Now that Never Trumpers have been handed control over gatekeeping and
party-discipline duties for the Democratic Party, I try very hard to be
a good Liberal and never question any of the decisions our Never Trump
supervisors hand down.
I got mah mind right, boss!
For example, I understand that we're no longer the "Democratic Party".
Now our brand is the "pro-democracy coalition" which is supposed to make it
easier for people who despise us and everything we hold dear to join our
"coalition" without having to worry that they might get some of that icky
"woke" stuff on them.
So every day I get up and turn portraits of Franklin Roosevelt, Harry Truman and
JFK to the wall to remind myself that "Democratic Party" is oldspeak
now. Maybe even crimethink!
And having been sternly lectured on the Never Trump Iron Clad Rule of
Alliances no less than 10,000 times over the past ten years (including from
people whose MAGA derangement has since metastasized and swallowed
them whole) I try to toe the line and do as I'm told.
But, to quote Captain Terrell from Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan:
Sir, that is difficult. I... try to obey, but...
For example, without guidance from my Never Trump handlers I'm all at sea
about what I should do with this new information about Tucker Carlson.
Tucker Carlson ‘sorry for misleading people’ with Trump support
Pundit Tucker Carlson is expressing regret for voicing support for
President Trump.
Carlson, who has been a sharp critic of Trump’s war in Iran, said during
a recent episode of his podcast and online show that prominent people on
the right who backed Trump ahead of the 2024 election are “implicated” in
what’s going on in the Middle East.
“So I do think it’s like a moment to wrestle with our own consciences.
You know, we’ll be tormented by it for a long time. I will be,” he said.
“And I want to say I’m sorry for misleading people and it was not
intentional. That’s all I’ll say.”
You can see why my simple, Liberal brain is all fuzzy and confused. Because a plain-text reading of the fine print of the Never Trump Iron Clad Rule of Alliances makes it very clear that Carlson cannot be welcomed into the "pro-democracy coalition" as a mere Adam Kinzinger-grade ally. No, no. According to established precedent, given that he is a high-status Person of Influence among the MAGA meatbags, he is to be automatically field-promoted to Liz Cheney Super-Ally status!
A class of ally whose most transparently ridiculous and self-serving excuses -- "I wuz fooled!" -- are to be treated like the Letters of Transit in Casablanca. They cannot be rescinded. Not even questioned.
So where does that leave me? I mean, I certainly don't want to run afoul
of the new protocols, so are my old Carlson graphics now potential thoughtcrimes?
Is it enough if I just burn them in my back yard, or will special depots for
their disposal be set up and supervised by Never Trumpers?
Also, does this automatically move Carlson to the front of the pack in the
2028 Democratic pro-democracy coalition presidential race, or does he need to appear on both Rogan and
The Bulwark before that decision is made? Is there a fund I should be
contributing to? And until then does Carlson's status exist in some indeterminate quantum state? A Schrödinger's alliance?
Again, please extend a thousand pardons to my Never Trump supervisors for all
of this. Clearly my opinion is worth something or I never would have merited 10,000 lectures on what a danger to democracy I was for not trusting the honorable intentions of Glenn Beck, Ann Coulter, Michael Cohen and so forth. And since no less than the fate of democracy hangs in the balance, I want to make sure that I'm on firm, Never Trump-approved footing, and at the moment I have no idea where firm footing lies.
In
fact, when it comes to reconciling our Never Trumpers' wise Rule of Alliances
with what I know of Tucker Carlson, my confusion is such that you could say
I'm having a Star Trek "Norman" moment.
I know a sales pitch when I hear one. Lord knows, across the span of my checkered past I've made dozens of
them myself. So I realize that, in the end, what I'm watching (below) is
a long pitch for the Lincoln Project, where the tactical use of "we" during the
pitch is meant to make you think that the Lincoln lads had anything to do with
Trump losing in 2020.
Spoiler: They did not. What they did was sop up tens of millions
of dollars from credulous Liberals which they used to hire themselves
and their friends to crank out very slick ads which one low-born wag referred
to (repeatedly) as political Pornhub for credulous Liberals. It
tickled Liberal pleasure centers and got the Lincoln Lads lots of free
publicity on MSNBC (which came back to bite them when various sexual and
financial scandalscame to
light), but there is no evidence that any of that moved the electoral needle one
iota.
