Tuesday, October 24, 2006

Give Me More Children.


For I am never sated.

This from the AP:


U.S. says more GIs may be needed in Iraq
By STEVEN R. HURST, Associated Press Writer 39 minutes ago

Two weeks before U.S. midterm elections, American officials unveiled a timeline Tuesday for Iraq's Shiite-led government to take specific steps to calm the world's most dangerous capital and said more U.S. troops might be needed to quell the bloodshed.

U.S. officials previously said they were satisfied with troop levels and had expected to make significant reductions by year's end. But a surge in sectarian killings, which welled up this past summer, forced them to reconsider.

At a rare joint news conference with the American ambassador, the top U.S. commander in Iraq, Gen. George Casey, said additional U.S. troops could come from inside or outside Iraq to "improve basic services for the population of Baghdad."

"Now, do we need more troops to do that? Maybe. And, as I've said all along, if we do, I will ask for the troops I need, both coalition and Iraqis," Casey said. There are currently 144,000 U.S. forces in Iraq.

The military has expressed disappointment over its two-month drive to cleanse the capital of Sunni insurgents and Shiite militia fighters and death squads. But the Americans also say that for the situation to improve, the Iraqi government must make political concessions to minority Sunnis.


The lack of any real political consensus even among Shiites, however, has made it extremely difficult for Iraqi leaders to keep deadlines; for example, they missed targeted dates on naming a government and in moving forward on constitutional amendments. Moreover, Tuesday's declarations lacked specifics on how to accomplish the goals.


Casey's estimate of when the Iraqi army will be ready was noteworthy because it has not changed even as the security situation in the country has deteriorated. Iraqis are now being killed at a pace of more than 40 each day in sectarian fighting and revenge killing.

Complicating the matter has been the recent outbreak of sustained Shiite-on-Shiite violence in the once relatively calm south of the country.

To curb the spreading and increasingly brutal killings, Khalilzad said the United States was "inducing Iraqi political and religious leaders who can control or influence armed groups in Baghdad to agree to stop sectarian violence," an apparent reference to recent secret talks the United States has conducted with Sunni insurgents.

Al-Maliki has repeatedly said he would rein in Shiite militias but so far has taken little public action beyond a decision to move aside two police commando leaders. He issued a statement on Monday saying the military had been ordered to take action against any illegal armed group, but the declaration, like the timeline introduced on Tuesday, lacked detail.


While Shiite militias and death squad violence represent a major security problem, curbing them would still leave the other half of the equation unsolved — the continued vibrancy of the Sunni insurgency that has been attacking Americans with a vengeance since summer 2003.

The timeline appeared, therefore, largely directed at luring the Sunni establishment away from violence and into the political process.

October has been the deadliest month this year for American forces. The military Tuesday announced the deaths of two more U.S. Marines, a sailor and a soldier. Since the start of the war, 2,801 U.S. service members have died in Iraq, according to an Associated Press count.

For Republicans, there is always plenty of room on Bush’s altar for another deranged sacrifice to the Gods of War and Hubris.

It is never too steeped in blood, so long as it’s someone else’s children who do the dying.

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

This is starting to be a theme just weeks before U.S. elections, the American officials unveiled a new timeline to determine if more U.S. troops might be needed to stop the bloodshed. The U.S. officials had previously said they were satisfied with current troop levels and expect to make significant reductions by year's end. It's starting to sound like good old campaign speak again.

Anonymous said...

Of course there are no more troops to send.



pwapvt

Anonymous said...

Funny how all the biggest supporters of the war don't have to worry about THEIR children signing up. And god-forbid they would sign up themselves. Oh pleeease!

The army's gonna have to start taking the developmentally disabled and the mentally ill next; more good Republicans in other words.

Anonymous said...

Where are they getting these extra troops? Are they going to travel back in time and borrow them from Eisenhower?

Anonymous said...

Don't insult the developmentally disabled and the mentally ill by calling them "Republicans."

cieran said...

What you see here is the anvil on which the GOP will be pounded into oblivion.

The pointless war that Bush and Cheney lied us into is devouring too many American soldiers (and their families) and additional troops will not soon be coming to rescue these idiots from their oil-addled dreams.

The one eternal truth about America is that we care about our children, and about their security. We make them wear bike helmets, award tax breaks for saving for their education, and obsess over how to give them a better life than we ever had. Our children are, and always have been, the most precious resource of this great nation.

We are at our core a nation of parents.

And now we are being asked to sacrifice our kids because George Jr is too stupid and delusional to see the error of his "I'm the decider" decisions, so we have to "stay the course" just because he can't see any other way?

I don't think so...

Any American faced with the choice between what is right for our sons and daughters or what is right for Georgie's ego is going to choose for our children, instantly and forever. Bush and Cheney may covet more of our young for their stupid war of choice, but they'll need a draft to get them, and they'll get a revolution before they get compulsory service on the Iraqi front.

The GOP has thus managed to place itself squarely between the anvil of All-American values of wanting a better life for our kids and the hammer of the all-too-deadly Iraqi insurgency, and these Republican morons are being pounded into oblivion before our very eyes.

It will only get worse for them from here on. The last two years have been awful for the Bush administration, and the next two will be infinitely worse.

They have sown the wind and they must now reap the whirlwind