It's in the last paragraph, which I'll get to directly after noting how, in his alter ego (or altar ego, hehehe) as the Faith and Humility Reporter for the Acela Corridor Pantograph beat reporter, Brooks reacted to Joe Biden's mention of the word "soul" as a thirsty man lost in the high desert might react to glimpsing a fully stocked La Croix wet bar next to a shiny, new Mercedes-Benz G Class on the horizon.
Here, ankle deep the bitter dregs of his long career of being wrong about everything, nothing so reanimates Mr. Brooks of The New York Times like the opportunity to burn a whole column making ponderous, sweeping, gassy pronouncements about Life, The Universe and Everything.
I want to dwell on the little word “soul” in that sentence because...
Nope. Don't care.
What is a soul? Well, religious people have one answer to that question. But Biden...
Nope. Still don't care.
But on he goes.
Because humans have souls, each one is of...
And on...
Because humans have souls, each one is...
And on...
The soul is the name we can give to...
And on...
The soul is the place our moral...
And on...
It is the place where our moral yearnings...
And on, until we come to the turn.
Political campaigns are not usually contests over the status of the soul. But Donald Trump, and Trumpism generally...
You must be fucking kidding me. The party of "Guns, God and Gays"? The party of anti-choice marches for Jesus? The "Book of Virtues" party? The Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson party?
The "school prayer" party? The monuments-to-the-Ten-Commandments everywhere party? The Karl Rove and Matthew Dowd slapping gay-hating constitutional amendments on the ballot in 13 states in 2004 to help Dubya sleaze his way back into the White House party?
Justice Sunday was a series of religious conferences organized by the Family Research Council, founded by James Dobson and headed by Tony Perkins, and Dobson's Focus on the Family organizations. According to FRC, the purpose of the events was to "request an end to filibusters of judicial nominees that were based, at least in part, on the nominees' religious views or imputed inability to decide cases on the basis of the law regardless of their beliefs."[1] Three such conferences were held. Perkins and Dobson have been present as speakers at all events, and some conservative politicians, including Zell Miller, Tom DeLay and Bill Frist have also made appearances.
A sequel to the first Justice Sunday, subtitled "God Save the United States and this Honorable Court" event was held on August 14, 2005 in Nashville, Tennessee. Conspicuously absent from the event was U. S. Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, who had recently drawn fire for departing from U. S. President George W. Bush's policy on stem cell research.
Speakers included Tony Perkins, James Dobson, Robert H. Bork, Tom DeLay, Zell Miller, Chuck Colson, Phyllis Schlafly, William A. Donohue, Harry R. Jackson, Jr., and Dr. Jerry Sutton.
A third Justice Sunday event, subtitled "Proclaim Liberty Throughout the Land" took place January 8, 2006, the day before Samuel Alito's confirmation hearings for the Supreme Court began. The event took place in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania at the Greater Exodus Baptist Church.
Greater Exodus is led by Pastor Herbert H. Lusk, II. Lusk explains his reasoning by saying, that he wants the government to "appoint people to the justice system that would be attentive to the needs I care about - stopping same-sex marriage, assisted suicide and abortions for minors and supporting prayer and Christmas celebrations in school."
James Dobson, Tony Perkins and Jerry Falwell took part as speakers, as well as Alveda King and Rick Santorum. Members from the local community and various organizations including Planned Parenthood and The World Can't Wait stood outside and protested the event.
Because unless I am somehow misremembering the thousands of scolding lectures delivered from a hundreds of pulpits and podia, and the dozens and dozens of the sanctimonious books by sanctimonious frauds about how the GOP was was in an apocalyptic struggle against the "Party of Death", it is fair to say that the modern Right -- of which Mr. Brooks was very much a part -- was built on the smug certainty of their moral superiority and animated by their belief that the soul of America was under imminent threat from wanton, degenerate, godless dirty hippies like me.
So no. It's not "Donald Trump, and Trumpism". It's David Brook's Republican party completing the long, dark journey it's been on since Brooks was in short pants. It's David Brook's Conservative movement finishing what it started decades ago.
Trump, and Trumpism generally, represents a kind of nihilism that you might call...
Nope. If it represents what 99% of Republican elected officials are willing to go along with, either cynically or enthusiastically, and it's what 99% of Republican voters either openly cheer for or will go along with...then it is, by definition, Republicanism.
Then comes a lot of pious preaching about the nihilism.
One of the hardest, soul-wearying parts of living through the Trump presidency was that we had to endure a steady downpour of lies, transgressions and demoralizing behavior..
One of the hardest, soul-wearying parts of seeing David Brooks' Republican party, over the past 50 years, making itself into a monster factory that would inevitably produce a beast like Trump while we on the Left warned over and over again that it would all end in ruin and tears, was being lectured on the moral superiority of Conservatism by pious mopes like Brooks. Being brushed off as crackpot alarmists by pious mopes like Dav, over and over again, decade after decade, until it was far too late.
And then, the kicker -- having to hear, over and over again, from these same pious mopes, how nobody could have possibly seen any of this coming.
These same pious mopes who still occupy the same privileged positions in the media.
And, at last, we arrive at the very end of the column where we find a slight variation of the watchword which, sooner or later, you will hear repeated by every recently-former Republican with a camera or microphone or a keyboard, from Joe Walsh to Rick Wilson to David Fucking Brooks
The contest between Biden and Trumpism is less Democrat versus Republican or liberal versus conservative than it is between an essentially moral vision and an essentially amoral one, a contest between decency and its opposite.
Fuck you David Brooks. This is damn well is Democrat versus Republican and liberal versus conservative in exactly the same way that the Civil War damn well was North versus South, Union versus secession, freedom versus slavery.