However, when you subtract the product pitch that Stuart Stevens is
making here from the story he is telling, I think you end up with one of the clearest
and most honest personal, political inventories of anyone in the Never Trumper
universe. I have always respected his candor, and his book --
"It Was All a Lie" -- sits proudly on our bookshelf at
home.
The story he tells is miles and miles away from Tom Nichols' brittle, angry,
and ultimately pathetic Jake Blues-like string of excuses and deflections:
His
"None of what happened had anything to do with me/ No one could have seen
this coming/ Whatabout Abbie Hoffman? Huh! Huh! Smartass!
Liberals aren't blameless here!" reaction every time anyone manages sneak a little GOP history into his
timeline (which is immediately followed by being blocked.)
Which is why, I think, media appearances by Stuart Stevens are so much rarer
than virtually any other Never Trumper in the media, and when he is brought in
it's usually to talk about what a monster Trump is (true) and strategies for
going forward. Not to expound on how the his former party
came to be what it is now, and definitely not to debate any
other recently-former Republican on that issue.
Because Stevens' unexpurgated history of the moral collapse of the Republican
party exactly matches -- beat for beat and milestone for
milestone -- the longstanding Liberal critiques/warnings about the trajectory of
the Republican party (about which
a lot more here.) The inconvenient truth that Trump did not hijack the GOP, he exposed it
for what it had been all along. The Republican base was not suckered into supporting Trump, the base manifested Trump.
And all of that is diametrically opposed to the story that legacy media and
the Never Trump media wants to tell. In their tale, the base of the party
were like unto the innocent child Maria in James Whale's 1938 masterpiece Frankenstein. The base just read Edmund Burke, sang little peasant songs and and toss flowers into
the water. And in their fictionalized history of the GOP, Trump is the destroyer. Trump is the
despoiler. Trump is the lumbering monster, built in a lab by a mad
scientist, who Maria foolishly trusts and who Trump ends up drowning.
And, to carry the analogy a little further, the Never Trumpers are Ludwig, shocked and saddened, bearing Maria's
corpse through the town, believing that such an unbearable outrage will rouse
the party leadership and the good people of the town to action.
However, despite the fact that this "history" is the lie
which the legacy media and the Never Trumpers have all agreed on, I am morally
obliged to be the buzzkill guy who points out that isn't what happened at all.
Maria isn't the base of the Republican party. Maria is the legacy
media's and the Never Trumper's comforting delusion of what the Republican party was. However, to
quote Stuart Stevens, it was all a lie.
The base didn't fear Trump as a destroyer. They greeted him as a
liberator. He didn't have a bad brain. He had an
awesome brain! Because his brain is just like their brain!
It turns out that real base of the party -- the peasants of
the town -- had always hated Maria and Ludwig and their whole sanctimonious
family. They're glad that bitch is dead! They danced on her grave
singing Hallelujah! It turns out, they were jubilantly pro-monster, so
fuck that weepy old Ludwig, and fuck Jeb! and, while we're at it, Hang Mike
Pence!
And, being politicians with their damp fingers forever testing the direction
of the prevailing wind, the town's leading citizens, the mayor and the
burghers (Republican elected officials), all figured this out real
quick. A few of them raised a few objections, but they were quickly
chased out of town by peasants with pitchforks and torches. And now,
with the party base and the party leadership united in reverence of the
monster, they made it their king and gave it the power of life and death over
everything in the kingdom.
And the terrible secret that dare not speak its name and that Never Trumpers carry in their hearts is that the monster wasn't built by some mad
scientist in a faraway lab at all. The truth is they built it. It was Ludwig
all along. It was all of them. A group effort carried out by
elite Conservatives, Republican leaders, Conservative media and the legacy
media. They created the monster, but in their hubris they thought they
could control it. And as long as they controlled it, no one
objected to it.
Consider that, just this very week, unreconstructed Conservative evangelical
and New York Times op-ed guy, David French, spent an entire column
explaining how Donald Trump bamboozled the otherwise noble and righteous
Conservative evangelical movement into abandoning their faith in Republican
Jesus, and investing it instead into an manifestly unchristian monster like
Trump.
