The ‘Stache That Wouldn’t Die.
I suppose there is no reason to be greatly surprised that Tom Friedman’s column today -- "Intercepting Iran’s Take on America" -- is his 1000th retread of the “Other Guy’s Speech as I Would Have Written It” shtick. Typing up bad impressions stuffed to the eye sockets with pedantry is a time-honored lazy-writer’s trick (having used it myself I should damn well know) but even for a hack, third-rate, full-shot-short-of-a-boilermaker writer, Captain Obvious falls back on that hagged-out trick an awful lot.
(Which is one more promise I can make to the NYT: top value for their pundit dollar when they’re paying for my beer and skittles and occasional trips abroad to investigate, oh, let’s say, supermodel sex junkets.)The other thing is, while I
on jelly donut patrol.
Because just when you think that the worst crime Captain Obvious is perpetrating this time is the debasement and pifflization of my favorite language, he goes suddenly malevolent and slips the razor blade into his mushy apple of a column.
So today, the Captain boldly leaps right into the NIE controversy thusly:
"There are two intelligence analyses that are relevant to the balance of power between the U.S. and Iran — one is the latest U.S. assessment of Iran, which certainly gave a much more complex view of what is happening there. The other is the Iranian National Intelligence Estimate of America…"That’s right; by skipping boldly over the whole, tawdry “Holy Mother of God, just when you thought the Bush Regime could not possibly humiliate itself further, or wank away even one more ounce of our Precious Bodily Credibility…” aspect of the story, and fictioning up a whole ‘nother “IE” -- an “Iranian National Intelligence Estimate” – the Captain curries himself a whole ‘nother hobby horse to ride.
The Captain then spins dramatically away from the audience, spirit-gums an even more massive and ominously sincere moustache over his own, permanently-affixed Moustache of Understanding, whirls back even more dramatically, and finishes his opening paragraph with (emphasis dramatically added):
"… which — my guess — would read something like this:"(Looks vaguely Heavenward while dramatically narrows eyes, pulls his crushed-velvet, drama-infused “Suck On This” cape around him [very dramatically], his and curls his tiny and nearly-human-looking hands into very dramatic, pudgy, talon-like thingies, and intones…)
"To: President AhmadinejadThen he spends a lot of rarefied columnage nagging “Americans” for being stupid.
From: The Iranian Ministry of Intelligence
Subject: America"
Also lots of other words are “in quotes”, which further heightens the Captain’s sense of drama…if one were to define “drama” as, say, Steven Segal trying to head-butt his way through “Lear” by flourishing wildly-out-of-place menacing looks every few seconds.
And going “Bwahahahahaha!” a lot.
With his arms akimbo.
Is it all creepily pathetic? Pathetically hilarious? Hilariously creepy?
Must I choose?
Suffice it to say I ground a solid quarter inch of enamel off my back molars reading the damned thing: half for yet another reminder of just how utterly, breathtakingly, talentless Friedman really is when it comes to the simple craft of writing, and half for reading it in the acutely painful light of the fact that he gets paid enormous sums of money for producing excrement that is almost always this bad or worse.
So having wowed us with his impish “quotiness” and ability to perfectly mimic the creative writing efforts of an imagination-challenged fifth-grader scrambling to throw something together before the bell rings, he reaches Three!Count!Em!Three! conclusions, which I will quote verbatim.
"…And here – right here -- is the point in the piece where Friedman stops being a sad shit-stained clown of a man and lets his ugly, twisted little heart shine right through.
We now have “high confidence” that America is on a path of self-destruction, for three reasons:"
"First, 9/11 has made America afraid and therefore stupid. The “war on terrorism” is now so deeply imbedded in America’s psyche that we think it is “highly likely” that America will continue to export more fear than hope and will continue to defend things like torture and Guantánamo Bay prison and to favor politicians like Mr. Giuliani, who alienates the rest of the world."Notice that Friedman repeats the word “America(n)” three times.
Because like Joe Klein and David Brooks and David Broder and all the rest of his litter mates, in the end Friedman is just a coward who, long, long ago started giving the wingnuts his milk money in exchange for them not beating his flat head into 'stache soup.
