Sunday, December 05, 2010

Sunday Morning Comin’ Down: Part One


A short primer on how Newt Gingrich lies to America.

Sometime later, assuming the Tullemore Dew holds out, I’ll have a “Part Two…” post up, followed by a “What did 2010 mean to Liberals?” piece.

For now, lets us consider briefly the case of Newt “Serial adulterer, pathological liar and disgraced former-Speaker-of-the-House-who-hasn’t-held-office-since-Bryant-Gumbel-was-hosting-‘The Today Show’" Gingrich, who, on Fox News Sunday, continued the longest, least-interesting and most-cringeworthy presidential candidacy striptease in modern American history.

Not that he won’t be successful -- after all, whoever Rupert Murdoch wants as the Republican nominee, Rupert will get -- but watching one of Roger Ailes’ employees talk to another of Roger Ailes’ employees about the electoral viability of himself and all the other little wooden dummies in Big Daddy Rupert’s ventriloquist act was at once hilarious and –- when you realize how many millions of idiots in this country take this farce as gospel –- horrifying.

He's almost certain he'll run, but he really wants to pray over it with his blowup-sex-doll third wife.

Or something.

Newt “Obama is ruled by the ghost of Luo TribesmenGingrich also dutifully repeated the GOP Talking Point of the Day –- the same one obediently repeated virtually verbatim by Mike Murphy, David Gregory and President Mitch McConnell on “Meet the Press”: that Liberal ideology has been defeated forever, so the Kenyan Usurper needs to abandon the crazy Liberal base and move to the Center!

Right now!

Good times.

However, one particular piece of perfidious claptrap offered up by Newt “Muslims are Nazis” Gingrich was about job training programs. Specifically, Newt is very angry that unemployment insurance is offered to just anyone who is unemployed, and not directly tied quid-pro-quo-style to a job-training program.

So that, in Newt’s words, “You don't get money for doing nothing.”

This kind of head-fake is a textbook example of the classic “Gingrich is a Genius” dodge:
Step 1: On a friendly talk show, between various lies and slanders, toss out some third-tier, wingnut notion that sounds plausible and think-y as long as you don't examine it in any way.

Step 2: Pack the words “basically” and “fundamentally” around it a hundred times.

Step 3: Sit back as the Villagers oh-and-ah at your daring genius.

Step 4: Rinse and repeat forever

Well, obviously Newt does know something about never missing a meal or a payday in good times and bad. But since not all of us can get rich destroying America by wrapping ourselves in 9/11 and using the fading glory of our former office to pimp our latest racist conspiracy theory on the GOP propaganda network or our latest godawful hack book to the wingnut “Hate of the Month Club”…the rest of us have to deal with life and work in the Real World.

And out here in that Real World, several, specific festeringly mendacious aspects of Gingrich’s bold “Fuck the Unemployed” strategy caught my eye.

Fair warning: This is one off those times when -- since I have no editors -- I am free to get my wonk on as hard and freaky as I like. If that isn't your cup of coffee, feel free to skip on past it. Believe me, I am can go on for days about this sort of stuff, but out of common courtesy will let my inner geek run wild for just a few column inches.

So, first, the unemployment insurance (UI) bit:
1. UI is not available to just anyone: you only qualify by losing your job in under very specific circumstances.

2. Unemployment insurance is just that: insurance. A typical worker has spent decades paying into it precisely so he or she can collect it when they need it.

3. To receive UI, you can’t “do nothing”. You have to look for work. Every week. And prove it. Every week.

4. UI pays a pittance. A bare survival stipend to keep food on the table. That is all.

5. Contrary to the age-old “welfare queen”-baiting racism and “Poor = Lazy/ Rich = Virtuous” class warfare meme of the Right, the average unemployed worker wants to work. Typically, he or she is out there every fucking day knocking on doors and being told “no”, applying online to companies from which they never hear back, working their ever-fraying network of friends and former colleagues, sending out hundreds of resumes. They fail because…

6. There are no fucking jobs.

Also too...

7. If you are over 45 there is a terrifyingly high probability that our economy will never produce another substantive job for you again.

Good times...

