Sunday, August 05, 2007

Abraham Lincoln:


The laziest blogger in the world.

Day Three at the Big Orange County Fair lead me by the hand through a scattering of colorful, pointillistic bits straining to become a Sunday Afternoon on the Island of La Grande Jatte.

There are some pieces of blue sky, part of Digby’s face, kittens, candidates, some grass, scattered across the three-dimensional veldt of a dozen breakout rooms and grand halls.

Toilets-cum-chatrooms and room parties.

In-groups and out-groups.

The button-festooned and the buttoned-down.

Full of people trying to figuring this blogging thing out.

This Roshoman technology.

And to grapple with it, we (myself included) disinter Descartes and begin dissecting and deconstructing. What does it do? How does it work? How can it work better? How can it work better for me?

OK, what does it do again?

Coming at the mysterious, black monolith from every angle and sight-line with a necessary-but-insufficient specificity – How can I harness this plow-horse to cut furrows in my fields? – accompanied by a conspicuous silence from the Big Picture viewing gallery.

Not to pick on them, but Labor makes a good example of this phenomenon, speaking many times of having to “get the word out”.

OK…to whom?

Who is it that you are trying to talk to? That you don’t already talk to? And with what intent? Do you want to deliver monological sermons about wages and benefits, or Are You Ready For Some Fucking Football?

For something loud and cranky and uncontrollable, that may veer wildly into issues of class, race, fairness or the stupid, alienating shit Labor does sometimes?

If not, stick with newsletters and websites, because this is not your magic bullet.

Because there is no magic bullet.

In the passing along of received wisdom – much of it valuable and interesting – over and over, the new-new blogger establishment tries to extrude the new-new thing into old media sausage skins and it keeps bursting out and blobbing all over the pretty paradigms with emergent purposes and promise that just do not fit.

They have run bang up against the limitations of time and resources that govern good intentions. When you have limited choices, there is little to judge. But when you have real power, people are going to judge how you use it. The choices you make.

So what choice are we making? Are we broadening or constricting? Are we reaching out to the weird kids under the bleachers, or lapsing into lunch room castes?

What choice should we make? And how will we know when the establishment is moving in the direction of excellence?

And here is where there is a story to tell...

So what do the disparate threads of blogger high-school cliquishness, the overwhelming preponderance of the male and the melanin-poor here in Chicago, the needs of Labor, Net Neutrality and so forth have to do with one another?

Why are they all under this big, weird roof?

Actually, they have equally to do with each other, and to do with the habits of the hands on the tiller. There really is a story here, but I have only caught little tumbleweeding wisps of it blowing through the halls.

So let's start with Labor as an entry point into wider waters.

The way they can help themselves is to forget about “getting the message out” because the people you desperately need to speak to don’t blog, don’t lurk, might not own a computer, very probably don’t have broadband, and don’t give much of damn about your message.

Because the people whose world you are trying enter are the working poor or the just-plain-poor; the real people in the real world that really do most need the power that a Rationally Organized Labor Movement could give them. People who, if treated with respect and peer-to-peer, would probably most adamantly carry your message, because for them the struggle is about good jobs for themselves and their kids.

And to do that, you need to reach them where they are, as they are, with conversation. If not, you will be perceived of as arriving on their doorsteps just like Americans have arrived in Third World countries for decades: We come in, make nice with the natives for seven minutes, yadda-yadda, start sneaking looks at our watches, and then out comes our shopping list.

And because these are not stupid people, it becomes quickly and painfully clear that we are really there to extract what we want from them -- oil, land, gold, dues -- and to badger them into agreeing that its for their own good.

Of course good organizers know this, which it why Labor could do worse than, say, throwing some money into “blogganizers”™ in the neighborhood where your Movement’s future currently lives and dies: because the moms and dads and churches and coaches in those blighted and left behind places are the natural constituencies of the Labor Movement and the Democratic Party.

They are hard-working Americans who want a better future for their kids. Who vote for you, but will not carry your water because you do not speak to them where they are, as they are, in a language they respect.

