This is a pic of the bros who make up a YouTube channel with the user-friendly
name, The Common Sense Conservative.
Because who can argue with common sense?
And this is the bio of the guy who runs the site:
I'm just a normal guy working a normal job trying to make a living for my
normal family. I have never been rich, I have never been bought and paid
for, and I have never just followed the talking points. As a nation, we are
quickly losing the ability of reasonable thought and common sense. My
biggest hope in doing this job is to bring some of that back into our
society. I hope to do this by filming events that the mainstream media
purposefully ignores, and providing my thoughts and perspective on current
events. I do this so that people may just take a moment and reflect on
what’s really going on in this country, and at the very least, walk away
being a little better informed.
Utterly anodyne stuff, right? Like the Amazing Randi's famous astrology
debunking demonstration --
-- it's written in a way that could plausibly apply to anyone of any political
stripe. He's just a regular, normal Murrican just like you! Who's
a-skeered that Murrica is losing its ability to do common sense and rational
thought, juts like you! And we all know there's stuff out there the
media won't talk about, right? But he will, and isn't that great!
But then we fire up the January 7, 2026 episode of The Common Sense Conservative and we find something very different.
Two of these meatheads were clearly reluctant to commit their opinions about the
murder of Renee Good by an ICE thug to a publicly viewable medium.
But one of them was not. Chris Wyatt, who ran for the Pennsylvania state
legislature back in 2024. From the York Dispatch, March 14, 2024:
Five Republican candidates make cases at state 92nd House District
debate
By and large, the policy positions of the five Republican candidates
for the 92nd District in the state House didn't differ much during their
debate Wednesday night.
Holly Kelley, Matthew Davis, Marc Anderson, Zachary Kile and Chris
Wyatt all said they'd defend the Constitution. All said they were
staunch supporters of the Second Amendment. All said they would push for
voter ID and in-person voting. They all proclaimed themselves pro-life;
while they called it a sensitive topic, several said they'd ban abortion
unconditionally if they could.
Turns out, Mr. Wyatt has a lot to say about Renee Good's
murder. And all of it exactly what you'd expect. This is my own rush, partial transcript, so any errors, typos or omissions are mine.
And I've added emphasis where I felt like it.
Wyatt: Well I have watched multiple footage of it...and there
were a lot of characters out there. What appears to be the case is
that ICE was in a neighborhood and these
Leftist Radical Insurrectionists Anti Rule-of-Law people had
blocked the road and obstructed Justice Department ICE from conducting its
mission...
You can see where this is going, right?
Wyatt: ...as they pulled forward they drove into an ICE
agent. Now people are refuting this, but if you see it from
different angles you can clearly see
his life was in jeopardy. And he drew his weapon and fired
four shots...
Wyatt: Some odd photographs with these
lunatic professional agitators out there... running around
screaming "Murderer! Murderer!" Now look, it's a
tactical decision by the agents on the ground so I will not fault them,
but there were dozens of ICE agents out there...they didn't form a cordon
or security perimeter, they allowed these idiots to run through -- this
one woman screaming ran down all the way up the to vehicle, within inches,
contaminating crime scenes, yelling "Murderer" and
"What the 'F' you doing".
In my view there should have been some better command and control.
These people should have been zip-tied and muzzled and locked up and
arrested for inciting a riot, and for interfering obstructing law
enforcement. They should be in federal prison
after conviction for obstructing law enforcement. That's my take on
it.
This assbag is so horny for Trump to declare open season on Liberals to he
can haul out his arsenal and go bag his limit that you can practically taste
it though the screen.
Wyatt: And we're hearing uh first the governor of of of
Minnesota
makes a threatening statement saying we need to get out there and protest this instead of using a rational voice saying, "Listen, let's not get this
situation overheated. Uh we'll have to see if this was justified, if it was
inappropriate."
Please note that, as been true of all fascists everywhere, "protest" =
"threats" and "incitement".
Wyatt: But instead of that,
he's not a real leader. Stolen Valor. Tampon Timmy.
He's a scumbag. And he incited violence. After he realized what he'd said, he comes back and tries to calm the
situation down, but it's too late.
But it's even worse than that. The
useless, scumbag mayor of Minneapolis said, uh, ICE, y'know, "Get
the 'F' out of Minnesota".
You know what buddy? I got a message for you. Get the 'F'
out of America. Why don't you go to Ontario? That's a nice place for people
like you.
