Hey, kids, remember me?
David Fucking Brooks thinks I'm
a Progressive.
Me.
Seriously.
This is -- for real, no kidding -- the actual thesis of the actual editorial that apparently no one with higher-order cognitive functions managed to stop the (suspected) tertiary-syphilis-brain-rot-impaired David Fucking Brooks from publishing in the New York Times today.
See, according to Bobo under the leadership of persons left conspicuously unnamed in his op-ed (but which one suspects may go by "George W. Bush" and "Dick Cheney") between 2001 and 2008, Bobo's Republican Party turned the national security apparatus of the United States into an incomprehensible mess, creating thousands of new agencies and organizations that are crawling up each others asses and shitting out enough meaningless paper to create another solar system.
(Incidentally, Bobo's Republican Party also plunged the nation into two wars -- one based entirely on lies and avarice -- and then botched those wars, pissed away a budget surplus and replaced it with a crushing deficit, took the United States Constitution into the woods and repeatedly shot it in the head, and nearly finished the Reagan Project of completely eviscerating the American middle class, but for some reason these niggling details were omitted from David Brooks' penetrating analysis.)
Then, over a period of 18 months (and over the concerted and fanatical opposition of the same Republican Party that had just finished leaving left an unbroken, eight-year-long shit-stain across the land) the Democrats passed a terribly watered-down version of the number one priority on which the President Barack Obama had run in 2008, and a tepid version of financial re-regulation to help reverse 30 years of radical Conservative deregulatory crackpottery and prevent the United States economy from exploding again.
According to a Right Wing think tank cited by David Fucking Brooks, the first Democratic initiative will create less that 200 "new agencies, commissions, panels and other bodies".
And according to another Right Wing think tank cited by David Fucking Brooks, the financial reform law is very long indeed!
Therefore, according to Bobo, these two periods -- the eight years of catastrophe his Conservative Movement unleashed on America, and the 18 months of the hedging, compromising Center/Right corporatist Democratic bucket brigade -- should for some reason be treated as identically long,
"During the first part of this period, the Republicans were in control."identically perilous and over-reachy,
...
"In the second part of the period, Democrats were in control."
...
"Already this effort is generating a fierce, almost culture-war-style backlash. It is generating a backlash among people who do not have faith in Washington, who do not have faith that trained experts have superior abilities to organize society, who do not believe national rules can successfully contend with the intricacies of local contexts and cultures."and should therefore rightfully be lumped together under one label: "Progressive".
"When historians look back on this period, they will see it as another progressive era. It is not a liberal era — when government intervenes to seize wealth and power and distribute it to the have-nots. It’s not a conservative era, when the governing class concedes that the world is too complicated to be managed from the center..."Got that?
The myriad high crimes, disasters, lies, and treason of the Age of Bush which sniveling, ass-licking Conservative cowards like David Fucking Brooks enthusiastically championed...weren't really failures of Conservatism at all!
Yay!
Instead they were all somehow, magically really examples of how fucking awful Progressivism is.
Why?
Because David Fucking Brooks says so!
Here:
"It’s a progressive era, based on the faith in government experts and their ability to use social science analysis to manage complex systems."And here:
"This progressive era is being promulgated without much popular support. It’s being led by a large class of educated professionals, who have been trained to do technocratic analysis, who believe that more analysis and rule-writing is the solution to social breakdowns..."And here:
"This progressive era amounts to a high-stakes test."And if the Glorious Progressive Revolution which David Fucking Brooks asserts was begun by this guy
should fail?
Bobo has the answer for that too:
"...well, what’s the 21st-century version of the guillotine?"To which I can only reply that while I'm not 100% sure what a 21st-century version of the guillotine might look like, I have some very clear ideas who the first one into the tumbrel
should be.
And right behind him will be the lords and ladies of America's Ministry of Truth (LLC) who make sure such freaks and perverts stay propped up and extruding their festively beribboned turds in front of our nation's cameras, behind our nation's microphones, and on the editorial pages of our nation's most powerful newspapers and magazines.
7 comments:
great photos!!!
you wrote "...Bobo's Republican Party turned the national security apparatus of the United States into an incomprehensible mess...."
didn't you mean: Bobo's Republican Party turned the United States into an incomprehensible mess?
If you saw any part of Glenn Beck's professorial (tiny wire-rims on shiny nose) lecture on "Progressivism" (from a Glenn Beck U. presentation on his show) last year - which I did (from a YouTube video) and barfed throughout - you will understand what DFB is doing mangling this concept today.
It's their way out.
Confuse the idjits with the facts.
And believe me.
When I tried to explain how wrong he was - that he had never even read a true definition of "progressivism" in his life obviously, I was shouted out of the library by the t(f)ools who were ready to sign up.
For that illustrious coming edifice: Beck University.
Get ready.
It's evidently time.
S
"When historians look back on this period, they will see it as another progressive era.
__________________
Of course it's 'progressive' - things progress right into an uncleaned Port Authority bus station toilet whenever these inept malfeasants take the reins, so that they can then tout their 'proof of concept' that government is bad and an anarchic capitalist free-for-all of serfs and overlords is the real American dream.
David Brooks is to intellectual honesty what Charles Manson is to respect for the sanctity of the American home - May his afterlife of choking on William F. Buckley's withered choad be an eternal one.
;>)
I was thinking about your phrase "...and prevent the United States economy from exploding again..."
I envision our economy as having been deliberately ex-and-im-ploded, like those building that are dynamited by experts.
First we see smoke issue from windows and crevices (foreclosures), then the roof collapses (jobs lost forever), and then the the walls slowly tilt inward and crumble to the earth inside a dense plume of dirt and asbestos and God-knows-what ("...Hurry,Hurry! We must give Wall Street Trillions, or they won't be able to award themselves billions in "bonuses"!).
THAT was our economy in 2008, and our Congress/President (bush) handed several trillion dollars to the demolition experts on Wall Street to help stop the collapse. But all the demo experts could do was keep the facade standing long enough to create a hologram of a healthy,vibrant economy. Now and then when power fluctuates a bit, Americans can see past the illusion to the smoking ruins.
And they ask WTF? And the reply is: "It's because of the Deficit!"; and "Illegal Mexicans did this!" and "Progressive tax & spend policies did this!" and last-but-not-LEAST: "Social Security & Medicare are responsible for this smoking heap of garbage! Entitlements MUST GO!"
And Americans believe it.
When I see photos of Dubya, I'm reminded of the iconic Mussolini image, arms folded, in a supremely arrogant stance.
Or, Shrub as a flying monkey,
Or, The Bush Family portraits by Goya,
(ok)
Funny pics.
Post a Comment