That rocket ain't gonna fly!
David Brooks, 1922:
Should a rocket ever escape our air, its journey could be neither accelerated nor maintained by the explosion of the charges it then might have left. That such an enterprise could take a man to the moon is a wild dream worthy of Jules Verne, and I am bold enough to say that such a voyage shall never occur regardless of all future advances.
And that iron horse ain't gonna do more than crawl!
David Brooks, 1825:
What can be more palpably ludicrous than this notion held out by fools of locomotives traveling twice as fast as stagecoaches?
Same deal with your stupid horseless carriage.
David Brooks, 1910:
For all practical purposes, the automobile has reached the limit of its development.And fuck teevee.
David Brooks, 1927:
The Philo Farnsworth's so-called tele-vision box is a parlor trick suitable to wow the hoi polloi at the carnival, but no serious person thinks anything will come of it.Also forget talking to your cousin in Philly by wire.
David Brooks, 1865:
The well-educated man knows that it is impossible to transmit the human voice over wires. Samuel Morse's coded dots and dashes, yes, but no human voice will ever be sent over a wire. And even if it possible to do so, the thing would be of no practical value.The good news is, the Marconi wireless will end war forever!
David Brooks, 1913:
The coming of the wireless era will make war obsolete!So you're a little let down that the wireless fell a little short in the war-ending department. Well fella, turn that smile upside down because I have some great news from Munich!
David Brooks, 1938:
My friends, history was made today when the British Prime Minister has returned from Germany bringing peace with honor. Peace for our time, for which we give thanks from the bottom of our hearts. Go home and sleep with the calm assurance that war in Europe is now an impossibility!
And even if war should break out here or there in the future, the idea of some madman developing a "super" weapon is sheer scientifiction:
David Brooks, 1933:
David Brooks, 1933:
Rest assured, no man will ever will be able to blow up the world by releasing atomic energy.
And just for fun, David Brooks, 1970:
There is no reason for any individual to have a computer in his home.
Seriously, if you read David Brooks at all (and you really, really shouldn't because it will hurt your eyes and shrink your brain, but there are people with degrees and impressive titles who do and who proclaim it to be the best shit they have ever read, which is how I know we're fucked) one of the things you pick up on real fast is just how often he is hugely wrong. Cartoonishly wrong. Like a belt-fed machine gun of being wrong, firing endlessly at targets the size of planets and missing them completely, every time.
And since I've already written about Mr. Brooks to the point where sometimes, late at night, when the house is quiet like it is now, I wonder if I'm in hell ... I won't bother heading down to the archives and hauling samples of his omnipresent, world-smother wrongness.
Instead I will just leave this here. Mr. Brooks' column from today. A great big ol' pinata of wrongness which everyone on the internet will pummel with their pummeling sticks until their arms are weary and they've sweated through their shirts and blouses and used up a week's ration of "fucks"--
And since I've already written about Mr. Brooks to the point where sometimes, late at night, when the house is quiet like it is now, I wonder if I'm in hell ... I won't bother heading down to the archives and hauling samples of his omnipresent, world-smother wrongness.
Instead I will just leave this here. Mr. Brooks' column from today. A great big ol' pinata of wrongness which everyone on the internet will pummel with their pummeling sticks until their arms are weary and they've sweated through their shirts and blouses and used up a week's ration of "fucks"--
‘Medicare for All’: The Impossible Dream-- after which Mr. Brooks will continue being employed by The New York Times and nothing whatsoever will change.
There’s no plausible route from here to there.
...
If America were a blank slate, Medicare for all would be a plausible policy, but we are not a blank slate. At this point, the easiest way to get to a single-payer system would probably be to go back to 1776 and undo that whole American Revolution thing.
Funny old world.
Behold, a Tip Jar!
7 comments:
I have been anxiously waiting for DFB to bless us all with his superior knowledge and personal experiences of how Gebus and Dr, Satan both do it.
Isn't it time for a creature of DFB's stature to clarify vividly his vast knowledge of the Bible , to trickle it down on us?
No doubt even the Pope would welcome DFB's prophecy on the matter of "Good and Evil both do it".
As a one time employee of Digital Equipment Corporation, "There is no reason for any individual to have a computer in his home" kind of hurt.
If America were a blank slate, Medicare for all would be a plausible policy, but we are not a blank slate.
He's not actually wrong about that.
At this point, the easiest way to get to a single-payer system would probably be to go back to 1776 and undo that whole American Revolution thing.
About this, though, he's right. If we could just go back to 1886 and undo that whole "corporate personhood" thing, the biggest obstacle would go away.
Gitmo for abetting crimes against humanity. Mr. D.F.F.F.-c.B. is a fucking Stuka divebomber. Nobody messes with Medicare for All and sustains their liberty.
Neo Tuxedo, FTW!
Listen to kindly doctor K: If we allow everyone to BUY IN to Medicare, then not only does the whole massive disruption problem disappear, but the whole "HOW WILL WE PAY FOR IT???!!" question is answered, and the benefits of it will sell it to the people just like the ACA did, and before you know it, we'll have single payer.
Wanting to do the whole transformation in one fell swoop is perverse.
You're playing around with trillions of dollars and perhaps the one issue that affects literally every carbon based organism, so I feel that using a strict timeline for implementation as a litmus test for primary candidates might be unrealistic, if you actually want to succeed.
I have Medicare because I'm disabled, and I can tell you that if you could get it, you would want to.
And again, where Brooks is concerned, I'd jump over a whole gang of Davids to get to a Mel.
-Doug in Oakland
Because history.
Post a Comment