Tuesday, September 29, 2026

The Barbering of Memory


One of the things Republicans clearly understand much better than Democrats is that politics is not just about laws and budgets and tax rates. It's also about shaping the past. About memory. About who gets remembered and who gets forgotten. About whose names get carved into stone, bolted onto airports, and slapped across every highway exit sign in America until future generations can barely remember a time when it wasn't there, which is why Grover Norquist spent years pushing his project to put Ronald Reagan's name on damn near everything that wasn't nailed down.

His goal was to have some landmark, building, road, bridge, school, or monument named after Reagan in every one of America's 3,141 counties. Hence Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport, the Ronald Reagan Turnpike, the Ronald Reagan Federal Building, and the Ronald Reagan Memorial Whatever-The-Hell. The point wasn't commemoration. The point was colonization.

Because that's what monuments are for.

And before some tote-bag Centrist starts hyperventilating about how monuments are merely expressions of civic pride, let's remember when and why most Confederate monuments went up. Not immediately after the Civil War. Not as spontaneous expressions of grief from bereaved widows. The great boom in Confederate monument construction came decades later, during the rise of Jim Crow, and then again during the Civil Rights era. They were not messages from the dead to the living. They were messages from the living to the living. They were giant bronze and marble "Fuck You!" billboards announcing who was in charge and who was expected to stay in their place.

Which brings us to Donald Trump.

Trump's obsession with naming, renaming, branding, rebranding, gold-plating and self-memorializing isn't just some eccentric personality quirk. It's part of the same tradition. Every building renamed. Every institution bent to his will. Every historical marker rewritten. Every federal program that had his brand slapped on it without even changing the font.  The point is to create the illusion of permanence. To make his movement seem inevitable.  To not just make his fascist movement a permanent part of the American political landscape, but to turn it into landscape itself, making future generations assume that all of this was always here and always would be.

The Romans had a name for the opposite process: Damnatio Memoriae. The condemnation of memory. When a tyrant fell -- through causes natural and otherwise -- if they were unpopular or there was political hay to be made damning their memory, then their statues came down, or their names and dates were chiseled off monuments and scraped from coins. Not because people suddenly forgot who the tyrant was, but because the public square isn't neutral and it isn't eternal.  

Every monument is making an argument, and every brass plate on every bench and building is an editorial. These are votes being cast in favor of a particular version of history. So if one generation has the authority to fill the landscape with propaganda, the next generation has exactly the same authority to haul it to the dump.

So, if the Trump administration can rename, redesignate, reclassify and reinvent public spaces to flatter the Dear Leader, another administration -- a Democratic administration -- can undo it.  Hell, who's to say that, in the name of "national security", a future administration couldn't seize Mar-a-Lago, compensate whichever of Trump's shell companies owns it one dollar as a fair market estimate of the value of a toxic shithole owned by the worst president in history, then turn it into a COVID Memorial Park.

If that's the future, Democrats need to come ready to play hardball.  Not to memory hole the record of the worst president in history, but to preserve the memory forever -- in parks, and statues, and piles of roped-off rubble -- that he was the worst president in history, that his collaborators in Congress and the media did betray this country, and that, driving all of it, was a mob of MAGA bigots and imbeciles.



Burn The Lifeboats


7 comments:

Anonymous said...

Americans should have done this writ large after the Civil War. The fact that Stone Mountain (loser, traitors) is bigger than Rushmore says everything. A big rock in Georgia is thumbing its nose at America.

dinthebeast said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
dinthebeast said...

"We forsake you, gonna rape you, let's forget you better still..."
-Pete Townshend

-Doug in Sugar Pine

Mr XD said...

A succinct description of the situation from a master wordsmith - "a mob of MAGA bigots and imbeciles."

Anonymous said...

"Democrats need to come ready to play hardball. Not to memory hole the record of the worst president in history, but to preserve the memory forever..."

Yeah, based on the track record, this won't happen. After all, the "we need to look forward, not backward" guy is still the most popular Democratic figure today^. And that mentality persists. Despite inheriting arguably the worst economy since the Great Depression, I can count on one hand the number of times Barack Obama *reminded* the American people who was responsible for that -- namely, George Bush Jr and the Republican party. And those precious few times he did blame them? He wouldn't name names. Instead he would hide behind weak-ass language like "the previous administration". Ditto for Biden, with his "The Former Guy (TFG)" nonsense when talking about Trump. And depressingly, legions of credulous liberals thought that was some *Sick Burn*, when in fact it was weak as hell. In politics, you gotta name names, yo. Republicans understand this, Democrats either don't or they're afraid of the blowback if they name names. Fwiw, my money's on the latter.

So yeah, if we're fortunate enough to have a Democratic presidential candidate win in 2028, the track record says they will mostly want to "Move On". Perhaps in terms of holding Republicans accountable they'll do better than Obama and Biden, but that's a bar that's so low, it's basically on the floor.

^One of these days Democrats are going to need to just admit that Barack Obama was a massive disappointment. He's incredibly overrated -- it's time to own up to that folks.

SouthSideGT said...

"Darkseid Is" Is it possible Grover Norquist influenced Grant Morrison? Anyway, Drifty, it's possible that Democrats led by people like AOC and Mamdani and Sayed are growing a spine. Further I don;t think Obama was a "massive disappointment" but he certainly was not a fighter who allowed the proto-MAGGOP to use him for a doormat by letting Moscow Mitch steal his SCOTUS pick not to mention he nearly shredded the social safety net just to cut a deal with Boehner. We were saved not by Obama but by Boehner and the proto-MAGAGOP who wouldn't take "yes' for an answer.

Robt said...

No rear of memory losses. We will have A.I. to tell us.
Tale remembering the fact of who won the 2020 election.
On the president's official site he has a AI to ask questions of. It seems people have asked this AI on the president's official web site , "Who won the 2020 election".
Now we have all jeard the Prez and his ranting and his lying claims of disproof.
His AI answered, " Joe Biden won and how many electoral he had and how many DJT had.
So you would think this will assist our memory.
Well, after the word got out, programmers got in to the AI on the Official site and altered it.
Now if you ask, it responds with it cannot reply with an answer to controversial political questions..
See how dependable AI is with its responsibility of knowledge to provide us worthless humans.?
Now we can accuse the AI of being corrupt and rigged just like elections by mail or election in person or election that allow anyone the Prez doesn't want to vote.