The Shrill One makes some excellent points in today's NYT:
...Democrats won big last year, running on a platform that put health reform front and center. In any other advanced democracy this would have given them the mandate and the ability to make major changes. But the need for 60 votes to cut off Senate debate and end a filibuster — a requirement that appears nowhere in the Constitution, but is simply a self-imposed rule — turned what should have been a straightforward piece of legislating into a nail-biter. And it gave a handful of wavering senators extraordinary power to shape the bill.He even locates the source of the dysfunction. Care to take a guess about which Party is primarily responsible for pulling down the temple?
Now consider what lies ahead. We need fundamental financial reform. We need to deal with climate change. We need to deal with our long-run budget deficit. What are the chances that we can do all that — or, I’m tempted to say, any of it — if doing anything requires 60 votes in a deeply polarized Senate?
...The problem -- the real, terrifying problem -- is that there is no one left on the Right to reason with, and there is almost no one left on the Left who dares to say that out loud.
The political scientist Barbara Sinclair has done the math. In the 1960s, she finds, “extended-debate-related problems” — threatened or actual filibusters — affected only 8 percent of major legislation. By the 1980s, that had risen to 27 percent. But after Democrats retook control of Congress in 2006 and Republicans found themselves in the minority, it soared to 70 percent.
And all because the money for shutting up, going along and selling us all out to the malefactors of great wealth is just too good.
Since the 80s, the "Government is the problem" GOP has made it perfectly clear that their long-term objective is to:
Destroy.
The.
Evil.
Gummint.
The.
Evil.
Gummint.
By any means necessary.
Win an election, by hook or crook...and Republicans break all land-speed records to loot the place outright and tow the wreck of whatever is left the Impound Lot of History. Lose...and Republicans stand on the Overpass of History lobbing cinder blocks into traffic.
And they can to this because they pay absolutely no penalty for; because their moral imbecile minions actual delight in it and rewards them for it. These millions of jerks -- the Pig People -- who giggle as the world melts. Who smirked as New Orleans drowned. Who reliably whine out the single biggest Big Lie in Modern American political history -- that "Liberals are just as bad" -- when they get cause red-handed gloating over the suffering of the poor and the weak in another fascist circle jerk of orgiastic sadism and misanthropy.
These are the fruits of the 30 years Conservative Base Breeding program designed to produce a crop of berserker wingnuts who regard any Democratic Administration as de facto illegitimate, any Liberal as a dangerous internal enemy to be crushed, and even the most modest attempts to govern responsibly as something (and I am quoting now from a conversation I had recently with an otherwise-pleasant Conservative colleague) straight out "of some Marxist Central Planner's playbook!"
A United State government that has been render so rotted, ineffectual, debt-crippled and idiot-ridden that, outside of occasionally pouring fire on some country on the far side of the Earth, it is incapable of taking any action whatsoever seems like a tragedy and a disaster to people on the Left like Paul Krugman, because they still have a social conscience.
Which is a blessing, but also a terrible blind spot.
Because no matter how many times they say it -- and no matter how many times their actions prove it -- we still seem incapable of comprehending that, for the Right, a government that has been methodically kneecapped to the point of complete dysfunctional -- where a fuckstick like Holy Joe Lieberman is made 30 pieces of silver richer every time he nicks another of democracy's arteries -- smells like Victory.
5 comments:
Interesting that you grabbed this, Drift.
Before I checked in here, I saw it at HuffPo this morning and just posted at Hullabaloo:
"I don't understand Krugman's pimping for this piece of shit, while at the same time, pointing out (rightly) the paralysis of the administration that has created it."
And then followed that with:
"If Obama had been one-half as zealous and creative about getting us a strong public option, as, for example, George Bush was in bullshitting us into Iraq, we would have real healthcare reform."
It's kinda of like trying to reason with a person of religious persuasions - reality, facts, numbers, statistics, science, nothing matters in the discussion because of their "beliefs" or "faith." Appeals to common sense (logic), are useless and unheard and, of course, when you believe in the apocalypse, hell, you're just doing "God's work" by helping along the total destruction of our home, the planet earth. The only real frustrating thing is that some scientists may find some other inhabitable planet, which in their belief don't exist. Well suffice it to say it may appear complicated to a non-believer, but when you "really believe" nothing is really a problem because you've got God on your side.
Thanks for saying it outloud DG, there are too few of you out there.
Sadly, the neocon agenda is also alive and well up here in Canada. The current minority CONservative government is working as hard as possible to destoy our country from within, and most Canadians are simply standing back and watching them do it.
Nickel, I'm really sorry to hear that.
I was heartened last week while I was at a Myrtle Beach, S.C. Bojangles fast-food emporium (they DO have good biscuits...) to listen to some live bluegrass.
I met a couple of snowbirds from Ontario, and, as is my wont, I asked them what they thought of their healthcare system. Wife smiled; husband smiled...and said:
"Everything you hear on Fox News about Canadian health care is a lie. We love it."
I'm sure it's not perfect...what is?
But in point of fact, I've never heard ANY Canadian down here say anthing but that.
You gotta get out less, Dg. Or with a better crowd.
This type "conversation" could be deeply emotionally disturbing.
And we don't want any more of that for you.
And TB, Myrtle? You're in my neck of the woods. And I like those biscuits too. Yummy with honey.
S
(and I am quoting now from a conversation I had recently with an otherwise-pleasant Conservative colleague)
Post a Comment