Tuesday, July 18, 2006

In one sense, Conservatives are right.

Because this...

(AP Photo/Alaa al-Marjani)

...isn’t a Civil War.

This is Total Civil War.

From the AP...


Iraq civilian toll spikes to nearly 6,000

By NICK WADHAMS, Associated Press Writer2 hours, 59 minutes ago

Nearly 6,000 civilians were slain across Iraq in May and June, a spike in deaths that coincided with rising sectarian attacks across the country, the United Nations said Tuesday.

The report from the U.N. Assistance Mission in Iraq describes a wave of lawlessness and crime, including assassinations, bombings, kidnappings, torture and intimidation.
Hundreds of teachers, judges, religious leaders and doctors have been targeted for death, and thousands of people have fled, the report said. Evidence suggests militants also have begun to target homosexuals, it said.

"While welcoming recent positive steps by the government to promote national reconciliation, the report raises alarm at the growing number of casualties among the civilian population killed or wounded during indiscriminate or targeted attacks by terrorists or insurgents," the U.N. said in a note accompanying the report.

In the last two days alone, more than 120 people were killed in violence in Iraq. In the worst attacks, fifty-three perished in a suicide bombing Tuesday in Kufa, and 50 were slain Monday in a market in Mahmoudiya.

According to the report, 2,669 civilians were killed in May and 3,149 were killed in June. Those numbers combined two counts: from the Ministry of Health, which records deaths reported by hospitals; and the Medico-Legal Institute in Baghdad, which tallies the unidentified bodies it receives.

The report charts a month-by-month increase in the number of civilians killed, from 710 in January to 1,129 in April. In the first six months of the year, it said 14,338 people had been killed.

The report's figures were higher than some other counts, but even the U.N. said many killings go unreported.

According to an Associated Press tally based on its daily reporting, at least 1,511 civilians were killed, in May and June, with at least an additional 289 police and security forces killed.


It also details the rise in kidnappings, particularly of large groups of people. On May 17, for example, the report said 15 Tae Kwon Do athletes were kidnapped in western Iraq.

"There is no news regarding their whereabouts," the report said.

Women report that their rights have been rolled back by extremist Muslim groups — both Shiite and Sunni. While under Saddam Hussein's largely secular regime, women faced few social restrictions, they say they are now barred from going to market alone, wearing pants or driving cars.

And children are frequently victims, perishing in large crowds or sometimes even targeted themselves, the report said.

"Violence, corruption, inefficiency of state organs to exert control over security, establish the rule of law and protect individual and collective rights all lead to inability of both the state and the family to meet the needs of children," it said.
The government still has not pursued many allegations of torture and other inhumane treatment in prisons and detention centers, the U.N. said.


Jesus Christ. Nearly 6,000 dead in two months.

Six thousand.

How can you fathom that?

Do you start by simply observing that this is twice the number who died on a pretty Fall day in America in September of 2001?

Or perhaps consider the estimated population of Iraq as of 1997 was 22 million and change, and the population of the United States is a hair under 300 million.

And ask yourself what would we do if factions fighting in the United States killed a proportional number of civilians over the same period of time?

What would we call it if, in the two months between the “Day Without Immigrants” protests and the day they paraded pictures of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi’s corpse for the cameras, warring factions of Evangelicals Christians had slaughtered 81,000 Americans in the streets of New York, Atlanta, Phoenix and Miami?

Or consider that at First Manassas/Bull Run, 2,708 Union soldiers died, and 1,981 Confederates.

And at the battle of Antietam, approximately 5,000 died on both sides (various figures depends on various definitions, but 5,000 is a fair compromise.)

The American Revolution itself -- the foundational moment when we first started calling ourselves “Americans” -- cost 4,435 American lives.

Now consider this definition of "Total War" from "Total War: The German and American Experiences, 1871-1914" (emphasis added):
"...Total war is fought heedless of the restraints of morality, custom, or international law, for the combatants are inspired by hatreds born of modern ideologies. Total war requires the mobilization not only of armed forces but also of whole populations. The most crucial determinant of total war is the widespread, indiscriminate, and deliberate inclusion of civilians as legitimate military targets."


