.
People of Republican religious values who are anti abortion shall now be banned from any legal option. for the opposition American population, I carve out an exemption (as did for the cake bakers of America) That Democratic registered voters may choose to adhere to medical advice or not. May choose medical attention for the procedure without the approval of any republican.

Robt said...

Alabama is going to have to monitor all females of their state when breed able.

The law calls for criminal prosecution for any woman leaving the state to have an abortion.

If you think like a GOPer on this,

It should become Pat Robertson clear. The need for a old escaped slave hunters, need to make a comeback.
So they can contract out these brave men to hunt down any woman who flees the state suspected of having an abortion. Because they are all suspects now.

The next step would be to save money, by banning any travel by any a woman. Living there, born there, moved there or visiting and site seeing there or just passing thru on the highway to get somewhere else.

The abortion risk Alabama roach motel.
They can enter the state but they can never leave. Because they will have an abortion.
Now, Any woman can own a gun. Use their 2nd Amendment right to abort at any stage of pregnancy or age.

A big part of the problem here is, these the people of these states bring this on themselves with their vote. But it doesn't stop their.

If I was on the SCOTUS would rule on this in this maner.

It seems the country is deeply divided on this issue. (in an Apartheid minority /majority divide)
It has been the intent of these lawsuits over time to nibble pieces of the established Stare Deciis on this issue.

With one side seeing a medical reasonable need and the other side saying there is no medical need (until it is their own medical need) and then, the very law they demand of others to be restricted. Should not bear on their personal freedoms to seek such medical resolve.

Therefore after way too much rehashing of vasectomies are exempt and not preventing life on the part of a male anatomy responsibility.

I rule that Registered republicans who are so believing on this. Are hereby restricted from any abortion for any reason, excuse or billionaires desire to abort a pregnant mistresses child to stop any inheritance lawsuit in the future.

Those not registered Republican, may choose to seek this medical attention if they chose. If anyone is found to vote for republicans, they will be placed on a list and banned from this freedom of choosing for themselves and any doctors advice. Only their TV evangelist can advise them.


As it remains the law that any peroson may own an assault weapon awith the explicit right to shoot anyone to defend themselves from anything a voice in their head speaks of fear and threat. Aborting a pregnant woman, any child out of the womb as defined as "late Term Abortion".

It is essential to apply judicial restraint and recognize both sides of science and medical profession.
People of Republican religious values who are anti abortion shall now be banned from any legal option. for the opposition American population, I carve out an exemption (as did for the cake bakers of America) That Democratic registered voters may choose to adhere to medical advice or not. May choose medical attention for the procedure without the approval of any republican.

dinthebeast said...

Yesterday I texted my friend in Huntsville: "Your governor has lost her damn mind."

She texted me back: "She never had one to begin with. I hate this fucking state."

-Doug in Oakland

Robt said...



What is so wrong about this.

The Hyde Amendment states you cannot use tax dollars for Abortion. There is no counter law that says, you cannot use tax dollars to file frivolous lawsuits on abortion.

So state senators use tax dollars for their personal piggy bank accounts for the pro life extremists.



Fritz Strand said...

Next step.......New laws to burn women at the stake for taking birth control.

If only we could force these folks to live in a world where their 'ethics' and technology were the same.

Pagan in repose said...

What about male masturbation? If human life is so sacred then no sperm shall be ejaculated unless in the act of procreation. Maybe wet dreams can be considered a misdemeanor and such and so forth.
But masturbation in Alabama must be stopped. Potential sperm lawlessly spewed is an outrage. It must be stopped now.

All men entering Alabama must register with the local authorities and have an armed guard at all time while in the state so that all sperm are protected and have an equal right to impregnate at all times.

All hands on deck. Your hands must be is plain sight at all times. Bring back the...Well you get the idea. Shaking your penis more than twice after urination will result in a month in jail.

So on and so forth. Give sperm a chance. Free the sperm from frivolous waste and spillage. Let it swim forth and have a chance like all free sperm should. It is half the process after all, and fertilization is a one and in a million shot to at best to begin with. Give sperm a chance, sung to the tune by John Lennon's "Give peace a chance." Sing it loud and proud. After all we all come from a big old spuge at some point.



A poor attempt at funny, but at times like these when the inmates are running the asylum, I say what's the difference.

Unknown said...

Huzzah, robt! From one who is presently, unfortunately, living in TaliBama