And to do that, you need ubiquitous, broadband internet access. To do that you need net neutrality.

Ah! A theme emerges...

To do that, you need cohorts of smart, straight-talking bloggers of color. Hispanic bloggers. Women bloggers. African-American bloggers.

And not under orders to hammer your message door-to-door like they’re pushing tin on commission. Because for this to work, you need to get comfortable with them catalyzing conversations on- and off-line far, far away from the Home Office. Conversations that may or may not lead to a discussion of wagesandbenefitsandNAFTA, and someone signing on the dotted line.

You need movement-thinkers not narrowcasters, which means getting your brethren and sisteren in the Bakers Food & Allied Workers Union (BFAWU) to lay on a second shift and crank out a lot more product, because if you want to succeed you will be casting a lot of bread upon the waters.

This is, I believe, part of the answer to why blogging desperately needs to expand into those communities and not wait until some critical mass of rage against the GOP machine is reached among the working poor as it was among (mostly) white (mostly) tech-comfy (mostly) guys. (This was expounded as the Serious Market Theory for why the Left Blogosphere came into being, why it is saturated, and and why, sorry, there is no room for you little fella.)

Part of the answer to "Why broadband?", and why the high school hierarchy knife-fights about traffic and popularity is, in the end, trifling.

For all the Flickr, Twitter, SMS, SMBD, FeedToob, and ScratchnSNFF widgets, for all the talk of ”Content is King” and the lone blogman being dead, for all blogrolling-versus-linking punch-ups, in one panel after another people (good people) slip or sprint towards the monkey bars and refrigerator-box forts of the old hierarchy.

Listen through one door and your hear Labor speaking of the glory days of radio and how they have to get into this new technology to “get their message out”.

Their impulse is understandable and correct -- they do not want to be left behind and pulverized by yet another technology revolution like they were with television -- but let me repeat: Out to whom?

Always that is a question that goes unspoken and unanswered (except maybe in the Lurker Caucus :-)

Kids do not lay out on the roof on warm, summer nights, listening to the crystal WiFi set they built in their garage, hoping to pick up a signal from the Big City.

Families do not huddle around the broadband Philco, listening earnestly to the staticky news from Over There.

And yet that one-to-many model is the one we keep falling back on because that is what we understand.

Until it becomes the $.99 paperback book you can stuff in your back pocket, every new technology is a shiny technology, beloved by engineers and professional kerners, and feared/avoided/grudgingly-tolerated by most normal people. But for all the flashdazzle and wheedoggie of the intertoobs, blogging is just democracy by the job-lot, delivered at the speed of light.

So we have the working-poor and the outright-poor to whom we not only have genuine moral obligations, but who are also – still and again and always -- the great, undiscovered salvific of Progressive Labor, Party, Movement and Nation.

And in our hands we find the greatest tool ever created to let them finally speak as they choose.

This geographic-independent, caste-independent, language-independent, capital-independent, bi-directional communication miracle, and fuck you if the unwashed track their feet over your nice, clean paradigm.

In the end, this is why the big pie fight, over A-listers, diversity, tech, and territoriality has a much larger and more vital meaning. And why, in the end, it will always be craft and sincerity, quality and heart and how well you back up your fine, inclusive words with sweaty action that will win this long war to save our beloved country from its fears, bigotries and its internal enemies that feast on that darkness.

Because for all the talk about how Content Roolz (which does have its merits), nobody bitches that Abraham Lincoln doesn’t crank out new posts every day.

Hell, let’s face it, that lazy, lone blogging fuck hasn’t posted new content in over 140 years.

And yet for some reason his shit is still being read, linked to and commented on.

Also he refuses to blogroll me.

Bastard!

15 comments:

Anonymous said...

Lurker Caucus...hee.

I hope you have had some relief (fun) from the tedium of who roolz. Sounds a bit hellish, all the chit chat about hierarchy and blog rolling.

I haven't found much in the way of reporting from the convention. Strange silence, or I am just not looking in the right places.