Like all the rest, Friedman’s pact with his personal Devil is that he will never, ever, ever form his mouth to speak this simple, ugly fact about American politics: Conservatives Are The Problem.
Everything else, however “true” it may be, is nothing but interesting architectural ornamentation on the brutal reality that, in the Age of Dubya, you can either be a Good American or a Good Republican, but you can no longer be both.
Friedman cannot bring himself to “report” on this simple, observable “reality” that anyone with half a mind and three working senses can perceive all around them; the same reality that the Conservative John Dean wrote about in “Conservatives Without Conscience” or the Conservative Kevin Phillips wrote about in “American Theocracy”. That America is being destroyed at every level by the deliberate actions of Authoritarian, and that with virtually no exception, all the fucking Authoritarian are now conveniently gathered in one political Party.
But to face that vital and overwhelmingly obvious fact, Captain Obvious would have to give up being a lying, gutless “Add both sides and divide by two” Centrist.
And the minute that happened Friedman would perish in a puff of epiphanic stink, so don’t hold your breath.
No 9/11 hasn’t made America stupid and afraid, Tom, so how about you sit back and see how that paragraph would read if we Secretly Substitute some stone-ground Accuracy for your usual Centrist Feculence:
9/11 has madeSee what a difference a little truth can make, Tom?AmericaConservatives and Useful Idiot 'Liberal' Hawk columnists like me afraid and therefore stupid. The “war on terrorism” is now so deeply imbedded inAmerica’sthe Right Wing Death Cult psyche that we think it is “highly likely” thatAmericaRepublicans will continue to export more fear than hope and will continue to defend things like torture and Guantánamo Bay prison and to favor politicians like Mr. Giuliani, who alienates the rest of the world.
Now let’s do the same with your second “conclusion”, because it isn’t “the U.S.” which opposes higher taxes to pay for vital infrastructure, is it Tom?
And it isn’t some politically non-denominational “primary campaigns” that have been reduced to flatter-the-simpleton panderfests focusing on gay marriage, flag burning and Biblical literalism, is it Tom?
See how it reads, Tom…
Second, at a time when America’s bridges, roads, airports and Internet bandwidth have fallen behind other industrial powers, including China, we believe that…when you’re not too fucking chickenshit to tell the plain truth?the U.S.Conservative Feudalist “Club for Growth” reptiles opposition to higher taxes — and the fact that the Republican primary campaignsprimary campaignshave focused largely on gay marriage, flag-burning and whether the Christian Bible is the literal truth — means it is “highly unlikely” that America will arrest its decline.
When you don’t feel you have to torture the facts so you can still pretend that Centrism is anything but a synonym for “lying media whore”?
Third, all theYes, Tom; because being an dutifully MSM Villager means you actually have to put yourself over and over and over again in the ridiculous position of arguing that someone insisting that a few of the more ruinous effects of Global Capitalists Gone Wild “free trade” might need to be humanely mitigated…. is exactly as bad as the man running for the leader of one of the most technologically advanced and dependent civilization on Earth professing his belief in the scientific superiority of a Bronze Age superstition.U.S. presidential candidatesRepublican Candidates are distancing themselves from the core values that made America such a great power and so different from us — in particular America’s long commitment to free trade, open immigration and a reverence for scientific enquiry wherever it leads. Our intel analysts are baffled that the leading Democrat, Mrs. Clinton, no longer believes in globalization and the leading Republican, Mr. Huckabee, never believed in evolution.
“U.S. politicians seem determined to appeal either to the most nativist extremes in their respective parties — or to tell voters that something Americans call “the tooth fairy” will make their energy, budget, educational and Social Security deficits painlessly disappear.”"... nativist extremes in their respective parties"?
OK, does anyone know what an Extreme Nativist Liberal might look like, because I don’t know as I’ve ever seen one?
For that matter, does anyone know any Progressives who believe for a minute that our nation’s energy, budget or educational problems are going to “painlessly disappear”?
