Friday, March 20, 2026

A Continuation, Not an Aberration

It is time once again for a feature you will only find on OG Liberal blogs that dare to dig back into the Before Time to notice how much of the deranged, disastrous Trump  policies are not an aberration but a continuation of the trajectory the Republican party has been on for decades.  

Now we could spend this post talking about Republican hypocrisy around debts and deficits, their reliance on demonizing relatively powerless groups to win elections, or their obsession with stripping women of their bodily autonomy.  But since today's headlines are all about a ruinous Republican war-of-choice in the Middle East, let's talk about that.  And let's begin by reminding ourselves that next week will mark the 22nd anniversary of this moment from the 2004 White House Correspondents' Association Dinner.  

You know, back in the Good Old Days!  Back when Republicans took America to war soberly and seriously, with careful preparation and on the basis of unimpeachable intelligence!

Yes, that was the previous Republican president, George W. Bush, cracking wise about not finding WMD in Iraq.  Which, you might remember, was the entire predicate for that disaster.   And right therewith him, applauding and laughing their asses off, were Washington's political elite, the cream of the Washington press corps and their celebrity guests.  Because Bush making light of not being able to find the WMD was just so damn funny!

You will also remember that, three years later, as the Bush administration was imploding and the war in Iraq was now indisputably a catastrophe – after Hurricane Katrina, after Terri Schiavo, after Republicans were crushed in the midterms and Bush’s poll numbers had cratered – we find Bush's Brain, Karl Rove, doing this at the 2007 WHCD:

And who's that right behind Rove?  One of his backup dancers on that infamous evening?

Yes it's David Gregory.  Four years after the Iraq invasion, three years after Bush’s WMD joke video, during a period when the Bush administration was under heavy criticism over the war and the Valerie Plame scandal, there’s Dancin' David Gregory happily going along with the bit.

A year later Gregory would be promoted to the Big Chair on Meet the Press, where he would spend the next six years destroying whatever shreds of credibility that show still had.  In 2018 he would be replaced by Chuck Todd, who was just as terrible as Gregory in exactly the same way.     Todd would go on being an embarrassment to his profession for nine long years, until 2023, when they replaced him with  Kristen Welker, who is just as terrible as Gregory and Todd in exactly the same way.

So pardon me if I'm not shedding too many tears over what Bezos is doing to The Washington Post or Ellison is doing to CBS News.  Yes, it's terrible, but the legacy media was doing quite an efficient job of immolating themselves in a bonfire of cloistered arrogance long before Trump's billionaire button men showed up.  

Now that we've covered Bush making jokes about WMD at the White House Correspondent’s dinner during a time which our Never Trump friends desperately want us to remember as the Good Old Days of serious, cautious Republican leadership, don't forget that our Never Trump friends also would like us to remember that time as a period of Republican transparency.  None of this "hiding critical wartime information from the American public" nonsense.  And, of course, we are to believe that Republicans during this time were always respectful, never attacking or slandering their critics.  All of that is Trump stuff!   

Except is it?  Really?

From Democracy Now, March 26, 2004

Rice Agrees to Meet 9/11 Commission But Only in Private

After coming under intense criticism, the White House offered Thursday to have National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice meet again with the 9/11 Commission. But White House officials said she would appear only in private and not under oath.

Rice was the center of criticism during the recent 9/11 hearings for refusing to appear. Former Senator Bob Kerrey said “My gosh, I think she was on every single network the day the commission opened its hearing this week, attacking our witnesses.”

The New York Times also reports–almost in passing — that Rice is planning to leave her job at the end of the year.

Meanwhile the White House continued to attack former counterterrorism chief Richard Clarke who is accusing the Bush administration of not heeding warnings before Sept. 11.

Senator Tom Daschle said “I have a simple request for the president today: Please ask the people around you to stop the character attacks they are waging against Richard Clarke. Ask them to stop their attempts to conceal information and confuse facts. Ask them to stop the long effort that has made the 9/11 commission’s work more difficult than it should be.”  

And of course you remember this.