French spends the first 13 paragraphs (ominous biblical number, that 13)
laying out the biography of one particularly odious Conservative evangelical
preacher named Douglas Wilson.
Then two paragraphs of #NotAllEvangelicals
In a religious movement as large and multifaceted as American
evangelicalism, you can — of course — find all kinds of people and
pastors, from the most compassionate and kind to the most self-righteous,
zealous and even violent.
To say that a pastor like Wilson exists no more condemns all of
evangelical Christianity (indeed, Wilson faces vigorous opposition in the
evangelical church) than to say that the existence of radical imams
condemns all of Islam. A better question is to ask whether a person this
cruel and extreme has real stature and influence — and whether his
influence is on the wane or on the rise.
And then:
There are many reasons for Wilson’s rise, but one of them is squarely
rooted in politics. When Donald Trump won the presidency in 2016, he
inherited a recent Republican tradition: The Republican president isn’t just
a political leader — he’s a de facto religious leader as well.
Yadda, yadda, yadda. Dubya Bush was awesome. Obviously no mention
of Iraq. Or Katrina. Or Teri Schiavo. Or running for
reelection on a gay-bashing platform of which David French fully
approved. Or any of it. Just Dubya Bush was awesome.
And then:
Bush is a devout Christian. Those words, to put it mildly, are not how
one would describe Trump.
And yet, each election cycle, Christians were told it was a spiritual
imperative to vote Republican, and that imperative did not change even
when the party’s positions — and its people — profoundly did.
But while the policies of the Republican party may have shifted around, the
basic themes -- the bones of the Reagan Revolution -- are still right there in
the Trump regime for anyone with honest eyes to see. From The Guardian:
Did Reagan pave the way for Trump? ‘You can trace the linkages,’ says biographer
...a critically praised biography of Reagan challenges these assumptions,
balancing recognition of Reagan’s strengths with a close examination of
his glaring weaknesses on inequality, race and the Aids pandemic. Its
introduction poses a provocative question: “Did Reaganism contain the
seeds of Trumpism?”
And the book comes not from a progressive Democrat but a former
foreign policy adviser to the Republican presidential campaigns of John
McCain, Mitt Romney and Marco Rubio. Max Boot is himself an immigrant: he
was born in Moscow, grew up in Los Angeles, gained US citizenship and is
now a senior fellow for national security studies at the Council on
Foreign Relations thinktank. ...
“Even more fundamentally, Reagan’s policies truly favoured the wealthy
and increased income disparity in the United States. You can argue that
those policies, whether it was the tax cuts, lack of anti-trust,
anti-union activity, all the rest, by widening those income disparities
opened the way for populism in America, both from the left and the
rightwing populism that Trump exploits today.”
Ultimately, Boot
argues, Reagan paved the way for Trump. “He was addicted to faux facts. He
would often cite apocryphal quotes and anecdotes and statistics that
weren’t really true but would keep citing them anyway, even when it was
pointed out that he didn’t have any basis for doing so. You can argue that
acclimated the Republican party to the fire hose of falsehoods that you
see from Trump.
For the record, Boot does mention Reagan's chilling refusal to take the AIDS
epidemic seriously (maybe it was God's will?) but doesn't mention Reagan's
cynical use of racism to get himself elected.
In the end it comes down to this: Republican elites and donors believe
in tax cuts, period, full-stop. And all the culture war garbage -- from
hating gays to hating women, to hating brown people, to hating
Liberals, to hating science -- has been deployed tactically, election after election, as a means
to get enough pliant Republican meatheads elected to pass the massive tax
cuts, which is all the Republican elite ever cared about.
And it worked: that culture war garbage was the hook that brought white,
Conservative evangelicals squarely into the heart of the Republican
party. But right here -- where French says that both the "party’s positions — and its people" profoundly changed -- this is where he palms the card and
hopes you will not notice. Because while Republican policies may have changes,
the white, Conservative evangelicals at the dark heart of the GOP have not.
Having lived through the same history as you and me, David French should fucking well know better. Which means, like so many other Never Trumpers, French is either lying outright about the history of the modern GOP to cover his own ass, or is so terminally delusional about the modern history of the GOP that his opinions are worthless.