Fifty years from now, one of the enduring mysteries of America in the late-20th and early-21st centuries will be the delusional, often borderline-catatonic behavior of the media.
They will say “If, out of some deranged abuse of the concept of ‘objectivity’, any meteorologist of that era had simply refused to report on a hurricane bearing down on coastal cities -- or had refused to attribute the aftermath of destruction and loss of life to the hurricane out of a fear of being ‘judgmental’ -- that meteorologist would have been fired instantly and probably tried and convicted for a variety of charges of fraud and acts against the public good.”
They will say “And yet virtually all main stream political journalists of that era, when confronted with the fact that really evil men with really evil motives drive the Republican Party, simply refused to acknowledge their existence. Refused to see the unique, overwhelming and malignant influence on civil society the theocrats and fascists were having, or the tremendous destruction they were leaving in their wake.”
They will say “In that era, people who got paid handsomely to tell the truth, spent enormous amounts of time and money to make sure that one of the Big, Important Truths of their time was never spoken aloud or in any way acknowledged."
They will say “And once the Big Lie of that era -- that both sides must be either painted as exactly and equally wrong all the time about everything, or whatever it was it was Clinton’s fault -- was punctured, the Great Media Ponsi Scheme collapsed almost overnight.“
They will say “And that was the day the journalismist career of Tom Friedman ended."
15 comments:
He he, home run again drifty!
I read the op ed this morning and had another WTF moment (thats two US WTF moments in 24 hours). My first WTF moment was GWB at the presser about the NIE, the second was Friedmans op ed about how the afraid merica was of the terrorists and stuff.
How many shit sandwitches can one country eat?
Your explications de texte are a wonder to behold!
And you nailed it in the graf mentioning John Dean and Kevin Phillips -- bumpersticker-worthy: The Conservatives Are The Problem.
Which is something every journalist ought to read, mark and inwardly digest before they utter another word.
Especially Cap'n Oblivious!
A fine post as usual, Drifty, but were you being facetious when you called the behavior of the corporate media an "enduring mystery"?
I see no mystery to it; the operatives of the Corporate Holodeck Media, such as 'Stache, are doing exactly what their masters pay them to do--lie their sorry asses off so their masters and the rest of the corporate elite can take advantage of the evil and/or stupid contingent of our fellow citizens to put their henchmen in office and loot us citizens and our nation for their power and profit.
Ultimately, even the conservatives are merely a symptom.
THE CORPORATIONS ARE THE PROBLEM.
The legal fiction of corporate "personhood" must be destroyed.
Selah.
From the Arkanshire, IBW
In the first place, Friedman is operating with a revoked literary license.
He is wanted for negligent metaphor abuse and Hit and run with intent to cause mental anguish for fraudulent purpose,both severe misdemeanors punishable by plucking out mustache hairs one at a time until the naked upper lip can be rubbed with turpentine.
drfity- the "supermodel sex junket" investigation is too dangerous, you'll be outnumbered, you need back-up. Therefore, I'm volunteering for the mission as your wingman.
Does anybody actually believe anything the 'Stache writes?
PS- Where can I buy that bumpersticker: The Conservatives are the Problem.
Though I greatly enjoy this blog, and generally agree with the sentiments expressed here, I have to take exception to part of this post.
Regarding Friedman's first conclusion (the "war on terror" is destroying America), you suggest that this is not a failing of America but of Conservatives.
You will not hear me defend conservatives, and certainly not on this point. However, I think you fail to take into account the extent to which America's non-conservative leaders have failed to prevent, or actively enabled, all the despicable things done in service of the War On Terror.
Check the congressional votes on the Patriot Act, the MCA, the FISA amendments, Iraq, Iran, and numerous others. You will find that many supposedly liberal leaders supported these initiatives. But more importantly, non-conservatives have utterly failed to stop them or even made sustained, principled efforts against them or the wrongheaded constructs of thought from which they spring.
