tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11363027.post1688586533761022301..comments2024-03-29T07:36:51.933-05:00Comments on driftglass: Sunday Morning Comin' Down -- Early Edition driftglasshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09379167083253389153noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11363027.post-24648588853031155562016-02-22T03:12:48.753-06:002016-02-22T03:12:48.753-06:00And who owns "Scientific American" now?And who owns "Scientific American" now?Cirzehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07070125217972397204noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11363027.post-65424625716255074512016-02-21T14:56:12.220-06:002016-02-21T14:56:12.220-06:00Yeah, I just read Shermer's latest offering ye...Yeah, I just read Shermer's latest offering yesterday. I'm considering not spending any of my meager funds to renew my subscription to SA because I don't want to subsidize a Sam Harris wannabe.<br /><br />In his book <b>Why People Believe Weird Things</b>, he confessed to being a disenchanted former Ayn Randroid. He still seems to be a right-winger. :PIvory Bill Woodpeckerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01318699512583970467noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11363027.post-61151542586998809972016-02-21T09:19:40.510-06:002016-02-21T09:19:40.510-06:00Or it could be Michael Shermer. (Seriously, read t...Or it could be Michael Shermer. (Seriously, read the "Skeptic" column in the latest bumper number of <i>Scientific American</i>. Calling it "utterly meretricious both-siderism" is an insult to meretrices everywhere who work hard for their money.)Neo Tuxedohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15455041641080873400noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11363027.post-59706910926733348322016-02-21T06:49:56.444-06:002016-02-21T06:49:56.444-06:00bowtiejack, I'm sure Ron Fournier'll show ...bowtiejack, I'm sure Ron Fournier'll show up somewhere to represent the liberals/progressives/democrats.Jeffhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02465622106648500528noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11363027.post-38695031402312619662016-02-20T22:12:09.284-06:002016-02-20T22:12:09.284-06:00" if he's gonna take the goat around back..." if he's gonna take the goat around back" That would probably actually be a sheep; the goat would but him into next week...<br /><br /> -Doug in Oaklanddinthebeasthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12941071534250216503noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11363027.post-6430501839445481152016-02-20T17:56:24.426-06:002016-02-20T17:56:24.426-06:00I'm sorry but there's a typo or something ...I'm sorry but there's a typo or something on your posting.<br />You left out all the liberals/progressives/democrats?<br />I mean if both sides do it, don't sides have to be represented?<br />bowtiejackhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03269786110593961195noreply@blogger.com