- A Romney may not injure a corporation or, through inaction, allow a corporation to come to harm.
- A Romney must obey orders given it by corporations except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
- A Romney must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.
oo, that was well done.
ReplyDeletePerfect for him, and the entire Republican Party.
ReplyDeletePerfect for him, and the entire Republican Party.
ReplyDeleteAsimov would approve....
ReplyDeleteAwesome. Unfortunately, republicans are too stupid to produce an "evolved" understanding of the three laws.
ReplyDeleteIn the same way that maximizing human safety leads to protecting humans from themselves (essentially conquering and imprisoning them), so does maximizing corporate safety leads to forcing them to preserve the middle class, no matter how badly corporations want to ruin the lives of their customers.
To the Mittbot, the definition of "corporation" in the presence of more than one is, "the most powerful one."
ReplyDeleteThis always allows eradication of the weaker.
As the Romney-bot 2.0 continues to evolve, it will eventually create its own Zeroth Law:
ReplyDeleteA Romney may not hurt oligarchy, or, through inaction, allow oligarchy to come to harm.
Hurm...I'd bet good money Mitt owes a lot of his ethical nodes to Weyland Industries as well...
ReplyDeleteHurm...I'd bet good money Mitt owes a lot of his ethical nodes to Weyland Industries as well...
ReplyDeleteTessier-Ashpool. It figures.
ReplyDelete"Rombotics" works better
ReplyDelete