So let’s compare Bush’s Iraq debacle with Trump’s Iran debacle.  The Good Old Days when Republicans were awesome, and the Bad New Days when Republicans are terrible.  

Lying us into war?  Check.

Claiming that we had no choice because the threat was imminent and terrifying?  Check.

Making up excuses after the fact?  Check.

Radically downplaying the downsides?  Overpromising and underdelivering?  Check and check.

Complete failure to prepare the public for what this war would really mean?  Check.

Keeping critical information from the public?  Check.

Slandering critics? Check.

Well, OK, but what about this?

From The New York Times, March 16, 2026:

With Threats and Claims of ‘Treason,’ Trump Pressures Media on the War

The Trump administration has unleashed a multifaceted pressure campaign against news organizations as it increasingly bristles at media coverage of a Middle East military operation that many Americans oppose.

Official Pentagon briefings now include attacks on outlets like CNN, with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth nit-picking headlines. President Trump is turning to his bully pulpit on Truth Social to accuse “Highly Unpatriotic ‘News’ Organizations” of airing “LIES” about the war and musing about “Charges for TREASON.”

The goal seems to be pressuring journalists to back off critical coverage of the war effort, or to at least encourage the public to second-guess reporting that runs counter to the administration’s preferred narrative. And the effort has gone well beyond words.

Mr. Trump’s top media regulator, Brendan Carr of the Federal Communications Commission, issued an explicit warning to broadcast television networks on social media, writing that “hoaxes and news distortions” could lead to the revocation of licenses for local stations, a threat that Mr. Trump said he was “so thrilled to see.”  

Surely there was no Bush administration equivalent of these attacks on the free press during the Before Time, right?

Well...

From The Brookings Institution, April 11, 2006:

Misplaced Blame: The Media’s Performance in Iraq

Throughout the Iraq war, the Bush administration has complained about the tenor of media coverage in Iraq. Paul Bremer did so during the first year of the American presence there, and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld as well as Vice President Dick Cheney make the point repeatedly. The complaint that we see only the bad news, not the good, has become increasingly prevalent within the U.S. armed forces as well.

…the broad argument by the American media’s critics is often badly overstated. While the overall image of Iraq conveyed by the mainstream media may be somewhat more negative than reality, it is not far off. If we lose in Iraq, it will most likely be because of events on the ground there, not a prematurely wavering political support here.

In fact, one can make a reasonable argument that the American public’s view on Iraq is just about where it should be given the facts. The public is enormously impressed by our troops, but depressed about the general lack of major progress on the ground and upset with the Bush administration for overpromising and underpreparing in regard to the war.

And then there is the filthy business of war profiteering.

From The Huffington Post, September 17, 2006:

Halliburton and Cheney: War Profiteers in Chief Fight to Keep Their Wallets Fat

Halliburton's stock has risen 200% since the invasion of Iraq three and a half years ago. David Lesar, its CEO, made over $40,000,000 in 2004 alone.

We all by now know that Dick Cheney retired from the Pentagon in 1993 to accede to the throne of Halliburton, an oil field services company based in Houston. After Mr. Cheney left Halliburton with tens of millions of dollars in his pocket largely earned because of his connections to Middle East dictators, Halliburton had to cough up $2.3 billion in cash, about $1.2 billion in stock and another $55 million in IOUs to help pay off the tens of thousands of people in this country who had suffered and/or died of asbestos poisoning at the hand of Dresser, which Mr. Cheney had acquired and for which Mr. Cheney was (and apparently still is) handsomely compensated. If this sounds a bit like Mr. Cheney's due diligence with respect to weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, it should. He never bothered to look at what Dresser had before he bought it for Halliburton and he never bothered to look at what Iraq had before he broke it for the U.S...

Until very recently, there has been relatively little penetration into the popular psyche of the role played by Halliburton in particular and other private military contractors in general. 

The reason is simple: the Bush Administration and its Congressional foot soldiers ranging from George Allen and John Warner of Virginia to Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania have refused at every turn to allow for any oversight at all, even though Democratic Senators have asked for such bi-partisan review for years. 