To conclude, I believe that what is necessary is for principled leaders to loudly and consistently proclaim that no issue is more important than preserving our constitutional rights and the rule of law. All these other issues (abortion, healthcare, gay rights, taxes, education, immigration, economic policy, etc) are merely red-herrings, and any victory on such issues means nothing without a victory in the fight to preserve the bill of rights and the rule of law. I have not seen this from liberals or progressives, or at least not to the extent where I could agree with your sentiment that "Conservatives Are the Problem." Our government is the problem.
andy in nz,
Thank you. Some mornings I just shake my head until I pass out.
mark1147,
Thank you.
Ivory Bill Woodpecker
No arguement; history will make us look like idiots for not ending corporate medos the minute we saw where it was leading.
Bustednuckles,
There's never a cop around when you need on is there?
US Blues,
I knoew the job was dangerous when I took it.
And, yes, millions of people still believe tha the 'Stache is a font of wisdom.
HHL,
This is always the vexing question isn't it? How to play the shitty hand you're dealt while continuing to angle for a better one.
I do not look for heroes in government, and have alway believed that government goes where the people force it to go. You are quite correct that our reserve of standout/standup men and women in federal elected office is small and a safe/default position of go-along-get-along has been acceptable for far too long.
However when I look at the principles of those who do the pushing and yelling and swearing on the Left, and the values of those on the Right, my choice becomes clear. Fundamentally the Right genuinely wants a nice, tidy, white theocratic state and have recruited legions of berserkers who will flog a congressman or Senator or radio station until they get what they want. The Left, on the other hand, has thought for too long that we could all sit and reason together and ignore the ignorant armies: what we got for our trouble was ever more audacious lunatics driving the GOP, and ever weaker and more pliant appeasers driving the DNC.
But when forced back to first principles, Modern Conservative citizens will always side with some form of Feudalism, and Liberals citizens will (however sloppily) rally to oppose that.
Which is why, stipulating everything you just said, I fight happily on the side I do.
drifty:
Your critiques of BoBo, the Captain and all the Sunday pundits is masterful. Maybe you should collect those pearls into a book. You really have the knack.
This era of the pampered millionaire media star has removed the sense of reporting truth to the people, and replaced it with self gratification, and being part of the "insiders" group.
Once upon a time, reporters were blue collar workers.
This was when Nelly Bly could fight her way off a barren farm in the heartland and carve out a career in the Big Bad City as a Plucky Newshen.
This served us well, because reporters were Underdogs, and fighting the powers that be was not only their job, but their passion.
Now the Powers are the Same as our Media Stars. So it is no wonder that we aren't fought for anymore.
Not by these people, anyway.
Jan in the Pan! Woo-hoo!
Thank you for reading Shitstache over there, so we don't have to read him here.
Thanks, driftglass, for doing what you do best -- Lay it Out Plain and tell the Conservative, Republican, Theocratic (and, yes, Corporate NonPersons ... and, yes, hhl, "Democrat" Surrender Monkeys) tell 'em all to strap on their rapture seat belts. Cuz that genetic shit-stream of the Zuvuuya in is in mid transport to hell. Kirk to the transporter room!
On a more elevated note, I love the Mystery Science Theatre 3000 "Brain That Wouldn't Die" photo. 'Cept I think Tommy Dum-Dum Friedman's pan neck juice makes Alien molecular acid gravy. It keeps eating thru the metal pan, too.
Perhaps we can coat infant toys in this stuff. Market it as Tom Tom Toys for Conservative Offspring. Why wait for conservative downbringing to rot the neural pathways of Young Republicans? Take 'em out. Now.
hhl, totally agree with your remarks: "no issue is more important than preserving our constitutional rights and the rule of law"
Unfortunately the "rule of law" is only as good as our government (judges, president, congress) and indeed US. There will be no "rule of law" until the authoritarian poison is removed from America's bloodstream.
from Chris Floyd's joint:
The "rule of law" will never be anything more than what the human beings alive at the time in a given society make of it. It depends entirely on the character of those who fashion, interpret and uphold the law – and on the public's attitude toward it.
from Chris Floyd's joint:
The "rule of law" will never be anything more than what the human beings alive at the time in a given society make of it. It depends entirely on the character of those who fashion, interpret and uphold the law – and on the public's attitude toward it.
Post a Comment