Thursday, February 19, 2026

These Days, Any $10 Cassandra Can Predict With Astonishing Accuracy...

...what advice Team Legacy Media and Team Never Trump will always insist Democrats must follow if they don't want to lose everything.

So, no surprise that, over at The Bulwark, Mark Leibovich's "advice" to Democrats was centered entirely around picking fights with other Democrats.

From Leibovich's Atlantic article, which is why Tim Miller invited him over for a bitch sesh:

The squabble underscored how the Democrats can’t help but keep playing to a stubborn stereotype—a soft and pampered bunch, unwilling to make the gritty sacrifices (such as getting dressed) necessary to prevail in their “existential” campaign to save democracy.

“The Democrats treat their fucking people like kindergartners,” Sarah Longwell, a former Republican consultant who quit the party over Donald Trump, told me. Longwell can get exasperated by her new allies on the left. When I mentioned the DNC’s in-person-work kerfuffle, it set her off.

“Republicans are over here being straight-up mercenaries,” Longwell said. “Democrats give everybody Fridays off and talk about work-life balance.” She apologized for yelling into the phone. Democrats “are not built for when the fascists come,” she concluded... 

Martin himself has a knack for reinforcing these caricatures. Just as I was starting this project, he presided over the DNC’s summer meeting in Minneapolis to begin the urgent work of rebuilding the Democratic coalition and making the party palatable to American voters again. Soon after calling the assembly of more than 400 party officials to order, Martin relinquished his mic to a representative of the Saginaw Ojibwe Nation for the DNC’s “land acknowledgment” ritual. Switching between English and her tribal language, the Indigenous woman affirmed that Minneapolis had been stolen from its native Dakota Oyate Tribe (“the original stewards of the lands and waters”). 

The interlude took only a minute or two but received outsize attention—and ridicule—as an example of how Democrats remain overly concerned with performative pandering to various small identity groups. “It is difficult to imagine more than a handful of people looking out over the current hellscape of U.S. policy and thinking to themselves: You know what we need to be sure to address today? The Dakota War of 1862,” Andrew Egger wrote in The Bulwark.

So let's take a look at how minor HR dispute and two minutes of harmless comments at a summer DNC meeting in 2025 got turned into a five-alarm, OMG DEMOCRATS ARE THE WORST! fire in 2026 at The Bulwark.

To start with, I found it interesting that Leibovich didn't feel the need to include the next couple of sentences of Egger's Bulwark column which are as follows (emphasis added):
Right-wing media gleefully ping-ponged the clip around social media: Wake up, babe, they’re still doing land acknowledgments!

Democrats may believe, sincerely, that there is no harm (and, indeed, some good) in these displays. But many more people instinctively recoil against this sort of thing...
Two things.  One for later and one for now.  The later thing is, who exactly are the "many more people" who "instinctively recoil against this sort of thing" and how in the world do these "many more people" know the first god damn thing about the 2025 DNC summer meeting?

Could these "many more people" tell me anything at all about the other 99.9% of that meeting?  Do they have strong opinions about the Rules and Bylaws Committee evaluating the early voting state lineup for the 2028 presidential election?  

Or the Resolutions Committee debate over proposals regarding the Israel-Hamas war, including potential calls for a ceasefire and changes to military aid?  

How about the "Organizing Summer" Initiative to build volunteer networks, register voters, and engage in non-political spaces to prepare for 2025/2026 elections?  Any thoughts on those?

Let's put a pin in that for a minute, and get on to the second thing.  In the portion of the column that Leibovich left out, Egger explains how this tiny moment became a "story" at all.  The right-wing media was doing what the right-wing media always does: latching on to some incredibly trivial moment that would have otherwise passed unnoticed,.. or taking some remark wildly out of context ... or just making shit up and using their gargantuan fascist echo chamber to hype the shit out of it.

Fox News headline, August 25, 2025:
DNC opens summer meeting with land acknowledgement ...
The second Fox News headline, August 25, 2025:
Lindy Sowmick, a Minnesota Democrat and self-described 'Indigenous queer woman,' recited the acknowledgement Monday...
The National Desk, August 26, 2025:
DNC faces ridicule over land acknowledgment
Ridicule?  Really?  From whom, I wonder?  Is it from...the fascists?!