Of course, it’s still early days in Trump’s Iran Fiasco, but does anyone doubt with so much money sloshing around and so little oversight, that Trump and his mob of looters and plunderers will soon be stuffing their pockets as fast as possible?

From The New York Times, March 13, 2026:

 The Oil Tankers Trump Seized Are Costing the U.S. Millions of Dollars

Although President Trump said seizing tankers would be a financial boon, the cost of maintaining just one aging ship has already reached $47 million.

The seizures have put the U.S. government in a financial bind. The ships are highly expensive to maintain. And the Trump administration cannot legally sell the oil in these tankers without a judge’s permission.

Maintaining the seized tankers has already cost the United States tens of millions of dollars — in one case, $47 million in only three months — and complicates Mr. Trump’s claims of swift financial victories from his military operations targeting Venezuela and Iran.

From Time Magazine, March 19, 2026:

'It Takes Money to Kill Bad Guys': Trump's Iran War Set to Boost Profits For These Defense Contractors

Administration officials have signaled that Trump will soon request Congress approve tens of billions of dollars in supplemental funding to replenish U.S. weaponry supplies. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth confirmed on Thursday that the Pentagon had sent the White House a request $200 billion in additional funds, though he stressed that the figure "could move."

"It takes money to kill bad guys," Hegseth told reporters. "So we’re going back to Congress to ensure we’re properly funded, for what’s been done, what we may have to do in the future." He added that the money was needed to ensure that the country's stockpile of ammunition is "not just refilled, but above and beyond.” 

Then there is this depraved Trump-era innovation.  From The Atlantic, March 18, 2026:

Maybe Turning War Into a Casino Was a Bad Idea?

A disturbing new low in the Polymarket era

On March 10, the journalist Emanuel Fabian reported on a missile that had been launched from Iran. The warhead hit an open area outside Jerusalem, which Fabian confirmed by speaking with rescue services and reviewing footage of the explosion. He wrote a short post on The Times of Israel’s live blog and moved on.

Meanwhile, gamblers had wagered millions on the unfolding events of the conflict. Fabian’s post became the subject of a major dispute on Polymarket, a popular prediction market where people can bet on the outcome of almost anything. The site had allowed users to guess when Iran would initiate “a drone, missile, or air strike on Israel’s soil”: More than $14 million was riding on whether such an attack had happened March 10.

People started reaching out asking Fabian to change his article. Some argued that Israel Defense Forces had not officially mentioned such an attack occurring on that day, and others said that the explosion he had reported was the result of a missile being intercepted, which according to Polymarket’s terms wouldn’t count as a strike “on Israel’s soil.” Confident in his reporting, Fabian did not amend the text. 

And just to button it up, let's go back to the promises these two Republican presidents made to the American people when they were candidates.

During the October 11, 2000 presidential debate with Al Gore, Republican candidate George W. Bush said this:

“If we're an arrogant nation, they'll resent us. If we're a humble nation, but strong, they'll welcome us… Our nation stands alone right now in terms of power, and that's why we've got to be humble.”

And this: 

"I'm not so sure the role of the United States is to go around the world and say, 'This is the way it's got to be.'"

24 years later, here is Republican candidate Donald Trump running for president: 


You see kids, Trump was not a break with the Republican past, he was a continuation of it: the end-state of a trajectory the GOP has been on for half a century.  

Of course the parallels aren’t exact, but if you put all of the malignant, corrupt, arrogant elements of the Bush administration's war with Iraq into a compression machine that would make it all bigger, faster, dumber, much louder and more reckless and with a giant, billionaire-backed hammer coming down on the media… you’d have Trump’s Iran War.



Burn The Lifeboats


Wednesday, March 18, 2026

You Liberals Don't Seem To Appreciate How Hard It Was Leaving The Klan


Not only did all my Klan brothers turn their backs on me, I also lost my steady gig on the Hate Speech Podcast Network.  Now how am I supposed to afford the monthlies on my private skate park, fortified party venue, and large production studio?

And you know what?  All the people whose lives I ruined aren't even saying "Thank You"!  They refuse to welcome me with open arms and set me up with a comparable gig on the Anti Hate Speech Podcast Network in gratitude for all I've sacrificed.