Second, the job training bit :
1. From the Trade Adjustment Act to the Workforce Investment Act, there already are lots of job-training programs funded by the government with most of the money going to the recently unemployed.

2. U.S. job-training programs have traditionally been massively under-funded, and have never had enough staff or money to help even a fraction of those who needed it.

3. Under the Bush Administration, these already-inadequate programs were repeatedly cut and restrictions on them were repeatedly increased.

4. Under the Bush Administration, these programs aggressively shifted from the previous model (which emphasized exactly the sort of training that Gingrich now touts) to a “work first” model, that permitted training only as a last resort.

5. Under the Obama Stimulus Package (which the Right keeps insisting has inflicted more horrors on America than six Hitlers) money for job-training programs for the unemployed went way, way up.

Guess what happened?
  • Local governments had to hire a ton of new staff to handle the expected influx of clients, to make sure the training programs weren’t scams, to track the outcomes, and generally to manage an already-complex system that had just gotten 50% bigger overnight.
  • The newly-expanded programs filled up with unemployed people almost immediately.
  • The unemployed people flocked into training in huge numbers.

Then guess what happened next?
  • Because the funding was only temporary, within a year local governments had to fire many of the new staff they’d hired. Which effectively doubled the workload on those remaining behind.
  • Because local governments are broke, they had to fire even more staff. Which – when you add in other budget-balancing tricks like mandatory overtime and unpaid furlough days -- effectively re-doubled the workload on those whose survived the layoff.
  • Meanwhile, those record numbers of unemployed Americans who were sent off to training (using one-time-only dough for which they can now never qualify again) started to graduate, and the now-decimated local government staff became responsible for finding them jobs. And not just any jobs…
  • The rules say that if you don’t find those people jobs that pay (on average) at least 85% of what they were making before -- and if those people don’t keep those jobs for at least six months -- your program is considered to have failed.

Guess what happened next?
  • A whole lot of those unemployed people – maybe most of them -- have become stranded in the system: staying unemployed, or taking crappy jobs well below their previous salaries and which, like as not, have nothing to do with the training they just received courtesy of the American taxpayer..

Why?

Is it because they are lazy?

Don't want to work?

Are ineducable?

Want to just loaf and live large off the couple of hundred bucks they get a week?

No.

They are still unemployed because there are still no fucking jobs.
C'mon people, try to keep up.

Now there are any number of other dorkish dimensions to this that I could bore you with, but for now it is sufficient to understand that Newt Gingrich fully well knows everything I have just outlined above, but the credulous boobs who get their Reality from Fox almost certainly do not.

Which is why – despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary – the rubes on the Right continue to believe that the same old class warfare swill that Newt "It doesn't matter what I do” Gingrich is constantly ladling out
BEATINGS
somehow marks him as is a Deep Thinker.

Coming in Part Two: Is there – please God -- a Theoretical Upper Limit to how fucking unspeakably bad “Meet The Press" can get?



Saturday, December 04, 2010

Speechwriting 101


Because the words politicians say every day of their professional lives mostly do not come flipping spontaneously off of their mental griddles like so many Churchillian flapjacks.

Friday, December 03, 2010

Too High Up and Too Far Away


Inherit the Whinge

James Fallows ruminates pityingly on the dyspeptic old husk that John McCain has become...
"I can remember when McCain seemed to be a potentially Eisenhower-ish, as opposed to an increasingly Bunning-like, figure in American public life. Broad-minded, tolerant, eager to bridge rather than open divides -- this was the way he seemed to so many people starting from his arrival in the Congress in the 1980s.

"Seeing him now is surprising not simply because it reminds us: this man could be the sitting president, but also because it again raises the question, how did he end up this way? Even if his earlier identity had been artifice, what would be the payoff in letting it go?"

And tries to find historical parallels.
I have been trying to think of a comparable senior public figure who, in the later stages of his or her career, narrowed rather than broadened his view of the world and his appeals to history's judgment. I'm sure there are plenty (on two minutes' reflection, I'll start with Henry Ford and Charles Lindbergh), but the examples that immediately come to mind go the other way.

George C. Wallace, once a firebrand of segregation, eventually became a kind of racial-healing figure near the end of his troubled life.
...