Cohost McKinley tries to interrupt, but Wyatt Supremacist is all up
in his feels now.
Wyatt: Hold on! We're not done!
The slimy former Obama dirtball, Keith Ellison -- the
Criminal-in-Chief of Minnesota. He is out there inciting violence,
telling people to protest and obstruct federal law
enforcement.
And on top of that, Ilhan Omar opened her cake-hole up and put
herself in a box -- I think she's gonna find herself being removed from
the House of Representatives before too much longer because o her
shenanigans.
But all these officials are inciting violence.
Inciting... upping the temperature, and then blaming the federal
government for no cooperating. The federal government is trying to
cooperate.
You refuse to cooperate with federal law enforcement. That's what
has caused this problem.
And you shoulda seen the mob out there!
These are insurrectionists! We have an insurrection which started in Minneapolis with George Floyd
and his come full circle back to Minneapolis. These people are not
Americans! They don't respect the Constitution! They
don't respect the law enforcement! They hate America! Just
deport them! I don't care if they were born here or not.
Deport them to Canada. It's a nice place for them to go.
Chalk this up as a real world object lesson in why it's pointless to try to
reason with MAGA meatbags.
It comes down to the unbridgeable chasm between how MAGA meatheads see of
themselves especially when they're talking among themselves -- normal,
reasonable, Common Sense patriots -- and what they actually are -- our own, home-grown fascist
meatheads with itchy trigger fingers who have been steeping in Hate Radio and
Fox News hate and lies for so long that they are beyond saving.
...this is what your Crazy Uncle Liberty was watching on his teevee.
As I wrote
15 years ago, our modern house divided against itself cannot stand.
...we cannot endure permanently half-Fox and half-free.
...we will become all one thing, or all the other.
And as of this writing, the Fox half of our nation has installed a fascist
madman in the White House for the second time, runs every branch of the
federal government, has shredded the Constitution, is invading sovereign
nations to steal their resources and saying so out loud, and shooting anyone
who gets in their way.
I don't like cilantro. I'm one of those people who are genetically wired
to register "soap" when I taste cilantro. Yes, I know. I
suffer terribly.
But some people love it. They add it to everything. Whatever the
dish it -- fish, pizza, mashed potatoes, oatmeal, Aunt Hattie's 90th birthday
cake -- in goes the cilantro. They can't get enough of that soapy ass
devil's weed.
And some of them assume that, if it tastes foul to you, well, you probably
just had one bad experience and you know what, it probably wasn't even
cilantro's fault! Or perhaps you just don't understand cilantro, man. Like on a deep, spiritual level.
Either
way, the solution is to keep trying it until you see the light.
Or maybe the problem is that you're slow; maybe they haven't explained the
glories of cilantro simply enough or a sufficient number of times for you to
get it yet.
Yeah. Maybe repetition is the key. Maybe the problem
isn't that they've used too much cilantro, but too little.
Maybe adding it to fish and pizza and mashed potatoes and oatmeal and Aunt
Hattie's 90th birthday cake wasn't enough to persuade you of its subtle
majesty. Maybe they need to throw every other spice away.
Put it in coffee. In fried chicken. In Coke.
If only there were some way to make it universal...
If we could all live, united, in a great Cilantroverse...
If you would just relax.
Sleep.
Let the pods do their work.
Then you would awake in a world where you will finally understand the glories
of cilantro.
Nope. Still tastes nasty.
And thus we arrive, at last, at the January 9, 2026
New York Times column by Mr. David Brooks. Which is, by my count,
1,507th column since he began his tenure at the at the Times in which he has
ham-fistedly shoved his Both Siderist cilantro down his reader's throats...if
that cilantro were ideological hemlock.
Date, time, subject -- none of that matters. This is literally the only
thing Brooks writes about. Or, more accurately, this is the only thing
the Sulzberger family pays him to write about The only thing
The Atlantic pays him to write about. The only thing PBS and NPR
book him on to talk about.
Two days ago, federal ICE goons carried out the cold-blooded, state-sanctioned
murder of a woman named Renee Nicole Good on the streets of Minneapolis,
Minnesota. Since many citizens were filming this from several different
angles, the facts are not in doubt: it was murder, pure and simple.
And before the body was cold, the Trump administration lies were flying thick
and fast.
