tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11363027.post1670667891041214918..comments2024-03-28T21:32:41.763-05:00Comments on driftglass: I Wonder Who Will Be Getting The Jewels of Nuancedriftglasshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09379167083253389153noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11363027.post-20155493316890776592013-11-22T18:04:18.214-06:002013-11-22T18:04:18.214-06:00obviously the DFHs are to blame. duh.obviously the DFHs are to blame. duh.chrome agnomennoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11363027.post-38486333825317806522013-11-21T18:06:15.610-06:002013-11-21T18:06:15.610-06:00@unsalted sinner
FTW!@unsalted sinner<br /><br />FTW!Lawrencehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05429309964648275918noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11363027.post-50789135165438696002013-11-20T20:54:35.859-06:002013-11-20T20:54:35.859-06:00At least we can feel certain that Both Sides were ...At least we can feel certain that Both Sides were to blame.Unsalted Sinnerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07388516480935688151noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11363027.post-35196780168161238102013-11-20T15:21:42.244-06:002013-11-20T15:21:42.244-06:00Another section for his next Humility course? Acad...Another section for his next Humility course? Academia awaits with bated breath.gratuitousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11363027.post-90507303758677871632013-11-20T15:16:53.624-06:002013-11-20T15:16:53.624-06:00You ARE joking, right? Brooks's theories, gene...You ARE joking, right? Brooks's theories, generalizations and stunning insights into human behavior only apply to the lower orders. He and his ilk are special flowers with their own unique reasons for what they do.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11363027.post-49782867607258859902013-11-20T11:51:14.876-06:002013-11-20T11:51:14.876-06:00I'm confused. The Post article is ostensibly a...<i>I'm confused. The Post article is ostensibly about David Brooks, but then refers to a "respected New York Times columnist."</i><br /><br />Yes, if this were a wikipedia article, that would need a little <i>[citation needed]</i> next to it.OBShttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11290768768025981403noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11363027.post-78975691104645441742013-11-20T09:05:51.250-06:002013-11-20T09:05:51.250-06:00It used to be that the Post and the Times thought ...It used to be that the Post and the Times thought it unseemly to report on divorce and marital strife. Oh well.<br /><br />I wonder who will get the "vast spaces for entertaining"?<br /><br />bowtiejackhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03269786110593961195noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11363027.post-25093905420169493862013-11-20T04:57:09.647-06:002013-11-20T04:57:09.647-06:00I'm confused. The Post article is ostensibly a...I'm confused. The Post article is ostensibly about David Brooks, but then refers to a "respected New York Times columnist."<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com