We remember Ronald Reagan welcoming America's most hateful and bigoted white,
Conservative evangelicals into the Republican party, back when Donald Trump was just another sleazy New York real estate crook.
We even remember Falwell's slanderous attacks on Norman Lear all the way back
in the 1980s.
We lived through clinic bombings and "Tiller the Baby Killer" becoming Bill
O'Reilly's mantra on Fox News, until someone actually killed Dr. Tiller.
We remember Falwell and Robertson, in the hours after 9/11, blaming everyone
the Right hates for the attack. Because for white evangelical Christians
scumbags like Falwell and Robertson, every catastrophe was
ordered by God and therefor must be divine punishment for not hating women,
minorities and the ACLU hard enough.
And yet, Republican leadership didn't grab these scumbags collar and belt and
throw them out of the Party of Lincoln, because by then it was no longer the
Party of Lincoln. It was well on it's way to being the Party of
Jefferson Davis: hateful, bigoted, White, stupid, superstitious and drunk on
holy vengeance.
Which is why, by 2004, we saw Bush the "devout Christian" getting
out the Conservative evangelical vote by running an explicitly gay-bashing
campaign in order to get himself re-elected.
Which is why, by 2008, we saw John "Maverick" McCain publicly reverse his
scathing 2000 criticism of Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson as
"agents of intolerance" who represented the
"outer reaches of American politics" and head down to Liberty
University to kiss Falwell's ass.
Because McCain wanted to be president and he fucking well understood where the
power center of the Republican party was located.
And let's not forget that as late as 2019, Never Trump Resistance Hero #1, Liz Cheney, was out there blithely leveling the most grotesque lies against Democrats and calling people like you and me "the face of pure evil". Because slander like that has been the Mother Tongue of the GOP since David French was in short pants.
This is the bamboozle that David French is trying to run. The White
Conservative evangelical base of the GOP didn't vote for McCain or Romney
because they had
joy, joy, joy, joy down in their hearts over the idea of a McCain or Romney administration. They
settled for McCain and Romney because the alternative was a
Democrat, and they had been lectured -- over and over again by their pastors,
for decades and from the sanctity of the pulpit -- that Democrats are all
commie, baby-killing servants of Satan.
That anyone on the Right is better than everyone on the Left.
In 2016 we saw Donald Trump win them over by promising to deliver what both
Bushes had failed to deliver and what everyone knew neither Romney nor McCain would ever
have been able to.
These people firmly believe in a Heaven where they will live forever with
Republican Jesus, and a Hell, where you and me and most everyone else will
fry for eternity. The thought of this delights them, but to get there
they have to bring about the end of the world, which is why the elimination of
Roe was never going to be enough. Moving the American embassy to
Jerusalem would not be enough, nor would terrorizing trans people or rolling
back gay marriage, because as the Henry Drummond says in
Inherit the Wind, "Fanaticism and ignorance is forever busy and needs
feeding."
These people are shooting for a Year Zero. The end of history. A
world cleansed of scum like us, and remade in the image of their radical
perversion of Christianity.
These are also people whose whole theology depends on dismissing objective
reality, believing in giant, global conspiracies being run by Satan and a
bone-deep certainty that they are a cruelly oppressed minority in an America which was designed to be an explicitly Christian country, but which has been stolen from
them by godless Liberals.
...in order to win elections and rake in vast fortunes, the Conservative brain caste has painstakingly created the perfect feeding-ground for con men and demagogues like Trump, the louder and more bombastic the better.
And because we Liberals believe in facts, and not bullshit, self-absolving
alibis, you are not obliged to just take my for any of this. There are
plenty of former evangelicals who have left the cult who will tell you the
same.
You could check out Tim Alberta's
"The Kingdom, the Power and the Glory: American Evangelicals in an Age of
Extremism."
Or you could check in with Frank Schaeffer, the author of
"Crazy for God: How I Grew Up as One of the Elect, Helped Found the
Religious Right, and Lived to Take All (or Almost All) of It Back"
Which is why, in a world of pious frauds like David French and grouchy charlatans like Tom Nichols, those of us on the side of the angels should cherish and celebrate the Stuart Stevenses and the Frank Schaeffers in this world.