DHS posted their lies on social media. They posted that she was a
violent rioter who weaponized her vehicle. That was a lie. That
she attempted to run over law enforcement officers in an attempt to kill
them—an act of domestic terrorism. That was a lie. That the ICE
officer fired defensive shots save his own life and that of his fellow
officers. That was a lie. That multiple ICE officers were hurt. That was
a lie.
And finally, who does the fascist regime blame for their public execution of
an innocent American citizen to blame for all of this? "Sanctuary
politicians" who fuel and encourage rampant assaults on our law
enforcement.
All of it is a lie.
And then of course, Trump himself began lying about it, calling her a
"professional agitator", driving the car in very disorderly, obstructing way
who then "violently, willfully, and viciously" ran over the ICE Officer. It's
hard to believe that he's even alive! But he's now recovering in the
hospital.
And who is to blame? It’s the Radical Left!
All lies. Every bit of it.
On Fox News, Jesse Watters highlighted that Renee Nicole Good, the woman
killed by ICE, had "pronouns in her bio". Fox News as usual is stunted
whenever a victim of these kind of incidents is a white person. They
lose much of their vocabulary.
And as this terrifying moment in American history was unfolding in real time,
what did Mr. Brooks choose to write about?
Take a wild fucking guess.
The problem is that the populists on left and right [in the work of fiction
Brooks is referencing]
are disgusted by the social order and values Rustin embodies, and they tear
it down...
That order and those restraints are now being destroyed.
People on both left and right decided that the old neoliberal order
was a hypocritical pose elites had adopted to mask their own lust for
domination...
Brooks then blats on for several paragraphs about “The Children of Light and
the Children of Darkness.”
The children of darkness have advantages in their struggle against the
children of light. They know what they want and don’t have to worry about
nuance. It’s easier to destroy a social order than to build one. They
capitalize on an elemental human reality: Humans fear death and their own
insignificance. They compensate for their fears of insignificance by
asserting their pride, by seeking power and control, if only vicariously
through some strongman.
And who exactly are the Children of Darkness?
The left progressives and the right populists who seek to tear down
the neoliberal order are being shortsighted — idiotic, frankly.
Every example of malice, intolerance, ideological arson and open fascism
Brooks cites -- every single one -- is drawn from the Right. And yet
because Brooks is so utterly hollow -- a bespectacled wraith so in love with
his dead and discredited ideology that, for 22 years, he has used his
New York Times column to prop up its corpse and wave its arms around
-- all he can think to write about at this game-changing moment in American history is what a rough time Awesome Moderates are having because of the
Extremes on Both Sides.
Because, as I noted a few paragraphs back, that is literally all Brooks ever writes about.
This is from me, back in 2010 ("How To Write a David Brooks Column"), telling any "Young Writer out there exactly how you too can learn to write
a New York Times Opinion Page Editorial just like America's Last Reasonable
Conservative, David Brooks!"
In just 10 Easy Steps you'll be punditting like a pro!
1) Pick a subject. Any subject. From Tasseled Loafers to Torture, it literally does not matter.
2)
Quote extensively from one person or group on the subject. It's OK to just
more-or-less copy and paste in big hunks of what
whatever-you-happen-to-be-reading-at-the-moment to flesh out your 800-word
column. Here at the Times we call that "research"!
3) Quote from
some other person or group on the same subject who appears to hold a
different opinion. If no actual opposition exists, just put on your Magic Green Jacket and invent an opposing opinion.
4) Although such is not
the case with today's subject, as often as possible, try to impute these
fictional distinctions to the different hemispheres of the political
Universe. So no matter how bigoted, reckless or just bugfuck crazy the Right
behaves, you just go right ahead and blandly assert with no supporting evidence whatsoever that the Left is equally and oppositely bad in exactly the same qualities and quantities. Here at the Times we call that
"seriousness"!
5) Discover in your final paragraph or two that --
amazingly! -- the precise midpoint between those two completely artificial
positions on an imaginary spectrum just happens to be exactly the Right and
Reasonable answer!
Oh boy!
6) Rinse and
repeat. No matter what the subject, no matter how false or bizarre the equivalence, just rinse and repeat.
Twice a week.
7) Every week.
8) Year.
9)
After year.
10) After year.
Long ago this stopped being a "style", and started being a fetish, Mr. Brooks
And now? 15 years later? Living under a lawless, murderous,
fascist regime spawned and midwifed into existence by David Brooks' Republican
party and David Brooks' conservative movement?
