Thursday, October 04, 2012

The Dead Hand of David Broder


So David Gergen was surprised that Mitt Romney just "flat-out lied" and that Barack Obama was so unprepared to cope with it.

Well isn't that just flat-out hilarious!  

Because what I witnessed last night was David Gergen's fondest, wettest dream leap from the most insipid paragraphs of the worst David Brooks columns ever written and come magically to life: the most perfect Villager debate imaginable, constructed entirely to Beltway Mouse Circus specifications, with every bathroom and breakfast nook and all the vast spaces for entertaining impeccably furnished in very finest High Broderism (from the Urban Dictionary):
Broderism

The worship of bipartisanship for its own sake, combined with a fake "pox on both their houses" attitude. The main goal is the establishment of a permanent ruling class of Washington insiders, our betters who know better. It is their rough agenda which is sold as "centrism" even when it has no actual relationship with the political center in a meaningful way. The establishment of an aristocratic class in America.

The belief that it all sides are equal and must compromise at all times. Regardless of the final outcome or the level of understanding or intelligence presented by each side.
A Republican left to lie as freely and easily as he wishes?

Check.  

A center/right Democrat hobbling himself by mashing his responses to one big, wild Republican lie after another into a verbal Procrustean bed of  "Um...y'know...uh...Mitt...I'm not sure... that's... uh... entirely... y'know... factually accurate..." ?

Check.

And then, rolled out like a stripper cake at a bachelor party, the biggest lie of the night.  The big lie that makes all the little lies possible. That old, reliable Big Lie of Centrism, paraded across the stage accompanied by all the requisite wailing and teeth-gnashing for the lost art of bipartisanship and aisle-crossing.

Check and mate.   

Check and mate because the President of the United States didn't have the balls to break David Brooks' heart once and for all by pointing out that it was all bullshit; that the reason the Good Ship Bipartisan lies in ruins is because a long, long time ago the Republican Party seized the wheel and deliberately ran it up on the rocks.  

Then then burned the wreck down to its nails and brass fittings.  

Then they salted the Earth for a 1,000 miles in every direction.

But saying that is rude so no one said it, which is how we left things last night. And which is why I was completely unsurprised to flip on my Liberal media this morning just long enough to see Chuck Todd, Tom Brokaw and a bunch of undecided Colorado voters dancing naked around a bonfire chanting "Both Sides do it! Both Sides do it! Both Sides do it! " :
"I did not get the sense that either one of them addressed the [crossing party lines] issue."
Kids, the reason Jim Lehrer didn't need to lift a finger to enforce any sort of rules was that,  absent an act of brutally frank and sustained will, the internalized norms of High Broderism are 100% self-enforcing.

So to those who wonders why I spend so much time and energy on this tiny blog of mine and on "The Professional Left" podcast focusing on the Big Lie of Centrism -- the lie that has gelded our professional media and all but killed our ability to conduct honest, public political discourse in the country -- that fiasco last night is your answer.

12 comments:

Wheezy said...

You are my hero. Seriously.

RossK said...

Jeebuz!

And here I thought that dead hand was finally going cold.

Clearly, I was gravely mistaken.

.

John Marriott said...

Plz keep doin' it. There ain't much sanity left. Need to nurture every tiny shoot.

Steve said...

Romney was blinking so fast during his closing statement I dont know how he did not levitate.

Anonymous said...

Do you recall back in 2008...
Hillary and Bill were saying shit about "Hard working WHITE people" and "Jesse Jackson" and tons of other shit...
and people screamed for Obama to swing back...to FIGHT
but he just kept his head down, stayed calm, and won the primary.

Then came Sarah Palin: "Pals around with terrorists"
Rev Wright
Black
Muslim
Born in Kenya
Hamas wants Obama to win!
...and everyone said "FIGHT! Swing back! Hit them as hard as they hit you!"
but he just kept his head down and plotted out how to get where he was going.
Now...
after ONE FUCKING debate
after 47%
and the Olympics
and tax returns
and a dressage horse
and Cayman Islands tax dodges
and Swiss bank accounts
Romney comes out and bullies and lies his way thru ONE debate
and makes the beltway pundits and a bunch of stupid people say AGAIN, "Jesus, man...why ain't you FIGHTING BACK???"

How many fucking times does this clever President have to show you how the LONG game is played? How you WIN without raising your voice and playing into the "angry black man" crap they set you up for by digging up that old video?
He's smart. BACON JIM BEAM BBQ SAUCE SMART
And he's happy to let Mittens have his debate victory.
Mittens is fucking toast and the best part, he don't know how toasted he is.
B. Obama let him go home yesterday feeling like he's still somebody -
will make the gutting to come so much more of a surprise, and you can take THAT to the fuckin bank.
There were SO MANY lies spewed by Romney.
Do you really think Obama was ignorant of the facts? Unable to call him out? Bullshit. Let the fact checkers do that...and let Willard have his win on style points.
"Here. Have some more rope. What? You want MORE rope? OK. Take as much as you want."
YANK!
Watch...and let me know what sort of odds you want on who gets ass spanked like a red headed step-child when push comes to votes.

See, for proof of my premise, the following day's takedown. SHIV!
And now Mitt is back of defense - responding to questions he cannot answer after his 12 hours of "I WON!"

THIS is politics properly executed.

