How Was I To Know, Ctd.

She was with the Russians, too?

In today's episode of "Who's letting driftglass down now?" I find myself once again very disappointed with Ms. Kathleen Hall-Jamieson.

Reader "Spike" left some  thoughtful remarks regarding her most recent offense in the comment section this older post, and it seemed a shame to let them languish there:

I'm going to keep this focus on Kathleen Hall-Jamieson. I listen to her several time and when breaking it down, she literally advertises for Republicans and pushes an idea that politicians need to be honest without journalist.

I took something different from it, well not too different. She is in fact a Russian spy. Her entire purpose is to trick those of us who believe in the truth and objective facts to lean towards this soft lazy journalism. This lady is dangerous and she and her entire organization should have NO credibility. In short, she's a liar.

In some ways she managed to trick you to a very small degree. How she tricked us is simply by avoiding to answer the question Moyer asked. She always goes into what she hope for politicians should do.. when the question was "Do they lie to us".

I also noticed an interesting pattern:

1) She talks about republicans first, then leans towards Obama.

2) When she talks about republicans, she makes an effort to let us know about their position and ignores Obamas (be easier if she never went into detail)

3) She always from the republican point of view.

For example when she talked about the most effective advertisement, noticed the words she used to describe them. Mitt Romney ad feature real people.. Obama takes a 'small' sentence. Mitt Romney needs to question Obama, Obama's ad was affected because of Mitt's tone.

Going through that interview, people would know more about the republican position and trying to get us to watch the debates. She tries to focus on what both sides agree on. She literally says "One of the really important things about debates that people don't notice is that if two can agree on something" So if both Obama and Mitt believe the world is really flat, she's secretly trying to tell us to believe in that.

Places like FactCheck tries to trick us into believing both sides are equal and avoid the bigger context of the situation. She literally tries to bury the truth that the Obama Campaign make efforts to correct their flaws and the Romney doesn't give a damn

I'm not surprise she's a spy, I'm more surprise on how systematic she play her roll. The only time she gives credit to the Dem is with Clinton's speech (which is about how republicans are liars), but only in passing to say Obama isn't as honest.