So much for the tolerant, forgiving Left!  Turns out they're just as mean and intolerant as the Klan!

Maybe I'll just refuse to vote for anyone from now on!  That'll show 'em!


Burn The Lifeboats


Tuesday, March 17, 2026

Professional Left Podcast Episode 977: An Apple Made of Razors


"As societies grow decadent, the language grows decadent, too. Words are used to disguise, not to illuminate, action: you liberate a city by destroying it. Words are to confuse, so that at election time people will solemnly vote against their own interests." --  Gore Vidal


















Monday, March 16, 2026

The Apple In The Razors

    

As longtime readers will know, I've dedicated a considerable fraction of this blog to tracking what I call the "razor and the apple" - that's the point after which a pundit, usually David Brooks or someone like him, has grudgingly acknowledged the sins or crimes or whatever incompetent malevolence the GOP had gotten up to that week.

But then comes the inevitable "razor and the apple", usually around the sixth or fifth paragraph: the moment at which they pivot to the blame-dispersal trope of "But the Democrats..." or "And the Democrats...".  Here, the facts will be waterboarded to the point that, whatever perfidy the Republican party has gotten caught doing, it will somehow always end up being the fault of (sing it with me now) Both Sides.

Over the decades, this particular genre of legacy media and Republican Party codswallop became so automatic and ubiquitous that it reached a point where I could predict to a joyless degree of precision what a mope like David Brooks was going to write about next: what the subject matter would be and in which paragraph you would find the "razor and the apple".  

From me in 2007:

Finally, just for fun, let us snap on the hazmat gloves, unsheathe the poo-snippers, and unfairly flense a few sentences from Bobo’s Friday NYT column and assemble them out of all context just to see what we can divine from them – like reading chickenhawk entrails -- about Iraq and who is about to be framed for the GOPs historic failure there.  See if you can spot the card Bobo is trying to palm... 
If the Democrats don’t like the U.S. policy on Iraq over the next six months, they have themselves partly to blame. 
…but the Democrats never came up with anything remotely serious. 
…The liberals who favor quick exit never grappled with the consequences of that policy… 
…The centrists who believe in gradual withdrawal never explained why that wouldn’t be like pulling a tooth slowly.... 
Funny, Bobo is usually a little more deft in hiding the razor in the apple.  
But then again, when attempting to spackle over such an enormous mound of shit with such a weak and watery thimble of third-rate prose, one has to deal with the fact that entire limbs of feces are going to stick out all over...

And the reason I could be so frequently and depressingly accurate was (and is) because it's a genre: a genre that is as structured and repeated as Square Dancing, and which, paradoxically allows lazy, fraudulent writers to get away with being lazy frauds.  Lazy, fraudulent writers whose primary mission is to ensure that the party or movement they are there to represent is not blamed for disasters that their party or movement clearly created.  Or, when there is no way to wish away Republican and Conservative liability entirely, as has been the case since the collapse of the Bush administration, then blame must be dispersed.  

The public zeitgeist must never, ever be allowed to become, as Norman Ornstein and Thomas Mann put it in their 2012  Brookings Institute essay: "Let’s Just Say It: The Republicans Are the Problem."  That would spoil everything!

Instead, some Liberal or some Democrat somewhere -- either wholly imaginary or wildly exaggerated -- must be dragged into it so that after five paragraphs quoting Pliny the Elder and grudgingly acknowledging that Republicans have done something awful, here it comes!  Pulling into the station right on time!  The "But the Democrats..." false equivalence that, golly, when you think about it, aren't speech codes at Brown nearly as bad as encroaching fascism?  

And if Democrats had half a chance, wouldn't they nominate and elect someone just as monstrous as Trump?  

To be fair, this became such an easy lie to spot because precisely because, as a false equivalence, its ridiculousness and ubiquity has had to grow at the same rate as Republican depravity.  And after a while, like an old programmer ferreting out a specific kind of bug in COBOL code, I knew what I was looking for: roughly where it was, and roughly what it was going to be.  Then you take a look and, "Yep, that's what went wrong, and that's where it went wrong, and that's why it went wrong." 