Anonymous said...

Do you recall back in 2008...
Hillary and Bill were saying shit about "Hard working WHITE people" and "Jesse Jackson" and tons of other shit...
and people screamed for Obama to swing back...to FIGHT
but he just kept his head down, stayed calm, and won the primary.

Then came Sarah Palin: "Pals around with terrorists"
Rev Wright
Black
Muslim
Born in Kenya
Hamas wants Obama to win!
...and everyone said "FIGHT! Swing back! Hit them as hard as they hit you!"
but he just kept his head down and plotted out how to get where he was going.
Now...
after ONE FUCKING debate
after 47%
and the Olympics
and tax returns
and a dressage horse
and Cayman Islands tax dodges
and Swiss bank accounts
Romney comes out and bullies and lies his way thru ONE debate
and makes the beltway pundits and a bunch of stupid people say AGAIN, "Jesus, man...why ain't you FIGHTING BACK???"

How many fucking times does this clever President have to show you how the LONG game is played? How you WIN without raising your voice and playing into the "angry black man" crap they set you up for by digging up that old video?
He's smart. BACON JIM BEAM BBQ SAUCE SMART
And he's happy to let Mittens have his debate victory.
Mittens is fucking toast and the best part, he don't know how toasted he is.
B. Obama let him go home yesterday feeling like he's still somebody -
will make the gutting to come so much more of a surprise, and you can take THAT to the fuckin bank.
There were SO MANY lies spewed by Romney.
Do you really think Obama was ignorant of the facts? Unable to call him out? Bullshit. Let the fact checkers do that...and let Willard have his win on style points.
"Here. Have some more rope. What? You want MORE rope? OK. Take as much as you want."
YANK!
Watch...and let me know what sort of odds you want on who gets ass spanked like a red headed step-child when push comes to votes.

See, for proof of my premise, the following day's takedown. SHIV!
And now Mitt is back of defense - responding to questions he cannot answer after his 12 hours of "I WON!"

THIS is politics properly executed.

drbopperthp said...

The Doctor Loves Drifty!!!

Coldtype said...

@ cousinavi

Where can I get some of what you're smoking?

marindenver said...

I love you DG, you know I do but:

" A center/right Democrat hobbling himself by mashing his responses to one big, wild Republican lie after another into a verbal Procrustean bed of "Um...y'know...uh...Mitt...I'm not sure... that's... uh... entirely... y'know... factually accurate..." ?"

C'mon. O hit plenty of his own home runs and let Willard pull out yard after yard of rope. And O's already out fashioning the noose for Mittbot. So very, very tired of everyone underestimating this guy.

Unknown said...

Woah, nice one, cousinavi!

Anonymous said...

I think the folks who are criticizing those who criticize Pres. Obama for not fighting back more/instantly/harder etc, fail to appreciate that we, the Lib Obama-complainers, want for him TO SHOW A F*KG SPINE... To fight BACK, because that's what strong people do... People with conviction. People who stand up for their principles, for what's right.

You know, like how every other spineless, Corporatist DNC Dem hasn't acted for, oh, decades now.

We are saying, F*k this 10-dimensional chess B*S - you are better Mr. Pres, you are right, you are more deserving of power / respect / authority by virtue of these simple facts - so why do you take a beating from this chameleon robot assclown??!! YOU DON'T HAVE TO. We, the morally-right-but-outshouted for 30+ years, would like for once & for Mother F*kg all, for you - our best & only hope in this generation - to F*G HIT BACK. YOU are the winner. YOU are in charge.

Mitt and all the Pig People (in the media and the general public) screeching & baying for him to win, are wrog. We've been forced into a corner, a place we do not deserve, for far too long. Put those F*rs in that place - they deserve it - and let them try to explain otherwise.

Why the ever living *FK* are we *negotiating* (a problem in itself to begin with), from an apparent position of weakness?? That is complete crap which must end - now.


*sigh*
sorry for all the shouty-bits there but I've about run out of patience w/ this whole thing.

I'll still vote for not-Mitt of course but am none too happy about it. I would dearly love for one of the votes I've cast, in every election since I first became eligible in 1980, to be meaningful - towards a cause or person truly deserving of it. I don't do 'protest' votes but would love to believe I made a positive difference for once.

Kang & Kodos 2016!

- Mike from CA

clem said...

the thing about this debate, romney used aa classic gish gallop, a technique named after a creationist apologist. the gish gallop consists of spewing so many lies so fast that the opponent doesn't have enough time to debunk them all, especially if the opponent wants to make other points.

https://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/10/04/1139926/-Romney-Won-Using-a-Debate-Technique-Called-the-Gish-Gallop

another well known exponent of the routine is the dishonest religious apologist william lane 'genocide is ok if god says so. oh, and animals don't feel pain so no problem of evil' craig.

it is closely related to another dishonest technique that practically defines the whole conservative movement, the pratt list. a pratt list is the assertion of a long list of already debunked falsehoods, hoping the opponent will not have time to redebunk them all and the conservative can then crow that 'you can't disprove that so i win!'

the best technique for defeating these tactics is usually to ignore the lies and concentrate on presenting your own positions.

personally, i would also apply hitchen's razor: 'that which can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof.' i would probably apply it with a direct accusation of liar! accompanied by a four letter word or three.