May I suggest that William Jennings Bryan (or his cinematic alter-ego, Matthew Harrison Brady) and his involvement in the Scopes Trial probably comes closest.

The issues at hand in the Scopes Trial were, in crucial ways, remarkably similar to DADT:
"I say that you cannot administer a wicked law impartially. You can only destroy. You can only punish. I warn you that a wicked law, like cholera, destroys everyone it touches — its upholders as well as its defiers."

-- Henry Drummond, "Inherit The Wind"
And the conflict's central antagonist -- a once-popular, perpetual candidate for President who never closed the deal on the top job and ends up being publicly humiliated in a legal battle he should never have inserted himself into --

is about as close to a dead-bang match to McCain as you are likely to ever find.

They are both stories of once-towering figures in the twilight of their lives who have plunged off a cliff with both feet because, where years ago there was once vigor, there is now only a bilious mental and spiritual rigor mortis: only hubris and rage, being channeled though an increasingly narrow and bitter mind.

Or, as Henry Drummond put it at the end of the movie:
"A giant once lived in that body, but Matt Brady got lost because he looked for God too high up and too far away."

Your Friday Podcast


As always, peering deep into America's Zombietainment Industrial Complex to answer Tom Waits' musical question: "What's he building in there?"



Related links:
  • Anderson Cooper's interview with a Texas Birther, is here.


Buy the Button, take the Ride...

This mint-condition memento of the final days of the Mainstream Media is available at Blue Gal's Cafepress Store (and keep listening later in the year for an opportunity to win one). And the Podcast Donate Button button below allows listeners to throw a contribution specifically towards the podcast. Thanks for your listenership and support!




Thanks again to Frank Chow for the graphic and Heather at Crooks and Liars Video Cafe for their help. And don't forget, our archives are available for free with no downloads at Professional Left.

Thursday, December 02, 2010

David Brooks has a Vision

QUEENBOBO_SM

He wrote about it in that Big City New York Paper:

A Tax Reform Vision

Published: December 2, 2010

I have a vision.
...
See?

Yeah, well

I have a vision too.

In David Brooks' vision, President Obama behaves like a imperturbable saint and tells everyone to shut up while he reinvents the U.S. tax code, after which all the equally naughty Democrats and Republicans stop behaving naughtily and quiet down until he is down.

Then everyone follows his beacon of Pragmatic Tax Centrism into the light.
"The tax reform process would reintroduce the parties to each other, and reduce the Manichean caricatures that have built up in their heads."
Yeah, because the real problem with the Right is not the aggressively and premeditatedly ruthless, merciless, reckless and often sociopathic way they actually act -- and have acted for decades -- but merely the Left's kooky caricature of them.

In my vision, the New York Times goes out of the maudlin Centrist claptrap business, stops putting 800-word embarrassments like this on the editorial page of America's paper of record, and Mr. Brooks retires to a quiet life of McDonalds assistant-managerhood where he spends the rest of his years boring high school girls with tales of how he almost didn't get everything he ever believed completely fucking wrong.

And why not?

"Visions" are cheap, and apparently in some professions -- like journalism -- there are absolutely no career downsides for getting them completely and hilariously wrong.

Over and over and over again.


UPDATE: Yes, I did leave my helpful suggestions in Mr. Brooks' comment section last night.

And, yes, they seem to have disappeared into digital heaven.

Well, I'm sure they're in a better place now. No more tears, little comments! Now you can laugh and play in Snarkylysium with other comments forever.



A Soundtrack


For Blue Gal's very fine post about "needs" testing the Age of Aquarius.

3...2...1...
And there's never gonna be enough money
And there's never gonna be enough drugs
And I'm never ever gonna get old
There's never gonna be enough bullets
There's never gonna be enough sex
And I'm never ever gonna get old
...

When "30 Rock"


Was in black and white.

David Brooks is Not Amused

QUEENBOBO_SM
By WikiLeaks.

Nope.

Not at all.

From the NYT:
...
Far from respecting authority, [Julian] Assange seems to be an old-fashioned anarchist who believes that all ruling institutions are corrupt and public pronouncements are lies.
...