The battles of Iraq’s Total Civil War are not fought for forts or fields or the high ground. They are fought for time.

They are fought to create and maintain horror and chaos over time.

And since this a Total War whose short- and medium-range goal is control of time and calendar, and not space, I can say three things that are true:

First, during the Battle of The Fourth May, 2,669 Iraqis perished. That is more than all the American forces who died during the War of 1812 (2,260).

Second, during the Battle of The Fourth June, 3,149 Iraqis perished. This is more than all American losses during the Spanish-American War (2,446).

And, third, anyone who still maintains that what is going on in Iraq is not a Civil War is either deliberately lying or insane.

13 comments:

Anonymous said...

Incisive as always. I would just offer one correction: anyone who maintains that what is going on in Iraq is not a Civil War is lying AND insane.

Anonymous said...

The top of my head blew off when I heard on the news last night that Chimpy would not allow stem cells "cuz that's murder".

And you say this after you have started a war which has killed uncounted tens of thousands? I am screaming this at the tv. Finally I had to restrain myself because the dog got very upset thinking I was yelling at him and was trying to get under the couch. Plus I was going to pop a vein. So I trod the now well-worn path to the liquor cabinet. My gods the man has no sense of irony. Nor yet decency.

I'd like to smack him with an iron, and I don't care if the secret service reads this.

BitterHarvest said...

What ever happened to all those "corners" Iraq turned? What ever happened to the insurgency being in its "last throes?" Where are the rosy predictions of Paul Wolfowitz and Don Rumsfeld now?

Anonymous said...

If you turn enough corners quickly enough, you end up screwing yourself into the ground (or flying up your own ass).

And obviously, those rosy predictions are "no longer operative". They've served their original purpose, which was to get us into this shitmire, and have been consigned to the Memory Hole.

Didn't you get the directive?

Anonymous said...

"Evidence suggests militants also have begun to target homosexuals, it said"

Bush doubtless thinks this is a silver lining.

jurassicpork said...

Digby's all over this, too, and I'll be using it as a counterpoint in my upcoming Assclowns of the Week.

Anonymous said...

Inner junior, wrestling with "outer" junior:

"must-not-grope-German-Chancellor..."

Inner-inner-junior (again, in fako Texas accent):

"Oh, GO ahead; Shitfahr! she'll love it. She probably never gits any...Who knows where it could lead; one good Texas horsefuckin' and I might get a regiment of krauts to help with the target duty in Anbar province."

Anonymous said...

The whole goddamn thing is getting to be like a condom, only instead of being filled with water for a prank, it's stretched to the breaking point with blood, bullshit, and body parts.

How long before it pops?

How long before the Shia in Iraq just say: "Fukkit; we'll take the oil in the south, Sadr can deal with whatever, in the midlands, and the Kurds can go-fish, with the Turks looking up their assholes."?

I mean, isn't it about at the point that there's no advantage to anyone except the exiles like Chalabi and his cousin, Allawi, to have us there? Are the Shia stupid enough to think that if they, and bushCo, DO manage to suppress the insurgents, that that will ensure that a REAL withdrawal will start?

All it will do is make it easier for bushCo to keep power in the mid-terms, and to maintain a substantial military presence in Iraq.

I think the light bulb is about to go on in some Iraqi heads.

Anonymous said...

Hmm I love the idea behind this website, very unique.
»

Anonymous said...

Interesting site. Useful information. Bookmarked.
»

Anonymous said...

Looking for information and found it at this great site...
»

Anonymous said...

Very nice site! Free work at home involving insurance verification Breast and feeding celexa

Anonymous said...

Excellent, love it! checks by fax Dysfunction+erectile+medication Buy gay underwear The jacket time Hattiesburg paintball fields Transvestite clubs in ireland Texas hold em poker card guard kit South western home decor Hydrocodone watson vicodin diazepam Better valtrex famvir Eb games in omaha Bone cancer in cats Front projectors Swing trading foreign currency Free sex stories + audio http://www.vwbeetleconvertiblehitch.info