Saturday, December 28, 2013

The New York Times Just Pulverized

Any last remnants of the wingnut fairy tale of Benghaaaaazi!

But before you get too excited, do not for one minute imagine this will trigger a sudden outbreak of Conservative self-awareness; there will be no wailing and rending of stupid, little "Benghaaaaazi!" ribbons by an army of Eagle-rampant-on-flag-rampant-on-the-Constitution-rampant-on-another-flag-rampant-on-crossed-M-16s Liberty! Christian! NRA! Free Markets!  Unapologetic! Love Murrica! Conservative! Twitter halfwits.  

None of this will in any way penetrate the lightless, factless Netherville in which they live.  We sailed way, way past that point years ago.  But one more baseline from which future historians can calibrate just exactly how hopelessly Limbaughtomized the Pig People actually were might be useful.


Right on cue, The White Citizens' Council Powerline chimes in:

The New York Times is out with a revisionist account of the Sept. 11, 2012 attack on the U.S. compound in Benghazi. The Times says that in months of investigating, it “turned up no evidence that Al Qaeda or other international terrorist groups had any role in the assault.” The Times also claims that the attack “was fueled in large part by anger at an American-made video denigrating Islam.”

I suspect that the Times story tells us more about Hillary Clinton’s assessment of the threat Benghazi poses to her likely 2016 run for president than it does about what happened in Benghazi...


Anonymous said...

What are the odds that David Gregory will/will not ask Issa about this on MTP tomorrow?

Neo Tuxedo said...

Not that any of it will penetrate the lightless, factless Netherville in which they live

If they even hear about it, the mere fact that it comes from Even the Liberal New York Times will be taken by the Pig People as prima facie evidence that it's Communist propaganda, ugly, frightening, and completely Satanic.

Anonymous said...

Good morning, Mr. Glass.

"Limbaughtomized" Heh. Witty. Well worth however long it took you to think that up.

Anyway, I wonder if there's a Random Rightwing Scandal Generator to determine the next thing we'll have to talk about that'll go nowhere.

Enjoy your day.

---Kevin Holsinger

StonyPillow said...

Since you seem too modest to mention it, congratulations on receiving a Jon Swift Memorial Roundup 2013 Best Posts of the Year award for Nick and Me, the indispensable tutorial on using the Twitter as a tire iron.

I'm glad to click that PayPal button every once in a while. Value given for value received.

JerryB said...

My question is where does it all end? When conversation, not to mention debate is impossible because one side refuses to accept common agreed to facts. When no amount of actual evidence produces anything other than a click of the tongue and a roll of the eyes and vague utterances of liberal bias accompanied by a dismissive wave of the hand, where does it end?

This kind of shit can't go on forever. Where does it end?

Anonymous said...

Time to remove the stupids & the bigots from mother earth. We need peace between us bad. The years of constant deep hate drilled into these low IQ mindless asscowns of America. Who cannot think for themselves. Have created a vast army of hate zombies. Facts, Evidence, does not matter . My way or the highway is the no#1 rule . To rule the land again with force.. To start ww111 & bring the the second comming of J.C & his army to fight evil. where do you go with that. How do you start a reasonable ,in reality con