As I may have mentioned once or twice or several hundreds time before, they
are all reprogrammable meatbags. No point debating them or arguing with them or engaging with them for any reason.
In fact, this was me in
May of 2005. From a post entitled
"The Black Hole where the press used to be".
For those of you doing the math at home, that was going on 26 21years ago,
And page-by-page it followed the same tired You-Must-Be-Shitting-Me Bush
nomination playbook. Specifically, a lavish and mindless defense mounted
by the infinitely reprogrammable Golem of the Religious Right: that
Reliable Fucktard Militia, trained to hold themselves ferociously blind to
facts of any kind – no matter how staggering -- that might conflict with
the pronouncements of Dear Leader. Always painting anyone standing in
their Shining Path as Christ-hating traitors at 100,000 decibels.
And as long as we've taken a swerve down memory lane, this is me from
November of 2005:
These reprogrammable pinheads get their “facts” from Limbaugh,
Hannity and Coulter…and fall apart like Santorum when asked to name Just
One of these fiendish Liberal Overlords, and point to Just One of their
“lies”. Where is the Liberal Fox News? Where is the Progressive CNN? The
Lefty Hate Radio to balance out twenty years of Rightwing AM lies?
And to any student of modern history, doesn't this all sound
frighteningly familiar?
The Christopaths believe we are living in the End Times, under siege on
all sides by the forces of Darkness, and the Republican Party is the
anointed agent of The Lord.
The bigots believe they are at war. That the Negroes and the Jews are in
league with the Commie Liberals to steal their jobs and their country.
That their glorious Jim Crow Nation can rise once again, and the
Republican Party is the place where that Segregationist Reformation can
begin.
The oligarchs laugh and laugh and fund the whole filthy mess so they can
loot the Earth unmolested.
There is considerable overlap between these factions, but each of them
have each been steeping in their own wholly delusional and poisonous
mythology for so long that in a very real sense they are not capable to
recognizing reality.
Even when reality comes home in body bags.
The burning Right Wing lust for Fascism – for a White Christian Military
Strongman who will brutally enforce Fundamentalist ideals of Order and
Decency by any means necessary -- has made more inroads, faster, under
George Bush than I ever thought would happen in my lifetime and, no, it
hasn’t arrived with jackboots and swastikas. It never will. As Huey Long
famously said, "When fascism comes to America, it will come wrapped in
an American flag."
It will come swaggering across the deck of an aircraft carrier in a
flight suit, looking straight into the cameras, and lying to the
American Public.
But none of it is possible without the Moderates. Those I referred to as
our own version of the Good German. Men and women who aid and abet and
go along with it all because they want their fucking tax cuts and, in
the end, they’d rather Rule in Hell than Serve in Heaven...
Never, ever let a Never Trumper lie to you that the base of their party went spontaneously fascist five minutes ago and that no one could
have predicted it.
You want to know why all the savvy people -- every one of them -- were baffled
and confused by the rise of Trump and MAGA, and still are?
Well, because I like you, I'll tell you. And I do this in the full
knowledge that none of this secret intel will leak to the savvy people because
the savvy people do not read Liberal blogs.
Ready?
Ok...but first we have do a thing. What the kids call a
side-quest.
You love Westerns, right? Anyway, I do, so there we are.
So, Westerns. What defines a Western? Well, even if you're not a
professional deconstructor of films, if you watch enough Westerns from every
era, you can see clear themes and commonalities, some of which remain fairly
constant across time, and others which change and morph into something else
entirely.
For example, in early Westerns, the heroes and villains were mostly
two-dimensional. Often literally White Hats versus Black Hats. Or
White Hats versus The Savages. But over time this changes. For
example, John Ford's landmark 1939 Western Stagecoach (The
Canterbury Tales with Stetsons) is all about inverting social hierarchies,
with John Wayne's Ringo Kid and Claire Trevor's
Dallas characters -- the Outlaw and the Prostitute -- emerging as the
heroes of the tale.
30 years later, in Sergio Leone's Once Upon a Time in the West,
the recognizable tropes of the Western were mostly still there -- heroes,
villains, hats, horses, guns, saloons, etc. -- but their meanings had all been
scrambled. The villain was no longer the Savages or the Black
Hats, it was the crippled railroad baron. The Black Hat gunslinger was
now reduced to the status of a hireling: the henchman of capitalism.
