- A Romney may not injure a corporation or, through inaction, allow a corporation to come to harm.
- A Romney must obey orders given it by corporations except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
- A Romney must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.
Thursday, June 07, 2012
The Three Laws of Mittbotics
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
To date, this is how the very few interactions I've had with Never Trumpers have gone, because I want to talk about the Befor...
-
It wasn't a fluke. It wasn't pilot error. It wasn't instrument failure. This is what Republicans wanted, and now they have a...
11 comments:
oo, that was well done.
Perfect for him, and the entire Republican Party.
Perfect for him, and the entire Republican Party.
Asimov would approve....
Awesome. Unfortunately, republicans are too stupid to produce an "evolved" understanding of the three laws.
In the same way that maximizing human safety leads to protecting humans from themselves (essentially conquering and imprisoning them), so does maximizing corporate safety leads to forcing them to preserve the middle class, no matter how badly corporations want to ruin the lives of their customers.
To the Mittbot, the definition of "corporation" in the presence of more than one is, "the most powerful one."
This always allows eradication of the weaker.
As the Romney-bot 2.0 continues to evolve, it will eventually create its own Zeroth Law:
A Romney may not hurt oligarchy, or, through inaction, allow oligarchy to come to harm.
Hurm...I'd bet good money Mitt owes a lot of his ethical nodes to Weyland Industries as well...
Hurm...I'd bet good money Mitt owes a lot of his ethical nodes to Weyland Industries as well...
Tessier-Ashpool. It figures.
"Rombotics" works better
Post a Comment