Tuesday, May 01, 2012

Last Year it was a Critique


"Arianna's House of Games was, is, and ever shall be an exercise in raw capitalist scammery dressed up in the best fair-market cotton Che tee-shirt money can buy, and once I had satisfied my morbid curiosity -- once I learned exactly how the simple, mechanical aggregation magic trick worked by doing it for a couple of weeks and once I had sussed out the 25 or so words which are in constant, Batman-Splat!-Pow!-Zowie! rotation inside the headline extruding algorithm -- I lost interest."

driftglass, November 2011
In January, it was a joke.
"I know a guy who knows the guy David Brooks hired to write the algorithm that extrudes his "column" twice a week.


"The fifth of gin he burn through every day does nothing to ease his fear that he may have destroyed Western Civilization."
driftglass, January 2012

Now it's an article in Wired (which, oddly, even includes the very unusual choice of the word "extrude" :-)

Can an Algorithm Write a Better News Story Than a Human Reporter?

By Steven Levy Email Author April 24, 2012

Had Narrative Science — a company that trains computers to write news stories—created this piece, it probably would not mention that the company’s Chicago headquarters lie only a long baseball toss from the Tribune newspaper building. Nor would it dwell on the fact that this potentially job-killing technology was incubated in part at Northwestern’s Medill School of Journalism, Media, Integrated Marketing Communications. Those ironies are obvious to a human. But not to a computer.

At least not yet.

For now consider this: Every 30 seconds or so, the algorithmic bull pen of Narrative Science, a 30-person company occupying a large room on the fringes of the Chicago Loop, extrudes a story whose very byline is a question of philosophical inquiry.
...

Somewhere out there in the Big Dark, the author of "Player Piano"
Player Piano, author Kurt Vonnegut's first novel, was published in 1952. It is a dystopia of automation and capitalism, describing the dereliction they cause in the quality of life. The story takes place in a near-future society that is almost totally mechanized, eliminating the need for human laborers. This widespread mechanization creates conflict between the wealthy upper class—the engineers and managers who keep society running—and the lower class, whose skills and purpose in society have been replaced by machines. The book uses irony and sentimentality, which were to become a hallmark developed further in Vonnegut's later works.
is laughing his head off.

And so it goes.

7 comments:

daver said...

Don't forget: you can have great influence and remain unknown - never know it yourself, even.

Be sure you know whether your goal is to have influence or to be well-known.

"The Perfect Man has no self; the Holy Man has no merit; the Sage has no fame." -Zhuangzi [the new Chuang Tzu]-

"In focusing your influence can you yield an a newborn child?

"In loving people and leading the organization can you take no action?

"In opening and closing the gateway to nature can you remain strong?

"In seeing clearly in all directions can you be without knowledge?

"Act without expectation
Advance without domination
These are called the subtle powers."

-Lao Tzu: Tao Te Ching-

Taylor said...

The Brave New World creeps closer every day...

Anonymous said...

My software engineer friend has chided me often for my slightly anguished observation that while the web might have democratized journalism, it has pulverized its ability to pay on a subsistence level. So now it isn't enough that I earn one-fifth of my 1999 take home, a fucking binary code agglomeration will compete for those remaining pennies. It may ultimately shake out that the information revolution will create more work than it destroys (as each technological revolution supposedly has), but I simply can't imagine when the jobs graph will start indicating anything but damage done. It's quite a price to pay for instant-access porn.

Bongo Shaftsbury said...

It's the converse of "Invasion of the Body Snatchers" A single, presumably human entity can assume control of everybody's computer and manipulate our reality.
When The Huffington Post first started a spent hours and hours battling in the trenches, under the delusion that my voice was making a difference. She even quoted one of my lines in an editorial, "Buchanan is the anti-Kerry, he was against the Iraq War before he was for it"
You don't have to have a degree in psychology to figure out this dream. I was making out with Arianna on a lounge chair on her patio. Then she took me upstairs where I assumed we were going to have sex, but instead there was a creepy guy who looked a lot like the devil who wanted to dance with me.
BEWARE THE SCREENS!

Cinesias said...

Capitalism is a pyramid scheme that will collapse. Infinite growth is not possible on a finite planet. It's just not sustainable.

As a species, we need to start phasing ourselves off wealth accumulation and "growth", unless we're planning a big die-off.

Computers and mechanization should be making our lives better, yet we're forced to compete with them in order to work a job to stay alive.

Profit is more important than people, and don't forget it.

chrome agnomen said...

the question is: could a thousand david brooks laboring away night and day on a thousand typewriters for a thousand years, produce anything as good as a single monkey.

jim said...

The Arc Of History: First as tragedy, then as farce ... then as the new Normal.

But what do I know? I'm such a dinosaur that even after all these years, I still can't get over people buying their drinking water at the store in plastic jugs.