And now, thanks to you all out there calling out the "razor and the apple" everywhere, the Both Sides Do It thing, has almost become a group puzzle or a sport.  A genre unto itself.   And the ludicrousness of the false equivalences these days have reach the stage where I barely need to prompt anyone anymore.  Instead, not a day goes by when I don't get a note from someone saying, "Did you get a load of this shit over here?" and I go over and take a peek, and yep, there it is.

Because once you start looking for it, it's like looking for Italians in Inferno -- Dante's in version of Hell.  Holy shit, it's everywhere.

And what's really heartening is the number of commenters who now pounce on this garbage the minute it's published and call it out for what it is really it.  Way to go, everyone!

Well, this week I encountered a mutation of that species of op-ed writing.  

It's by David French,  a right-wing, evangelical, professional "hate the Left" kinda guy who had his resume hurriedly tidied up by The New York Times enough that he could be slotted into their op-ed lineup without causing a riot.

Like Liz Cheney, the late Michael Gerson, David Brooks, Michael Steele, Tim Miller, Charlie Sykes, Mona Charen, Kathleen Parker and hundreds more, David French is just one more Conservative culture warrior who spent his entire  career enthusiastically building a monster which would eventually turn on him and chase him out of the party.    Just one more Conservative culture warrior who refuses to recognize that the monster he spent decades helping to build was a monster long before it chased him out of the party.  A monster whose vile nature he took to be a virtue...as long as its ferocity was directed at people like us.  

And when people like us recognized the monster for what it was and pushed back against it, well you'll never guess how David French remembers it.  I highlighted the relevant passage:

The online response to my argument, however, was volcanic. I was accused of legitimizing heresy. Another writer said that I’d suffered an apparent “brain injury.” My appreciation of Talarico’s approach even put the soul of evangelicalism at risk. Once again, I was written entirely out of the Christian faith by angry Trumpist evangelicals.

(I did have to laugh at the Babylon Bee’s joke headline: “David French Praises Satan as ‘Most Christian Person in History.’”)

In their minds, I was elevating “niceness” over justice and righteousness. To this way of thinking, Talarico’s manner makes him more dangerous, not less, and it was my responsibility to warn Christian America away from this dreadful man.

In their anger and vitriol, I saw the mirror image of the far-left intolerance I’ve encountered through much of my career...

And this is the op-ed in which we find a dizzyingly bizarre inversion of the usual "razor in the apple" claptrap because David French has managed to write an entire "apple among the razors" column and publish it without anyone at the Times throwing themselves in front of the "Publish" button and telling him, "No.  This is too stupid even for the times.

I the name of healing the nation (which his party, his movement and his faith have damaged almost beyond repair, French unspools paragraph after paragraph of Both Siderist false equivalence, pausing only briefly, in the seventh paragraph, to say that of course isn't doing what he very obviously is doing. 

To say that both sides view each other with equivalent disdain is not to say that both sides are equally dangerous. When a hateful, vengeful man is in the Oval Office, wielding the awesome power of the presidency beyond its constitutional limits, then he immediately becomes the most dangerous person in America.

So, knowing what you know about the Both Sides Do It cult, and the pathology of it's followers, what word do you suppose Mr. French uses to being the very next paragraph after explicitly telling his readers that he is not, not, not doing false equivalence.

If you guessed the word "But", give yourself a big gold star!

French began by asking this question:

Does anyone think a healthy nation with a healthy political culture would elect a man like Donald Trump not once, but twice?  The eternal return of President Trump is a sign of our national sickness, and a recent Pew Research Center study shows us exactly what that sickness is. 

And what is that sickness?  That the GOP has been on rocket ride towards fascism for more than 40 years?  That men like French not only ignored every red flag, but kept stomping harder on the accelerator?  That a party which elevated racist scum like Rush Limbaugh and his hundreds of imitators as it's political voice and a vicious Newt named Gingrich and his hundreds of imitators as their spirit animal was headed towards disaster?

Nope.