To make the point absolutely clear -- that this was about the closing of the
frontier and the end of the traditional Western -- Leone hired iconic American
good guy actor Henry Fonda to play Frank, the murderous, amoral tool of
capitalism.
And sticking with Once Upon a Time in the West for just one
more minute, the opening scene does what all great opening scenes do: it sets
the tone for the rest of the tale. In Fred Zinnemann's
High Noon, the entire story is about a train that's due to arrive
at...when? When? Don't go simple on me now,
it's the title of the movie. Four bad
men -- Frank Miller and his backup singers -- are due to arrive in town at
noon and they are out for revenge. Everyone in town knows it, and
as the fateful hour approaches (the director keeps the audience apprised of
the time by placing clocks in nearly every scene) the townspeople slowly
desert their sheriff, leaving him to face the four bad men all alone.
Then, at last, the clocks strike twelve.
Once Upon a Time in the West completely inverts this.
Instead of an arrival by train being the event towards which all plot lines
are moving, Once Upon a Time in the West starts with an
arrival by train.
Instead of four bad men getting off the train and
marching into town to hunt down the hero, three bad men are waiting at the
train for the hero to arrive.
To drive home the point that this movie was to be the end of the Western,
Leone originally wanted the stars of his Dollars Trilogy -- Clint
Eastwood, Lee Van Cleef, and Eli Wallach -- to play the three gunmen.
But they declined, so Leone cast Woody Strode, Jack Elam, and Al Mulock
instead.
At this point I was going to go on a long thing about how awesome
The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance is, but this isn't a movie review
post, and if you didn't already know how awesome
The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance is, well, I just feel sorry for you is
all.
Obviously Once Upon a Time in the West wasn't the end of the
Western genre, because the archetypes the genre developed are too sturdy and
too firmly rooted in human nature to disappear. And so, every year or
two, someone comes along to mix and match the same elements in different
way. In Silverado you find a classic Western done very well,
even ending in a gunfight in the street with the church behind our hero.
In Lonesome Dove, a sweeping epic. In
Quigley Down Under you get the Western in Australia. In
No Country For Old Men, you get the Western in the West Texas of 1980
because the
Coen brothers love Westerns.
Is Unforgiven a Western? Obviously. But is Firefly a
Western? You bet. It's whatchacall a "neo-Western", but
c'mon.
Is Justified? Damn right it is.
So what is all of this to do with Republicans and their MAGA headgear?
Well, since you asked, getting back to explaining why all the savvy people --
every one of them -- were baffled and confused by the rise of Trump and MAGA,
and still are... don't go simple on me now, because it's the title of this post.
MAGA is not a set of policy beliefs or checked set of ideological
boxes.
MAGA is a genre. MAGA is a vibe.
Which is why, when the savvy crowd sees Republican voters appear to casually
and completely reverse what they swore were their bedrock beliefs (and then do it again... and again) the savvy crowd are flummoxed. They
have no theory to fit the facts, because they had always taken as gospel that
what Republican mopes say they believe on any given day was something akin the
hammer throw at a track and field event: momentum is built up, then
released, and the hammer follows a straight tangent line from the point of
that release.
But Republican voters do not behave that way. At all. Because the
policies they'll swear by on a Monday because Sean Hannity said so... and then
drop like first period French on Wednesday because Sean Hannity said so...are just props. Just plot devices.
This is why MAGA mopes not only don't give a shit that Trump lies constantly,
they're thrilled by it. Since, in the MAGA genre, everything is treated
as a plot device that either advances the MAGA narrative, or threatens it, who
cares whether an individual story element is true or not?
Now for a quick bit of genre hopping.
You love Film Noir, right? Well anyway, I do, so here we are again. When
Howard Hawks was filming The Big Sleep, his writing team
couldn't figure out who killed the chauffeur, Owen Taylor. So Hawks
fired off a telegram to the author of the original novel, Raymond Chandler,
asking him to clarify. Here was their exchange.
Hawks: "Who killed the chauffeur?"
Chandler: "Dammit, I don't know either."
Even though the murder of Owen Taylor is central to the plot, Chandler didn't
know or care who killed him because that wasn't the point of the novel.
The Big Sleep is about atmosphere and characterization, not nailing
down every detail, and since it didn't really matter who offed the chauffeur,
Chandler didn't bother with it.
From the MAGA perspective, asking whether or not this is true...