The Colorado Springs Gazette:
Byron York blasts DNC land acknowledgement...
Really?  York at the Colorado Springs Gazette?  Oh how the mighty fops of yesteryear have fallen.

Megyn Kelly on Facebook:  
The Democratic party learned NOTHING as they start summer meeting with "land acknowledgement..."
Megyn Kelly on YouTube:  
The Democratic party learned NOTHING as they start summer meeting with "land acknowledgement...
Megyn Kelly on YouTube Shorts:  
Megyn Kelly reacts to the ridiculously long "land acknowledgement" at DNC summer meeting.
The Blaze:  
The Democrats have gone insane
So at this point this is just another "OMG!  Obama wore a tan suit!"/ "OMG!  Obama likes fancy mustard!"/"OMG!  That crazy communist Kenyan Obama thinks inflating your tires correctly will solve all our energy problems!" bit of catnip for the bigots and imbeciles who think Fox News is "news" and who jerk off to Megyn Kelly's hate-porn.

For the fascists to boost bullshit like this out of the Fox News terrarium and into the wider world they're gonna need help.   

They need their manufactured indignation at least appear to be "bipartisan".  

The need some cranky, octogenarian Democrat who is 20 years past his sell-by date to pop off about how awful this insignificant little moment was.

They need...
Carville slams DNC over land acknowledgment.
There we go!

Yep.  That was the Fox News headline, August 28, 2025.

And this was the Fox News headline, August 29, 2025:
Carville rebukes DNC over woke 'land acknowledgment' ...
And this was the headline in Rupert Murdoch's New York Post,  August 29, 2025:
Carville erupts over DNC's woke land acknowledgment ...
Yay!  It's out there in the world now!  People are talking!  People like Dan "Turncoat" Turrentine talking to [checks notes] Laura Fucking Ingraham.  

So helpful!

From The Daily Caller, August 26, 2025:
‘It’s Maddening’: Ex-Dem Strategist Slams Party After Day 1 Of DNC Summer Meeting

Former Democratic strategist Dan Turrentine condemned his party on Monday following the first day of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) summer meeting.

One of the first items on the DNC meeting agenda was a “land acknowledgement,” based on the premise that the Minnesota land they were on was improperly taken from indigenous people. Turrentine said on “The Ingraham Angle” that the Democratic Party was repeating its past mistakes that led it to its current diminished state. 

“Laura, you said it: it’s the definition of insanity: you just keep doing the same thing over and over again. And as a Democrat, it’s maddening that we’re still not serious,” Turrentine told host Laura Ingraham.
And this is where Cokie's Law kicks in.

Are you familiar with Cokie's Law?  If not, let the coiner of the term, OG Liberal blogger and my Bradcast radio partner, Heather "Digby" Parton, explain.  From Salon, August 24, 2015:
Many years ago when political blogging was in its infancy, I coined the phrase “Cokie’s Law,” which referred to a specific comment by pundit Cokie Roberts about the Lewinsky scandal that illustrated the precise way the beltway media excused their propensity for cheap gossip and scandalmongering. In discussing whether or not Hillary Clinton had actually blamed her husband’s childhood for his philandering, Roberts said:
“At this point it doesn’t much matter whether she said it or not because it’s become part of the culture. I was at the beauty parlor yesterday and this was all anyone was talking about.”
Cokie’s Law is the axiom that says the press can  pass judgement about anything once it’s “out there” regardless of whether or not what’s “out there” is true. This allows them to skip doing boring rebuttals of the facts at hand and instead hold forth at length about how it bears on the subject’s “judgement” and the “appearance” of wrongdoing without ever proving that what they did was wrong.
Once Carville had popped off, and Egger had written his bitchy paragraph and worried about those  "many more people" who "instinctively recoil against this sort of thing",  the pervasive contempt for Democrats which is always roiling just below the surface at The Bulwark was free to ricochet around like a fistful of bottle rockets in a phonebooth.  

They were obsessed with this story, not because of anything inherent about the facts of the story, but because of what "people out there", "voters", "normal people" would think.  See!  See!  Democrats don't care about normal people stuff.  This is why Democrats lose!

