definition of a broken democracy: when a large majority of voters want an increase in the minimum wage, greater access to healthcare, common sense gun reform, policies dealing with climate change, protection of women's freedom to decide, etc, and none of this actually gets done.
— Matthew Dowd (@matthewjdowd) October 27, 2021
Of course, as any averagely bright, non-Republican citizen can tell you. none of these issues arose yesterday. In fact, they've been haunting us for a long, long time.
So let us now pierce the Veil of Time and go all the way back to the Year of our Lord 2016. Because if I remember a'rights, there was a candidate who ran for national office on exactly these same issues!
Do any of you recall who that candidate was?
The ambitious Clinton climate plan nobody is talking aboutAnd here is where candidate Clinton stood on gun control:
Here is where Hillary Clinton stands on gun controlAnd here is where candidate Clinton stood on a minimum wage and on child care:
Hillary Clinton on income and minimum wage: CNN’s Reality Check team vets the claimsAnd here is where candidate Clinton stood on health care.
Clinton backs public option on health care in nod to Sanders supporters
Hillary Clinton on Saturday expressed support for expanding taxpayer-funded health insurance, in a nod to the desires of Bernie Sanders’ supporters.
In a statement released as Democrats gather in Orlando, Florida, to finalize their party’s platform, Clinton backed the so-called “public option” for states, which would expand health insurance coverage beyond the current provisions in Obamacare...
Hillary Clinton's views on women's bodily autonomy and right to choose have always been abundantly clear:
Hillary Clinton’s Debate Answer on Abortion Is Why We Need More Women in Politics
Finally, for the first time in their presidential debates, Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump faced off on abortion on Wednesday night.
As one would expect from a candidate who’s not quite sure what he thinks about the procedure, Trump stumbled over his response. He claimed he’d nominate pro-life justices to the Supreme Court but refused to say whether he’d wish to overturn Roe v. Wade.
And as one would expect from a candidate who’s spent her career speaking about women’s health, Clinton delivered an impassioned defense of the right to reproductive autonomy. “I will defend Planned Parenthood. I will defend Roe v. Wade, and I will defend women’s rights to make their own health care decisions,” she said.
In fact, when it comes to the issue of a woman's right to choose, in 2016 Hillary Clinton warned us in the starkest possible terms that, if Trump were elected and allowed to pack the courts, this day would come:
Hillary Clinton warned us this day would come
...She stated, presciently, "The fact that our next president could appoint as many as three or four justices in the next four years" is a striking reminder "that we can’t take rulings like today’s for granted.”
Clinton left no room for speculation. “Just consider Donald Trump, the Republicans’ presumptive nominee. The man who could be president has said there should be some form of ‘punishment’ for women seeking abortions. He pledged to appoint Supreme Court justices who would overturn Roe v. Wade. And last year, he said he’d shut down the government rather than fund Planned Parenthood.”
And Clinton made clear the consequences. “If we send Trump to the White House and a Republican majority to Congress, he could achieve any — or all — of these things. And that’s why this election is so important."
Wowsers!
Well, I guess since the issues Matthew Dowd is running on in 2021 are a virtual carbon copy of the policies Hillary Clinton was running on just five short years ago, Dowd must have been a huge supporter of hers, right?
Right?
And since Mr. Dowd was ABC News' chief political analyst at that time and had access to a massive media platform, it might make you wonder how his passionate support of everything Hillary Clinton believed in manifested itself on a day-to-day basis.
Unfortunately, due to Mr. Dowd's decision to delete his entire Twitter archive covering that period, much of the good work he must have been doing on behalf of "the minimum wage, greater access to healthcare, common sense gun reform, policies dealing with climate change, protection of women's freedom to decide, etc," is lost to history.
Fortunately, at least one disreputable Liberal blogger had the foresight to document Mr. Dowd's antics in real-time.
So, as Al Smith was famously alleged to have said, "Let's take a look at the record!"
I have worked in both parties. There is no improving them from within. Need to disrupt from without.— Matthew Dowd (@matthewjdowd) August 7, 2016
so do I. We just have to disrupt the rigging going on. Need ubers in politics and governance.— Matthew Dowd (@matthewjdowd) August 11, 2016
@RavMABAY i am optimistic. Trump can easily be an accelerator to disrupt our current corrupt political system. end the duopoly.— Matthew Dowd (@matthewjdowd) December 10, 2015
Join me in putting country over party. For independent minded leadership And if you are sick of the party duopoly. https://t.co/v1sLCEhGTX— Matthew Dowd (@matthewjdowd) November 10, 2016
Our constitutional democratic republic is strong enough to withstand any President; it isn't strong enough to withstand continued duopoly.— Matthew Dowd (@matthewjdowd) September 16, 2016
As we move towards the party conventions, the two broken major parties are about to each nominate unelectable candidates. Wow. Duopoly.— Matthew Dowd (@matthewjdowd) July 13, 2016
math correct. the duopoly has no interest in uniting the United States. Independents! https://t.co/v1sLCEzhLv— Matthew Dowd (@matthewjdowd) September 10, 2016
I am a common sense conservative who thinks DC and the duopoly party control is sadly broken and can't be trusted.— Matthew Dowd (@matthewjdowd) June 18, 2016
I have picked a side. America. And independence from a broken duopoly. Why don't you try not to be a sheep— Matthew Dowd (@matthewjdowd) November 2, 2016
i think about my family/my country all the time.I am not going to be forced by the duopoly to vote for someone i don't trust— Matthew Dowd (@matthewjdowd) October 24, 2016
@SheriffClarke the "binary choice" supposition is the last argument of a dying duopoly. https://t.co/yXqCIrNXjF— Matthew Dowd (@matthewjdowd) August 13, 2016
@GovGaryJohnson every time someone says it is a binary choice, I say that is duopoly defending status quo.— Matthew Dowd (@matthewjdowd) August 9, 2016
stop. That is what duopoly says to preserve status quo.— Matthew Dowd (@matthewjdowd) August 7, 2016
@MrWalterShapiro @DemFromCT @KevinMaddenDC trump isn't he problem - the problem is the corrupt duopoly of partisanship in America today.— Matthew Dowd (@matthewjdowd) March 8, 2016
1 comment:
Unfortunately I think Mr. Dowd is the beginning of a rash of sideliners "stepping up" to offer their fumigated experience and insight to our electoral process. The pundit/consultant/speechwriter/advisor offal pile's stank is wafting into plebeian conversation. They figure they have name recognition and have successfully lied so far. Running allows them to point the finger away from their own part in creating the problems. Who better to solve them?
Post a Comment