Trump: “It’s a tremendous difference... We’re going to get the drug prices down…
Not 30 or 40 percent…
No, we’re going to get them down 1,000 percent, 600 percent, 500 percent,
1,500 percent — numbers that are not even thought to be achievable… and it will be, you know, serious. It will be numbers that nobody can
even imagine.”
... or the 10,000 other lies Trump has spewed are true is irrelevant.
As irrelevant as who killed Owen Taylor.
Because all those lies are just plot devices designed to advance the MAGA
narrative.
Ergo understanding which
way the MAGA mob will jump next is not (and never had been) a matter of
sifting through the mountain of self-contradicting bullshit that constitutes
MAGA dogma. This is what the savvy crowd always gets
wrong.
Understanding the wild oscillations of MAGA dogma only makes sense when you
understand the Republicans mythos being served by those lies: a mythos that
long pre-dates the rise of Trump.
And it's really pretty simple. As simple as the earliest Westerns.
Their world is a world of Black Hats and White Hats. They -- white
Conservative Christian nationalists and their fellow travelers-- are the White
Hats and pretty much everyone else are the Black Hats.
They're the real Americas. They are "righteous" in the
original meaning of that word: just, upright, and in accord with divine
law. And since, to MAGA, this is all self-evident -- that they and only
they are properly aligned with God's moral order -- then it follows that
whatever they feel to be true and good must be true and good.
Instead of "Cogito ergo sum" -- "I think therefore I am" -- the MAGA
way is (pardon the rough Latin translation) "Sentio ergo est" -- "I
feel therefore it is".
It's a pre-Enlightenment way of thinking, where faith doesn't merely beat
facts all day long, but facts that conflict with the One True Faith are the
darkest heresy. Something to be rooted out and destroyed.
For decades Conservative media and Republican politicians have been making
fortunes and winning elections reinforcing this mythos by feeding the base an
endless supply of Black Hats to hate and vote against. Liberals.
Mouthy women. Brown people who don't know their place.
Urbanites. The gays. Immigrants. Unions. Trans
people. Pointy-headed intellectuals. Government employees.
Hollywood. "Rootless cosmopolitans". Socialists. You know
the drill.
And once the base came to accept as axiomatic that is was perpetually under siege by the Black Hats,
everything became existential crisis. Deficits were an existential
crisis...then they weren't...then they were again...then they weren't
again. Every Democratic president was somehow illegitimate and also simultaneously a feckless
weakling, a jackbooted tyrant and the Worst President in History.
Everything was a battle in a forever war for the survival of real America where the salvation of the nation was always hanging by a
thread. And gradually, the fascist "blood and soil" language that
has been thrown around on Hate Radio since the 1980s -- constantly framing the
press as the "enemy of the people", slandering any opposition as deranged
parasites, speaking of the nation as something that needed cleansing and
purification -- filtered up from the base, where it was the common
tongue, and into Conservative teevee, Republican political ads, Conservative
think tanks and publications and Republican politicians.
And in that environment, what does it matter if what the Dear Leader says is
true or not? What does it matter if what fascist state media says is
true or not? Who cares if slander about eating the pets is racist
bullshit? Who cares if trans people are no threat to anyone? The
only thing that matters is the utility of the words coming out of the Dear
Leader's mouth. And since us Black Hats are so dangerous -- "the face of pure evil" (Liz Cheney, 2019) -- any and all weapons and tactics are permitted.
Which is why we can carefully pack up all our facts -- our mountains of
irrefutable facts stretching back decades -- and lay them aside for
another day, or for when we talk among ourselves. Conservative media and
Republican politicians worked very hard for many decades engineering a voting
base for whom facts are irrelevant and anyone who tells them anything they
don't want to hear is dismissed as treason and Fake News. This how
Conservative media and Republican politicians paved a road for Donald Trump to
win the White House.
Did lies about Obama's birth certificate feel true to the racist
Republican base? Did lies about Somalis eating people's pets
feel true to those same bigots 15 years later? Did lies about
cafeteria castrations feed the MAGA moron's hysteria about trans people?
Does the torrent of lies that Trump vomits out on a daily basis tickle MAGA's
ganglia and reinforce their myths about apocalyptic struggle, heroism and
destiny?
Yes. And in the end, to them, that's all that matters.
Because MAGA is not a set of policy beliefs or checked set of ideological
boxes.
MAGA is a vibe. MAGA is a genre in which it's just Black Hats
versus White Hats, all day long.
And all those lies are the necessary story elements that move the plot
along.