Content and access. Local sweat. Inspiration. And in the case of DG, brilliance and heart from the land o' Lincoln.

Anonymous said...

And there you are wielding words the way a surgeon wields a new-fangled laser scalpel. Slicing directly to the heart of the situation, excising diseased tissue and leaving behind precision-cauterized health. Democracy includes everyone, amazing how simple it all is. :-)

Anonymous said...

You are one smart motherfucker.

driftglass said...

leigh,
Actually it was a lot of fun.

And no one forced me (or anyone) to do anything. I spent most of my time listening to what the common wisdom was supposed to be on a lot of things -- some that interested my, but mostly on things I know little about. It was fascinating to cross-cut between very different conversations just to hear how people were framing and discussing ideas.

PhysioProf,
I just hang out with smart people.

US Blues,
Exactly. Checking the cables, rebooting and going back to First Principles solves most problems :-)
And thank you for your kind words.

/humbled

Anonymous said...

Since you went ahead and got all meta with this post: it would be very interesting to hear a bit about how you got to your unique perspective in terms of life history and intellectual development. I know that ain't your blog schtick, but I'm just sayin'.

Anonymous said...

Maybe YKos is a malting floor. You've obviously come away with
the makings of a right fine nectar.

If half the attendees (optimist) take away half of what you've gleaned from the nose-bleed seats,
the new new newbies will become a legion.

What you've written here is a textbook. It's probably not dumbed-down enough to threaten your stature in the eyes of your fans, cohorts and admirers, but between this, your willfully given archives, a bit of talent and six drops of essence of terror...

When the stirrin' done may I lick the spoon?

Ebon Krieg said...

You have aided my perspective in polymultiple ways and more than reinforced a perception that I have had about rethugs since my grandfather sat me on his knee and said something (at the time I thought that this was a big religious secret between him and me) which has stuck with me for 45 years, "don't ever vote for a republican, they are all crooks." he set me back on the floor, took a big gulp off his can of Olympia beer and went back to watching some nature show (WIld Kingdom, I think.) Hell, at five I had memorized the hail mary (now that I think about it I have never really paid attention to the words of that prayer) this was easy. 2 years later I was asked who I would vote for if I could vote by my teacher, Sister Rosalie. "Not Goldwater," I answered. She asked why and I regurgitated the proper prayer as my grandfather had taught. No, I am not a savant of any kind. I had no clue there was a difference until I felt the dark side with tricky dick. Nothing a rethug has done since has refuted what my grandfather said to me that day.
Man, did I go out on a tangent. All I wanted to know was where in the nine hells are you? I say this because I was born in OC and I know the OC Fair occurs every year at the end of July. It was more of a carnival back then. Don't mind me I am babbling now...
Finally, you make a good point about those bloggers who don't write every day and how it is upsetting to the reader; snicker.
You are the first blog I read everyday. Thanks.

Anonymous said...

SMCD. WANT!

Anonymous said...

Some fascinating perspectives here that my life experiences have not put me in contact with before, but these issues have captivated me like a small bit of sand-polished green glass shared between friends in a moment of crossed paths.

There are amazing possibilities here that most of us have not even begun to wrap our brains around. Then again, some certain others seem to have been thinking and doing on this for a while. The rest of us have a lot to learn.

That Lincoln. They just don't make Republicans (or much of anyone else) like him anymore. He should be as common among us as those worn, ignored copper coins that bear his image. We've got some work to do. Thanks.

Anonymous said...

OMG! A YKOS attendee who actually gets it!
Heaps of praise be upon you, from a member of the working poor, as executed from my intermittent dial-up connection!
Thank you for acknowledging how progressive bloggers view us as useful idiots, to whom the message must be preached!
We live the abuse of the corpocracy every damn day. We don't need message, we need action to topple our abusers, those who deny us a living wage and access to higher ed, so that we too may join the shrinking middle class!
(also, must say how much I admire your talent. Loved the Dumbses piece!)

Organic Mechanic said...

Driftglass -- mmmm, thanks!
once again, you nail it.
as a small brown mostly rural person, i just belly laugh at the the concern critics wanting to reach out to me. ME! oh, i'm so important -- i get to be in the "Diversity" column. check.
well-meaning and all that, i know. but organized labor in USofA is corrupt. it's basically a jobs program and not for workers, but for union administrators, field operatives, health care brokers, etc.
i'm a union member -- all they want are my dues.
i was @ YK1 and as the harsh spotlight of celebrity that the MSM shown on the so-called "leaders" began to ratchet up, one could see the eyes of some get starry-like and they became night-of-the-living-dead-wanna'-be-celebrities.
et voila -- suddenly a paycheck!

keep writing, Driftglass, ignore the fools behind the curtain. you touch many.

Anonymous said...

You'll always be an A-lister to me, Drifty. Nobody, and I really mean this, NOBODY writes the way you do. You are a disgracefully overlooked talent.

Anonymous said...

Can I just say, that as part of the Lurker Caucus, that..............

Oh, dang!!..........


.....

driftglass said...

PhysioProf ,
Screwing up a lot. Trial and error. Listening to people that know more than I do. Losing and failing. Noticing how something I picked up in one venue seems to have some application in another.

The typical writer’s resume.


Rehctaw,
There is no spoon :-)

Ebon Krieg,
My fault for faulty punctuation. I meant the Big, Orange “County Fair”, which is what the Ykos thing felt like at times.

In the real world, I’m in the Chicago area.

And thank you

DavidW
Thank you.

Anonymous
I would not go that far. There are progressive bloggers who get it (Steve Gilliard towered at the very top of that list), there are those that don’t, and there are those who are tackling different sets of problems with their limited time and energy.

Organic Mechanic,
Thank you kindly

Scout
Thank you, but I’m not “disgracefully” anything except when it comes to dancing :-)
I run a little boutique shop at the edge of town.
I get lively, funny and smart people coming in the door to read, comment and chat a bit during their busy day.
Every now and then I get uplinked to a Big Blog and for a day or two my hit meter goes wild. Then things calm back down again and I pick up 2-3 new “regulars”.
If this site gets bigger than that, great.
If not, that’s fine too

Given the limitations of time/energy everyone works under, it is perfectly understandable that large blogs cannot advance every cause and agenda. But what does piss me off is when some larger bloggers do not use their megaphones to advance the causes they themselves profess to care about.

Anonymous said...

And, Houston; we have a problem.

In fact, lots of problems.

The Iraqi power grid and the Iraqi government are simultaneously imploding.

The rest of the Sunni ministers bailed today.

A truckbomber killed himself and 28 other people, including 19 children, in Tal Afar, which the MSM is referring to as;

"northern Iraq".

It IS way up in the north, but flying the Iraqi flag up there will get the shit beat out of you, or worse. The Kurdish north is supposed to be the "quiet" area; the "mission-not-totally-fucked-up" area.

When the body parts start flying up THERE, it's hard to spin Kurdistan-in-waiting as a part of the shitmire that is a success.

And 6 more of our troops were killed.

And some general warned that the dastardly insurgents would ramp up attacks to make things look bad just before the surge assessment. Which ducks the question of:

"If you know it's coming, and if the surge is even partly working, why in the fuck can't you stop it?"

Plus, "If they can do this at will, with the surge in place; is bush going to make the surge permanent, just to preserve the status quo of about 80-100 american troops dying each month, along with the hundreds of Iraqis dying?"

And the question which for some reason, the talking MSM heads never think of asking:

"What happens when the surge is lifted? If the Baghdad lockdown isn't successful, what happens when the lockdown stops?"

And, of course:

"Can we please hear Rudy, or Mitt, or someone, putting out to the voters, the GOP talking points about keeping this going until some nebulous date in...say...2009? We on the democratic side of the aisle think that would make a great red-meat stump speech!" :o)

As ever; one fine riff, Mr. Charles Parker Driftglass. :o)