For someone with his mind-set, the decision to expose secrets is easy. If the hidden world is suspect, then everything should be revealed. As The New Yorker reported, WikiLeaks has published technical details about an Army device designed to prevent roadside bombs from detonating. It posted soldiers’ Social Security numbers. This week, the group celebrated the release of internal State Department documents with a triumphalist statement claiming that the documents expose the corruption, hypocrisy and venality of U.S. diplomats.

For him, it’s easy. But for everyone else, it’s hard. My colleagues on the news side of this newspaper do not share Assange’s mentality.
...

As journalists, they have a professional obligation to share information that might help people make informed decisions. ... At the same time, as humans and citizens, my colleagues know they have a moral obligation not to endanger lives or national security.

The Times has thus erected a series of filters between the 250,000 raw documents that WikiLeaks obtained and complete public exposure. The paper has released only a tiny percentage of the cables. Information that might endanger informants has been redacted. Specific cables have been put into context with broader reporting.

Yet it might be useful to consider one more filter. Consider it the World Order filter. The fact that we live our lives amid order and not chaos is the great achievement of civilization. This order should not be taken for granted.

This order is tenuously maintained by brave soldiers but also by talkative leaders and diplomats. Every second of every day, leaders and diplomats are engaged in a never-ending conversation. The leaked cables reveal this conversation.
...

The quality of the conversation is determined by the level of trust. Its direction is influenced by persuasion and by feelings about friends and enemies.

The quality of the conversation is damaged by exposure...

The WikiLeaks dump will probably damage the global conversation. Nations will be less likely to share with the United States. Agencies will be tempted to return to the pre-9/11 silos...

...
This fragile international conversation is under threat. It’s under threat from WikiLeaks. It’s under threat from a Gresham’s Law effect, in which the level of public exposure is determined by the biggest leaker and the biggest traitor.
...
David Brooks again underscores his lack-of-amusedness in his "Conversation" with Gail Collins today:
"They [The WikiLeaks] are bad for the world because they destroy trust, which isn’t in great supply to start with, and I wish the establishment still had enough self-confidence to marginalize this sort of behavior and protect the social ecology."
Poor, old Establishment; a multi-trillion dollar budget, control of every major gummint and financial institution on Earth, enough weapons to blow up half the Solar System, and they still can't muster enough horsepower to put those fucking hippies in their place.

But no surprise here, right?

You have another, Very Reasonable column by America’s Greatest Conservative Public Intellectual righteously defending a World Order which, in turn, permits America’s Greatest Conservative Public Intellectual to make a very good living defending it.

And as long as you only read David Brooks' Disneyfied, G-Rated fairy-tale version of "The Prince", that World Order is fairly simple to understand.

For example, its cast of characters is conveniently short and easy to divide into Black Hats and White Hats: there are Hero Journalismists who are constantly balancing their "moral obligations" against the public's right to know a few, saucy details about what the World Order had for lunch today and who it's dating; there are Noble Civil Servants (both armed and unarmed) who silently work behind the scenes to keep the gears and cams of the World Order humming smoothly along; and there are filthy, little Leakers who are (at best) anarcho-simpletons or (at worst) traitors, and always, always a proxy for the specter that has haunted David Brooks his entire adult life -- the Eternal Hippie who smells bad, needs a haircut, has weird sex (with the lights on fer Chrissake!) and wants to smash the System and bring down that nice President Nixon President Reagan President Bush President Cheney for no good reason!

And the mission of this World Order? Why, that's even easier to understand!

Like the Loving but Stern Daddy, the World Order merely wants whats best for you, kitten. Which, in this case, means making it possible for America’s Greatest Conservative Public Intellectual to drive to and from the Applebees of his choice without being attacked by Osama bin Laden.

Which, again, is very reasonable: Hell, after a hard day subverting the youth of America and questioning various dominate paradigms, even a dirty fucking hippie such as myself would like to be able to enjoy a nice Applebee's riblet basket, slice of Sizzling Apple Pie and a frosty adult beverage in peace and quiet, unmolested by al-Qaeda.