No, this is why you can never trust a Never Trumper.  Because they've still got that Conservative media wiring in their heads.  Because whenever the Conservative media machine (which they loyally served for their entire adult lives) does shit like this, it never occurs to them to attack the machine itself for wildly exaggerating some bit of nothing into Civilization On The Brink Of Collapse.  

Instead they automatically react by beating up on Democrats for...what?  For letting someone talk for 90 seconds at a two day conference?  

This is why your humble scrivener warned y'all about the Never Trumpers colonizing the Liberal media and elbowing actual Liberals out of the way.  Because believe it or not, there is another way -- a different way -- to talk about these garbage stories which the right-wing media is constantly trying (and, as they did here, frequently succeeding) to stovepipe into the wider public conversation.

You hang a lantern on it.  Contextualize it.  Talk about how the whole Fox News business model is based on taking trivial nonsense and inflating into crises and expecting us to fall for it.  To be distracted from the Epstein Files by it. Good God how stupid do they think we are?

Also, I for one would like someone to explain to me how it came to be the received wisdom of the Legacy Media that low-information or disengaged or undecided voters can be people who have no idea what's happening in the country and couldn't tell you who their senators are or their representative is if you held a bazooka to their heads.. 

...while at the same time these same low-information or disengaged or undecided voters are apparently so deeply enmeshed in the right-of-the-decimal-point organizational details of the Democratic party that they're going to give up on the Democrats and vote straight fascist party ticket because of 90 seconds at the 2025 DNC party meeting or some HR dispute that some anonymous, disgruntled staffer leaked to The New York Times (which is always only too happy to "report" on bitchy office gossip.)  

And our "allies" will never just use a Fox News talking point to bludgeon Democrats just once.  They recycle them, stacking one high dudgeon atop another until they have the highest dudgeon of all.  

Because it wasn't enough for our "ally" to wildly overreact in the pages of The Atlantic to what amounted to an HR dispute:

“The Democrats treat their fucking people like kindergartners,” Sarah Longwell, a former Republican consultant who quit the party over Donald Trump, told me. Longwell can get exasperated by her new allies on the left. When I mentioned the DNC’s in-person-work kerfuffle, it set her off.

“Republicans are over here being straight-up mercenaries,” Longwell said. “Democrats give everybody Fridays off and talk about work-life balance.” She apologized for yelling into the phone. Democrats “are not built for when the fascists come,” she concluded...

Goodness no.  Leibovich just had to recycle the bullshit Fox News talking point from last year to make sure the knife went in all the way.  

You can watch this shit move through the system like a contrasting agent moving through a human body during a C/T scan.   From the Fox News Bombast Machine to Megyn Kelly's histrionics to a useful chump like James Carville shitting pine cones over it, then on to The Bulwark and cable news...

...then recycled and amplified in The Atlantic, then back to The Bulwark where any $10 Cassandra knows what comes next.  

A stern warning that if Democrats want to win, they need to start picking fights with other Democrats.

And picking fights with former Democratic presidents.  

Oh, and don't forget picking fights with "various groups that make up the party’s broad coalition".  

So yay!  More hippie punching. All of which is supposed to make Democrats more popular with "regular people."

And yet somehow going after Republicans -- y'know, the actual fascists who actually have a knife to the throat of American democracy -- isn't really on the menu.  

So, should Democrats follow this advice and start a circle of infighting, what exactly is it that "regular people" are supposed to suddenly notice?  That no Democrat likes the Democrats?  That every Democrat is running against their own party?  

In which case this $10 Cassandra predicts that, should any of that happen, we can all look forward to a chorus of Team Legacy Media and Team Never Trump voices decrying "Democrats in disarray."

One final note, by way of demonstrating that anyone can have all kinds of fun with Cokie's Law.  Can you believe Sarah Longwell losing her shit and yelling into the phone while she was on the record?

But, well, what'dya expect?  Chicks, amirite!  Way too emotional to be trusted with really important jobs.  

And, being a sane and decent person, you would probably bark at me.  How dare I!  And rightly demand that I take that misogynist shit back.  

But, see, under the shield of Cokie's Law I am protected.

Because under the shield of Cokie's Law it doesn't matter if it's true. 

All that matters is my assertion that some non-specific group of "people" are talking about it.

That it's "out there"  

That it's "in the air".

That it's what I'm hearing.


I Am The Liberal Media



No comments: