When the boss is a massive tool.
After over 500 posts, many of which have been spent stirring the bilious gruel that washes around inside the sharply tapered skulls of Christopath Republicans and making merry mock of the lumpy bits of idiocy that float to the surface like so many mob hit victims that have rotted out of their Sakrete wingtips, it may come as a petit shock that I in no way believe it was inevitable that I would be a partisan.
Or, rather, it was never pre-ordained that I would dig my toes in so deep on the Liberal side of the aisle, or that I would have such unreserved contempt for any of the GOP Stalinists who have stood so ferociously and mindlessly by the Dear Leader these last five year, or have bayed in approval like rabid hounds at twenty-years of Newt-and-Rush calling anyone that disagreed with them America-hating cowards and traitors.
Because there is an honorable way for sincere conservatives and sincere liberals to have a spirited debate.
Really, really I tell you true, there is, because there is honor to be found in the best sentiments of both schools of thought.
There is integrity is trying to keep a downward pressure on government where possible, and where important programs are not gutted, because as terrific as those programs are, they do drain some measure of capital and creativity away from the marketplace in which the wealth…that generates the revenue…that funds those programs is created.
And there is integrity is trying to keep an upward pressure on government, because we do not live in a dictatorship, under occupation by an alien power. This is the poisonous shaping-delusion that neocons and Fundy’s have flogging as the Pure Quill for the last three decades. Government in a Democracy is no more than all of us acting together for our common good. The “commonweal”, which will evolve as times and circumstance change, but whose core First Principles will always sound something like this:
“…establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of Liberty for ourselves and our posterity.”
Sound familiar?
You want to know what Democrats are “for”?
That’s what we are for, and in the middle of an honest debate over the conflicting impulses to over what the exact the scope and scale of our democratically-elected government should be, men and women of good faith give and take and swallow some shit they hate and get some things that are near and dear to them.
It’s called political compromise: It is exactly what the Founders had in mind as the mechanism for governing a far-flung and diverse nation, and it is exactly what the Fake Originalists of the Right have worked for thirty years to cripple and destroy.
The reason I loathe the modern Republican Party is not that idea of smaller government, or transparent government or accountable government are bad. They’re not; there is merit in those positions.
The reason I loathe them is that, in order to win, they have crawled into a filthy, Procrustean Bed with the scum of the Earth, and are now deep in the belly of that beast.
At this point in our history, Segregationist and the Christopath should be marginal, freak-cults confined to living history museums and Davidian-style compounds deep in the high desert. Instead they openly call the shots in every branch of our government, while Party “Moderates” cower in the cloak room with their thumbs in their ears, glue over their eyes, hysterically repeating, “We gave the our party to Fat Falwell, and insist we do not mind the smell.”
Oh, and bite the arm of any Democrat, Liberal, Progressive or whatnot that tries to make them face the truth.
The reason I loathe them because in order to win they have allowed themselves to degenerate into a Party of monsters and slaves; Degenerati that gleefully betray in fact every ideal they claim to hold in principle.
The reason I loathe them is because while the Democratic Party may be, on some things, of many voices, the Republican Party is firmly ensconced in Hell and demands that the rest of us join them there.
The reason I loathe them is because the Modern Republican Party has murdered everything that was noble about genuine Conservativism, and those that should be the most enraged and horrified by the seeing their values butchered – Conservatives of Conscience – still mindlessly buy into the hateful propaganda about Liberals that their Party’s assassins manufactured in order commit the fucking crime in the first place.
And who should be on the top of every genuine conservative’s Enemies List?
This from the the Paul Krugman may give you a hint (From a March 3rd column, “George the Unready”, meticulously Silly Putty-ed off a dead tree version of the NYT, ‘cause the e-version lies beyond the Hot Gates of NYT Select. Emphasis added by me):
Iraqi insurgents, hurricanes and low-income Medicare recipients have three things in common. Each has been at the center of a policy disaster. In each case experts warned about the impending disaster. And in each case — well, let's look at what happened.
…
Intelligence analysts who refused to go along with that line [that insurgents were dead-enders and furriners] were attacked for not being team players. According to U.S. News & World Report, President Bush's reaction to a pessimistic report from the C.I.A.'s Baghdad station chief was to remark, "What is he, some kind of defeatist?"
Many people have now seen the video of the briefing Mr. Bush received before Hurricane Katrina struck. Much has been made of the revelation that Mr. Bush was dishonest when he claimed, a few days later, that nobody anticipated the breach of the levees.
But what's really striking [about the Bush WH response to Katrina], given the gravity of the warnings, is the lack of urgency Mr. Bush and his administration displayed in responding to the storm. A horrified nation watched the scenes of misery at the Superdome and wondered why help hadn't arrived. But as Newsweek reports, for several days nobody was willing to tell Mr. Bush, who "equates disagreement with disloyalty," how badly things were going. "For most of those first few days," Newsweek says, "Bush was hearing what a good job the Feds were doing."
…
How did this happen? The same way the other disasters happened: experts who warned of trouble ahead were told to shut up.
We can get a sense of what went on by looking at a 2005 report by the nonpartisan Government Accountability Office on potential problems with the drug program. Included with the report is a letter from Mark McClellan, the Medicare administrator. Rather than taking the concerns of the G.A.O. seriously, he tried to bully it into changing its conclusions. He demanded that the report say that the administration had "established effective contingency plans" — which it hadn't — and that it drop the assertion that some people would encounter difficulties obtaining necessary drugs, which is exactly what happened.
Experts within the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services must have faced similar bullying. And unlike experts at the independent G.A.O., they were not in a position to stand up for what they knew to be true.
In short, our country is being run by people who assume that things will turn out the way they want. And if someone warns of problems, they shoot the messenger.
…
Bingo.
Michael Brown is now sticking like a bone in the throat of the Bush White House because while Brownie obviously got the memo about the ablative function of underlings in the corporate feudal state, he has loudly failed to heed it.
And for people who are especially frantic to make sure that government is run "like a business" the Bush/Brown example should be of particular interest.
Because the oligarchs tout a business mind-set as a panacea for all the ills of the public sector without ever acknowledging how businesses -- all kinds of businesses -- are really run.
Businesses are a dictatorship, not a democracy.
They are a One Party State in which the guys at the top are, quite often, morons.
Now startups, for example, are different, and there are thousands of company owners who run their shops extremely well because they learned how every machine on the factory floor operates, and they work 16-hour days sweating blood to squeeze another nickel out of the production cycle.
But there is another kind of business that is not run on merit or competence, but is ruled by petty, spoiled, dimwitted martinets who keep their power and can make you dance solely because they can destroy your economic life on a whim. And in such cesspits, there is another breed CEO that is all too common – the buzzword-spewing, inbred Loafetarians with contacts to burn and hollow resumes burnished everywhere Daddy's money and friends could make an entree.
In my life and in the lives of many people I have known, we have had occasion to be in the presence of more than one highly-placed individual who was exactly like Dubya; a non-too-bright sack of lumpen, trustfund meat who has had the privilege of being girded on all sides since swaddling days by sycophants and ass-buffers.
Clowns who really will kill 50 minutes of a one-hour meeting expounding lavishing and emphatically in that special kind of “tardthusiasm” stupid people have when they think they've just hit on some New Verity (or as Jon Stewart says, saying the most obvious shit in the world that everyone but dumbass has know for years as if he'd just discovered it...and as if you disagree)..and then holding forth for nine of the remaining ten minutes on whatever breathless, stale, decade-old wisdom that chapter seven of Tom Friedman's latest Corporate Harlequin Romance has vouchesafed to him that morning.
Spoiled baby-men who do amazingly stupid, risky shit with other people’s money and livelihoods based on hunches and the Emperor’s New Clothing Haberdashers with which they encase themselves.
Who will tout themselves as the second coming of Edward Deming the one time in a hundred they stumble into being right…and keep the boardroom shelves stocked with underlings to toss on the grenades that come with the other 99 times that thier stupidity outstrips their dumb luck and shit blows up in their faces.
Who will treat those who conscientiously warn of troubled water ahead as mutineers.
Who will never, ever take responsibility for any of the disasters they trail behind them like Linus’ Blanket.
Who will casually shoot anyone that comes bearing bad tidings…and then turn right around and lecture everyone else on their failure to take responsibility for not warning him more vigorously.
Think of the most high-density, low-wattage, craven nitwit you have every work for.
Now knock 10% off of his IQ, give him access to nuclear weapons and the United States Treasury, and puppet-masters that are bent on the destruction of the America we know and love.
The reason I loathe the modern Republican Party is that they -- and they alone -- have eviscerated honor, comity, compromise, respectful debate and every other essential virtue handed down to us by our Founders and replaced them with the anti-tolerance of Rush Limbaugh, the anti-Americanism of Ann Coulter, the anti-Christianity of James Dobson, the anti-Journalism of Fox News, and the anti-Presidency of George Bush.
They have carefully and calculatedly terminated the Age of Enlightenment and replaced it with the nightmare of the Age of Dubya.
I loathe the modern Republican Party because in the Age of Dubya, you can either be a Good American, or a Good Republican, but you can no longer be both.
21 comments:
because as terrific as those programs are, they do drain some measure of capital and creativity away from the marketplace in which the wealth…that generates the revenue…that funds those programs is created.
Alas, I'm going to take issue with this one my dear friend. Most of those programs directly or indirectly benefit "business." Whether it's a public school system that provides a good education that supports innovation, infrastructure work, or the public money that buys products from manufactures or supports agriculture. Many of the programs you mention exist because of the social inadequacies of the "free market."
I would also argue that the GOP has been dead since I was born. I base this on the simple exersize of listing the men who have run for President on the GOP ticket since 1960: Richard Nixon (twice), Barry Goldwater (a vote for Barry is a vote for fun), Gerald Ford (pardoned Nixon- the President should NEVER be above the law, member of the Warren Commission which covered-up, er, I mean, investigated JFK's assasination), Ronald Reagan, Bush the Elder, Bush the Imbecile. Not a very impressive list in terms of bi-partisan dialogue.
I dare say I've NEVER had any respect for the GOP, in fact, those people have been criminals and fools since before I was born (need I get into Herbert Hoover or Joe McCarthy?). And now they've hit the level where the idea of a War Crimes Trial for the highest elected officials in the US government, along with their staffs and appointees, seems like the only reasonable course of action.
Like Thoreau said, I'm in favor of a better government. Of course, I don't see much from the Dems these days to hope they are offering the quality of leadership we require in these bizarre days.
/rant
What do the rest of you think?
us blues,
I read you.
I mean simply that we cannot fund everything we might possibly want to fund. Not without becoming a command economy that taxes at 80% and where we all work de facto for the gummit, and I have no interest in the kind of centalized, socialist state that lies down that road any more than I can stomach an oligarchy or theocracy.
There are programs that desperately need reform, and there are programs -- like education, worker retraining and energy research to name three -- that desperately need massive funding increases, and were we in that world, the debate over priority-setting and increasing taxes on the wealthy would proceed apace.
But we're not in that world, not by a long shot. That world is denied us because the Third Political Party -- the Dixiecrats -- has made common cause with theocrats and neocons to gut and hijack a willing and electorally-desperate Republican Party.
If the GOP were to jettison its haters and fanatics and freaks and just try to live up to its rhetoric -- like keeping the gummint the hell out of people's private lives -- I think we could at least learn to coexist.
I might be wrong, but that's what makes it a horserace, eh ;-)
Heh heh. He said "ablative." Heh heh.
It's certainly true that the GOP could jettison its racists, fanatics, and freaks, but then they'd never win an election. Remember, not all Republicans are racists, but all racists are Republicans.
clap.
clap.....
clap... clap... clap... clap clap clap clap clap... Clap Clap Clap Clap Clap...CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP
ClaClaClaClaClaClaClaClaClaClaClaClaClClClROOOOOOAAAAAAAAAR!
US Blues, et al: The way I see it, the Dems have run from the "tax and spend" moniker for so long that they've forgotten how to defend the very fine and necessary work called "government."
Personally, I'd pay a reasonable percent of my salary to get good health care, to educate the next generation, to keep the roads decent and especially to clean up the environment. Oh, and to pay off that little debt Bush has run up. We pay for it one way or another.
In the meantime, the cream floats to the top and CEOs make obscene salaries while workers make less.
The weird part is that Republicans always run as if they're going to curb waste and trim the gvt, when historically they do just the opposite. WHEN the Dems will ever call them on it is the big question.
drifty - great work as always
i just wanted to check (for your own benefit)- you wrote "meticulously Silly Putty-ed off a dead tree version of the NYT"
you dont *really* do that do you??? typing out stuff both sucks and blows, simultaneously.
i'll assume not, but just in case, you might save yourself a lot of work by just typing in a few words and putting them into google, and then you can rely on c&p. the article will sometimes be on google.news, more often in regular google, and nearly always in google.groups (use the tab at the top) - they aren't all available immediately - but day+1 would most likely cover most cases.
if i just saved you (an hour per month), you owe me (an hour per month minus the incalculable pleasure in reading each of your posts)
lukery
Pure Fucking Art. Truth as the canvas, layered with all the colors in Drifty's palette of righteous indignation, is a work of art indeed.
Smoking' Drifty. I found another couple of items you might be interested in, but unfortunately they aren't as brief as the last one.
Feel free to delete or ignore my next couple of posts.
A comment found in a poorman thread:
ice weasel Says:
March 4th, 2006 at 3:05 am
I don’t know anything about Tigerhawk, nor need I. I’ve seen this before, many times of late.
This is the result of the cognitive dissonance felt by those who supprted the right, for whatever the reason. And I’ve heard those reasons as being afraid of the left’s security cred. I’ve heard that they believed in the rights stated policy of smaller government. I’ve heard it expressed that the left was strong enough on any number of issues. But always expressed in there is some small acknowldgment that they supported bush just a bit reluctantly, because there was no way they could support the left (usually for a reason having something to do with being afraid of something else, see above).
That’s a fine excuse for a civilized parlor discussion about politics and policy but it doesn’t work in 2006. There is no excuse for being ignorant of the gross incompetent and overwhelming malfaesance this administration has demonstated over and over again.
Yet, there is still reluctance on the part of some in coming to grips with this. I think it all comes down to admitting, publicly, you made a really shitty decision based on issues that weren’t real and evidence that didn’t exist. Not many people want to make that confession in public, least of all folks whose pretense is that of brave warriors and rugged individualists (however wrong or self-deluding that perception might be).
Finally, we see this again in this flaccid attack on Gore. Suddenly it’s a bulging forehead discussion on what constitues treason and what the limits of free speech are. Bullshit. Anyone with even a modicum of personal integrity (that excludes nearly everyone who voted for king george and everyone who still supports him) could not possibly think Gore’s intent was to undermine the US. Get fucking real. It was a speech. It was crafted to affect opinion. If you want to undermine the US’s efforts in fighting the war, saving people after a natural disaster, well, anything, you just hang out a RNC shingle and get appointed to this administration. You don’t have to traipse all the way to fucking middle east.
Who has done more damage to US?
Michael Brown or Michael Moore?
Al Gore or Paul Bremer?
Tom Delay or John Kerry?
Max Cleland or Ralk Reed?
Aren’t these questions easy to answer?
This is going to be a fiendishly difficult problem for us as a society. A large group of us have to admit that they’ve been fucking things up, badly, for some time now. They have to admit they’ve enabled another smaller group to actually perform criminal damage to this country. That’s got to be tough to deal with but you know what? Like The Editors feelings about torture, I’m done trying to compromise and make people feel good about it. It’s time to rub those dog’s collective nose in that shit until they admit crapping on the floor is wrong stop shitting on the floor once and for all.
The poorman thread is at: http://www.thepoorman.net/2006/03/03/response-to-tigerhawk-2/#comments
Awsome exerpt here:
So please don’t write a big long post pointing out times in the past when you said torture is bad, because that doesn’t cut it. All it is going to do is make me feel very, very sleepy, and so I’m going to have to have another cup of coffee, and if I have another cup of coffee before I get some food in my stomach … well, it’s not going to be a pretty picture for anyone involved. What is really going to put me in my place is if someone - say, for example, you - actually decides that the Bush policy of extralegal, unaccountable torture is worth getting upset about, perhaps even more deserving of disapprobation than Ward Churchill getting tenure, Al Gore’s views on visa policy, Michael Moore’s waistline, or whatever else the leading lights of today’s denatured conservatism think everyone should be gnashing their teeth about this week. (Or last week.) Because right now, America tortures people. You live in a country where the President has declared an effectively permanent state of war, and can, and does, as a matter of policy, and on a global scale, engage in torture. Morally, practically, spiritually, profoundly: this is wrong. It is worth being upset about. It is worth overlooking the use of literary devices you don’t agree with. It is worth forgiving minor policy disagreements. It is even worth telling people you otherwise agree with that, when they defend, excuse, or minimize the situation, they are wrong - morally, practically, spiritually, profoundly, even - and they, through deed or inaction, disgrace America. Because they do. And if you did it, you’d probably be more polite than me. And they might even listen. And then, eventually, this might change. And then I’d be completely busted, and I’d have to start berating you about, I don’t know, marginal tax rates, and uh, workplace harrassment lawsuits, and all those other things I’m told I care so deeply about, instead of about the corruption of the soul of my country. Please let me live with that shame instead.
The thing that amazes me is that no matter what anyone says about the Republicans, really its much much worse than that.
The best I can do is say that they don't care about America. They are glad to waste Trillions of dollars in order to steal Billions. All the damage we see is just a surface effect that results mostly from carelessness and inattention. The real malevolence is still hidden from us, and will so remain until the whole country looks like post-Katrina New Orleans.
Could a conservative be one who believes in conservation, could liberals be misplaced? That I believe in conservation of resources, economics, environment are these not conservative values? What is liberal- open minded, maybe towards sexual orientation, race, religion, diverse cultural beliefs, why are these not conservative values? Why is liberal not for those who spend and waist our resources liberally? This structure of power needs to be dismantled and we not exist as their pawns.
Great post.
You meant Edwards Deming, right?
One can still find some "Conservatives of Conscience", along with a few of us liberal types, over at antiwar.com .
Please consider the possibility that much which seems like incompitance and stupidity in this administration is acctually very purposeful and in fact very skillfully done - to achive a particular set of results. One of which is to achive as much chaos and enmity in the middle east as possible in order to require and justify the establishment of perminant military bases and an unending war footing and to control access to water and the stability of the dollar through control of oil while it lasts - among who knows what else. The apparent inaction durring Katrina might well be traced to other compareable goals. And it goes on. Hints: Look at the decision to use so much torture of a sexually humilliating nature, especially homosexual, on muslum men - and woman. And look at the fact that Katrina was happening in a mostly black city - and even though the oil refineeries were at risk. Or maybe because they were at risk and the situation and conflicting initial reports afforded extra market manipulation. What the overarching goal might be I don't care to torture myself, just now, by speculating about. But please beware all - what seems so awesomely dumb and blind might be very clever and far seeing indeed. - from a Farmer
Why won't the elected Dems say exactly what you just wrote? In St Louis on Friday Obama said I don't think George Bush is a bad person. Whaaaaat? Yes, they are bad, every one of them. They have caused death and destruction for three years---will the Dems ever acknowledge this?
Anon., I think one reason is that the Democrats, the independent liberals, and the conservatives of conscience are, for the most part, nicer people than our Bushevik adversaries, and fear sinking to their level if we unleash our capacity for anger. Alas, I fear we may need to hold our noses and stoop to the Bushevik level, because too many of our fellow citizens--especially too many of my fellow pale males--see Bushevik meanness and rudeness as signs of strength, rather than as signs of intellectual and cultural inferiority.
Wonderful stuff, driftglass.
"[T]he ablative function of underlings in the corporate feudal state" is a definite keeper.
anon at 1:43 AM -- If I had my way, what I'd like to hear Dems like Obama saying is: "I don't think Bush is a bad person -- but as President, he's obviously a miserable failure."
For all I know, not having listened to his speech, the Senator may have said something along those lines. Regardless, I don't believe the "Evil, pure and simple ... from the Eighth Dimension!" line of attack is going to be very productive at this point in time. After a few more Chickens from Hell have come home to roost, maybe, but right now all it does is feed into the "deranged Bush hater" meme.
Far better to use the facts at hand to paint him as the clueless Bubble Boy figurehead of the most corrupt, incompetent regime in the history of our Republic. (And yes, I know enough of our political history to recognize the magnitude of that claim, though I consider it entirely justifiable.)
The real challenge will be to generalize the discontent with a fumbling nitwit's lame duck administration into voter disenchantment with the entire modern GOP.
dcnative:
"In the meantime, the cream floats to the top and CEOs make obscene salaries while workers make less."
In keeping with the scatological nature of some of these comments, I need to point out that cream isn't the only thing that...uh...floats.
I do agree, though, that salaries for CEOs of publicly traded corporations are completely out of control, and the income gap between those whose names are on the company letterhead versus those who actually work for a living is absolutely insane.
Driftglass, keep on typin'....
JJ
I am here because of search results for blogs with a related topic to mine.
Please,accept my congratulations for your excellent work!
I have a makes money site.
Come and check it out if you get time :-)
Best regards!
Post a Comment