And as long as we are willing to act like good little Conservatives and collectively ignore the spectacularly inconvenient realities of recent American history prior to, say, 2008, then David Brooks' fairy tale of How The World Works hangs together really well.

Sadly, we are not good little Conservatives , but rude little Liberals who remember how completely David Brooks' fairy tale fell apart when the issue at hand was not the Myers-Briggs of world leaders, but the invasion of Iraq.

When the Hero Journalismists were agenda-pushing liars like David Brook's former New York Times colleague Judith Miller, and Wingnut sock-puppets like "Jeff Gannon"

(no, we haven't forgotten le Gannon.)

When the filthy, little Leakers were powerful Bush Administration hatchet-men like Scooter Libby, Karl Rove and Dick Cheney.



When the Noble Civil Servants were a diplomat named Joe Wilson who was trying to keep us from invading the wrong country, and a CIA operative named Valerie Plame, who was working undercover to save Mr. Brooks' favorite Applebees from being blown to atoms by keeping loose nukes from falling into the hands of groups like al-Qaeda.

Hmm. Let's see. Noble Civil Servants trying hard to keep us from getting blown up by nuclear-armed terrorists...and help us avoid pitching the world into a decade of avoidable anarchy by starting an endless, bloody war in a major Middle Eastern country based on lies, deluded ideology and a truly staggering ignorance of the local history and culture?

Wow! Sounds like just the kind of prudent actions the World Order would love! And just the sort of chaos-aversion strategies that America’s Greatest Conservative Public Intellectual now insists "should not be taken for granted."

So how did America’s Greatest Conservative Public Intellectual react to L'affaire Plame?

Funny you should ask.

America’s Greatest Conservative Public Intellectual and Defender of the Establishmentairian Faith described these events...

... as follows.

The scandal itself, according to David Brooks, was a "farce."
Ending the Farce

"In retrospect, Plamegate was a farce in five acts. The first four were scabrous, disgraceful and absurd. Justice only reared its head at the end."
(In other words, in Brooks' reckoning, "Justice only reared its head" when Scooter Libby's sentence was commuted.)

To continue...

Per America’s Greatest Conservative Public Intellectual, Joe Wilson was...
"...the charming P.T. Barnum of the National Security set, an inveterate huckster who could be counted on to wrap every actual fact in six layers of embellishment. "
Regarding the people who got screwed and the political hit job that the Bushies ran on them?
"By the start of Act Three, nobody cared about the outing of a C.I.A. agent. That part of the scandal disappeared. And all that was left of Joe Wilson and Valerie Plame were the creepy photos in Vanity Fair."
And far from being a filthy, little Leaker, Scooter Libby was an honorable guy who paid for his own lunch, fer Chrissakes! (from "The News Hour"):
DAVID BROOKS: I went to lunch with Scooter Libby twice when he was -- and he told me...

JIM LEHRER: What were the dates of those?

DAVID BROOKS: Well, what struck me was, A, he told me nothing. I didn't even know what he was ordering half the time.

DAVID BROOKS: And he was incredibly discrete.

And the second thing that always struck me is, he would pay in cash. Usually, you can buy somebody lunch if it's up to $20. But he would insist on following the law to the stickler of the detail. He would always put down a $20 bill.
Bush's critics?
"Of course, the howlers howl. That is their assigned posture in this drama. They entered howling, they will leave howling and the only thing you can count on is their anger has been cynically manufactured from start to finish."
The lasting effect of the Bush Administration's treasonable behavior?
"The farce is over. It has no significance. Nobody but Libby’s family will remember it in a few weeks time. Everyone else will have moved on to other fiascos, other poses, fresher manias."
All of which simply underscores what every rude little hippie already knows.

That behind his carefully cultivated firewall of Perfect Bland Reasonableness, David Brooks is just awful; just another spiteful, lying Conservative hypocrite with unlimited access press credentials.

And that David Brooks' World Order can be a very Nice Conservative Daddy who only wants what's best for you...

...right up until you cross it in any substantial way. At which point you can expect to have your throat ripped out, your family destroyed and your shattered body tossed into some back alley of history, where the last thing you will see in this life is David Brooks, hoisting up his 1,000 starched Centrist skirts and petticoats to take a piss on you.