French says its because we hate each other.  And that is where his analysis ends, because any further inquiry into exactly why we hate each other would make men like French look very, very bad.   

Instead, French treats hatred as if it were a pandemic that just cropped up out of nowhere and has no specific, traceable cause.   There is no mention of the fact that racism, misogyny and blind hatred of the Left has been the Mother Tongue of the Republican party for my entire adult life.  That it has been  stoked by the Right for ratings and votes and billions is profits.

No inkling that, until he got run out of the party, this was the team he happily played for.


And now that the damage is done?  Now that his party has dropped the final veil and bared its fascist fangs for all the word to see?

Now we get this:

For example, in a 2022 survey, Pew found that large shares of Democrats and Republicans thought of each other as closed-minded, dishonest, immoral and unintelligent, and the measurements were getting worse every year.

And this:

Both sides hate each other so much that it’s almost meaningless to ask who hates whom the most. 

And this: 

If you’re a Republican or a Democrat, the best way to imagine the other side’s view of you is to simply mirror your own attitude. They despise you with the same intensity that you despise them. They view you with the same sense of threat and alarm that you view them. 

The rest of the column is spent hand-wringing, wishful thinking and pretending the Obama administration never existed.

So the problem is very clear. David French's party, his movement, and his religion, are the fucking problem.  

Period. 

But David French cannot bear the thought of living in a universe where this is true, because, well, for one reason, there's no money to be made in that universe.  Because that universe is already occupied by Liberals living out of tip jars, because we've been writing about this shit for decades now. So there's no fortune to be found -- no New York Times audience to be found -- for someone who says, "Yep, the Republican party sucks, and it's sucked forever, and the Right-wing evangelicals like David French were at the core of the problem." 

Instead, we get the same Republican Dissociative Disorder we've seen in virtually every other Never Trumper.  Everything was fine and then, suddenly and with no warning, everyone around David French in the fundy evangelical world went spontaneously crazy.  To men like David French, modern history began on that day.  Before that day, everything was fine.  After that day, everyone went nuts, except him.

And since people like David French cannot live in a universe where they and their people are the villains and the authors of the madness and ruin we see all around us, they very badly needs for there to be a bunch of people on the left who are just as bad.

Which is how we get a little bite of apple among the razors.  

Which is just the way the legacy media likes it.

         



I Am The Liberal Media

Sunday, March 15, 2026

Je Ne Te Ferais Pas Pipi Dessus Même Si Tu éTais en Feu. Et Tu Es en Feu.

Please forgive my Google Translate French.  I can practically hear Madame Alfille wagging her finger at me and scolding me for wasting my time on debate and track in high school when I should have joined her French club.

Alas, I am poorly made, and this was the best French translation I could come up with for, "Wouldn't Piss On You If You Were On Fire.  And You Are On Fire."

From Raw Story

Trump’s panicked plea goes largely ignored by world leaders: 'No country stepped forward’ 

President Donald Trump issued a plea Saturday to several countries in the hopes that they would “send ships” to a major shipping route off the coast of Iran to help the United States’ war effort against the Middle East nation, a plea that as of Sunday afternoon appeared to go largely ignored 

In response to the U.S.-Israeli joint military siege launched late last month, Iran has vowed to attack any sea vessels aligned with the United States and its allies that attempt to pass through the Strait of Hormuz, a major shipping route through which 20% of the world’s oil trade flows. As a result, oil prices have skyrocketed, reportedly sparking panic within the Trump administration.

“Hopefully China, France, Japan, South Korea, the UK, and others, that are affected by this artificial constraint, will send Ships to the area so that the Hormuz Strait will no longer be a threat by a Nation that has been totally decapitated,” Trump wrote in a social media post on Saturday.

Begging a community of nations -- which he has spent a decade shitting on -- to come and save his rapidly decomposing ass from a catastrophic war of choice he launched with no plan and no warning is the most beta cuck thing I have ever heard of.

And so far the silence from other nations is coming through loud and clear.

In Japanese:  Tatoe kimi ga moete ite mo, kimi ni shōben o kakeru koto sae shinai yo. Soshite kimi wa ima, moete iru nda.

