In case you missed Piggy's post-SCOTUS rebuke of his tariff regime...here's the short version.
The six justices who voted against the tariffs are fools, lapdogs, a disgrace and have betrayed
’Murrica.
The Democrats on the Court did it because Dems want to destroy ’Murrica. The
Republicans on the Court who overturned Trump’s tariff regime — including
the two muppets he himself appointed — are actually RINO stooges under the
influence of foreign powers.
But it doesn’t matter, because what the decision really said was that
I have vastly more power to tariff, embargo, and destroy other countries
than ever. I can destroy anyone. Any country. I tried to be nice before. I
was a good boy. But now? Forget it.
Biden was incompetent.
This country was dead a year and a half ago. Dead.
Now we’re the hottest country in the world. Barely legal but tits out
to *here*! And that ass!
Every president but me was stupid for not using tariffs to make us all rich.
I’m very good at reading!
Brett Kavanaugh is a good lil’ stooge who’s gonna get two scoops. His
dissent is genius, and you have to be a radical left lunatic to disagree.
I won. In a landslide. There was so much cheating, but I still won.
Yadda yadda yadda. All the usual demented rambling claptrap intermixed with
the usual lies from a degenerate old criminal whose brain is turning to
prune dip before our eyes. I’m sure I missed some of the finer points, since
after a few minutes of this maniac slurring and stumbling us onto the ash
heap of history, it all sounds like Charlie Brown’s teacher — if that
teacher were George Wallace, drunk and brain-damaged.
And if this makes your blood boil, don’t forget to thank your Republican
neighbors, co-workers, and fellow churchgoers for putting this depraved,
bigoted monster back in the Oval Office.
No Half Measures
7 comments:
it all sounds like Charlie Brown’s teacher — if that teacher were George Wallace, drunk and brain-damaged.
Or if that teacher were a zebra, drunkenly vomiting for multiple uninterrupted minutes before staggering drunkenly off to mate with the nearest convenient baobab.
I thought the reasoning of the three dissenters was interesting. After all, how are we going to make these refunds?
After the news release of SCOTUS decision striking down the orange tariffs.
Tariffs on Americans to help pay for his tax cuts for the wealthy.
The tariffs are illegal but I paid them. So I wrote my congressman and senators telling them I want my money back that was fraudulently taken from me in illegal tariff (tax). They knew it was congress's power and they let TGOP prez impose them fraudulently when it was their power and they took an oath do defend the constitution.
If the Prez will not pay restitution then my congressman and senators must.
How does MAGA and GOP voters drop their pants, bend over and lube up for their cult leader who has told them he is a very rough and tough Hombre. Yet, he is always the victim. They are all out to get him and stop him from making us all like a Jeffrey Epstein.
He is being stopped from making us all billionaires living the life.
But he is the al powerful U.S. President and all will pay harshly if they cross him, so he says.
So which is it? Is he the weak victim or the all powerful Oz?
trumperor fiddles, has no clothes
Remember when Justice Roberts said he just calls balls and strike in a baseball analogy?
Baseball has had a strike zone computerized reader that they show where the pitched ball actually passes to the catcher. If it was over the plate in the strike zone or not.
This year, Baseball has a new rule they are truing. The pitcher of the catcher can now challenge a pitch called balls or strike by the umpire.
So it is sort of AU. So far in pre season the umpire has been correct most of the time.
So you got that?
If Justice Roberts is calling balls and strikes. Why can;t we set up something to challenge him (SVOTUS) in if their rulings are actually how they called it and if that shrike they called (ruled) was actually a legal ball? Or, vice versa.
Umps have made some poor calls but few where Justices nave made bad calls more so.
The law is black and white. Right. You can say you interpret the constitution to mean something other than anyone has ever interpreted it. There is no way Justice Thomas or Alito should get away with saying they have seances with the dead founders and figured out they really meant legally something they did not write.
So program in the law to AI PC and replace SCOTIS for accuracy and eliminate the biased calls to help the ump's favorite team?
I mean it is okay to use tech to replace the working class. It is not okay to replace CEO's with AI and save all that money.
Sort of like a mixture of Terminator, Matrix and Walking Dead.
So DG, in your coverage of the SOTU will you apply the bias of not covering equally, the Democrats alternate SOTU to be held on the National Mall?
I am trying to toss you a rope here.
Post a Comment