In the name of God and Saint Ronald Reagan, your recently-former party has spent a generation and billions of dollars drawing an ever-clearer, ever-brighter, every-more-openly-bigoted and ever-more-openly-fascist Us vs. Them line across this country.
And the fact that a small handful of smarmy, pious, elite media Conservatives freaked out and ran when the Rough Beast your side has been trying to conjure since before Nixon finally slouched its way all the way to the White House up in the form of Donald Trump does not make this less so.
8 comments:
Excellent! Just excellent!
Thank you.
Thank you , that was just perfect !
The hazard of these arguments about Brooks' contradictory turns of thought is that to claim Brooks' thinking has gone wrong assumes that there was ever a time when it was right. Having followed Brooks through your blog since 2005ish I don't recall there was ever that time.
What's going on is much deeper and stranger than one adipose white preacher with a lifetime sinecure on the masthead of the USA's (world's) newspaper of record. Brooks seems to genuinely believe his own screedling as sermons from some mount, so satirizing him in papal garb is sort of dull: that's who he actually thinks he is, and it seems sulzbergera take sacrament from him as the spirit of wherever...
It's pointless to critique it with reason, because it's never been reasonable.
There's something else about it.
Presumably Brooks has an adoring audience. Who are they? Your trope of him scolding "hippies" gets to the heart of Brooks: he's a holdover of WASPy rectitude for a USA conservatism spoiled by libertine sons.
I see the direct antecedents of Brooks' rectitude in the power of Joseph Kennedy, the celebrity and fashion of JFK and the political muscle of RFK.
Two documentaries taken together place an bold light on the ethical miasma of the American politics that produced Brooks and Trump.
Any reading of US history during Brooks' lifetime must attend the facts of a coalesced duality of the two major parties amidst the rise of enormous Federal economy and generational fallout of an industrial volcano of social upheaval overshadowing any rhetoric of this age is Brooks'.
There are movies about US culture that now put floodlight on the upheaval:
Elia Kazan A Directors' Journey (1995)
https://m.imdb.com/title/tt0246601/
Sinatra: All or Nothing at All (2015) Part 2
https://m.imdb.com/title/tt4584952/
Exterminate All the Brutes (2021)
https://m.imdb.com/title/tt8396314/
Watchmen (2019 miniseries)
https://m.imdb.com/title/tt7049682/
Can't Get You Out of My Head (2021)
https://m.imdb.com/title/tt13973190/
Hypernormalization (2016)
https://m.imdb.com/title/tt6156350
Sorcerer (1977)
https://m.imdb.com/title/tt0076740/
After seeing these movies, it will be impossible to further regard American politics as something substantial anchored in common sense pursuit of justice. With luck Brooks might shrink in your tiny pantheon of bleating heads to his rightful stature as a Ken doll of discourse for the insane culture we all now endure.
Pretty sure President Biden has a soul.
Not so sure about Dark Brandon.
Perhaps there are different types of souls.
Some people are Ass-souls
mr. brooks is a funhouse mirror. he needs to reflect on how, in all things he is wise, compassionate, and patriotic. he wants those of like minds to follow along..to read, to think and to keep him in upscale comfortable loafers and have a well endowed retirement. to see themselves as they imagine.
this is the legacy of edmund burke...to comfort the oppressors, to succor their dim glimmering of a sense of responsibility and empathy. that IS compassionate conservatism...edmund burke was british empire loving irishman
'i am sorry you feel bad and you have nothing really wrong and if so you did it for the right reasons...'
you are swell! that is the message the center needs as that as THEIR red meat...you are noble and good.
(..his political career was entirely confined to England where he moved freely in the shades of the great oak trees, the Rockinghams and the Fitzwilliams, and where pronouncements such as "Ireland cannot be separated one moment from England without losing every source of her present prosperity and even hope of her future" were entirely acceptable.'...https://www.irishtimes.com/news/brought-to-burke-1.1131390)
Good morning DG and BG.
Excellent essay as always. Thank you.
I understand that you're (sort of) respecting Mr. Brooks by referring to him as a former Republican. Also with respect, I would aver that I don't think that's accurate.
Mr. Brooks may wrap himself in centrist, "above all that" rhetoric, but his words - DECADES of his poisonous words - make it utterly and unignorably clear that David Brooks is still very much a Republican. If he lacks the courage to proudly wear that badge, that only further denotes his lack of character, integrity and honesty.
Or more simply put, Brooks is as he always was: a remorseless, conscienceless liar for hire. A poison on American political and social discourse. And his funders share that shame (not that they care).
Thanks for all you do.
Being a musician, I have a slightly different take on the word soul, and just figure that DFB is about as far from it as it is possible for a carbon based biped to get.
-Doug in Sugar Pine
Thinking about it.
Most of the news, especially political variety.
It is always about something or someone that is , well just plain wrong. Intentionally vile at being wrong at that.
Take the issue of women's reproductive rights. News Stories are all about taking it form, restricting it.
Stories of improving and ensuring a woman's right does not capture the broadcast time. Show hosts have difficult u in bringing on a guest and discussing the positives their rights bring when they are facing difficult situations and to have the medical access they require and it is not one shoe fits all.
The stories of bad situations made god in time. They do not promote these stories.
While reporting and spending time on the anti woman's rights. We do not hear the practical decent outcomes of having such choice.
It is like having a turd sandwich without the bread.
Taking away the only thing that had a positive nutrient and leaving only the rotten to bite into. At least with the bread there is sustenance.
But DFN would not know of such matters and I do not think his imaginary cab driver pal of commoners would either.
Post a Comment