Monday, September 07, 2026

"Inadvertently"? You Keep Using That Word.


I do not think it means what you think it means.

This is so fucking adorable I could plotz.

We had the makings of just such an "independent media" decades ago.  

It was the Liberal blogosphere.

We saw through the legacy media's toxic addiction to the "Both Sides" lie.  We warned -- very clearly, every day -- exactly where the poisonous combination of escalating conservative-media lies and racism, coupled with obstinate legacy-media Both Siderist denialism, was going to lead.

And all of those warnings were routinely slandered and dismissed by the likes of Longwell, Kristol and all the rest of them until it was far, far too late.  After all, we were just Dirty Fucking Hippies.

Funny thing about the term Dirty Fucking Hippies, which was coined, I believe by Atrios/Duncan Black sometime during the early aughts.  This would have been during roughly the same period that Sarah Longwell was working for the Conservative Intercollegiate Studies Institute, and Bloody Bill Kristol was pimping the shit out of Bush's Iraq Debacle, promising it would all be over in a matter of weeks, and calling anyone who opposed it a clueless libtard traitor. 

Y'know, the Good Old Days.

The point of “Dirty Fucking Hippies” wasn't the profanity: it was the sarcasm. It was how Beltway pundits and journalists portrayed the online left precisely because bloggers could say things establishment media figures refused to say.

In fact, it could get you fired.  From Sarah Boxer, in The New York Review, February 2008:

Bloggers give new, Web-inflected meanings to old words. A “troll” on the Web is someone who posts provocative things just to cause an outcry. “Astroturfing” is creating a fake grassroots movement. Bloggers also sprinkle their blogs with expressions like WTF (translation: “What the fuck?”), lol (laugh out loud), and meh (a verbal shrug). They willfully misspell—like “teh” for “the.” They call the Internet “the internets,” cutely following George W. Bush’s slip. If people wrote like this for publication, they’d be fired. 

And, indeed, there is a term for getting canned because of your blog: “dooced,” named for the blogger Dooce, now a stay-at-home-mother (SAHM) or, as she puts it, a “Shit Ass Ho Motherfucker,” who got fired for blogging about her employer.

Bloggers challenged mainstream-media gatekeeping and the way the media had become an insulated, self-satisfied cult of performative "objectivity".  It's Jay Rosen's "view from nowhere".  And starting during the Bush years, Liberal bloggers treated profanity as evidence that they were not performing objectivity for elite approval.

Which sure sounds a fuck of a lot like the makings of an "independent media" to me.  

And of course, during all that time, Longwell, Kristol and all the rest of them never objected to the corrosive Both Siderism of the legacy media, because that corrosive Both Siderism always tilted the playing field heavily in favor of the Right.  It still does. And so only now, when the same Both Siderism is no longer reliably serving their side, do Longwell, Kristol and all the rest of them seem to have discovered that there's something wrong.  

But it's the word "inadvertently" that makes it art.  

As you might know, The Bulwark runs live-read ads for The New York Times, and were running live-read ads for The Washington Post right up until pundits like Jennifer Rubin began fleeing the place.  Their rapid growth has depended almost entirely on MSNBC (now MS NOW) promoting their business and their employees practically every single day since it was founded in 2019, plus regular appearances on NPR and that bastion of Both Siderism, the  Sunday Shows.  And, of course, by maintaining at least a cordial relationship with the legacy media.  A small sample:

 The Washington Post (May 2024):  

"The Bulwark finds a sweet spot in the center-right"

Vanity Fair (2025)

"How The Bulwark Is Thriving in a New Trump Era"

Semafor (2025)

"Washington Post economics columnist moves to The Bulwark"


Which is no surprise given that the Trump origin myth that Never Trumpers have been peddling since day one:  that Trump came outta nowhere and somehow hypnotized 77 million voters and virtually every elected Republican into becoming fascists.  Isn't that weird?

That story is ever so much more congenial to the Both Siderist bubble the lords and ladies of the legacy media live in than the actual history of the modern GOP that Liberals are always yapping about.  

So why go out of your way to piss off institutions who you wish to speak kindly of your business and your brand new book?

Hence the word "inadvertently".

But we Dirty Fucking Hippies know better.

Oh yes, we fucking well do.  



I Am The Liberal Media


4 comments:

SteveSteve said...

i really hate those guys.

RockDots said...

Smuggle this into the Bulwark comments section. A great topic for Buy My Book Week!

Robt said...

Words mean things, I am told by right wingers/
As they call Democratic minded folks Socialists and Progressives Communists.
They have a large derogatory vocabulary they built over the years.
Forming a group of people and calling yourself a political party or a movement is a socialist endeavor uniting together for your desires.
Accepting money from wealthy people to act only in the manner these donors demand is communism.
Having your GOP members send in their money to the GOP leadership for them to spend in the groups behalf is Socialism.

If you are a registered republican you are in a socialized group.
When a republican controlled government offers tax dollars (other people's money) to wealthy corporate entities. As Space X operating cost is 40% funded by tax payers.
This is socialism again.
When GW Bush deregulated that banking industry and it collapsed from its crazed wild casino gambling with customers dollars and lost badly into bankruptcy. That GOP controlled government that bailed out the banks was an act of Socialism.
When a republican goes to congress, he receives tax dollars as pay, health care and other perks. Supposedly for representing the constituents. This is socialism. When they are lobbied and bribed to disregard their constituents and act on behalf of the bribe. This is corrupt communism.
Of course there is Crony capitalism, corrupt capitalism and other categories but not discussing all them today.
Need I explain more?
Is it clear when GOP is name calling what they are as a projection?
Does this make it clear
There are names for things like this.
The same people who condemn sex trafficking are the same people that are hiding the Epstein files and many of them are in the files for reasons.
What do we call that?

dinthebeast said...

You know who did not, in fact, get fired for writing like that, and had a column in the, uh, right-leaning San Francisco Examiner?
Hunter S Thompson, that's who.
He sort of explained that situation in a column about heroin, I'll try to quote from memory: "If the Reagan administration could find a speechwriter who could write like Sam Coleridge, they would hire him on the spot and never mind his nasty habits."

-Doug in Sugar Pine