In Simplified Chinese: Jiùsuàn nǐ húnshēn zháohuǒ, wǒ yě lǎndé sā pào niào jiù nǐ. Ér nǐ xiànzài quèshí zhèng zháohuǒ ne.

In Korean: Nega bultaoleugo iss-eodo ojum han bang-uldo an ssal geoya. geuleonde neon jigeum bultago issjanh-a.

Welsh: Fyddech chi ddim yn Pissio Arnoch Pe Byddech Ar Dân. A Ti Ar Dân.

Cockney:  I wouldn’t ‘ave a slash on ya if ya was goin’ up like Guy Fawkes Night — and look at ya, you’re already bleedin’ burnin’, ain’t ya

Even in Klingon:  Vaj Dunay'Qo' meQlI'chugh vay'. 'ej bImeQlI'.


Burn The Lifeboats


Saturday, March 14, 2026

One of These Things Is Not Like the Others







No, the difference is not the lies.  

All three of them were lying.  Reagan was lying after the fact.  Bush was lying before the invasion, laying the fraudulent predicate for it.  And Trump was lying in medias res, so to speak. 

But they're all liars.  Republican liars.

The difference is that Trump didn't have speechwriters like Landon Parvin (Reagan) and Michael Gerson (Bush) bending the language around to tailor those lies for general public consumption.


Burn The Lifeboats


Never Trust a Never Trumper, Part 377.

Your friends at MSNBC polished him up like a shiny new penny and presented him to their Liberal audience dozens (hundreds?) of times as a penitent ally.  A humbled sinner, truly sorry for his role in the rise of Donald Trump.  

And then...  From WFMD "Free Talk" AM 930 in Frederick, Maryland, January 19, 2026:

MS NOW stays silent on Michael Cohen’s admission he felt ‘coerced’ to give anti-Trump testimony

He was MSNBC’s golden goose — until his story no longer fit the network’s preferred narrative.

President Donald Trump‘s former personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, was a frequent MSNBC guest for years while he was a key member of the #Resistance. But the liberal network — now called MS NOW — has not covered his striking admission he felt “pressured and coerced” to deliver testimony that would help secure convictions against the president.

Cohen, who was a key prosecution witness in two New York cases against Trump, accused New York Attorney General Letitia James and Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg on Friday of pursuing evidence squarely aimed at getting Trump. He alleged in a Substack post that prosecutors in both offices were uninterested in testimony that didn’t fit their narrative...

Cohen had long been a fixture on MSNBC, which changed its name late last year, appearing over the past five years on programs such as “The Beat with Ari Melber,” “The Rachel Maddow Show,” “Inside with Jen Psaki,” “The Weekend,” “Deadline: White House” and “PoliticsNation,” often to deliver anti-Trump commentary. He was also frequently discussed on the network even when he wasn’t appearing as a guest...

The progressive channel covered Trump’s criminal case in New York extensively in 2024. According to a Grabien transcript search, “Michael Cohen” was mentioned 10,906 times from the start of the trial on April 15, 2024, through May 31, 2024 — the day after the verdict was announced.

But MS NOW has, as of Monday afternoon, ignored Cohen’s revelation that he felt “coerced” to deliver anti-Trump testimony...

 

And thanks to the MSNBC Republican Reputation Rehab project, as long as he drew clicks, your bestest buds over at the Meidas thing also had much love for Trump's repentant fixer: 


And then...


Your recently-former Republican Never Trump pals at The Bulwark and The Lincoln Project (who also enjoyed the lavish benefits of MSNBC's Reputation Rehab spa treatment) also managed to find time in their busy schedules to squeeze a Cohen appearance or two into their lineups: 



And then...


Michael Cohen announces to Lara Trump that he is teaming up with Laura Loomer to do a podcast together.

[image or embed]

— Ron Filipkowski (@ronfilipkowski.bsky.social) March 12, 2026 at 7:56 PM


Perhaps consider this the next time the "liberal" media offers up yet another Republican with their new Resistance spray job still wet from the paint shop as our new Hero of Democracy.  



I Am The Liberal Media