This is not the time to speak on or report on or speculate on or point the finger of blame of. It is Thoughts and Prayers time.
After the Las Vegas mas shooting, I wrote my GOP house Rep and asked that he consider legislative actions he could take to prevent such devastation in the future. His response was that he is a believer in the 2nd Amendment. No, he didn't explain whose definition of the 2ndamendmment he believes in. He did volunteer this wonderful incite of his view. "Strongly believe in the 2nd Amendment right to bear arms to defend yourself against government tyranny". Unquote.
I sent a follow up for him to clarify, Exactly how does the right to defend against government tyranny work? Is it a individual judgement? A specific group think? Does a political party leader make the call of Tyranny? During that time GOP Rep. Steve Scalise was shot at a baseball feild while practicing. He had a security dtail provided to him as he was number 3 GOP in the house at the time. The security detail responded and shot and killed the shooter. This was on a day the GOP house was to take up a bill to legalize silencers for guns. But I asked my congressman, Being that Scalise is in fact government. That this shooter must of concluded he was being being tyrannical by government. Didn't this mean that the shooter was legally exercising his 2nd Amendment right to defend himself from a tyrannical government??? Which would mean, did the Scalise security team -- Murders__ THAT SHOOTER? No response of course.
The question now after the Trump rally shooting.
First, prove that Trump was the target? Not the others who were hit.
If this shooter was exercising his 2nd Amendment right to defend himself from government tyranny. Did Trump's security detail MURDER him? Trump says he is still president which makes him government. Apparently the shooter believed he was being tyrannized. Does that make the shooter's intent legal right of exercising his 2nd Amendment right?
With the SCOTUS rulings on guns everywhere for every one.
I noticed they received threat calls over their decisions on things like Roe. SCOTUS demanded congress increase the funding for extra security for the Justices. Same justices that have a law that bans any one from carrying a weapon within 300 yards of the SCOTUS building where they pretend to rule with legal minds. There is an exemption for justices to carry weapons at the building . We can;t afford security for all these people anymore with our national debt and all. Each of those justices can purchase a firearm to defend themselves like any other citizen. They are the same justices that cause guns for everyone everywhere in regular citizens lives. The wife and I discussed things like going to grocery shop. A simple thing. Except now we don't know which gun toting person is about to start spraying bullets. We must be aware of exits to flee. They did this and they do not provide my wife with a security detail to grocery shop.
The same guy who on J6 was told his supporters were not entering through the entrance provided because they were armed and did not want to go through the metal detectors. That his response was, turn off the metal detectors and let them through because they are his people and not here to harm him. Harm other is okay. Is the same guy who has a security detail force gun owners to go through security entrance to come into a perimeter for the rally. In other words, no guns pass this point. But guns in our grocery stores, our toy stores, cutches, concerts, Etc.. is legal. Check your gun before entering MAGA Loco. When does the SCOTUS 6 rule that prison is a dangerous place and prisoners have a right to have arms to defend themselves under the 2nd Amendment shall not be infringed.?? DEfund these security details and and give these people the freedom to defend themselves under the 2nd Amendment as they interpret it. You know, like the rest of us.
5 comments:
This is not the time to speak on or report on or speculate on or point the finger of blame of.
It is Thoughts and Prayers time.
After the Las Vegas mas shooting, I wrote my GOP house Rep and asked that he consider legislative actions he could take to prevent such devastation in the future.
His response was that he is a believer in the 2nd Amendment. No, he didn't explain whose definition of the 2ndamendmment he believes in.
He did volunteer this wonderful incite of his view.
"Strongly believe in the 2nd Amendment right to bear arms to defend yourself against government tyranny". Unquote.
I sent a follow up for him to clarify,
Exactly how does the right to defend against government tyranny work?
Is it a individual judgement? A specific group think? Does a political party leader make the call of Tyranny?
During that time GOP Rep. Steve Scalise was shot at a baseball feild while practicing. He had a security dtail provided to him as he was number 3 GOP in the house at the time.
The security detail responded and shot and killed the shooter. This was on a day the GOP house was to take up a bill to legalize silencers for guns.
But I asked my congressman, Being that Scalise is in fact government. That this shooter must of concluded he was being being tyrannical by government. Didn't this mean that the shooter was legally exercising his 2nd Amendment right to defend himself from a tyrannical government???
Which would mean, did the Scalise security team -- Murders__ THAT SHOOTER? No response of course.
The question now after the Trump rally shooting.
First, prove that Trump was the target? Not the others who were hit.
If this shooter was exercising his 2nd Amendment right to defend himself from government tyranny. Did Trump's security detail MURDER him? Trump says he is still president which makes him government. Apparently the shooter believed he was being tyrannized. Does that make the shooter's intent legal right of exercising his 2nd Amendment right?
With the SCOTUS rulings on guns everywhere for every one.
I noticed they received threat calls over their decisions on things like Roe.
SCOTUS demanded congress increase the funding for extra security for the Justices. Same justices that have a law that bans any one from carrying a weapon within 300 yards of the SCOTUS building where they pretend to rule with legal minds. There is an exemption for justices to carry weapons at the building .
We can;t afford security for all these people anymore with our national debt and all. Each of those justices can purchase a firearm to defend themselves like any other citizen.
They are the same justices that cause guns for everyone everywhere in regular citizens lives. The wife and I discussed things like going to grocery shop. A simple thing. Except now we don't know which gun toting person is about to start spraying bullets. We must be aware of exits to flee.
They did this and they do not provide my wife with a security detail to grocery shop.
Defund security for SCOTUS .
Clearing my craw,
The same guy who on J6 was told his supporters were not entering through the entrance provided because they were armed and did not want to go through the metal detectors.
That his response was, turn off the metal detectors and let them through because they are his people and not here to harm him. Harm other is okay.
Is the same guy who has a security detail force gun owners to go through security entrance to come into a perimeter for the rally. In other words, no guns pass this point.
But guns in our grocery stores, our toy stores, cutches, concerts, Etc.. is legal.
Check your gun before entering MAGA Loco.
When does the SCOTUS 6 rule that prison is a dangerous place and prisoners have a right to have arms to defend themselves under the 2nd Amendment shall not be infringed.??
DEfund these security details and and give these people the freedom to defend themselves under the 2nd Amendment as they interpret it. You know, like the rest of us.
The truth shall set us free.
Bartkid sez,
'Cause fire is the Devil's only friend
Post a Comment